Notebookcheck Logo
Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone review (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G review – A feature-focused smartphone for bargain hunters

The twin becomes a problem.

The Redmi Note 14 Pro is an affordable mid-range phone with premium features, rare at this price. However, Xiaomi has made some compromises. Find out where it excels and where it falls short in our review.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Sebastian Jankowski (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Verdict

When holding the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, it feels more like a premium mid-range device than its specs suggest. The robust casing, narrow display bezels, and Corning flagship protective glass are rare in affordable Android phones. It also excels in key daily-use areas like display, speakers, and battery life.

However, those seeking high performance and fast storage may quickly look elsewhere, as the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G falls short in these areas. Even with a significant price drop soon after launch, its technical specs aren’t particularly compelling.

The Poco X7, a nearly identical twin, is noticeably cheaper, raising the question: Why choose the Note 14 Pro over the Poco? The 200 MP camera system doesn’t provide a strong reason either—at least not in its current state under HyperOS 1.0, where photo quality remains underwhelming.

Pros

+ bright OLED panel with PWM dimming
+ long runtimes
+ robust casing
+ good speakers
+ stable performance ...

Cons

- ... but SoC lame for the price range
- slow WLAN
- only USB 2.0
- so far Android 14
- Update guarantee could be longer

Price and availability

The Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G has an RRP of $400 for the base model (8GB RAM, 256GB storage), while the top variant (12 GB RAM, 512 GB storage) is priced at $450. However, just a few weeks after launch, street prices have already dropped to around $300, including on Amazon US and from Xiaomi Germany.

Amazon Logo
$6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Protector for Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G with Camera Lens Protector,3D Full Coverage HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G Screen Protector
  • $7.99
    Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Protector for Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G/4G/Poco X7 5G with Camera Lens Protector,3D Full Coverage HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Screen Protector
  • $11.39 ($5.70 / Count)
    Ibywind Screen Protector For Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G/Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G 6.67"(2 Pcs),Flexible TPU Film,With 1Pc Camera Lens Protector,1Pc Back Film,Bubble Free[Easy to install]

Possible competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
77.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $7.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
3. $11.39 ($5.70 / Count)
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
List Price: 400€
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
2.
77.7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $6.99
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi Poc...
3. $11.39
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
185.5 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
3.
74.7%
Motorola Moto G85
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $249.50
List Price: 349€
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
405 PPI
P-OLED
4.
79.9%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 429€190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2400x1080
393 PPI
AMOLED
5.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $5.98
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
6.
85.8% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $359.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $319.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
3. $7.89
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi R...
List Price: 399€
187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

With the Redmi Note 14 Pro, Xiaomi once again aims to push mid-range smartphones closer to the premium segment. The key selling points are features rarely found at this price, including a 200 MP camera, an ultra-bright 3,000-nit AMOLED display, and a durable, well-built casing.

Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G comes in configurations with 8 GB or 12 GB RAM and 256 GB or 512 GB of storage.

Specifications of the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDD4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 227 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, Miracast, eSIM
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.55 x 162.33 x 74.42 ( = 0.34 x 6.39 x 2.93 in)
Battery
5110 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.65, IOS, Videos @2160p/​30fps) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 2 MPix (f/2.4, macro lens), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (FF, f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR valu: 0.994W/​kg Head, 0.992W/​kg Body; Widevine L1, GNSS: Beidou: B1I|GPS: L1|Galileo: E1 | GLONASS: G1|QZSS: L1, SBAS, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5, HDR: Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, fanless, waterproof
Weight
190 g ( = 6.7 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 87 g ( = 3.07 oz / 0.19 pounds)
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Xiaomi smartphone with IP rating

Color selection of the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Color selection of the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

The Redmi Note 14 Pro aims to set new durability standards in its price range. It features an IP68 water-resistant casing that also protects against dust ingress. According to Xiaomi, the phone is designed to be particularly robust, with an aluminum composite frame and a steel-reinforced structure that enhances impact resistance. Another standout feature is the Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 display cover, which offers high durability and is rarely found in this price segment.

