Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Smartphone Review: Near bezel-less mid-range phone with IP68 rating and 30-hour battery life

Shifts boundaries.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G challenges you to throw conventional ideas of a mid-range smartphone overboard. You get extremely thin display edges, a well-protected chassis, a powerful battery, and six years of OS updates. But do you really get a high-end feeling for €400? Let's find out.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G offers a lot of smartphone for a street price of less than €400. Features such as Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for display protection, a straight, nearly borderless display, water and dust protection in accordance with IP68, long battery life of around 30 hours in our practical WLAN test, and six years of security updates are highly impressive in this price.

Plus, an extremely bright AMOLED screen, a decent main camera, usable speakers, and good positioning capability including SBAS for greater accuracy further add to the appeal. The housing only heats up slightly under load and the SoC throttling is quite minimal.

That being said, it helps to note that there are also phones with more power in this price range. This is noticeable in gaming, for example, where you often have to make do with just 40 fps for more demanding games and high settings.

The screen uses PWM flickering but at least tries to mitigate this with DC dimming. You'll have to check whether this suits you personally.

Overall, there is not much to criticize about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G, so it is likely that it will once again be a bestseller this year.

Pros

+ long battery life
+ robust and stylish casing
+ bright AMOLED display with HDR
+ narrow display edges
+ hardly any throttling
+ precise positioning
+ many mobile phone bands
+ reverse charging up to 22.5 W
+ precise in-display fingerprint sensor
+ six years of security updates

Cons

- little power reserves
- PWM flickering
- no microSD slot
- only average WLAN speed
- camera images sometimes not very sharp
- HyperOS with ads and bloatware
- only Android 15 at the moment

Price and availability

Xiaomi wants just under €400 for the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G and this is exactly the price you pay on Amazon DE. An 8 GB + 512 GB SKU can be had from Amazon US for $425.

Other online retailers may offer the Redmi Note 15 Pro at even cheaper prices, with savings of up to €90 in some cases.

Amazon Logo
$424.99
XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 8GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Pro AI Camera Model 25080RABDG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Titanium Color)

Xiaomi's Redmi Note 15 series is set to shake up the mid-range once again, and the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G is at the forefront. Like its predecessor, it puts the competition under pressure with a bright screen, a powerful battery, and good speakers.

But has Xiaomi learned from the weaknesses of the last generation, particularly with respect to the somewhat low performance? Let's find out.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 15 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 4 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.83 inch 19:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, cpacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 2.560 Hz Abtastrate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 211 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 163.6 x 78.1 ( = 0.31 x 6.44 x 3.07 in)
Battery
6580 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 45 Watt charging, 22.5 Watt reverse charging (via cable)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/​1.7, phase shift-AF, OIS, LED flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle (Kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.949W/​kg head, 0.997W/​kg body; IP68 certified; 6 years security updates; eSIM support, fanless, waterproof
Weight
210 g ( = 7.41 oz / 0.46 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
400 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Build: Very robust with clear changes

Visually, the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G differs significantly from its predecessor. The display is no longer stretched across the corners but is now straight and the phone has a metal frame all the way around. 

The screen-to-body ratio has now been improved to 90% and clearly goes beyond the limits of this segment. All that remains is a very narrow black border around the screen, which is barely noticeable.

Other things on the housing are also unusual for the price range. Gorilla Glass Victus 2 is currently one of the best protective glasses for the screen and is installed in the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G. 

Xiaomi has also put a lot of thought into durability and has equipped its phone with multi-stage shock absorption. However, you can twist the phone a little with your bare hands and cause it to creak, which reduces the impression of quality.

The Xiaomi phone is also protected against water and dust in accordance with IP68 standards, so it can be taken for a swim in shallow water. A special function then uses rapid vibrations to eject water and dust from the speakers.

The phone, whose matte back is available in Black, Light blue, and Titanium colors, is somewhat heavier than comparable phones but also comes with a more powerful battery.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Size comparison

163.6 mm / 6.44 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 199 g0.4387 lbs163.6 mm / 6.44 in 78.1 mm / 3.07 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 210 g0.463 lbs162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 78.2 mm / 3.08 in 7.4 mm / 0.2913 in 195 g0.4299 lbs154.1 mm / 6.07 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 175 g0.3858 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Hardware: A lot for €400

There are three storage variants of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G to choose from:

  • 8 GB RAM / 256 GB storage: €399.90
  • 8 GB RAM / 512 GB storage: €429.90
  • 12 GB RAM / 512 GB storage: €449.90

The memory cannot be expanded via microSD.

