Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review - The affordable smartphone focuses on security & a premium feel

Very long updates for little money.

If you're looking for an affordable mid-range phone in 2025, then it's hard to avoid the Galaxy A36. At least with regards to its focus on long-term update support. But dual eSIM and a water-resistant case are also unique selling points in this price range. Has Samsung built the best smartphone for under $400?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Galaxy A Smartphone Android

Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G

The Galaxy A36 is a high-quality smartphone within the affordable mid-range segment, featuring an IP67 certification and Gorilla Glass Victus+. The Galaxy A36 places a special focus on security. Samsung emphasizes various software measures to protect the user, as well as the hardware-supported Knox Vault security architecture. Buyers can also look forward to six years of security updates, including a quarterly patch supply.
 

Despite some minor shortcomings, such as its slow and somewhat inaccurate fingerprint sensor or its wide display bezels, the Galaxy A36 left a positive overall impression on us. It offers good value for money, now costing well under $400. If you would rather steer clear of the Samsung phone in view of its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, then you should consider the Nothing Phone (3a) or Poco X7 Pro as viable alternatives.  

In terms of its performance, especially in the context of long-term use, there are a few question marks surrounding its Qualcomm chipset. Its performance gain compared to the Galaxy A35 is hardly noticeable, and in general, the 2025 model's performance doesn't convey a feeling of confidence.

Pros

+ long updates
+ fast OLED panel
+ waterproof case
+ dual eSIM

Cons

- only USB 2.0
- SoC slightly slow
- only WiFi 6 (without 6 GHz)
- few Bluetooth audio codecs

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is available to order from Amazon for $384.99.

The most popular mid-range smartphone series according to Samsung has been given a successor generation. Alongside the top-of-the-range Galaxy A56 5G, its smaller brother aims to impress with its good price-performance ratio in particular—without compromising on security and data protection all the while. Samsung places particular emphasis on its new AI features called "Awesome Intelligence" and the extra-long update period for its mid-range phones. Samsung has gone for Qualcomm for its chipset this year, equipping the mid-range phone with the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3.

Specifications of the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Galaxy A30 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, Super AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 233.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 162.9 x 78.2 ( = 0.29 x 6.41 x 3.08 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, Videos @2160p/​30fps) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide) + 5 MPix (f/2.4, macro), Camera2API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, FF, Videos @1080p/​30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, One UI 7.0, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.525W/​kg Head, 1.293W/​kg Body, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), SBAS, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, BT-Codec: SBC, AAC, SSC, LDAC, aptX HD, fanless, waterproof
Weight
195 g ( = 6.88 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Galaxy A36 5G features a glass back

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G comes in lots of colors (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G comes in lots of colors (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

The Galaxy A36 is equipped with a 6.7-inch display, so it's 0.1 inches larger than its predecessor. In addition, the bezels around its screen have become almost one millimeter narrower, increasing its display-to-surface ratio to a decent 86.5 percent. Compared to other smartphones in this price range, however, the edges around its Super AMOLED panel are still a little wide. The Samsung phone now weighs in at 195 grams, which is 14 grams less than the A35.

To protect its display, Samsung uses Gorilla Glass Victus+, which is not only scratch-resistant but should theoretically also withstand drops from a height of up to two meters. Its back is clad in Corning Gorilla Glass 7, i.e. Gorilla Glass Victus. A highlight in this price range is its IP67 certification, which protects the phone's case against dust and water. The Galaxy A36's build quality is exemplary and all gaps are even. However, the frame of the Galaxy A36 is only made of plastic, which compromises its feel and premium appearance compared to the Galaxy A56. That being said, the Samsung phone doesn't feel cheap by any means.

