Notebookcheck Logo
Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Lightweight curved smartphone with great endurance and a strong price-performance ratio - Motorola Edge 60 Pro review

Piece of jewelry.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores with many features that are normally reserved for much more expensive smartphones and packs them into a high-quality casing with hand-friendly qualities. These include a 6000 mAh battery and a bright curved display with over 4000 nits. There is also fast charging with 90 watts.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Conclusion on the Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Motorola gets a lot of things right with the Edge 60 Pro. Thanks to the good triple camera with optical zoom, the high-performance MediaTek Dimensity 8350, the very bright display and long battery life, it can easily hold its own against the mid-range competition. There are also advantages such as fast WiFi 6E, plenty of storage space and lots of Bluetooth codecs. The complete package is also available at a fair price.

One criticism of the Edge 60 Pro is the update supply, which will be discontinued in 2029. If you really push the Motorola phone, it can also get uncomfortably warm. This does not happen with the cheaper Edge 60 sister model. Thanks to its very similar camera and memory features, it is also a real alternative to the Edge 60 Pro despite its slightly slower SoC and shorter battery life.

Pros

+ very bright OLED screen with 120 Hz
+ high-quality housing with IP69
+ 512 GB storage space
+ eSIM support
+ good triple camera
+ 3x optical zoom
+ very good battery life
+ fast charging with up to 90 watts
+ many Bluetooth codecs

Cons

- updates only until 2029
- no microSD slot
- no power adapter included in the scope of delivery
- sometimes high operating temperatures

Price and availability

The Edge 60 Pro costs in the Motorola webshop 600 Euros (~$706). You can pay significantly less at other online retailers and get the smartphone for well under 550 Euros (~$648), for example at Amazon.

Amazon Logo
$7.29
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible with Motorola Edge 2025/Moto Edge 60 Fusion/60 Pro Screen Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Moto Edge 2025 Screen Protector
  • $9.88
    Foebxxs [2 Pack Hydrogel Flexible Screen Protector for Motorola Edge 60 Pro, Upgraded Non-breakable HD Clarity Soft TPU Protective Film [Anti-Scratch] [Bubble Free] [High Sensitivity] (Not Glass)
  • $7.59
    Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible with Motorola Moto Edge 60 Fusion/Moto Edge 60 Pro/Moto Edge 60/Edge 60S Screen Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free

The Edge 60 Pro is at the top of Motorola's Edge series and does a lot better than its predecessor. With the Edge 50 Pro the periscope zoom was removed, but it is back in the test candidate. The Edge 60 Pro also costs significantly less despite having better hardware. We find out how well the mid-range smartphone fares against the competition in our test.

Specifications

Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Edge 60 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, Peak Brightness 4500 nits, Touch sampling rate up to 300 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 479 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Magnetometer (e-Compass), Miracast, Camera2 API Full, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/11/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/43/66/71), 5G (n1/2/3/5/7/8/20/26/28/38/40/41/66/71/75/77/78), Nano-SIM + eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.2 x 73 ( = 0.32 x 6.35 x 2.87 in)
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 90W max. charging speed
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony LYTIA 700C, f/1.8, OIS) + 50 MPix Ultrawide (f/2.0, 120°, AF, Macro) + 10 MPix Tele (f/2.0, 3x optical zoom, 50x digital zoom, OIS, AF)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB Type-C to USB Type-C cable, Guides, SIM tool, protective case, 24 Months Warranty, IP69/IP68 certified, MIL-STD 810H certified, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (front), silicone finish (back); HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B2a), QZSS; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus, LHDC V2-V5; SAR: Head SAR 0.9 W/kg, Body SAR 1.39 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
186 g ( = 6.56 oz / 0.41 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Edge 60 Pro with AI button and Pantone colors

Thanks to its rubberized back cover, the Edge 60 Pro, which weighs 186 grams (~6.6 oz) and has a high-quality finish, is very comfortable to hold. Its IP69 certification also makes the curved smartphone waterproof and dustproof. The AI button on the long left side launches Motorola's in-house Moto AI.