Xiaomi has also incorporated energy-absorbing foam and polymer buffer materials to further protect the display. These materials act as shock absorbers, reducing the risk of screen breakage. The screen itself occupies around 89% of the phone's front, a top-tier ratio for an affordable mid-range device. In comparison, the Galaxy A35 and Nothing Phone 2a Plus have screen-to-body ratios of just under 85% and 87%, respectively.

In the US, the Redmi Note 14 Pro is available in three color variants. Our test sample features a PU leather look, while the other two options have a roughened plastic back. The finish is visually appealing, and the artificial leather on the back does not feel cheap.

Test Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Size comparison

162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 185.5 g0.409 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 76.3 mm / 3 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 209 g0.4608 lbs161.9 mm / 6.37 in 73.1 mm / 2.88 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 171 g0.377 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 74.3 mm / 2.93 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 187 g0.4123 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G with USB 2.0

The Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G offers an impressive feature set for a mid-range smartphone. It supports Dolby Vision, has an NFC chip for contactless payments, Miracast, an IR blaster, and Bluetooth 5.4 with support for Sony's LDAC and LHDC codecs. However, compared to the Note 13 Pro, the 3.5 mm headphone jack has been removed, and storage specifications remain unchanged. Xiaomi still relies on UFS 2.2 and LPDDR4X, despite the Dimensity 7300's memory controller theoretically supporting faster LPDDR5 at up to 6,400 MHz and UFS 3.1.

The phone also lags behind premium devices due to its slow USB 2.0 standard, which does not support wired image output. However, USB OTG is available. In our file transfer test using a Samsung 980 Pro NVMe M.2 SSD, the USB port achieved a low transfer speed of just 30 MB/s. On the plus side, the Note 14 Pro 5G is compatible with the exFAT and NTFS file systems, making it more convenient for Microsoft-based systems.

right side of the case (buttons: volume, on/off)
right side of the case (buttons: volume, on/off)
left side of case
left side of case
upper side (microphone, loudspeaker, IR blaster, microphone)
upper side (microphone, loudspeaker, IR blaster, microphone)
lower side (loudspeaker, USB port, microphone, card slot)
lower side (loudspeaker, USB port, microphone, card slot)

Software - Xiaomi phone still runs Android 14

The Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G will receive security updates for four years and operating system upgrades up to Android 17. At the time of testing, the device runs Android 14 with HyperOS 1.09.

The security patches are from January 2025, but Redmi phones have historically had inconsistent update speed and reliability. Starting in February 2025, an OTA update will bring Android 15, including AI-powered enhancements for photos and videos such as AI Bokeh, AI Film, and AI Erase Pro. Additionally, Xiaomi Interconnectivity is not present in the Android 14 settings menus.

Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone

Sustainability

Xiaomi does not provide detailed information on the materials used, their recycling rate, or the smartphone’s CO₂ footprint over its life cycle. However, the packaging appears plastic-free, though it comes wrapped in a protective film from the factory.

The company claims to have increased its use of recycled materials, including aluminum, gold, and copper, across all its smartphones. Additionally, it promotes the use of bio-based high-polymer materials and recycled plastic from discarded fishing nets to reduce environmental impact. However, these sustainability claims do not specifically apply to the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G.

Communication and GNSS - Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G only with WiFi 6

In terms of connectivity, the Note 14 Pro 5G is not perfectly future-proof. With the WiFi 6 standard lacking support for the fast 6 GHz range and only one receive and transmit channel (1x1 MIMO), the Xiaomi phone delivers rather slow transfer rates. In the test with our reference router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, we achieved a peak speed of only around 400 MBit/s. Nevertheless, the data rates are largely stable.