Our test device: The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G in Awesome White
Our test device: The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G in Awesome White
 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Size comparison

163.52 mm / 6.44 in 77.5 mm / 3.05 in 8.35 mm / 0.3287 in 201 g0.4431 lbs162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 185.5 g0.409 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 78.2 mm / 3.08 in 7.4 mm / 0.2913 in 195 g0.4299 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 209 g0.4608 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - The Samsung phone only has USB 2.0

The Galaxy A36 comes with either 6 or 8 GB of RAM, in combination with 128 or 256 GB of internal storage. The Samsung phone's Universal Flash Storage (UFS) is no longer expandable via microSD cards. However, OTG is supported, allowing you to connect external storage media with FAT, FAT32 or exFAT formatting. NTFS is also possible, but only data reading is permitted in this case.

Otherwise, the mid-range smartphone offers good connectivity, although it still only uses USB 2.0. Its transfer speeds of 29 MB/s weren't particularly high during the copying test.

The Galaxy A36 uses the hardware-supported Knox Vault, which combines a dedicated processor with a storage unit to secure personal data such as passwords. According to Samsung, a number of extensive security measures are also implemented into the phone, such as anti-theft protection.

Left case side
Left case side
Right case side (buttons: volume, on/off)
Right case side (buttons: volume, on/off)
Top case side (microphone)
Top case side (microphone)
Right case side (speaker, microphone, USB port, microphone, card slot)
Right case side (speaker, microphone, USB port, microphone, card slot)

Software - The mid-range phone with long update support

The Galaxy A36's update supply, which includes six major updates to its operating system and six years of security updates including quarterly patches, is great for a mid-range phone. Hardly any other smartphone in this price range offers this package, with the Moto G75 or Nothing Phone (3a) coming closest to Samsung's exemplary software support. The Galaxy A36 is once again also available as an Enterprise Edition—here, there are even seven years of security and One UI updates.

During our test, the Galaxy A36 was delivered with Android 15 including security patches from April 2025 and the in-house user interface One UI 7. New is "Awesome Intelligence" as a mobile AI with a wide range of AI functions and Circle to Search. The little brother of the Galaxy AI from the Galaxy S models processes texts, images and videos and provides familiar features for photo editing, such as the object eraser.

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review

Sustainability

The Galaxy A36 is delivered in plastic-free packaging. Samsung hasn't provided exact details on its use of recycled materials, but there is plenty of data on its CO2 emissions. Values of 35 and 41 kgCO2 eq are given for Europe.

Communication and GNSS - The Galaxy A36 5G with WiFi 6

With IEEE 802.11-ax, the Galaxy A36 only uses WiFi 6 with two frequency bands. However, its transfer rates were quite fast and stable using our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. The installed modem supports a solid range of frequencies for both LTE and 5G, making the Samsung phone an interesting travel companion. Even so, the Galaxy S25 supports significantly more bands.

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
400 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
375 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
398 (min: 193) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
377 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼45%
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
845 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
817 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
725 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (440-918)
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (466-956)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (713-779)
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (777-861)
Location services indoors
Location services indoors
Location services outdoors
Location services outdoors

Outdoors, the Galaxy A36 quickly finds a satellite signal and locates its position with an accuracy of 3 meters. All the major global satellite networks are available for locating, but only in single-band mode.

During our practical test consisting of a short trip on foot, on which we took a reference smartwatch (Garmin Venu 2) with us to compare, the Samsung phone cut a good figure. Still, walking around corners wasn't always accurately mapped and there were some minor deviations from the actual route we took. All-in-all, however, a good performance and completely sufficient for navigation tasks.

Location services: Galaxy A36 5G vs. Garmin Venu 2
Location services: Galaxy A36 5G vs. Garmin Venu 2

Telephone functions and call quality - The Samsung smartphone with eSIM support

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review

During everyday use, voice transmission sounds natural on the Samsung phone and background noise is largely filtered out. The Galaxy A36 supports common functions such as Wi-Fi calls or VoLTE as well as dual SIM operation. The latter can even be done exclusively via eSIMs.

Cameras - The Galaxy A36 5G with a Sony sensor?

Selfie on the Galaxy A36
Selfie on the Galaxy A36

The Galaxy A36's front-facing camera has a resolution of 12 MPix and is equipped with a fixed focus. The lens can create 10-bit HDR images and features a 4K30 option. Its image quality for photos is good, and skin tones look quite natural.

