Verdict on the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola's Edge 60 Fusion is once again a relatively affordable, well-built and nicely designed smartphone that comes in a variety of Pantone colors. It's just a matter of taste whether you like that the phone has again been sprayed with Motorola's signature scent.
This model has been given some improvements over its predecessor: Users can look forward to even better performance, better water resistance and a little more battery life. At the same time, the phone has only become a few grams heavier.
Its features, which include eSIM support, NFC and 8 GB RAM, are decent. However, a few disappointments are inevitable: Although the phone finally supports WiFi 6, it only does so with one antenna per direction, resulting in no speed advantage at all. Its USB 2.0 port without an option of wired image output to a monitor isn't unusual in this price range, but Motorola could have set itself apart from the competition in this respect.
Its update promise is solid, but it can't keep up with the competition from Samsung. Its location services are sufficiently accurate, it supports lots of mobile networks and Bluetooth audio codecs—plus, it has a decent camera system and quite good speakers.
All-in-all, a very solid and attractive mid-range phone that impresses thanks to its high performance and good battery life.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
At the time of writing, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is not yet available to purchase in the USA. In Europe, it has an MRSP of 329 euros (approx. $340).
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- Specifications
- Case – Rubberized back in Pantone colors
- Connectivity – Including eSIM support
- Software – Average update promise
- Communication and GNSS – Slow despite WiFi 6
- Telephone functions and call quality – Clear conversations
- Cameras – Less flexible, but with good photo quality
- Accessories and warranty – Protective case included
- Input devices and operation – Speedy touchscreen
- Display – Bright OLED
- Performance – Good performance for the class
- Games – 60fps is sometimes possible
- Emissions – Hardly any throttling on the Edge 60 Fusion
- Battery life – Lasts a little longer
- Notebookcheck total rating
- Possible alternatives compared
Specifications
Case – Rubberized back in Pantone colors
In contrast to its predecessor, glossy materials on its case are now a thing of the past: The back of the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is made entirely of rubberized plastic, which also covers the camera module. This is once again elegantly integrated into the case with a slight curve at the sides.
The back is available in three Pantone colors, and the frame matches the color: Slipstream, a dark and slightly more muted blue, Zephry, a pastel pink and Amazonite, a light blue-green. A color called Mocha Mousse, a slightly reddish brown tone, is available from some retailers.
Gorilla Glass 7i is used as the screen's glass, which is specially adapted for mid-range phones: it doesn't offer quite as much protection as Gorilla Glass Victus 2, but at least ensures that the phone passes the MIL-STD tests. It can now also withstand high-pressure water in accordance with IP69. Thanks to its IP68 certification, you can also use the phone in dusty environments or submerge it in fresh water.
The glass is drawn over the edges on all sides, giving the phone an elegant appearance as its bezels appear even narrower. Although the material transitions are barely noticeable overall, they aren't completely even on the back. The phone is pressure-resistant, but it creaks when you try to twist it.
The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is nice and lightweight for its size.
Connectivity – Including eSIM support
In Europe, where this test was carried out, only the version with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB UFS 2.2 storage is available. In Asia, there is also a version with 12 GB RAM.
Internally, its USB-C port is only connected via the USB 2.0 standard, so it can't control a monitor. Data transfers are also comparatively slow.
NFC is on board, so you can easily use mobile payment services or verify yourself in corresponding apps using an ID card equipped with an NFC chip.
Although there is only one nano SIM slot in the Edge 60 Fusion, you can set up an eSIM profile so you can use two SIM cards simultaneously.
microSD card reader
The phone's storage can be expanded via a microSD card. We tested the reader using our Angelbird V60 reference card.
The Edge 60 Fusion actually delivered quite stable transfer rates and a good average read speed during the copying test.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Software – Average update promise
Android 15 comes pre-installed on the Edge 60 Fusion—the manufacturer has only changed Google's operating system slightly and outsourced its own functions to separate apps so they can be updated more easily.
The smartphone is set to be given 4 years of security updates and 3 new Android versions until March 2029, i.e. until Android 18. That's a decent promise, although Samsung is well ahead in this price range with 6 years of updates.