The mid-range phone can access the mobile data network with the 5G standard, provided such networks are available; multiple bands are supported. The band configuration in the 4G network is also appealing for the mid-range and all frequencies relevant for English-speaking countries are available. The Note 14 Pro 5G is even well equipped for a stay abroad with 21 LTE bands.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
976 (949min - 996max) MBit/s +144%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=140)
859 MBit/s +115%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +109%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=184, last 2 years)
730 MBit/s +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
678 (544min - 711max) MBit/s +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
400 (196min - 413max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
398 (193min - 410max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
361 (316min, 320.06P1 - 373max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
866 (728min - 921max) MBit/s +131%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=138)
831 MBit/s +122%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +121%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=182, last 2 years)
720 MBit/s +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
581 (491min - 618max) MBit/s +55%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
377 (187min - 380max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
375 (361min - 380max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (322min, 323.74P1 - 347max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=81, last 2 years)
1430 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (614 - 1902, n=21)
1256 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
946 (497min - 1015max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=81, last 2 years)
1372 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (743 - 1816, n=21)
1228 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
928 (893min - 940max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø393 (196-413)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (544-711)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø374 (361-380)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (491-618)
Localization in the building
Localization in the building
Outdoor localization
Outdoor localization

To test the positioning accuracy, we took the Note 14 Pro 5G on a walk and compared its results with a Garmin Venu 2. The phone determined its position with an accuracy of one meter, but some deviations were noticeable along the route. Since the Note 14 Pro 5G relies on single-band GNSS, it occasionally shortened the path, particularly when changing direction. Despite this, the phone remains reliable for general navigation tasks. 

Garmin Venu 2 vs. Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Garmin Venu 2 vs. Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Phone functions and voice quality - Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G with eSIM

Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone

The Note 14 Pro 5G delivers natural voice quality with effective ambient noise suppression, though it struggles with very loud or high-frequency noises. It supports two physical nano-SIM cards or an eSIM, enabling dual SIM functionality. Features like VoWiFi and VoLTE are also available on the device. 

Cameras - Xiaomi phone with 200 megapixels

Selfie with the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Selfie with the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

The 20 MP front camera, which lacks pixel binning despite its high resolution, captures detailed photos in everyday use. HDR processing and exposure adjustments perform well, even in direct sunlight. However, the absence of autofocus and the lack of a 4K video recording option slightly diminish the overall experience of the Note 14 Pro's selfie camera.

A standout feature for the mid-range is the 200 MP Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor. In the Redmi Note 14 Pro, this 1/1.4-inch sensor uses 16-in-1 pixel binning by default to compensate for its small native pixel size of just 0.56 micrometers.

0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
4x
4x
10x
10x
30x (max)
30x (max)
200 MPix mode
200 MPix mode
Macro
Macro

The optically stabilized main camera captures a high level of detail in daylight, but images tend to appear overly sharpened. Sharpness at the edges and color saturation, particularly in green and blue tones, are not optimal. Image quality also deteriorates significantly in low-light conditions.

One benefit of the 200 MP ISOCELL HP3 sensor is the ability to achieve 2x and 4x zoom without a dedicated telephoto lens. However, the sensor crop is only effective in very good lighting conditions. The same limitation applies to the 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera, which struggles with noticeable image distortions even in daylight. Color reproduction and dynamic range are also lacking, and the fixed focus prevents it from being used for close-up shots, leaving the 2 MP macro sensor as the only option for macro photography.

Video recording is limited to 4K resolution at a maximum of 30 fps with the main camera. While image quality is decent and autofocus performs reliably, switching between the main and ultra-wide lens is not possible during recording, even in 1080p mode, requiring users to select their preferred lens before filming.

Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main sensorMain sensorUltra wide angleLow LightZoom 5x

Under controlled lighting conditions, we analyze the color reproduction of the 200 MP main camera by comparing it to actual reference colors. The Note 14 Pro 5G exhibits the typical smartphone tendency to brighten images, with some noticeable deviations in certain shades. While the camera software generally maintains a satisfactory level of color accuracy for a mid-range device, some significant outliers in color fidelity, exceeding a deviation of 15 in the ColorChecker Passport test, are evident. 