The 50 MPix main camera with optical image stabilization is likely based on the Sony LYT-600 or IMX882—Samsung hasn't provided exact details on the 1/1.95-inch sensor. While the lens shows a good dynamic range, some details are swallowed up even in daylight. In low light, on the other hand, the shots look increasingly noisy with a soft focus, but they're nice and bright.

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
4x
4x
10x (max)
10x (max)
Macro
Macro

The camera system comprises a total of three lenses. The main camera is supplemented by an ultra-wide-angle lens with an 8-MPix resolution and a 5-MPix macro camera. Zooming is exclusively digital, which results in very poor quality beyond 2x magnification. The ultra-wide angle, on the other hand, is pretty decent for the price range—even photos don't look particularly sharp and quickly become noisy in darker areas.

Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD at up to 30fps, while 1080p recordings support a maximum of 60fps. The image stabilization using the 50 MPix lens is good overall. Those who like to use third-party apps for videos should note that the Galaxy A36's Camera2 API only has a limited support level. This means that only limited access to the camera functions is possible.
 

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low lightUltra-wide angle5x zoom

In controlled lighting conditions, we analyzed the main camera's color reproduction in comparison to the actual reference colors. The Galaxy A36 showed some brightening, but no major deviations. We only observed one outlier in color fidelity (>15) in the ColorChecker passport, otherwise the Samsung phone produced a consistent color image.

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A36 5G: 6.99 ∆E min: 1.32 - max: 16.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
57.4 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A36 5G: 38.11 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 57.43 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Samsung phone without a power supply

The Galaxy A36 5G's card slot
The Galaxy A36 5G's card slot

The Galaxy A36 only comes with a USB-C cable and a SIM tool. A protective film doesn't come pre-installed. The matching Samsung power adapter or other accessories are optionally available to buy from the Samsung online store.

The phone is covered by a standard 12-month warranty, which can be extended via the manufacturer's Care+ insurance package. This costs between $40 and $120, depending on the service period and scope of insurance.

Input devices and operation - The Galaxy A36 5G with FaceUnlock

The Galaxy A36's responsive touchscreen ensures smooth operation with a high refresh rate of 120 Hz. During everyday use, on the other hand, the Samsung phone always seems a little overwhelmed and minor stutters occur. As soon as actions are processed in the background, such as updating apps, its performance drops noticeably.

While the optical sensor integrated into the phone's OLED display does recognize fingerprints, its reliability isn't the best and the Galaxy A36 takes considerably longer to unlock compared to the S series' ultrasonic models. Alternatively, the Galaxy A36 offers optional facial recognition via the front-facing camera, which generally works well. However, this method has some limitations: not only is it less secure than the fingerprint sensor, but it's also unreliable in poor lighting conditions.

The installed linear vibration motor provides nice haptic feedback and can be fully customized in the device's settings, letting users adjust its intensity.

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review

Display - The Samsung phone uses AMOLED

The OLED display is based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green light-emitting diode each
The OLED display is based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green light-emitting diode each

The Galaxy A36 has a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen. Its refresh rate is automatically adjusted by the system straight out of the box, and is either 60 or 120 Hz. The panel has grown by 0.1 inches compared to its predecessor, resulting in a slightly lower pixel density with the same resolution.

During our test, the Galaxy phone managed over 1,100 cd/m² when showing a full white display with the ambient light sensor activated. As is typical for OLEDs, it got better when depicting a distribution of light and dark areas (APL18)—here, its brightness increased to up to 1,877 cd/m². When playing an HDR video, we even noted 2,012 cd/m², ensuring very good HDR effects and a wider contrast range.

