Notebookcheck Logo
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Has this mid-range phone gotten even better? Motorola Edge 60 Fusion review

Refined.

Motorola wants to really show off again with its Edge 60 Fusion by installing WiFi 6 and a high-quality case in Pantone colors. The manufacturer has additionally given the phone a new SoC, improved water resistance and a larger battery. Let's see if the stylish smartphone can make a comeback.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android ARM

Verdict on the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Motorola's Edge 60 Fusion is once again a relatively affordable, well-built and nicely designed smartphone that comes in a variety of Pantone colors. It's just a matter of taste whether you like that the phone has again been sprayed with Motorola's signature scent.

This model has been given some improvements over its predecessor: Users can look forward to even better performance, better water resistance and a little more battery life. At the same time, the phone has only become a few grams heavier.

Its features, which include eSIM support, NFC and 8 GB RAM, are decent. However, a few disappointments are inevitable: Although the phone finally supports WiFi 6, it only does so with one antenna per direction, resulting in no speed advantage at all. Its USB 2.0 port without an option of wired image output to a monitor isn't unusual in this price range, but Motorola could have set itself apart from the competition in this respect.

Its update promise is solid, but it can't keep up with the competition from Samsung. Its location services are sufficiently accurate, it supports lots of mobile networks and Bluetooth audio codecs—plus, it has a decent camera system and quite good speakers.

All-in-all, a very solid and attractive mid-range phone that impresses thanks to its high performance and good battery life.

Pros

+ stylish design
+ decent speakers
+ low heat development
+ precise fingerprint sensor
+ microSD card reader
+ good camera quality
+ good battery life, even under load
+ eSIM support

Cons

- pre-installed third-party apps
- mediocre location services in narrow surroundings
- limited camera flexibility
- only 1x1 MIMO for WiFi 6
- no wireless charging
- PWM flickering (at high frequency)

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is not yet available to purchase in the USA. In Europe, it has an MRSP of 329 euros (approx. $340).

Specifications

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1200 pixel 445 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, curved, 300Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 200 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n75/​n77/​n78) , LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 161 x 73 ( = 0.31 x 6.34 x 2.87 in)
Battery
5200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 68 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.88, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @2160p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), plastic bumper, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68/​IP69-certified, MIL-STD-810H-certified, eSIM, fanless, waterproof
Weight
178 g ( = 6.28 oz / 0.39 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
329 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Rubberized back in Pantone colors

In contrast to its predecessor, glossy materials on its case are now a thing of the past: The back of the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is made entirely of rubberized plastic, which also covers the camera module. This is once again elegantly integrated into the case with a slight curve at the sides.

The back is available in three Pantone colors, and the frame matches the color: Slipstream, a dark and slightly more muted blue, Zephry, a pastel pink and Amazonite, a light blue-green. A color called Mocha Mousse, a slightly reddish brown tone, is available from some retailers.

Gorilla Glass 7i is used as the screen's glass, which is specially adapted for mid-range phones: it doesn't offer quite as much protection as Gorilla Glass Victus 2, but at least ensures that the phone passes the MIL-STD tests. It can now also withstand high-pressure water in accordance with IP69. Thanks to its IP68 certification, you can also use the phone in dusty environments or submerge it in fresh water.

The glass is drawn over the edges on all sides, giving the phone an elegant appearance as its bezels appear even narrower. Although the material transitions are barely noticeable overall, they aren't completely even on the back. The phone is pressure-resistant, but it creaks when you try to twist it.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is nice and lightweight for its size.

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Size comparison

162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs162 mm / 6.38 in 73 mm / 2.87 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 175 g0.3858 lbs162.2 mm / 6.39 in 77.5 mm / 3.05 in 7.4 mm / 0.2913 in 198 g0.4365 lbs161.9 mm / 6.37 in 73.1 mm / 2.88 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 171 g0.377 lbs161 mm / 6.34 in 73 mm / 2.87 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 178 g0.3924 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity – Including eSIM support

In Europe, where this test was carried out, only the version with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB UFS 2.2 storage is available. In Asia, there is also a version with 12 GB RAM.