In the blue color variant Dazzling Blue, the back cover imitates a nylon texture, while our test device (Sparkling Grape), which is a vibrant purple, and the third, more subtle color variant Shadow each have a faux leather finish.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro in the Sparkling Grape color variant (Image source: Motorola)
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro in the Shadow color variant (Image source: Motorola)
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro in the Sparkling Blue color variant (Image source: Motorola)

Size comparison

162 mm / 6.38 in 77.3 mm / 3.04 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 213 g0.4696 lbs161.72 mm / 6.37 in 75.77 mm / 2.98 in 8.02 mm / 0.3157 in 206 g0.4542 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 73 mm / 2.87 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 186 g0.4101 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 72.4 mm / 2.85 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 186 g0.4101 lbs160.5 mm / 6.32 in 75.1 mm / 2.96 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 195 g0.4299 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 198 g0.4365 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Lots of memory for the Motorola cell phone

With 12 GB RAM and 512 GB mass storage, the Edge 60 Pro has a good memory configuration and officially costs 600 Euros (~$706). Unlike the Edge 60 the internal memory cannot be expanded using a microSD card.

left: AI button
left: AI button
right: volume rocker, power button
right: volume rocker, power button
above: Microphone
above: Microphone
below: Speaker, USB-C 2.0, microphone, SIM slot
below: Speaker, USB-C 2.0, microphone, SIM slot

Software - Android 15 with Moto AI and updates until 2029

The Edge 60 Pro starts with Android 15, which Motorola has left virtually untouched apart from a handful of its own apps. The smartphone receives 3 OS upgrades and 4 years of security updates. However, compared to the support offered by competitors such as Google and Samsung (6 and 7 years respectively), this is not all that long.

Motorola's in-house AI Moto AI summarizes messages, transcribes audio recordings and saves notes along with screenshots and photos. Google Gemini and Google Circle to Search are also included. A Motorola account is required to use Moto AI.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Sustainability

Motorola has opted for plastic-free packaging for the Edge 60 Pro, which is printed with soy ink and made from recycled materials in accordance with FSC Mix certification.

Motorola provides comprehensive information about its sustainability efforts on its website, but not about the smartphone's carbon footprint. Spare parts and instructions for self-repair are not available.

Communication and GNSS - Edge 60 Pro with fast WiFi 6E

The Edge 60 Pro supports WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4 and NFC. It is also well positioned in terms of mobile phone frequencies, so you shouldn't have any reception problems even when traveling in other EU countries.

With our reference router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, the Edge 60 Pro achieves quite stable Wi-Fi transfer rates, reaching a peak of 1574 MB/s.

Networking
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼85%
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼58%
OnePlus 13R
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
957 (min: 927) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
750 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1519 (min: 176) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1768) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼82%
Xiaomi 14T
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼84%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
843 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
827 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1195 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1250 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1382 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1393 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø990 (879-1101)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1844 (1768-1895)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1574 (1183-1632)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1511 (1431-1564)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (493-998)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø722 (680-801)
GPS reception in the building
GPS reception in the building
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

The Edge 60 Pro performs well when it comes to navigation. In the practical test, in which we pitted it against the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, the smartphone was often a few meters off the bike route, which was around 10 kilometers (~6.2 miles) long, but was precise enough for everyday use.

GPS test Motorola Edge 60 Pro: Overview
GPS test Motorola Edge 60 Pro: Overview
GPS test Motorola Edge 60 Pro: Underpass
GPS test Motorola Edge 60 Pro: Underpass
GPS test Motorola Edge 60 Pro: turnaround
GPS test Motorola Edge 60 Pro: turnaround
Garmin Venu 2: Overview
Garmin Venu 2: Overview
Garmin Venu 2: Underpass
Garmin Venu 2: Underpass
Garmin Venu 2: Turnaround
Garmin Venu 2: Turnaround

Phone functions and voice quality

A nano SIM card fits into the card slot of the Edge 60 Pro and an eSIM can also be activated for dual SIM operation. In addition to VoLTE, the phone also supports Wi-Fi calls.