Some third-party apps come pre-installed for advertising purposes, but these can be easily removed. What is more annoying is that you are asked to install additional apps during setup. The user interface is also designed in such a way that you can click and install the apps by mistake, which isn't very user-friendly.
At the time of testing, the latest security patches were from March 2025, which is still within the 2-month update cycle promised by the manufacturer.
Sustainability
Motorola has chosen a plain white box printed with soy ink. The phone's packaging doesn't contain any plastic. However, it does feature a shimmery effect print, which may not be so environmentally friendly. It's nice that Motorola has used recycled plastic for the included bumper.
We couldn't find a report on its exact CO2 footprint, nor on the materials used in the device.
Motorola has entered into a cooperation with iFixit for self-repair and spare parts supply, where you can find spare parts—albeit only for older phones. The same can be said for online retailers, where spare parts are more likely to be available for phones that are at least 2 years old.
Communication and GNSS – Slow despite WiFi 6
The smartphone supports the WiFi 6 standard, but only with one receiving and one transmitting channel (1x1 MIMO). As a result, its transfer rates are only slightly higher than devices with WiFi 5 and were around 320-400 MBit/s during our test. This is sufficient for everyday use, but if you want to make the most of your gigabit internet connection, you'll be left out in the cold.
Full reception is available close to the router—even large websites load reasonably quickly and when scrolling, you only have to wait a short time for images to appear. At a distance of 10 meters and through 3 walls, half the phone's signal strength is still available and websites load more slowly.
5G is available as its fastest mobile communications standard. So many LTE and 5G frequencies are supported that you can take the phone abroad without hesitation, and you will most likely be able to use it on the local mobile network. We monitored its reception during our test period and compared it with high-end phones. The phone performed quite well, achieving signal strengths similar to more expensive phones.
Networking | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Let's take a look at its locating accuracy: If you step outside, you are very quickly located to within one meter. The SBAS system, which increases accuracy, is a big help here.
Our practical test consisted of a bike ride, during which we took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch with us to compare, as it's known for its precise location services. In this case, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion did quite well locating us in open terrain and only occasionally cut a corner or two.
In the narrow old-town streets, on the other hand, the phone struggled and often placed us incorrectly.
Overall, the cell phone can indeed be used for navigation, but you shouldn't expect complete accuracy.
Telephone functions and call quality – Clear conversations
Motorola uses the standard Android app for making calls, so it should be easy to find your way around the phone after switching from lots of other cell phone brands.
The device's call quality via the earpiece is clear, and the microphone picked up our voice reliably and forwarded it to the other party without interference during our test. Its sound is also clear via the hands-free microphone and loudspeaker, but you just need to make sure not to speak too quietly.
Cameras – Less flexible, but with good photo quality
As with its predecessor, the Edge 60 Fusion comes with a 50-megapixel main camera. Its photos are colorful and sharp, and are able to reproduce the lighting atmosphere well. Even in low light and high contrasts, the phone works reliably with good sharpness and a decent dynamic range.
In contrast to more expensive phones, however, it lacks a real zoom lens or at least a telephoto focal length. This makes the system somewhat less flexible in terms of image composition.
4K videos can be recorded at a maximum of 30 fps. Here too, the picture looks very sharp and the autofocus reacts quickly and almost invisibly.
The phone's wide-angle camera has a resolution of 13 megapixels and takes photos with a medium level of detail, which look decent overall and also capture the lighting atmosphere well.
Furthermore, selfies look similarly high quality, although we noted a slight lack of dynamics in darker areas in this case.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle cameraIn our lab, the test photo depicted medium sharpness and a slight red cast. However, the contrast was very good and even small text remained easy to read. The camera's color reproduction was a little too dark, but overall, it was still well rendered.
In very low light, rough details of the subject were still recognizable.


Accessories and warranty – Protective case included
Motorola doesn't include a charger with the phone, but it does come with a hard plastic protective cover. There is also a USB-C cable and a SIM tool in the box.
The phone is covered by a 12-month warranty in the United States.
Input devices and operation – Speedy touchscreen
Thanks to the touchscreen's 120 Hz refresh rate and 300 Hz sampling rate, the Edge 60 Fusion can be operated very smoothly and responds promptly. Plus, the touchscreen is sensitive right into the corners and along the edges. However, the risk of accidental inputs is slightly increased due to the glass being pulled over the edges of the phone. Even so, during our test, the system was able to distinguish well between intentional and unintentional inputs.