ColorChecker
8.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G: 9.38 ∆E min: 2.83 - max: 20.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
59.6 ∆E
61.8 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
43 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
71.3 ∆E
40 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
73.7 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
24 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G: 43.34 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 73.71 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Xiaomi smartphone without power adapter

No charger is included
No charger is included

In Germany which is where we conducted our testing, the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G comes with a protective case (black), a tool for ejecting the SIM card, a user manual (including warranty information) and a pre-installed protective film as well as a data cable.

The warranty period is 12 months. Xiaomi's own Care Accidental Damage and Care Accidental Damage + Theft can be added (from 44 euros) when purchased from the manufacturer's store.

Input devices and operation - Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G with Face Unlock

Inputs on the 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED display are registered accurately, even at the edges of the touchscreen. With a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, the Note 14 Pro 5G delivers mostly smooth performance in daily use, making animations appear fluid. However, occasional stutters are noticeable.

The OLED panel has a high sampling rate of up to 480 Hz, ensuring a quick response to touch inputs. In gaming mode, Xiaomi claims it can reach 2,560 Hz, meaning the touchscreen refreshes up to 2,560 times per second. The haptic feedback, provided by an X-axis linear vibration motor, is precise and stands out in this price range.

For biometric unlocking, the phone features an in-display fingerprint sensor that supports up to five fingers. The optical fingerprint recognition worked reliably in testing, with minimal delay in waking the display from standby, though a slightly higher positioning would have been preferable. The device also includes AI-based face recognition using the front camera, but as it relies on 2D imaging, it lacks secure authentication features.

Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone
Test Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G smartphone

Display - Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G with OLED

The OLED displays are based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green light-emitting diode.
The OLED displays are based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green light-emitting diode.

The 12-bit panel of the Note 14 Pro 5G has a 1,220p resolution with a 20:9 aspect ratio and a pixel density of 446 PPI, which is sharp enough for its size. The refresh rate does not adjust dynamically, but users can switch between 120 Hz and 60 Hz manually.

In our measurements, the Note 14 Pro 5G does not set brightness records, but it still performs well for a mid-range device. With the ambient light sensor activated and a pure white image displayed, we recorded a brightness of 1,154 cd/m², which aligns with Xiaomi’s claimed 1,200 nits (HBM). When displaying a mix of bright and dark areas (APL18 pattern), the luminance remained similar at 1,140 cd/m². While we did not reach the advertised peak brightness of 3,000 nits, the Note 14 Pro 5G still managed a strong 2,510 cd/m² when playing HDR content.

Xiaomi sources its displays from multiple suppliers, including CSOT, Tianma, and Visionox, so there may be slight variations between different production batches.

1133
cd/m²
1131
cd/m²
1152
cd/m²
1140
cd/m²
1138
cd/m²
1154
cd/m²
1132
cd/m²
1127
cd/m²
1124
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1154 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1138 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G85
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-3%
-2%
-26%
-30%
-25%
Brightness middle
1138
1156
2%
1207
6%
1034
-9%
904
-21%
1205
6%
Brightness
1137
1150
1%
1177
4%
1038
-9%
912
-20%
1177
4%
Brightness Distribution
97
98
1%
94
-3%
96
-1%
97
0%
90
-7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.1
-0%
1.36
-24%
1.8
-64%
2.1
-91%
1.51
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
3.1
-19%
2.8
-8%
3.9
-50%
2.8
-8%
4.07
-57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.6
-0%
1.4
12%
2
-25%
2.2
-38%
2.5
-56%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.1 105%
2.175 101%
CCT
6284 103%
6304 103%
6591 99%
6803 96%
6478 100%
6407 101%

* ... smaller is better

The PWM process used by OLED screens can cause discomfort for sensitive users, leading to fatigue, eye strain, or headaches due to screen flickering. To mitigate these effects, Xiaomi has implemented high-frequency 1,920 Hz PWM dimming in the Note 14 Pro 5G, which our measurements confirm. Additionally, the device features a finely tuned 20,000-step brightness adjustment to ensure smooth and eye-friendly transitions in brightness levels.