The voice quality of the Motorola smartphone is impressive. Voices remain easy to understand even in hands-free mode and the noise suppression works reliably.

Cameras - Triple camera with 3x optical zoom

Selfie camera shot
Selfie camera shot

In addition to a 50 MP main camera and a 50 MP ultra-wide-angle camera, the Edge 60 Pro also has a 10 MP telephoto camera. The latter works with a 3x optical zoom and takes good pictures in daylight. Digital zoom is possible up to 50x, but only captures rather blurred details at higher magnification levels.

Photos taken with the main and ultra-wide-angle camera are rich in detail and contrast and are characterized by very good quality. The same applies to the 50 MP selfie camera, which is one of the best in this price range. The smartphone also records videos in good quality, but only with a maximum of 4K at 30 FPS.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

DaylightDaylightUltra wide-angleLow light

In the test lab, the main camera shows that it can capture colors quite accurately in optimal lighting. However, there is a lack of accuracy with green tones. The test chart remains fully recognizable with 1 lux of residual light.

ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
20 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Pro: 9.77 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 19.96 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
62.5 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
33 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
76.7 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
85.8 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Pro: 45.87 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 85.82 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The 90-watt power supply costs extra

The scope of delivery includes a USB-C cable, a plastic protective cover, a SIM tool and a quick start guide.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro in the USA comes with a standard one-year limited warranty. Moto Care Accident Protection, an optional plan, can extend coverage for accidental damage.

Input devices and operation - Fast fingerprint sensor

The P-OLED screen responds quickly and precisely to inputs and, together with the 12 GB RAM and the MediaTek SoC, ensures very smooth operation.

The fingerprint sensor under the screen unlocks the smartphone quickly and did not make any mistakes in the test. The 2D face recognition via the selfie camera also works reliably.

Keyboard up
Keyboard up
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display - P-OLED screen with more than 4000 nits

Subpixel
Subpixel

According to Motorola, the P-OLED screen has a maximum brightness of 4500 nits. The screen does not quite reach this in the test, but still achieves an excellent 4122 cd/m² on small surfaces (APL18 measurement). The average is 1099 cd/m².

The P-OLED screen works with a relatively high DC dimming frequency of 716 Hz in all of the brightness levels we measured. Due to the high signal amplitude of 75 percent, PWM-sensitive users may still feel disturbed by PWM flickering.

1102
cd/m²
1034
cd/m²
1066
cd/m²
1121
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
1088
cd/m²
1054
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1121 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1072.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.031
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
OnePlus 13R
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi 14T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
31%
-16%
-0%
-8%
7%
Brightness middle
1099
2063
88%
1064
-3%
1213
10%
1211
10%
1012
-8%
Brightness
1073
1914
78%
1038
-3%
1206
12%
1214
13%
1016
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
88
-3%
97
7%
99
9%
95
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.25
0.7
44%
1.17
6%
1
20%
1.6
-28%
0.7
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.68
2.2
-31%
2.47
-47%
2.3
-37%
2.4
-43%
1.8
-7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.2
14%
2
-43%
1.6
-14%
1.5
-7%
1.2
14%
Gamma
2.031 108%
2.23 99%
2.238 98%
2.22 99%
2.13 103%
2.19 100%
CCT
6403 102%
6524 100%
6423 101%
6546 99%
6456 101%
6489 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 715.7 Hz
Amplitude: 75 %

The display backlight flickers at 715.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 715.7 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

The analysis with the photo spectrometer and CalMAN software confirms the display's high color fidelity. In Natural color mode, the display shows only minimal deviations from the grayscale and reference colors.

Color fidelity
Color fidelity
Color space
Color space
Grayscale
Grayscale
Color saturation
Color saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 17.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Outdoors, the Edge 60 Pro shows off its bright and viewing angle stable display to its full advantage. Screen content is still reasonably easy to see even in direct sunlight. There are no problems with readability in the shade.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Point of view
Point of view

Performance - Motorola Edge 60 Pro with MediaTek SoC

Equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 the Edge 60 Pro has no trouble holding its own against smartphones in the same price range in terms of performance. The Motorola phone performs particularly well in AI calculations. In prestigious benchmarks such as AnTuTu v10, with 1,409,057 points, it is not far behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 of the OnePlus 13R (1,772,142 points).

