Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, FF, Videos @1080p/30fps)
Price comparison
Average of 48 scores (from 94 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
If you're looking for an affordable mid-range phone in 2025, then it's hard to avoid the Galaxy A36. At least with regards to its focus on long-term update support. But dual eSIM and a water-resistant case are also unique selling points in this price range. Has Samsung built the best smartphone for under $400?
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A56 and Galaxy A36 are excellent mid-range phones, offering great software support, premium design, high-quality displays, decent cameras, and adequate performance. However, there are plenty of other phones in the same price bracket that offer better performance, battery life, and much better cameras. If you don't care too much about performance, cameras, and battery life, but do care about software support and premium build, then you could consider the A56 or A36, depending on your budget. However, if performance, battery life, and cameras are higher priorities, then I'd recommend the Nothing Phone 3a Pro (Review), Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Review), OnePlus Nord 5 (Review), or the Poco X7 Pro (Review) instead of the Galaxy A56. For those considering the Galaxy A36, you could again look at the Poco X7 Pro or the Nothing Phone 3a (Review). Samsung's Galaxy A56 and Galaxy A36, while good phones, are definitely outshone by the competition, especially when you consider the pricing.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/04/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Police

My recommendation is mixed. If you’re picking up a Galaxy A36 on an excellent carrier deal for just a few bucks a month, you’ll be satisfied. It’s a solid smartphone with fantastic software support. However, if you’re paying full price, it’s worth considering other midrange phones, such as the Pixel 9a and the Moto G Stylus 2025. If you can wait for the Galaxy A56, you’ll be better served. However, for a good deal, you won't regret picking up a Galaxy A36. Samsung made several good decisions with the Galaxy A36, equipping it with an excellent 6.7-inch display and offering six years of software support. However, its 6GB of RAM holds it back compared to the competition, as the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 is capable of delivering better performance. Still, the Galaxy A36 gets fantastic battery life and has serviceable cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A26 brings solid basics at a wallet-friendly price, but the A36 steps things up with a smoother display, a sleeker design, and a faster processor. Are those upgrades worth the extra cash? Check out this HEAD-TO-HEAD for the COMPLETE BREAKDOWN of how these two phones compare in terms of screen quality, battery life and charging speed, chipset performance, and camera image quality, all based on our extensive reviews.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2025
Source: Tech Advisor

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is another solid, affordable mid-ranger that won’t let you down. However, it also won’t excite you in any way. There’s a new breed of mid-range phones that dare to try something different, whether it’s the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro’s telephoto camera and memory-aid button, or the Motorola Edge 60’s unusually robust design and super-bright screen.When taken in this context, the Samsung Galaxy A36 can’t help but feel a little safe and drab. What it does supply is a decent screen, a good camera, solid stamina, and exemplary software support. Whether that’s enough to set your pulse racing is another matter. You have to feel that Samsung should be doing more in performance and design terms.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A36 brings a few noticeable tweaks to the A-series — a brighter display, upgraded camera sensor, and quicker charging. The Galaxy A35, however, offers pretty much a similar package, from the design to the battery size. So, is the newer model worth getting?
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2025
Source: GSM Arena

Galaxy A36 or A56 — which one’s the smarter buy? The A56 packs a snappier chip and a brighter screen, but the A36 keeps things simple and budget-friendly. Let’s see which one makes more sense for you.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2025
Source: Mobile Syrup

The Galaxy A36 shows how Samsung has a full-service portfolio in Canada. The handset isn’t for me, I’m a flagship guy, but if you’re not interested in the bells and whistles, this might be for you. My little brother uses his phone to listen to music, make calls and text his friends. This is all he would need. Similarly, my dad doesn’t use his phone often, and I would have no problem recommending this to him either.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2025
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, wrapping up this review, I’d say the Samsung Galaxy A36 is a decent phone with some nice features. But at this price point, it doesn’t really blow me away. If you’re dead set on buying a Samsung phone and don’t want to cross the 50K mark, then sure, go for the A36. But if you’re fine with a non-Samsung phone, then there are better phones in this price range. Like the Nothing Phone (3a) (review), Honor 200 (review), or the CMF Phone 2 Pro (review). In short, the A36 is like ordering a fancy meal that tastes okay but leaves you thinking, “Maybe I should’ve just spent a bit more for the steak.”
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Nextpit EN