Internally, its USB-C port is only connected via the USB 2.0 standard, so it can't control a monitor. Data transfers are also comparatively slow.

NFC is on board, so you can easily use mobile payment services or verify yourself in corresponding apps using an ID card equipped with an NFC chip.

Although there is only one nano SIM slot in the Edge 60 Fusion, you can set up an eSIM profile so you can use two SIM cards simultaneously.

Top: microphone
Top: microphone
Bottom: SIM slot, microphone, USB-C port, speaker
Bottom: SIM slot, microphone, USB-C port, speaker
Left: no connections
Left: no connections
Right: microphone, standby button, volume rocker
Right: microphone, standby button, volume rocker

microSD card reader

The phone's storage can be expanded via a microSD card. We tested the reader using our Angelbird V60 reference card.

The Edge 60 Fusion actually delivered quite stable transfer rates and a good average read speed during the copying test.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird V60)
37.9 MB/s
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years)
30.6 MB/s -19%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø32.7 (16.1-45.5)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.2 (54.8-83.8)

Software – Average update promise

Android 15 comes pre-installed on the Edge 60 Fusion—the manufacturer has only changed Google's operating system slightly and outsourced its own functions to separate apps so they can be updated more easily.

The smartphone is set to be given 4 years of security updates and 3 new Android versions until March 2029, i.e. until Android 18. That's a decent promise, although Samsung is well ahead in this price range with 6 years of updates.

Some third-party apps come pre-installed for advertising purposes, but these can be easily removed. What is more annoying is that you are asked to install additional apps during setup. The user interface is also designed in such a way that you can click and install the apps by mistake, which isn't very user-friendly.

At the time of testing, the latest security patches were from March 2025, which is still within the 2-month update cycle promised by the manufacturer.

Software Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Software Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Software Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Sustainability

Motorola has chosen a plain white box printed with soy ink. The phone's packaging doesn't contain any plastic. However, it does feature a shimmery effect print, which may not be so environmentally friendly. It's nice that Motorola has used recycled plastic for the included bumper.

We couldn't find a report on its exact CO2 footprint, nor on the materials used in the device.

Motorola has entered into a cooperation with iFixit for self-repair and spare parts supply, where you can find spare parts—albeit only for older phones. The same can be said for online retailers, where spare parts are more likely to be available for phones that are at least 2 years old.

Communication and GNSS – Slow despite WiFi 6

The smartphone supports the WiFi 6 standard, but only with one receiving and one transmitting channel (1x1 MIMO). As a result, its transfer rates are only slightly higher than devices with WiFi 5 and were around 320-400 MBit/s during our test. This is sufficient for everyday use, but if you want to make the most of your gigabit internet connection, you'll be left out in the cold.

Full reception is available close to the router—even large websites load reasonably quickly and when scrolling, you only have to wait a short time for images to appear. At a distance of 10 meters and through 3 walls, half the phone's signal strength is still available and websites load more slowly.

5G is available as its fastest mobile communications standard. So many LTE and 5G frequencies are supported that you can take the phone abroad without hesitation, and you will most likely be able to use it on the local mobile network. We monitored its reception during our test period and compared it with high-end phones. The phone performed quite well, achieving signal strengths similar to more expensive phones.

Networking
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
403 (min: 383) MBit/s ∼48%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
617 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
529 (min: 443) MBit/s ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
400 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
375 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼45%
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
361 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
341 (min: 322) MBit/s ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
766 (min: 698) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
666 (min: 568) MBit/s ∼80%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
730 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø364 (320-376)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø403 (383-416)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Let's take a look at its locating accuracy: If you step outside, you are very quickly located to within one meter. The SBAS system, which increases accuracy, is a big help here.

Our practical test consisted of a bike ride, during which we took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch with us to compare, as it's known for its precise location services. In this case, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion did quite well locating us in open terrain and only occasionally cut a corner or two.

In the narrow old-town streets, on the other hand, the phone struggled and often placed us incorrectly.

Overall, the cell phone can indeed be used for navigation, but you shouldn't expect complete accuracy.