1129
cd/m²
1126
cd/m²
1142
cd/m²
1133
cd/m²
1127
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
1141
cd/m²
1136
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1149 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1127 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (3a)
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Screen
-11%
12%
9%
-42%
Brightness middle
1127
904
-20%
1138
1%
1156
3%
1287
14%
Brightness
1137
912
-20%
1137
0%
1150
1%
1274
12%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
98
0%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
1.1
39%
1.1
39%
1.9
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2.8
-0%
2.6
7%
3.1
-11%
8.7
-211%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.2
-5%
1.6
24%
1.6
24%
3.4
-62%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
CCT
6466 101%
6478 100%
6284 103%
6304 103%
7072 92%

* ... smaller is better

The downside of rich blacks and high dynamics is OLED flickering, which can lead to burning eyes or headaches in sensitive people. At minimum brightness, the Galaxy A36's refresh rate also isn't particularly high at 120 Hz to 240 Hz. Although its flat and even amplitude curve mitigates this a little, we would have liked to see high-frequency PWM dimming used here.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.04 %
Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8389 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).

Our analysis with a photo spectrometer and Calman's software revealed the mid-range phone to achieve low average Delta-E deviations in the sRGB color space, and its color temperatures were spot on using the "Natural" profile. Unfortunately, the Samsung One UI only offers two color profiles, whereby the most accurate display of colors and grayscale doesn't allow any adjustments to the color temperature. Samsung should urgently offer users more setting options in this respect.

Color accuracy (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8225 ms rise
↘ 0.748 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.599 ms rise
↘ 0.59 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.2 ms).

The Galaxy A36 faces no issues when being used outdoors; even in direct sunlight, content always remains clearly legible. Even so, if you do without the ambient light sensor, you'll have to contend with less brightness (419 cd/m²).

The OLED panel's viewing angles are very stable, and we only noted a moderate loss of brightness when viewed flat. Only a slight blue haze covers the panel at extreme viewing angles.

Performance - The Samsung phone with a Qualcomm SoC

The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 inside the Galaxy A36 features two Cortex-A78 cores and four power-saving cores based on the Cortex-A55. With the exception of slightly higher clock rates, the chipset is therefore the same as the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 from 2022, an entry-level SoC. Unsurprisingly, the Galaxy A36 couldn't keep up with more powerful mid-range smartphones in our test, such as the Poco X7 Pro. The Nothing Phone (3a) with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 was around 10 to 15 percent ahead of the Samsung phone in the Geekbench test. We also measured hardly any performance gain over its predecessor. In fact, the Exynos 1380 of the Galaxy A35 often performed slightly better in the benchmarks.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=212, last 2 years)
1571 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1171 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1043 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1033 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (1011 - 1033, n=2)
1022 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=212, last 2 years)
4503 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3250 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
2955 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (2887 - 2955, n=2)
2921 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2891 Points -2%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=140, last 2 years)
1315594 Points +113%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
795329 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
631545 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (617456 - 620511, n=2)
618984 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
617456 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
15606 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
14120 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13421 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (12811 - 13807, n=2)
13309 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
12811 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=153, last 2 years)
1009 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
877 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (737 - 877, n=2)
807 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
785 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
709 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)
6905 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5543 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4983 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (4532 - 4545, n=2)
4539 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4532 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points -3%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)
10787 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10784 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (8445 - 9006, n=2)
8726 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8672 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8445 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)
7687 Points +66%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7675 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4768 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4632 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (4554 - 4632, n=2)
4593 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -7%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
19710 Points +146%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8951 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8632 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8011 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (7298 - 8011, n=2)
7655 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points -12%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)
1626 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1585 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1452 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (1425 - 1452, n=2)
1439 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1387 Points -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=147, last 2 years)
17780 Points +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (8253 - 9416, n=2)
8835 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8626 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8253 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8087 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -27%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
27442 Points +4575%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
719 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (587 - 729, n=2)
658 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
587 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=47, last 2 years)
1651 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1441 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (512 - 1441, n=2)
977 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
542 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
406 Points -72%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
397 Points -72%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=47, last 2 years)
960 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
844 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (212 - 844, n=2)
528 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
233 Points -72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
138 Points -84%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
136 Points -84%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
851 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (211 - 851, n=2)
531 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=48, last 2 years)
443 Points -48%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
233 Points -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
141 Points -83%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
137 Points -84%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=49, last 2 years)
4346 Points +1354%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1388 Points +364%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
299 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (n=1)
299 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
232 Points -22%