A fingerprint sensor is hidden behind the phone's display, which works very accurately and quickly recognizes a print once it has been saved. The screen is then unlocked with almost no waiting time. Facial unlocking is also supported, but only using the front camera without an auxiliary sensor, making it more susceptible to manipulation.
Display – Bright OLED
According to the manufacturer, the 6.67-inch P-OLED display can achieve a brightness of up to 4,500 cd/m² when depicting very small white areas; in our test, on the other hand, we noted a maximum of 1,543 cd/m². When depicting very large white areas, its brightness was similarly high at an average of 1,280.6 cd/m², so it's sufficient for displaying HDR content.
We measured PWM flickering at low brightness levels, albeit at a relatively high frequency of 716.2 Hz. Sensitive people should nevertheless try out the screen before buying.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1281 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.062
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion P-OLED, 2712x1200, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G85 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 12% | 8% | 7% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 1281 | 1213 -5% | 1138 -11% | 1207 -6% | 1184 -8% |
Brightness | 1281 | 1190 -7% | 1137 -11% | 1177 -8% | 1179 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 97 3% | 94 0% | 99 5% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.47 | 1.36 7% | 1.1 25% | 1.36 7% | 1.7 -16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.14 | 2.3 27% | 2.6 17% | 2.8 11% | 3.2 -2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.1 50% | 1.6 27% | 1.4 36% | 2.4 -9% |
Gamma | 2.062 107% | 2.254 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6628 98% | 6624 98% | 6284 103% | 6591 99% | 6544 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 716.2 Hz Amplitude: 45 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 716.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 716.2 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).
In our lab tests using the CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the Edge 60 Fusion performed quite well. We couldn't detect a visible color cast in its display—at most just some small deviations.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
The display does well outdoors on cloudy days, and content remains clearly legible. Nevertheless, some reflections are visible, so working in the shade still feels more pleasant.
Its viewing angles are fine, and we didn't notice any color shift even at very flat viewing angles.
Performance – Good performance for the class
Motorola has opted for a fairly modern mid-range SoC in the shape of the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, which is also used in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, for example. As a result, it delivers more performance than its predecessor, the Edge 50 Fusion, securing it one of the top spots in most benchmarks.
The Edge 60 Fusion usually runs smoothly, with waiting times only occurring with multiple apps running simultaneously or when very demanding tasks are performed.
The SoC also performs well for the affordable mid-range when it comes to AI calculations.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (8087 - 27964, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (231 - 1106, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (231 - 4555, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 4549, n=5, last 2 years) |
AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12578, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (232 - 577, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G |
In terms of graphics performance, users get what they would expect from a phone in this price range in 2025, but no more than that.
As such, the Edge 60 Fusion can run the majority of apps. However, if you're looking to perform very demanding tasks, you'll probably have to look for a more powerful device.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 |
Websites load quite quickly and images generally appear in no time. You may have to face some short waiting times from time to time but overall, surfing the web on the Motorola phone is a smooth and pleasant experience.
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 401, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (n=1) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (76.5 - 130, n=4) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5.6 - 8.19, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (56 - 118, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (22739 - 37949, n=7) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1066 - 2154, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) |
* ... smaller is better
Although the device's UFS 2.2 storage isn't one of the fastest modules currently available, it enables reasonably short loading times and good transfer speeds when copying.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | Motorola Moto G85 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -6% | -5% | -31% | -14% | 54% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 967.4 | 967.8 0% | 1009.67 4% | 529.8 -45% | 905 ? -6% | 2054 ? 112% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 908.8 | 800.5 -12% | 833.64 -8% | 525.3 -42% | 725 ? -20% | 1667 ? 83% |
Random Read 4KB | 272.1 | 281.5 3% | 248.81 -9% | 220.7 -19% | 231 ? -15% | 286 ? 5% |
Random Write 4KB | 286.9 | 241.4 -16% | 266.92 -7% | 237 -17% | 241 ? -16% | 327 ? 14% |
Games – 60fps is sometimes possible
When gaming, you shouldn't choose games that are too demanding, or at least only play them in low details.