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – overview
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – overview
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – turning point
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – turning point
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – bridge
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – bridge
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – overview
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location services – bridge

Telephone functions and call quality – Clear conversations

Motorola uses the standard Android app for making calls, so it should be easy to find your way around the phone after switching from lots of other cell phone brands.

The device's call quality via the earpiece is clear, and the microphone picked up our voice reliably and forwarded it to the other party without interference during our test. Its sound is also clear via the hands-free microphone and loudspeaker, but you just need to make sure not to speak too quietly.

Cameras – Less flexible, but with good photo quality

Photo taken with the front-facing camera
Photo taken with the front-facing camera

As with its predecessor, the Edge 60 Fusion comes with a 50-megapixel main camera. Its photos are colorful and sharp, and are able to reproduce the lighting atmosphere well. Even in low light and high contrasts, the phone works reliably with good sharpness and a decent dynamic range.

In contrast to more expensive phones, however, it lacks a real zoom lens or at least a telephoto focal length. This makes the system somewhat less flexible in terms of image composition.

4K videos can be recorded at a maximum of 30 fps. Here too, the picture looks very sharp and the autofocus reacts quickly and almost invisibly.

The phone's wide-angle camera has a resolution of 13 megapixels and takes photos with a medium level of detail, which look decent overall and also capture the lighting atmosphere well.

Furthermore, selfies look similarly high quality, although we noted a slight lack of dynamics in darker areas in this case.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle camera

In our lab, the test photo depicted medium sharpness and a slight red cast. However, the contrast was very good and even small text remained easy to read. The camera's color reproduction was a little too dark, but overall, it was still well rendered.

In very low light, rough details of the subject were still recognizable.

ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Fusion: 7.92 ∆E min: 3.6 - max: 13.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
57.6 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
70.9 ∆E
43 ∆E
40 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
49.7 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Fusion: 43.72 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 72.16 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – Protective case included

Motorola doesn't include a charger with the phone, but it does come with a hard plastic protective cover. There is also a USB-C cable and a SIM tool in the box.

The phone is covered by a 12-month warranty in the United States.

Input devices and operation – Speedy touchscreen

Thanks to the touchscreen's 120 Hz refresh rate and 300 Hz sampling rate, the Edge 60 Fusion can be operated very smoothly and responds promptly. Plus, the touchscreen is sensitive right into the corners and along the edges. However, the risk of accidental inputs is slightly increased due to the glass being pulled over the edges of the phone. Even so, during our test, the system was able to distinguish well between intentional and unintentional inputs.

A fingerprint sensor is hidden behind the phone's display, which works very accurately and quickly recognizes a print once it has been saved. The screen is then unlocked with almost no waiting time. Facial unlocking is also supported, but only using the front camera without an auxiliary sensor, making it more susceptible to manipulation.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display – Bright OLED

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array

According to the manufacturer, the 6.67-inch P-OLED display can achieve a brightness of up to 4,500 cd/m² when depicting very small white areas; in our test, on the other hand, we noted a maximum of 1,543 cd/m². When depicting very large white areas, its brightness was similarly high at an average of 1,280.6 cd/m², so it's sufficient for displaying HDR content.

We measured PWM flickering at low brightness levels, albeit at a relatively high frequency of 716.2 Hz. Sensitive people should nevertheless try out the screen before buying.

1305
cd/m²
1281
cd/m²
1237
cd/m²
1305
cd/m²
1281
cd/m²
1258
cd/m²
1315
cd/m²
1292
cd/m²
1251
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1315 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1280.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1281 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.062
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
P-OLED, 2712x1200, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G85
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Screen
12%
8%
7%
-6%
Brightness middle
1281
1213
-5%
1138
-11%
1207
-6%
1184
-8%
Brightness
1281
1190
-7%
1137
-11%
1177
-8%
1179
-8%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
97
3%
94
0%
99
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
1.36
7%
1.1
25%
1.36
7%
1.7
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.14
2.3
27%
2.6
17%
2.8
11%
3.2
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.1
50%
1.6
27%
1.4
36%
2.4
-9%
Gamma
2.062 107%
2.254 98%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.12 104%
CCT
6628 98%
6624 98%
6284 103%
6591 99%
6544 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 716.2 Hz
Amplitude: 45 %

The display backlight flickers at 716.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 716.2 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).
 