When it comes to the phone's integrated Adreno 710 graphics unit, the gap between the Galaxy A36 and a Nothing Phone (3a) was just as wide during our test as with the CPU. The Qualcomm GPU also proved not to be major upgrade compared to the values of a Mali-G68 MP5.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1063 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
901 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
883 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
842 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
907 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
871 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points -11%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4186 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3502 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3167 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3129 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -20%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -9%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -8%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -24%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -7%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -12%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +13%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -19%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -26%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -23%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.1 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -18%

Surfing the web on the Samsung phone is a real pleasure, as websites load quite quickly and are displayed without any major delays. However, its benchmark results weren't particularly high.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
161.602 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years)
140.4 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
131.654 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (126.4 - 131.7, n=2)
129 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
85.453 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
176 runs/min +68%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=142, last 2 years)
174.1 runs/min +66%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
105 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (105 - 105, n=2)
105 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
77.4 runs/min -26%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=99, last 2 years)
12.7 runs/min +83%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
11.2 runs/min +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (6.94 - 6.97, n=2)
6.96 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
6.94 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
6.56 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
149 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (127 - 140, n=2)
133.5 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=154, last 2 years)
130.4 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
127 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
96 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
45346 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years)
43606 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
38099 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (37483 - 38099, n=2)
37791 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
28945 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
1351.21 ms * -31%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1343 ms * -30%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (1031 - 1077, n=2)
1054 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
1031.23 ms *
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
862.4 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

The Samsung phone features UFS 3.1, which is solid for this price range, but its write values were noticeably slow during our test. Still, we already observed a similar situation with the Galaxy A35.

Samsung Galaxy A36 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco X7Nothing Phone (3a)Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
184%
163%
217%
275%
366%
Sequential Read 256KB
968.34
529.32
-45%
1009.67
4%
947.4
-2%
1031.34
7%
Sequential Write 256KB
166.77
270
62%
833.64
400%
915.23
449%
1001.28
500%
Random Read 4KB
233.98
244.24
4%
248.81
6%
100.16
-57%
245.48
5%
Random Write 4KB
62.58
62.59
0%
266.92
327%
226.88
263%
285.24
356%

Games - Can the Galaxy A36 run games?

Although the phone's rather weak Adreno GPU isn't predestined for gaming, we still measured solid frame rates of 60fps at low to medium detail settings with the GameBench application when running PUBG Mobile. Even the demanding game Genshin Impact was displayed at an average of 43fps by the Galaxy A36 at low graphics settings. And with older games, the panel's native refresh rate of 120 Hz even proved to be the limit in some cases. However, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 doesn't support ray tracing and there are some question marks over the future suitability of the Adreno 710 for modern games. 

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; Dead Trigger 2: Ø114.6 (96-120)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø43 (25-60)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø24 (18-44)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.5 (47-61)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59 (44-60)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (34-41)

Emissions - The Samsung smartphone isn't throttled

Temperature

The Galaxy A36's temperature development wasn't a problem during our test, even under permanent load. Its performance development during the Wild Life stress tests of 3DMark was constant and didn't lead to any significant throttling.