We noted a relatively stable 60fps when running PUBG Mobile, for example, with very low settings. When playing Genshin Impact, on the other hand, you'll have to make do with 30fps even at minimum settings, and stutters can't be ruled out.
We measured the frame rates using the GameBench software.
Emissions – Hardly any throttling on the Edge 60 Fusion
Temperature
We ran the phone under full load for a longer period of time to see how the temperatures on its case develop. The maximum temperature rise we noted was actually lower than its predecessor, the Edge 50 Fusion, at a maximum of 42.4 °C. Although this is noticeable, it is by no means a problem.
Our test device performed similarly well in the 3DMark stress tests and wasn't throttled even after numerous runs of the benchmarks.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Motorola Moto G85 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G |
Speakers
The speaker on the bottom edge of the phone is supported by the earphones, creating slight stereo effects when the device is held horizontally. The sound is good—not terribly powerful, but balanced and it remains reasonably clear and differentiated even at maximum volume.
Speaking of volume: the speakers can get loud enough to fill a medium-sized room with sound. The Edge 60 Fusion also provides slightly more bass and treble than its predecessor, making its sound more interesting and fuller.
External playback devices can be connected via USB-C or Bluetooth. This works without any problems and sounds great. All common Bluetooth codecs are supported, so you can almost certainly connect your headphones in good quality.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery life – Lasts a little longer
Power consumption
At first glance, the Edge 60 Fusion looks like a conventional smartphone in terms of its energy consumption, but it actually consumes very little power, especially under full load.
It can be charged at a maximum of 68 watts, although no charger is included. Still, the phone got on well with the chargers in our test lab, and a full charging process took just under an hour with a suitably powerful charger.
The mid-range phone doesn't support wireless charging.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion 5200 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Moto G85 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -33% | -17% | -4% | -70% | -7% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1 | 1 -0% | 1.17 -17% | 1 -0% | 0.72 28% | 0.938 ? 6% | 0.872 ? 13% |
Idle Average * | 1.3 | 1.3 -0% | 1.38 -6% | 1.2 8% | 1.45 -12% | 1.368 ? -5% | 1.415 ? -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 1.9 -19% | 1.41 12% | 1.4 12% | 1.49 7% | 1.497 ? 6% | 1.556 ? 3% |
Load Average * | 2.9 | 5.1 -76% | 3.58 -23% | 3.4 -17% | 9.68 -234% | 3.18 ? -10% | 7.04 ? -143% |
Load Maximum * | 5.6 | 9.4 -68% | 8.44 -51% | 6.8 -21% | 13.39 -139% | 7.26 ? -30% | 10.6 ? -89% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Runtimes
Compared to its predecessor, the phone's battery has gotten slightly bigger and can now provide 5,200 mAh. Its runtimes have increased accordingly—especially under load, the phone now lasts quite long at 5:29 hours, so we can recommend it for intensive gamers who are often on the move.
During everyday life with normal use, you can expect to go two days without a power outlet, or a day of using the phone on your couch without needing to reach for a charging cable.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion 5200 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Moto G85 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 1% | -8% | 40% | |
Reader / Idle | 1966 | 1874 -5% | 1754 -11% | 1974 0% | 3173 61% |
H.264 | 1161 | 1158 0% | 1423 23% | 1114 -4% | 2506 116% |
WiFi v1.3 | 1023 | 966 -6% | 1206 18% | 894 -13% | 1199 17% |
Load | 329 | 297 -10% | 236 -28% | 286 -13% | 215 -35% |
Notebookcheck total rating

The Edge 60 Fusion is a very stylish mid-range phone with a good camera.
Compared to its predecessor, it shows improved battery life and performance.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- 04/26/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.99 QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Motoro... 2. $7.99 Anoowkoa 2 pack for Moto Edg... 3. $9.88 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr... List Price: 329€ | 178 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1200 445 PPI P-OLED | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.58 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Ultra High D... 2. $13.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 3. $8.99 NECARSIN 2 Pack for Motorola... List Price: 399€ | 175 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" 2400x1080 393 PPI P-OLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 2. $7.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. $11.39 ($5.70 / Count) Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 400€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED | |
Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $249.50 List Price: 349€ | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 405 PPI P-OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.95 NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa... 2. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 3. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 479€ | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.