In our lab tests using the CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the Edge 60 Fusion performed quite well. We couldn't detect a visible color cast in its display—at most just some small deviations.

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

The display does well outdoors on cloudy days, and content remains clearly legible. Nevertheless, some reflections are visible, so working in the shade still feels more pleasant.

Its viewing angles are fine, and we didn't notice any color shift even at very flat viewing angles.

Viewing angles
Viewing angles
Outdoor use
Outdoor use

Performance – Good performance for the class

Motorola has opted for a fairly modern mid-range SoC in the shape of the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, which is also used in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, for example. As a result, it delivers more performance than its predecessor, the Edge 50 Fusion, securing it one of the top spots in most benchmarks.

The Edge 60 Fusion usually runs smoothly, with waiting times only occurring with multiple apps running simultaneously or when very demanding tasks are performed.

The SoC also performs well for the affordable mid-range when it comes to AI calculations.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=205, last 2 years)
1544 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1380 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1052 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1043 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
998 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (541 - 1054, n=8)
977 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
940 Points -11%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=205, last 2 years)
4401 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
3890 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3032 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2891 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2813 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1906 - 3098, n=8)
2799 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
2067 Points -32%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
901303 Points +38%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
652828 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (598120 - 667282, n=7)
647012 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
631545 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
571043 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
481436 Points -26%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15563 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15308 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
14298 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13982 Points -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (11724 - 15834, n=7)
13957 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13421 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
12367 Points -21%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1036 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
709 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
708 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
688 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (390 - 759, n=6)
667 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
619 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)
6801 Points +33%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
5117 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4983 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (4432 - 5117, n=5)
4808 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4765 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
4147 Points -19%
System
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
11239 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10784 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)
10640 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8743 - 10784, n=5)
9223 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8825 Points
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
8686 Points -2%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)
7516 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
6297 Points
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
5162 Points -18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (4432 - 6297, n=5)
5013 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4768 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4465 Points -29%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
19418 Points +126%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8632 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8611 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8564 - 8632, n=5)
8589 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7249 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
4772 Points -45%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)
1612 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1433 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1417 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1387 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1382 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1130 - 1462, n=5)
1363 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
26724 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8087 - 27964, n=5)
19676 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
11181 Points -58%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
9206 Points -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8087 Points -70%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
5689 Points -79%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 1106, n=4, last 2 years)
594 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
539 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (n=1)
539 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 4555, n=5, last 2 years)
1364 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1312 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (n=1)
1312 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2692 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (n=1)
2692 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 4549, n=5, last 2 years)
1860 Points -31%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=44, last 2 years)
4248 Points +636%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
577 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (232 - 577, n=4)
394 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
232 Points -60%

In terms of graphics performance, users get what they would expect from a phone in this price range in 2025, but no more than that.

As such, the Edge 60 Fusion can run the majority of apps. However, if you're looking to perform very demanding tasks, you'll probably have to look for a more powerful device.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1362 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
883 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
793 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
410 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1382 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
871 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
860 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
418 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5237 Points +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3167 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3130 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3066 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1578 Points -50%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
659 Points +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
254 Points -27%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
372 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
253 Points -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +33%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
104 fps +20%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
87 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
156 fps +37%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
114 fps
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -12%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +59%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +90%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps -4%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -36%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +83%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -17%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +112%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +6%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +89%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -8%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -39%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps +19%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -6%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.8 fps -39%

Websites load quite quickly and images generally appear in no time. You may have to face some short waiting times from time to time but overall, surfing the web on the Motorola phone is a smooth and pleasant experience.