You can't expect a USB 3.x port in this price range, so there is no option to output an image signal to a display via cable. However, this is easily possible wirelessly via Miracast.

NFC for contactless payments and an infrared port are also on board.

Top: Infrared interface, microphone, loudspeaker
Top: Infrared interface, microphone, loudspeaker
Bottom: Loudspeaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: Loudspeaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot
Left: No connections
Left: No connections
Right: Volume rocker, standby button
Right: Volume rocker, standby button

Software: Up to 6 years of updates

HyperOS 2 comes pre-installed on the smartphone, Xiaomi's in-house software is based on Android 15. This is actually somewhat disappointing, as current smartphones are usually released with Android 16. Even if you have HyperOS 3 on your phone, you should still be wary, as according to Xiaomi, this can be based on Android 15 or Android 16.

The manufacturer promises security updates for six years, i.e. until the beginning of 2032. Since the Redmi Note 12 series still gets Hyper OS 3, but based on Android 15, you should be able to expect at least three major OS updates.

HyperOS does a few things differently to the standard Android but also integrates advertising into some of its system apps. This can only be turned off individually or with a trick. Some third-party apps are also pre-installed for advertising purposes, but these can be uninstalled quite easily.

Software Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Software Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Software Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Software Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Software Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Software Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Sustainability

Xiaomi does not provide any really reliable information about the device's carbon footprint or environment sustainability efforts.

That being said, there is a self-repair portal with instructions and spare parts.

Communication and GNSS: Precise positioning

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G comes with Wi-Fi 6 as the fastest Wi-Fi standard but cannot access the less-used 6 GHz 6E frequency band. Xiaomi has apparently also skimped on the antenna equipment, as the phone only achieves very average speeds of around 300 Mb/s. Other phones in this price range are able to perform much faster.

Xiaomi has enabled many mobile frequencies, so the Redmi phone can also be used when traveling abroad. The reception is usually at a high level in random samples during our test.

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
214 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
364 (min: 246) MBit/s ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
400 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
375 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼31%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
763 (min: 678) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
964 (min: 828) MBit/s ∼70%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
536 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1191 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼63%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
820 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
702 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
727 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1302 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1381 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø214 (175-268)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø364 (246-412)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

If you step outside with the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G, you will be located quickly and with a good accuracy of 2 meters. The SBAS system also helps here for even greater accuracy.

We also carry out our practical navigation test with a walk around the city to which we also take the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch as a comparison device. Due to the weather, this time we take the car for a change.

Xiaomi's phone is very accurate when it comes to positioning, and we only detect deviations before the bridge crossing and on the bridge itself. These are also within an acceptable range, so we have no qualms in recommending the Redmi Note 15 Pro for navigation.

Tracking Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: Overview
Tracking Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: Overview
Tracking Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: Turnaround
Tracking Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: Turnaround
Tracking Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: Bridge
Tracking Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: Bridge
Positioning Garmin Venu 2: Overview
Positioning Garmin Venu 2: Overview
Positioning Garmin Venu 2: Turnaround
Positioning Garmin Venu 2: Turnaround
Positioning Garmin Venu 2: Bridge
Positioning Garmin Venu 2: Bridge

Phone functions and voice quality: Partly muffled

The Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G comes with important phone functions such as VoLTE and VoWiFi. VoNR (telephony via the 5G network) is also supported.

The voice quality is quite good in a test call. However, the other party sometimes sounds a little muffled.

Cameras: 200 MP in a Redmi Note

Recording front camera
Recording front camera

Xiaomi remains faithful to the ISOCELL HP3 as the main sensor of the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G — this was also installed as the main camera in the predecessor.

The 1/1.4-inch sensor uses 16-in-1 pixel binning as standard to achieve larger and more light-sensitive pixels, resulting in a resolution of 12.5 MP in most cases. The full 200 MP resolution can be used in a special mode.

A good quality zoom is possible by simply reducing the image section, allowing the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G to take decent photos at up to 4x magnification even without a telephoto lens.

If you use the main camera without zoom in the standard setting, you get photos with decent brightness dynamics, but the general sharpness is only average. Individual details also appear somewhat washed out. Colors are partially oversaturated.

In low light, the autofocus struggles and sometimes produces blurred photos.

Panoramas can be photographed with a wide-angle camera. However, these look very muddy in detail and should therefore not be enlarged too much.

The selfie camera on the front has a 20 MP resolution. At first glance, the photos appear to be of good quality, although the details are somewhat blurred.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera

Under studio lighting, the sharpness of the test chart is good. Even difficult colors such as red do not cause any problems.