Max. Load
 41.6 °C
107 F
40.6 °C
105 F
38.1 °C
101 F
 
 42.3 °C
108 F
41.2 °C
106 F
37.5 °C
100 F
 
 42.1 °C
108 F
41.5 °C
107 F
37.7 °C
100 F
 
Maximum: 42.3 °C = 108 F
Average: 40.3 °C = 105 F
37.5 °C
100 F
39.7 °C
103 F
42.9 °C
109 F
36.1 °C
97 F
41.1 °C
106 F
43.5 °C
110 F
37 °C
99 F
39.8 °C
104 F
41.6 °C
107 F
Maximum: 43.5 °C = 110 F
Average: 39.9 °C = 104 F
Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 %
05101520Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.42 (5.38-5.44)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.7 (20.6-20.8)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.8 (20.7-20.9)

Speakers

The phone's stereo speakers are loud and offer a good sound for the price range, but the Galaxy A36 lacks depth and high tones are too present. Alternatively, the device can output sound via USB-C or Bluetooth. However, the latter supports comparatively few audio codecs.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.839.52528.134.73124.429.74020.5305029.5356318.930.98017.734.810015.836.212513.439.616013.953.620011.251.925010.453.731511.759.140010.163.25008.865.86308.965.48009.271.710009.876.6125010.378.5160010.879.6200011.880.2250011.380.23150128140001381.9500012.677.5630012.877.4800012.975.51000013.375.41250013.559.51600013.656.5SPL23.890.5N0.582.1median 11.8median 75.4Delta1.510.627.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A36 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - The Galaxy A36 charges quite quickly

Power consumption

During our measurements, the Galaxy A36 wasn't particularly efficient in idle mode, and the Qualcomm SoC consumed quite a lot of energy under load, namely almost 11 watts.

The Samsung mid-range phone's 5,000 mAh battery can now be charged at 45 watts instead of just 25 watts like its predecessor. Interestingly, the A-series charges faster than a Galaxy S25, a fact that will raise a few eyebrows. We weren't supplied with a suitable power adapter for our test, but we noted a charging time of around 70 minutes using the Xiaomi Powerbank 25000.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.75 / 1.82 Watt
Load midlight 5.31 / 10.95 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
13%
18%
19%
1%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.89
-3%
1.17
-36%
1.09
-27%
0.93
-8%
Idle Average *
1.75
1.99
-14%
1.38
21%
1.28
27%
1.67
5%
1.425 ?(1.1 - 1.75, n=2)
19%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
2.14
-18%
1.41
23%
1.31
28%
1.68
8%
Load Average *
5.31
4.57
14%
3.58
33%
3.25
39%
3.69
31%
7.01 ?(5.31 - 8.7, n=2)
-32%
Load Maximum *
10.95
12.31
-12%
8.44
23%
8.62
21%
4.75
57%
10.5 ?(10.1 - 11, n=2)
4%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.18 (1.064-10.1)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.5 (1.215-7.76)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.929 (0.868-1.382)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.08 (4.83-5.23)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.37 (2.88-3.92)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.929 (0.868-1.382)

Runtimes

In our battery tests, the mid-range phone from Samsung delivered good runtimes. Best comparability is provided by the results at an adjusted display brightness (150 cd/m²). In this case, the Galaxy A36 lasted almost 15 hours when surfing using WLAN. When playing back an endless video without WiFi, we even noted over 24 hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
14h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 27min
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
2%
18%
15%
Reader / Idle
2006
2600
30%
1754
-13%
2567
28%
H.264
1456
1401
-4%
1423
-2%
1610
11%
WiFi v1.3
888
902
2%
1206
36%
1049
18%
1233
39%
Load
267
262
-2%
236
-12%
218
-18%

Notebookcheck total rating

Thanks to its long software support and attractive features, the Galaxy A36 is a good smartphone in the affordable mid-range segment.

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G - 05/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
15 / 55 → 27%
Application Performance
61 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance
48%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
73%
Average
76%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
91.5%
Materials
50%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.8%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 81.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
78%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.99
[3+3 Pack] Galaxy A36 5G Scr...
2. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
List Price: 379€
195 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED
2.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $6.89
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
3.
77.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $7.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
3. $4.73
Aiziki 2 Pack for Redmi Note...
List Price: 400€
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
4.
77.7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $4.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
3. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
185.5 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
5.
79.2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
2. $6.35
Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...
3. $7.99
Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...
201 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
387 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review - The affordable smartphone focuses on security & a premium feel
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-05-11 (Update: 2025-05-11)