The Xiaomi phone also holds triple certification from TÜV Rheinland, covering flicker-free operation, circadian-friendly lighting, and low blue light emissions.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %
Secondary Frequency: 1851 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

A series of measurements were taken with a fixed zoom level and varying brightness settings. The amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, but this is due to scaling. The info box provides an enlarged view of the amplitude at minimum brightness for a more detailed analysis.

HyperOS provides extensive customization options for the display, allowing users to choose from three color profiles, adjust the white balance, and adapt the color temperature to ambient lighting. In the "Pro" profile, the most precise calibration was achieved in our tests by accurately controlling the P3 color space. Both grayscale and color accuracy showed very low DeltaE values on the Note 14 Pro 5G, with minimal visible differences compared to reference data.

Color space (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Color space (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Color saturation (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Color saturation (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Color accuracy (profile: standard, target color space: P3)
Color accuracy (profile: standard, target color space: P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7025 ms rise
↘ 0.576 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8075 ms rise
↘ 0.724 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

The AMOLED screen maintains good color stability even at shallow viewing angles. While there is some brightness loss, it remains minimal. Thanks to its high brightness and strong contrast, the Note 14 Pro 5G is easy to read outdoors, with enough brightness reserves to handle bright summer conditions. Under winter lighting, reflections do not significantly impact readability, though the curved edges of the display can still produce some noticeable reflections. 

Performance - Xiaomi phone relies on Mediatek

The Note 14 Pro 5G is powered by the Dimensity 7300, built on 4nm technology, but its performance is underwhelming for this price range. In our benchmarks, the mid-range phone delivers modest results, with the Cortex-A78 cores of the MediaTek processor particularly struggling in the Geekbench multi-core test.

The similarly priced Poco X7 Pro, equipped with the Dimensity 8400, offers significantly better performance. Even the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Note 13 Pro 5G performs only slightly weaker than the Dimensity 7300. Additionally, MediaTek's SoC does not stand out in AI benchmarks, making it a less compelling choice for performance-focused users.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1598 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=205, last 2 years)
1544 Points +48%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1221 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1043 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (541 - 1054, n=8)
977 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
940 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
6239 Points +116%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=205, last 2 years)
4401 Points +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2891 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1906 - 3098, n=8)
2799 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2678 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
2067 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1160 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2437, n=160, last 2 years)
1094 Points +35%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
889 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
811 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (726 - 817, n=4)
788 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
783 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
726 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
703 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5284 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=160, last 2 years)
3693 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2989 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (2741 - 2989, n=4)
2890 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2741 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2678 Points -10%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1922 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1917 Points -36%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1695493 Points +168%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +106%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
765520 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (598120 - 667282, n=7)
647012 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
631545 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
566071 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
481436 Points -24%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
14805 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13982 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (11724 - 15834, n=7)
13957 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
13701 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13421 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
12367 Points -8%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1287 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +40%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
751 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
709 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (390 - 759, n=6)
667 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
619 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8278 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)
6801 Points +36%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5192 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5056 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4983 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (4432 - 5117, n=5)
4808 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
4147 Points -17%
System
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10784 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)
10640 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
10410 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8743 - 10784, n=5)
9223 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8761 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
8686 Points -19%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6847 Points -37%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8484 Points +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)
7516 Points +58%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5293 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
5162 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (4432 - 6297, n=5)
5013 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4768 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4595 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -10%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
36491 Points +323%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
19418 Points +125%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
13376 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8632 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8564 - 8632, n=5)
8589 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7168 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
4772 Points -45%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1905 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1731 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)
1612 Points +16%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1453 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1387 Points
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1382 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1130 - 1462, n=5)
1363 Points -2%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
49010 Points +506%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
27837 Points +244%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8087 - 27964, n=5)
19676 Points +143%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points +125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
8618 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8087 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
5689 Points -30%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
29244 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
27735 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (n=1)
14587 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
13748 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
691 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
421 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5141 Points +2116%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=44, last 2 years)
4248 Points +1731%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (232 - 577, n=4)
394 Points +70%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
232 Points