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 401, n=11, last 2 years)
197.6 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
173.073 Points +48%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
116.926 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1)
116.9 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
191 runs/min +47%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
169 runs/min +30%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
130 runs/min
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
110 runs/min -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (76.5 - 130, n=4)
97.7 runs/min -25%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
91.8 runs/min -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
77.4 runs/min -40%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +54%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
12 runs/min +47%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
8.19 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5.6 - 8.19, n=5)
6.94 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
6.56 runs/min -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
6.55 runs/min -20%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
5.55 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
138 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
114 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
106 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (56 - 118, n=5)
96.8 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
96 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
95 Points -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
50719 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
43074 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
37452 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
36202 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
34162 Points -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (22739 - 37949, n=7)
30520 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
28945 Points -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1066 - 2154, n=5)
1425 ms * -34%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
1351.21 ms * -27%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
1172 ms * -10%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
1090.6 ms * -2%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
1066.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
792.6 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Although the device's UFS 2.2 storage isn't one of the fastest modules currently available, it enables reasonably short loading times and good transfer speeds when copying.

Motorola Edge 60 FusionMotorola Edge 50 FusionXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GMotorola Moto G85Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-6%
-5%
-31%
-14%
54%
Sequential Read 256KB
967.4
967.8
0%
1009.67
4%
529.8
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
908.8
800.5
-12%
833.64
-8%
525.3
-42%
725 ?(369 - 913, n=40)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
272.1
281.5
3%
248.81
-9%
220.7
-19%
Random Write 4KB
286.9
241.4
-16%
266.92
-7%
237
-17%

Games – 60fps is sometimes possible

When gaming, you shouldn't choose games that are too demanding, or at least only play them in low details.

We noted a relatively stable 60fps when running PUBG Mobile, for example, with very low settings. When playing Genshin Impact, on the other hand, you'll have to make do with 30fps even at minimum settings, and stutters can't be ruled out.

We measured the frame rates using the GameBench software.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø29.8 (28-31)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø29.6 (20-31)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.2 (50-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.7 (31-41)

Emissions – Hardly any throttling on the Edge 60 Fusion

Temperature

We ran the phone under full load for a longer period of time to see how the temperatures on its case develop. The maximum temperature rise we noted was actually lower than its predecessor, the Edge 50 Fusion, at a maximum of 42.4 °C. Although this is noticeable, it is by no means a problem.

Our test device performed similarly well in the 3DMark stress tests and wasn't throttled even after numerous runs of the benchmarks.

Max. Load
 42.1 °C
108 F
41.7 °C
107 F
39 °C
102 F
 
 42.4 °C
108 F
42.2 °C
108 F
38.3 °C
101 F
 
 42.3 °C
108 F
42 °C
108 F
40.4 °C
105 F
 
Maximum: 42.4 °C = 108 F
Average: 41.2 °C = 106 F
37.3 °C
99 F
41.2 °C
106 F
39 °C
102 F
38.4 °C
101 F
39.8 °C
104 F
40 °C
104 F
38.9 °C
102 F
40.6 °C
105 F
42.3 °C
108 F
Maximum: 42.3 °C = 108 F
Average: 39.7 °C = 103 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.18 (5.17-5.19)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.77)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.03 (5.01-5.04)
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.5 (2.49-2.51)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.6-18.8)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.2 (18.1-18.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.5 (18.3-18.6)
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.43 (9.4-9.46)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.58 (2.57-2.59)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø1.89 (1.881-1.902)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.53 (2.5-2.54)
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back

Speakers

Available Bluetooth audio codecs
Available Bluetooth audio codecs

The speaker on the bottom edge of the phone is supported by the earphones, creating slight stereo effects when the device is held horizontally. The sound is good—not terribly powerful, but balanced and it remains reasonably clear and differentiated even at maximum volume.

Speaking of volume: the speakers can get loud enough to fill a medium-sized room with sound. The Edge 60 Fusion also provides slightly more bass and treble than its predecessor, making its sound more interesting and fuller.