At an illumination level of just 1 lux, the image becomes much coarser, but the subject is still clearly recognizable.

ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: 7.92 ∆E min: 2.16 - max: 14.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: 9.76 ∆E min: 3.04 - max: 16.89 ∆E

Accessories and warranty: With or without charger?

Our test device comes with a charger, as we received it from abroad. However, buyers in the EU should not look forward to this. A case, charging cable, and a SIM tool are included in the package.

Xiaomi grants a 12-month warranty.

Input devices and operation: Precise fingerprint sensor

The 120 Hz screen enables rapid responses to inputs and the touch sampling rate of up to 2,560 Hz makes the touchscreen very precise. Inputs are therefore usually made without delay.

The fingerprint sensor is located behind the screen and is positioned quite close to the edge so that even people with smaller hands can reach it easily. It unlocks the phone almost immediately and very reliably.

Face recognition is also possible. However, this is done without additional sensors via the front camera, so it is not quite as reliable. However, it also worked perfectly in our test.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display: Bright, but with PWM

Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix

The screen is also slightly larger than its predecessor due to the slightly narrower bezels. The resolution is also slightly higher at 2,772 x 1,280 pixels to compensate for this.

In everyday use, the screen is about as bright as its predecessor with a maximum brightness of up to 1,155 cd/m². However, Xiaomi has once again increased the brightness in HDR mode — up to 3,000 cd/m² is now possible in this mode.

Color accuracy, however, is not as good this time around. In the original "Color Pro" mode, there is a slight blue cast. Blue tones in particular deviate slightly from the optimum.

1134
cd/m²
1139
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
1125
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
1136
cd/m²
1137
cd/m²
1129
cd/m²
1122
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1155 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1155 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.42 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.246
CCT: 7263 K
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
pOLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
OnePlus Nord CE 5
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Screen
28%
22%
29%
20%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1155
1138
-1%
1132
-2%
1315
14%
1127
-2%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1136
1137
0%
1114
-2%
1300
14%
1137
0%
Brightness Distribution (%)
97
97
0%
98
1%
97
0%
98
1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.42
1.1
55%
1.55
36%
1.22
50%
1.8
26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.63
2.6
54%
3.28
42%
2.7
52%
2.8
50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
1.6
57%
1.5
59%
2
46%
2.1
43%
Gamma
2.246 98%
2.23 99%
2.107 104%
2.258 97%
2.11 104%
CCT
7263 89%
6284 103%
6473 100%
6503 100%
6466 101%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1953 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1877 cd/m² -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1140 cd/m² -42%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2922 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2510 cd/m² -14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2012 cd/m² -31%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.5 Hz
Amplitude: 16 %

The display backlight flickers at 120.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8070 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

We detect PWM flickering with a frequency around the frame rate, i.e. around 120 Hz. However, Xiaomi promises that up to 3,840 Hz PWM is also possible. 

Nevertheless, we would advise sensitive people to test the screen thoroughly before buying.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN Color Gamut sRGB
CalMAN Color Gamut sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

The Redmi Phone can be used very well outdoors thanks to its high brightness.

The viewing angles are unobjectionable. The screen content can be seen very well even at flat angles.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Wide viewing angles
Wide viewing angles

Performance: A minor speed bump

Xiaomi uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra SoC in the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G. This chip largely corresponds to the Dimensity 7400 or 7400X in terms of performance. 

This means that there is only a small performance update compared to the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, and that phone's performance was already a point of contention back in the day.

For everyday use, the performance is usually sufficient to prevent stuttering. However, the performance reserves for more complex apps are not all that great.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=208, last 2 years)
1781 Points +70%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1325 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1099 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1050 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
1050 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1043 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1033 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=208, last 2 years)
5208 Points +77%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4201 Points +43%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3087 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
2955 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2939 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
2939 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2891 Points -2%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=145, last 2 years)
1498019 Points +116%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
730590 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
693873 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
693873 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
631545 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
617456 Points -11%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
17465 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=181, last 2 years)
14891 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13662 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
13662 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13421 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
12811 Points -6%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2722, n=118, last 2 years)
1171 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
877 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
709 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=145, last 2 years)
7794 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
5002 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
5002 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4983 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4532 Points -9%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=145, last 2 years)
11594 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10865 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
10865 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10784 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8445 Points -22%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=145, last 2 years)
8880 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4953 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
4953 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4768 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4632 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=145, last 2 years)
26488 Points +204%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8704 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
8704 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8632 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8011 Points -8%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2587, n=145, last 2 years)
1711 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1452 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1402 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
1402 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1387 Points -1%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
27865 Points +236%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=129, last 2 years)
19714 Points +137%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8301 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
8301 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8253 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8087 Points -3%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=115, last 2 years)
23311 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1392 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
587 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1112 Points +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=69, last 2 years)
746 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
571 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
571 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
569 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4496 Points +238%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=69, last 2 years)
3045 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1329 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
1329 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1311 Points -1%
Quantized NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4547 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=69, last 2 years)
4474 Points +69%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2689 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2645 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
2645 Points 0%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22780, n=80, last 2 years)
5363 Points +893%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
540 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
  (n=1)
540 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
299 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
232 Points -57%

The Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G also only delivers standard values in terms of graphics power. The OnePlus Nord CE5 shows that a lot more graphics performance is possible in this price range.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2795 Points +176%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1033 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1012 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
901 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
883 Points -13%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2774 Points +175%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1054 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1010 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
907 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
871 Points -14%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9956 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3708 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3502 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3167 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
417 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
404 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points -11%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
411 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
405 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
372 Points -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +20%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
90 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
131 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps -14%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -10%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -4%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +188%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +26%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +168%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -7%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +184%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.7 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.1 fps -4%

When surfing the Internet, the Redmi Note 15 Pro achieves decent results and you can usually visit even more complex websites without any problems. 

The loading times are average — you have to wait a little for a picture every now and then.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=144, last 2 years)
156.9 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
131.654 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 (Chrome 141)
122.3 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)
112.7 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)
112.67 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
85.453 Points -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=115, last 2 years)
233 runs/min +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)
123 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)
123 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
105 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
77.4 runs/min -37%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)
14.8 runs/min +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)
7.49 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)
7.49 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
6.94 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
6.56 runs/min -12%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=140, last 2 years)
147.9 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
127 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
118 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)
112 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)
112 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
96 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=191, last 2 years)
49628 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)
38676 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)
38676 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
38099 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
35354 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
28945 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
1351.21 ms * -26%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)
1152 ms * -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)
1073 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)
1072.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
1031.23 ms * +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
1021.8 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS 2.2 storage does not break any speed records but is a good choice in this class. Data transfers are usually sufficiently fast and loading times are not too long.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GOnePlus Nord CE 5Samsung Galaxy A36 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
6%
10%
-33%
-5%
82%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
945
1009.67
7%
1235
31%
968.34
2%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
837.4
833.64
0%
795
-5%
166.77
-80%
733 ?(369 - 998, n=58)
-12%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
184
248.81
35%
222
21%
233.98
27%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
326.1
266.92
-18%
302
-7%
62.58
-81%

Gaming: Up to 60 fps possible

Gaming with very high frame rates on the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G is usually just a pipedream. The games we tested all limit the frame rate to 60 fps. This is also achieved very consistently in games like Call of Duty Mobile, for example.

However, the more demanding Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile only run at 40-50 fps in high detail settings. This is probably sufficient for casual gamers, but those who are more demanding will have to look elsewhere.

We test the frame rates with the GameBench software.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Call of Duty Mobile; low: Ø59.4 (39-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Call of Duty Mobile; very high: Ø59.9 (58-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø51.1 (40-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø38.6 (25-46)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58.1 (36-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39 (18-41)

Emissions: Hardly any throttling

Temperature

The maximum temperature rise on the casing is 40.7 °C under prolonged load. This is noticeable by hand but not problematic.

In the 3DMark stress tests, we check whether the performance is also constantly available without throttling. We find the frame rates are still very similar even after several repetitions of the benchmarks.

Max. Load
 37.6 °C
100 F
37.6 °C
100 F
37.3 °C
99 F
 
 38.8 °C
102 F
38.4 °C
101 F
38 °C
100 F
 
 38.7 °C
102 F
38.6 °C
101 F
37.2 °C
99 F
 
Maximum: 38.8 °C = 102 F
Average: 38 °C = 100 F
37.6 °C
100 F
37.3 °C
99 F
40.7 °C
105 F
37 °C
99 F
38.6 °C
101 F
38.9 °C
102 F
38 °C
100 F
39.6 °C
103 F
39.4 °C
103 F
Maximum: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Average: 38.6 °C = 101 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.1 % -3%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.01 (6-6.03)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.01 (2.99-3.02)
Surface temperatures: Top
Surface temperatures: Top
Surface temperatures: Bottom
Surface temperatures: Bottom

Speakers

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G has a speaker on the bottom edge and is also supported by the earpiece, which also has a grille on the upper edge of the housing allowing for slightly wider stereo effects.