The Dimensity 7300's graphics unit features a Mali-G615 MP2. In graphics tests, the Note 14 Pro 5G performs better than the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and Galaxy A35 5G, making it a competitive option. However, the Poco X7 Pro once again takes the lead, dominating the benchmarks in this category.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3691 Points +318%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1372 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
883 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
842 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
788 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
410 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3840 Points +341%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1388 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
871 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
800 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
418 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4789 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3211 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3141 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3039 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1575 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6358 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1272 Points +242%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
523 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
372 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6996 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5641 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5468 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4156 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3852 Points -30%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20018 Points +286%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9887 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5455 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5220 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5187 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14161 Points +168%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5308 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5287 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4993 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1752 Points -67%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
90 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
568 fps +385%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
166 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -16%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
243 fps +193%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +190%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
199 fps +243%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +279%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +259%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps +306%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +259%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +272%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +273%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -44%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +278%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.8 fps -49%

The Note 14 Pro 5G performs poorly in browser benchmarks, but in everyday use, browsing speed remains satisfactory. Loading times for complex web pages are not excessively slow, and scrolling is generally smooth.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
137.7 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
117.292 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +35%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
110.527 Points +29%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)
105.736 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
85.453 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (60.2 - 108.5, n=4)
85.4 Points 0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +92%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)
10.1 runs/min +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5.6 - 8.19, n=5)
6.94 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
6.56 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -11%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
5.55 runs/min -15%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +34%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)
127 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
115 Points +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (56 - 118, n=5)
96.8 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
96 Points
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
95 Points -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
43074 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
35379 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
34162 Points +18%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)
33203 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (22739 - 37949, n=7)
30520 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
28945 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1066 - 2154, n=5)
1425 ms * -5%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
1351.21 ms *
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128)
1172.11 ms * +13%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
1172 ms * +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
1170.6 ms * +13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +19%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS storage in the Note 14 Pro 5G delivers solid performance, but given its $400 price point, UFS 3.1 would have been expected. The Dimensity 7300 SoC supports this faster standard, making Xiaomi’s decision to stick with UFS 2.2 somewhat disappointing.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GMotorola Moto G85Nothing Phone (2a) PlusSamsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-27%
17%
-49%
-8%
-10%
60%
Sequential Read 256KB
1009.67
529.8
-48%
1037.34
3%
529.32
-48%
946.8
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
833.64
525.3
-37%
954.87
15%
270
-68%
808.2
-3%
725 ?(369 - 913, n=40)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
248.81
220.7
-11%
298.12
20%
244.24
-2%
239.2
-4%
Random Write 4KB
266.92
237
-11%
345.83
30%
62.59
-77%
220.5
-17%

Games - Xiaomi smartphone only manages 60 fps

Beyond benchmark results, we tested the performance of the Mali GPU with real-world gaming using our partner GameBench to measure exact frame rates in selected Play Store games.

High frame rate (HFR) gaming is not possible on the Note 14 Pro 5G, but lighter titles like PUBG Mobile run smoothly at 60 FPS on low settings. More demanding games, such as Genshin Impact, are playable at lower graphics settings, though noticeable frame rate drops occur, affecting overall smoothness.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø49.9 (25-62)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø39.8 (18-53)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (52-62)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.7 (33-41)

Emissions - Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G hardly throttles at all

Temperature

We did not observe any throttling in the 3DMark stress tests for the Xiaomi phone, and surface temperatures remained relatively low during our load scenario with the Burnout benchmark. However, performance drops under sustained load are uncommon in this price range, and our comparison devices also maintained consistent performance levels.