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2214 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
2066 Points +42%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=207, last 2 years)
1608 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1457 Points
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1440 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1225 - 1457, n=4)
1345 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points -21%
Multi-Core
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6605 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
6341 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=207, last 2 years)
4626 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4616 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4423 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (3947 - 4616, n=4)
4232 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points -32%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1772142 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1516996 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1409057 Points
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1399064 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=147, last 2 years)
1335016 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1133809 - 1409057, n=2)
1271433 Points -10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
19261 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
17338 Points -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (9907 - 19261, n=4)
16144 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14751 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
14304 Points -26%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points -28%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13085 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9273 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
8827 Points +23%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8039 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (7178 - 8279, n=2)
7729 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7178 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=156, last 2 years)
7018 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6894 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points -16%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
14627 Points +78%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12637 Points +54%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11587 Points +41%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=156, last 2 years)
10823 Points +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (8213 - 11001, n=2)
9607 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8213 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
7593 Points -8%
Memory
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12087 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
9036 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (8146 - 9693, n=2)
8920 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
8573 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8146 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=156, last 2 years)
7887 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7735 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points -30%
Graphics
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
27837 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
27809 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (26099 - 28497, n=2)
27298 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
26099 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
23338 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=156, last 2 years)
22600 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
20938 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points -49%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1982 Points +30%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1763 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1676 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1648 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=156, last 2 years)
1630 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1521 - 1546, n=2)
1534 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1521 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
63113 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (58543 - 63113, n=2)
60828 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
57997 Points -8%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=147, last 2 years)
18518 Points -71%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13564 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
11738 Points -81%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points -86%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (4367 - 4532, n=2)
4450 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4367 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)
1868 Points -57%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
521 Points -88%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (4364 - 4545, n=2)
4455 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4364 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)
1148 Points -74%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
224 Points -95%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1068 - 1140, n=2)
1104 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1068 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)
508 Points -52%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
235 Points -78%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7987 Points +80%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4443 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=55, last 2 years)
4310 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1070 - 4443, n=3)
3166 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
598 Points -87%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4854 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4378 Points +43%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3153 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4891 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4329 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3110 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3079 Points -1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19048 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13847 Points +28%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11001 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10786 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points -50%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8398 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7948 Points +57%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5058 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4953 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8364 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7894 Points +60%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5183 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4946 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1803 Points +48%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1706 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1218 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1036 Points -15%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -16%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1821 Points +49%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1636 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1222 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1221 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps -3%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
545 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
460 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
454 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
384 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -35%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
387 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269 fps +19%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps +14%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps -18%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +3%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -49%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
266 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
215 fps +19%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -8%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -54%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +30%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -5%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -24%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -61%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +23%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +54%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +68%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +66%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -9%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -41%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps -6%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -60%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +25%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -54%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
182.387 Points +64%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)
140.4 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (111.4 - 138.7, n=2)
125.1 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
123.193 Points +11%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
115.454 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
111.429 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
70.555 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
298 runs/min +89%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min +17%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=141, last 2 years)
177.7 runs/min +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (158 - 192, n=2)
175 runs/min +11%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
158 runs/min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
147 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
117 runs/min -26%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
187 Points +63%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
136 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=154, last 2 years)
131.7 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (115 - 148, n=2)
131.5 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
115 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
103 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
103 Points -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
64838 Points +69%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
44442 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (38258 - 49086, n=4)
43048 Points +13%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
41734 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
39130 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
38258 Points
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
35853 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
1899.3 ms * -75%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1324 ms * -22%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
1150 ms * -6%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
1087.5 ms *
OnePlus 13R (Edge 133)
1002.6 ms * +8%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
972.4 ms * +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (847 - 1088, n=2)
967 ms * +11%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
598.12 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Edge 60 ProGoogle Pixel 9Motorola Edge 50 ProOnePlus 13RSamsung Galaxy S24 FEXiaomi 14TAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-64%
-51%
-9%
-61%
-11%
-14%
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
3852.89
1584.56
-59%
1023.6
-73%
3987.44
3%
1783.43
-54%
3605.16
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
3842.42
256.48
-93%
1025.9
-73%
3201.32
-17%
631.23
-84%
3294.31
-14%
3102 ?(1524 - 4030, n=46)
-19%
Random Read 4KB
439.58
226.41
-48%
337
-23%
374.54
-15%
312.98
-29%
403.97
-8%
382 ?(250 - 504, n=46)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
585.66
266.19
-55%
390.2
-33%
542.13
-7%
127.53
-78%
493.57
-16%