The speakers can get quite loud, and the sound is balanced overall but shows slight dips in the mid-range treble. This can lead to an overemphasis of very high frequencies, which creates a somewhat unpleasant sound at high volumes.

If you want to avoid this, you can connect external speakers or headphones via USB port or Bluetooth. A wide range of codecs is available for wireless transmission and also for sound in Hi-Res Audio quality.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2016.916.62517.819.83120.725.54032.936.3503640.96331.636.68034.739.310033.137.412529.238.31602642.12002449.725023.255.431521.359.940020.663.950014.366.263015.474.180011.376.410008.177.212506.180.216002.880.320004.277.825004.972.731508.666400013.76450006.165.463003.675.180002.577100002.576125003.572160004.260.7SPL26.787.8N0.669.8median 8.6median 69.8Delta8.8937.839.528.134.724.429.720.53029.53518.930.917.734.815.836.213.439.613.953.611.251.910.453.711.759.110.163.28.865.88.965.49.271.79.876.610.378.510.879.611.880.211.380.212811381.912.677.512.877.412.975.513.375.413.559.513.656.523.890.50.582.1median 11.8median 75.41.510.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A36 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life: A long-lasting mid-range phone

Energy consumption

The Dimensity 7400-Ultra SoC is initially somewhat more energy-hungry than many other smartphones in this class, but its consumption is relatively low at a maximum of 7.4 W under high load.

The phone can be charged with a maximum of 45 W power, and wireless charging is not possible. 

A charger is not included in Europe, but the phone works with all power adapters in our test lab without any problems. A full charge takes around 1:30 hours.

Other devices can be supplied with up to 22.5 W power via wired reverse charging.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 4 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
6580 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
-1%
-13%
0%
-15%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.2
1.17
2%
0.8
33%
0.86
28%
1.2 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.5
1.38
8%
1.2
20%
1.75
-17%
1.5 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.9
1.41
26%
1.7
11%
1.82
4%
1.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average * (Watt)
4
3.58
10%
5.4
-35%
5.31
-33%
4 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
7.4
8.44
-14%
10.1
-36%
10.95
-48%
7.4 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.42 (1.489-7.14)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.98 (4.04-5.46)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86)

Battery life

Xiaomi has fitted a significantly more powerful battery than before, and the Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G now features a 6,580 mAh battery.

This means that good battery life can be achieved in practice. In our WLAN surfing test at 150 nits, the phone lasted over 30 hours. That means the phone should last for two days of normal use without charging. If you rarely use your phone, you can wait much longer before charging it.

Under high load, for example when gaming, you still get a runtime of 5:11 hours, which is a good value.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 10min
WiFi Websurfing
30h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
31h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 11min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
6580 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 5
5200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Battery runtime
-28%
-20%
-45%
-26%
Reader / Idle (h)
39.2
29.2
-26%
33.4
-15%
H.264 (h)
31.7
23.7
-25%
24.3
-23%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
30.5
20.1
-34%
24.4
-20%
16.9
-45%
14.8
-51%
Load (h)
5.2
3.9
-25%
4.5
-13%

Notebookcheck's overall impressions of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Thanks to the long battery life, the very bright screen, and the good main camera, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G maintains its place at the top of the mid-range smartphone segment.

However, the device would benefit from a little more performance to make it stand out even more.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G. Test device provided by Xiaomi Germany.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G. Test device provided by Xiaomi Germany.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G - 01/25/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
43 / 69 → 62%
Weight
88%
Battery
96%
Display
91%
Games Performance
16 / 55 → 29%
Application Performance
60 / 85 → 70%
AI Performance
57%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
65%
Average
65%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
95.7%
Repairability
56%
Software Updates
83.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 48.3%

Potential alternatives in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
77.6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $424.99
List Price: 400€
210 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
2.
77.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $372.49
XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Pl...
2. $309.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G ...
3. $377.99
XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Pl...
List Price: 400€
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
3.
79.5%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.88
Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Scr...
2. $9.68
Lyepetik [2 Pack] Hydrogel S...
3. $11.99
MiKoyi for Motorola Edge 60 ...
List Price: 399€
175 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
pOLED
4.
80.8%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $589.00
List Price: 349€
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
5.
78%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $375.00
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G A Seri...
2. $266.99
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Ai (fo...
3. $254.00
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 2025 |...
List Price: 379€
195 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Smartphone Review: Near bezel-less mid-range phone with IP68 rating and 30-hour battery life
Florian Schmitt, 2026-01-29 (Update: 2026-01-29)