Max. Load
 41.3 °C
106 F
40.9 °C
106 F
37.6 °C
100 F
 
 39.4 °C
103 F
41 °C
106 F
36.6 °C
98 F
 
 39.3 °C
103 F
38.7 °C
102 F
35.1 °C
95 F
 
Maximum: 41.3 °C = 106 F
Average: 38.9 °C = 102 F
34.8 °C
95 F
37.7 °C
100 F
37.3 °C
99 F
34.6 °C
94 F
36.7 °C
98 F
37.4 °C
99 F
32.1 °C
90 F
36.4 °C
98 F
37.2 °C
99 F
Maximum: 37.7 °C = 100 F
Average: 36 °C = 97 F
Power Supply (max.)  29 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 %
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.03 (5.01-5.04)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.5 (18.3-18.6)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.53 (2.5-2.54)

Speakers

The Note 14 Pro 5G features a dual-speaker system with Dolby Atmos, delivering decent sound quality for a mid-range device. Our Pink Noise measurement shows a linear frequency response in the highs, though the mids could be more balanced. The speakers also provide some depth with minimal bass presence.

For external audio playback, users can connect devices via the wired USB port or wirelessly through Bluetooth 5.4, which supports a wide range of codecs.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203340.92527.536.63122.8394026.3395036.437.76321.137.38020.739.210019.641.412512.643.116016.350.320016.35125013.153.531512.458.34001062.150010.870.963012.473.280011.975.8100011.681.3125012.483.4160011.679.1200011.379.8250011.977.6315012.179400013.182.9500013.180.9630013.780800013.375.11000013.670.61250013.772.81600014.268.8SPL24.691.5N0.689.5median 12.6median 75.1Delta1.1927.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Xiaomi smartphone charging speed is neither particularly fast nor slow

Power consumption

The Note 14 Pro 5G is equipped with a generous 5,120mAh battery, which can be charged via USB-C at up to 45 watts. However, due to its large capacity, a full charge still takes around 70 minutes. It is somewhat puzzling that Xiaomi opted for slower charging compared to the Note 13 Pro, which supported 67-watt charging. Wireless charging remains unavailable.

The power consumption of the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is unremarkable in both idle and load conditions. However, with over 1 watt of power draw in idle mode, there is still some room for optimization.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.17 / 1.38 / 1.41 Watt
Load midlight 3.58 / 8.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
11%
-8%
-29%
-1%
8%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
1.17
1.09
7%
1
15%
0.86
26%
0.89
24%
1.3
-11%
0.938 ?(0.6 - 1.17, n=6)
20%
Idle Average *
1.38
1.28
7%
1.2
13%
1.56
-13%
1.99
-44%
1.4
-1%
1.368 ?(0.8 - 2.03, n=6)
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.41
1.31
7%
1.4
1%
1.59
-13%
2.14
-52%
1.6
-13%
1.497 ?(1.1 - 2.09, n=6)
-6%
Load Average *
3.58
3.25
9%
3.4
5%
4.52
-26%
4.57
-28%
2.5
30%
3.18 ?(2.9 - 3.58, n=5)
11%
Load Maximum *
8.44
8.62
-2%
6.8
19%
9.58
-14%
12.31
-46%
9.1
-8%
7.26 ?(5.4 - 8.62, n=5)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.51 (1.223-7.48)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.95 (1.383-9.14)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.958-2.99)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.811.11.31.51.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.23.43.6Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.43 (3.19-3.82)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.958-2.99)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

Battery life

The Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G offers excellent battery life in everyday use. In standardized tests with the display brightness set to 150 cd/m², the phone lasts over 20 hours while browsing on Wi-Fi. With continuous video playback offline, it can even reach nearly 24 hours, making it a strong performer in battery efficiency.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 14min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 133)
20h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 56min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
15%
8%
-1%
Reader / Idle
1754
1974
13%
2190
25%
2600
48%
1786
2%
H.264
1423
1114
-22%
1685
18%
1401
-2%
1142
-20%
WiFi v1.3
1206
894
-26%
1104
-8%
902
-25%
1002
-17%
Load
236
286
21%
298
26%
262
11%
307
30%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The strengths of the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G do not lie in performance or camera quality, but its overall user experience is impressive. The device stands out with its robust design, which enhances durability and usability in everyday use. 

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G - 02/14/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
15 / 55 → 26%
Application Performance
59 / 85 → 70%
AI Performance
10%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
71%
Average
62%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G review – A feature-focused smartphone for bargain hunters
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-02-16 (Update: 2025-02-16)