Games - 60 FPS are realistic

With its ARM Mali-G615 MP6-GPU, the Edge 60 Pro achieves good 3D performance. While no match for the OnePlus 13R or Samsung Galaxy S24 FE the frame rates determined with Gamebench show that the performance is easily sufficient to play current games smoothly, even in high details.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø59.6 (54-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø56 (47-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.8.0: Ø59.8 (58-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.8.0: Ø39.9 (36-41)

Emissions - noticeable heating under continuous load

Temperature

In the stress test with the burnout benchmark, the Edge 60 Pro gets really uncomfortably warm at up to 58.4 °C (137.12 °F). However, this extreme scenario remains the exception in everyday use.

In the 3DMark stress tests, the Edge 60 Pro can maintain its output performance for a relatively long time, but then drops sharply. After 20 test runs, only just under 40 percent of the original performance remains.

Max. Load
 53.8 °C
129 F
54 °C
129 F
47.8 °C
118 F
 
 54 °C
129 F
53 °C
127 F
48.7 °C
120 F
 
 54.7 °C
130 F
54.3 °C
130 F
47.7 °C
118 F
 
Maximum: 54.7 °C = 130 F
Average: 52 °C = 126 F
46.9 °C
116 F
53.3 °C
128 F
50.3 °C
123 F
47.3 °C
117 F
54 °C
129 F
51.5 °C
125 F
47.1 °C
117 F
54.2 °C
130 F
58.4 °C
137 F
Maximum: 58.4 °C = 137 F
Average: 51.4 °C = 125 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.7 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88.6 % +110%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.4 % +79%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % +62%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.1 % +59%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.2 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.4 % -7%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +135%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +69%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.4 % +60%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.8 % +49%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.1 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.5 % -11%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % +61%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.4 % +54%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.3 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35.1 % -15%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +89%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.6 % +70%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % +61%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % +42%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.6 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.9 (7.61-18.1)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.2 (10.9-15.3)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22 (11.3-30.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (14.5-23.1)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.6 (12-17.8)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.7 (28.4-67.4)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.2 (36.3-53.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.9 (38.8-98.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.6 (49.7-74.1)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (43.9-58.2)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.9 (28.2-65.7)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.2 (45.1-55.7)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (44-65.4)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø12.7 (6.96-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (17.2-25.5)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø12.8 (6.91-16.7)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.5 (10.1-28.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.8 (17.3-27.2)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø12.2 (11.1-16.6)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.23 (3.77-9.06)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.79 (5.95-7.59)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.89-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.73 (8.08-13.6)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.23 (6.01-9)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Speakers

The speaker on the bottom edge is amplified by the earpiece, which means that the Edge 60 Pro produces stereo sound. This remains largely without bass, but still sounds good thanks to the relatively balanced mids and highs.