External playback devices can be connected via USB-C or Bluetooth. This works without any problems and sounds great. All common Bluetooth codecs are supported, so you can almost certainly connect your headphones in good quality.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204637.72539.137.13133.234.34037.841.65040.142.96325.526.48016.523.810017.730.712519.538.716017.442.620015.849.125016.354.731514.759.240013565001762.463020.667.98002168.6100018.870.1125017.176.3160015.876.920001479.5250012.476.2315012.275.6400012.570.7500012.172.4630012.473.4800012.271.61000012.270.81250012.179.11600011.768.5SPL27.886.7N0.965.1median 14.7median 70.1Delta2.79.638.130.628.729.123.125.326.529.237.635.319.627.616.726.924.231.220.434.220.538.511.643.310.747.310.352.57.851.18.155.79.2659.567.69.670.58.171.39.366.59.766.610.265.310.963.811.469.612.375.112.873.613.970.314.667.115.468.516.260.623.681.70.549.3median 10.9median 65.32.69.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 60 FusionMotorola Edge 50 Fusion
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life – Lasts a little longer

Power consumption

At first glance, the Edge 60 Fusion looks like a conventional smartphone in terms of its energy consumption, but it actually consumes very little power, especially under full load.

It can be charged at a maximum of 68 watts, although no charger is included. Still, the phone got on well with the chargers in our test lab, and a full charging process took just under an hour with a suitably powerful charger.

The mid-range phone doesn't support wireless charging.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 2.9 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
5200 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-33%
-17%
-4%
-70%
-7%
-45%
Idle Minimum *
1
1
-0%
1.17
-17%
1
-0%
0.72
28%
0.938 ?(0.6 - 1.17, n=6)
6%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.3
-0%
1.38
-6%
1.2
8%
1.45
-12%
1.368 ?(0.8 - 2.03, n=6)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.9
-19%
1.41
12%
1.4
12%
1.49
7%
1.497 ?(1.1 - 2.09, n=6)
6%
Load Average *
2.9
5.1
-76%
3.58
-23%
3.4
-17%
9.68
-234%
3.18 ?(2.9 - 3.58, n=5)
-10%
Load Maximum *
5.6
9.4
-68%
8.44
-51%
6.8
-21%
13.39
-139%
7.26 ?(5.4 - 8.62, n=5)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.911.21.31.51.61.81.92.12.22.42.52.62.8Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.36 (1.08-2.94)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.03-1.51)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.911.21.31.51.61.71.922.22.32.52.62.8Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.84 (2.34-2.9)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.03-1.51)

Runtimes

Compared to its predecessor, the phone's battery has gotten slightly bigger and can now provide 5,200 mAh. Its runtimes have increased accordingly—especially under load, the phone now lasts quite long at 5:29 hours, so we can recommend it for intensive gamers who are often on the move.

During everyday life with normal use, you can expect to go two days without a power outlet, or a day of using the phone on your couch without needing to reach for a charging cable.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 46min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 29min
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
5200 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
1%
-8%
40%
Reader / Idle
1966
1874
-5%
1754
-11%
1974
0%
3173
61%
H.264
1161
1158
0%
1423
23%
1114
-4%
2506
116%
WiFi v1.3
1023
966
-6%
1206
18%
894
-13%
1199
17%
Load
329
297
-10%
236
-28%
286
-13%
215
-35%

Notebookcheck total rating

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion review. Test device provided by Motorola Germany.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion review. Test device provided by Motorola Germany.

The Edge 60 Fusion is a very stylish mid-range phone with a good camera.

Compared to its predecessor, it shows improved battery life and performance.

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion - 04/26/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
45 / 69 → 65%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
13 / 55 → 24%
Application Performance
62 / 85 → 73%
AI Performance
48%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
67%
Average
65%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
30%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.9%
Repairability
12%
Software Updates
66.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.1%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
77.1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $8.99
QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Motoro...
2. $7.99
Anoowkoa 2 pack for Moto Edg...
3. $9.88
LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr...
List Price: 329€
178 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1200
445 PPI
P-OLED
2.
75.4%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $8.58
LXEEOLX [2 Pack Ultra High D...
2. $13.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
3. $8.99
NECARSIN 2 Pack for Motorola...
List Price: 399€
175 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"
2400x1080
393 PPI
P-OLED
3.
77.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $7.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
3. $11.39 ($5.70 / Count)
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
List Price: 400€
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
4.
74.7%
Motorola Moto G85
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $249.50
List Price: 349€
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
405 PPI
P-OLED
5.
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
2. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
List Price: 479€
198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Has this mid-range phone gotten even better? Motorola Edge 60 Fusion review
Florian Schmitt, 2025-04-29 (Update: 2025-05- 2)