Headphones or external speakers can be connected via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.4. The Edge 60 Pro supports most current Bluetooth codecs.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.3352540.636.93131.8284029.735.65036.436.86324.321.18019.424.410022.236.112520.746.216018.852.120018.853.825019.258.131515.564.140015.360.950017.463.863024.368.480026.967.8100022.166.8125018.768160017.672.3200016.771.5250015.569315015.265.4400017.173.6500021.383.1630024.482.9800026.975.31000023.472.51250017.574.91600017.954.2SPL33.888.1N1.867.5median 18.8median 67.8Delta2.96.540.543.932.243.833.238.931.139.838.546.526.141.924.642.919.547.818.348.416.354.815.455.3146015.160.913.259.511.564.911.864.713.470.515.276.313.381.31378.512.782.313.980.714.281.21484.914.681.413.775.313.674.813.574.813.46512.658.125.991.90.786.4median 13.7median 74.8110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 60 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 FE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Edge 60 Pro with 6000 mAh battery and good endurance

Energy consumption

The Edge 60 Pro's 6000 mAh battery can be charged with up to 90 watts. Up to 15 watts is possible via wireless charging.

We did not have Motorola's 90-watt power supply available for the test, which is why we used the Anker 317 instead (100 watts). However, the Edge 60 Pro is not really happy with this, as it takes 1.5 hours for one charging cycle, which is far too long. If the smartphone and power adapter are compatible, charging should be completed in well under an hour.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Load midlight 8.6 / 14.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
39%
11%
10%
37%
-35%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.66
49%
0.9
31%
0.81
38%
0.78
40%
0.97
25%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.49
22%
1.3
32%
2.11
-11%
1.31
31%
1.12
41%
3.74 ?(1.9 - 5.57, n=2)
-97%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.78
26%
1.6
33%
2.17
10%
1.36
43%
1.19
50%
4.01 ?(2.4 - 5.61, n=2)
-67%
Load Average *
8.6
7.44
13%
4.8
44%
9.2
-7%
13.23
-54%
4.13
52%
10.3 ?(8.6 - 12, n=2)
-20%
Load Maximum *
14.9
16.64
-12%
6.7
55%
11.12
25%
16.23
-9%
12.25
18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.91 (2.44-3.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.65 (0.953-6.75)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.2 (0.989-16.4)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.389 (1.27-2.54)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.161 (1.066-1.56)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.7 (12.4-14.9)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.17 (4.82-5.42)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (9.75-15.3)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.389 (1.27-2.54)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.161 (1.066-1.56)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Battery life

The Edge 60 Pro is very durable in the practical battery tests. It lasts almost 22.5 hours in the Wi-Fi test. With this, it not only beats its predecessor, but outlasts most rival phones except the OnePlus 13R. The Edge 60 has no chance with its 5000 mAh battery.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
22h 23min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh
1343 min
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
990 min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
979 min
OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh
1516 min
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh
749 min
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
1091 min

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro offers good features for the money and scores particularly well with a large battery and a very bright curved display.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro - 07/03/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
49 / 69 → 72%
Weight
90%
Battery
93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
27 / 55 → 48%
Application Performance
71 / 85 → 83%
AI Performance
74%
Temperature
74%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
81%
Average
67%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
95.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
77.8%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 48.1%

Comparison of possible alternatives

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
81.5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.29
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
2. $9.88
Foebxxs [2 Pack Hydrogel Fle...
3. $7.59
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
List Price: 600 Euro
186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
P-OLED
2.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $679.97
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
2. $1,098.70
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
3. $1,799.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...
List Price: 899€
198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
3.
87.6% v7 (old)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 720 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $9.99
Cmiuubrer 3+2 Pack Screen Pr...
2. $8.99
Type C Charger Fast Charging...
3. $8.68
Iiseon High Sensitivity Hydr...
List Price: 699€
186 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"
2712x1220
444 PPI
P-OLED
4.
82.9%
OnePlus 13R
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
2. $9.58
uShield 4 Pack For OnePlus 1...
3. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
List Price: 749€
206 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
5.
85.7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
3 Pack Glass Screen Protecto...
2. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
3. $6.94
amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
AMOLED
6.
83.4%
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro S...
3. $5.46
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Compatible w...
195 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Lightweight curved smartphone with great endurance and a strong price-performance ratio - Motorola Edge 60 Pro review
Manuel Masiero, 2025-07- 5 (Update: 2025-07- 6)