The Galaxy A5X has been one of the best-selling smartphones across the world for years, while cheaper models often receive less attention. This year, the A56 once again proved to be a solid choice in the mid-range in our review. Neither performance, battery, nor camera stood out, but there are no serious weaknesses with it either. In combination with Samsung's excellent update policy, the device retains a clear "Buy" recommendation. However, the Samsung Galaxy A36 has caught up and is almost as good as its big brother. For $100 less, Samsung has made cuts in the right places without compromising its suitability for everyday use. The plastic frame is hardly noticeable in everyday use, especially with a protective cover. The ultra wide-angle camera lags behind that of the A56, but even the more expensive model does not offer outstanding quality in this department.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Calcalistech

The Galaxy A36 invites the classic question: is the glass half empty or half full? At first glance, its lack of AI features might make it seem like a second-tier device in Samsung’s lineup. However, the A36 has some strong points: solid protection, support for eSIM (still rare at this price level), an excellent display, and overall, it performs its intended role well. That said, it faces stiff competition. At the same price point, other devices offer better water and dust resistance, more storage, faster charging, or more RAM. There are also cheaper phones that match the A36’s feature set. It's unclear whether Samsung's brand name alone will be enough to convince consumers to opt for this more affordable model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2025
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A36 is a solid update to the A35 with a brighter display, smoother performance, and extended update promises. It also takes cleaner photos and adds a dash of AI. It’s a strong choice if you want a reliable Android phone for under $400. If you're willing to increase your budget by $100, the Pixel 9a offers even better camera quality and advanced AI tools, making it our Editors' Choice winner for midrange Android phones.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

Is the Galaxy A36 my favorite budget phone? Not really. While I can see how it can suffice for the basic things, I would still recommend ponying up the extra $100 to get the Pixel 9a — for the extra performance boost, value, and richer AI features. That said, the Galaxy A36 is a well-designed phone that checks off most of the boxes. It’s even better in the battery life department over its predecessor, but it falls short in other areas like its low light camera performance, subpar performance, and the fact that its display compares poorly to other AMOLEDs.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techlusive

After reviewing for more than 20 days, I could say that Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is a solid mid-raneg smartphone with notable improvements over its predecessor. However, the smartphone is not without its flaws and hence it could be better, especially in gaming section and demanding applications. The camera offers an incremental improvement, with few weak spots in low-light. The positive side is that the display offers a vibrant quality and the battery life is excellent. The design feels premium for the price range it belongs. If you are someone who is looking for a smartphone with reliable performance for everyday tasks, then this could be the best option. It offers good camera quality and solid software support and hence it is worth considering keeping the price range in mind.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/23/2025
Source: The Mobile Indian

At Rs 32,999, there are phones that offer better performance than the Galaxy A36 5G. However, like the Galaxy A56 5G, what makes the A36 5G stand out is its overall balanced approach. Instead of just chasing raw power, it delivers a well-rounded experience. It might not be a gaming powerhouse, but it handles everyday tasks smoothly, offers a stable software experience, reliable battery life, decent cameras, and a stunning display — all wrapped in a solid build. That’s where the Galaxy A36 5G really shines.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Android Authority

There are brief moments when the A36 5G runs smoother, but those are the exception. That inconsistency doesn’t inspire much confidence, especially when this is how the phone behaves fresh out of the box. Hopefully, this is just a software optimization issue that Samsung can improve in a future update, but the underperformance in CPU benchmarks doesn’t leave me convinced that Samsung made the right choice to switch to a chip that can handle games better, but isn’t working for basic multitasking. If someone outside the US asked me whether to buy the Galaxy A36 5G, the answer would be a firm no. At this price point, you’ll find several better-performing options from brands like OnePlus, Motorola, Xiaomi, realme, and others — many of which offer stronger cameras and snappier performance for the same or even less money.In the US, however, the story’s a bit more complicated.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A36 might be the most balanced Samsung mid-ranger from 2025 with an improved design, more powerful graphics, and faster charging, and longer software support than the Galaxy A35. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2025
Source: NLT

So, should you buy the Samsung Galaxy A36? I think this is a tough question to answer. At the price of RM1,499, I think this is actually quite expensive – particularly because of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. If Samsung opted for the Exynos 1480, I’d say it’s a much better deal. I think the biggest reason to buy the Galaxy A36 is because of One UI 7. Even with the Now Brief missing, One UI 7 is superbly powerful thanks to features such as the Modes and Routines and Samsung Wallet.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2025
Source: Phone Arena

See, it's natural for just about anyone to always lust after the most premium and spec'd-out flagships. It's just human nature to be awed by shiny things. However, the Galaxy A36 5G isn't a bad phone just because it's a value offering. It shapes up to be a decent proposition in the sub-$400 category. Yes, it will start at $399 when it hits the shelves on March 26, and that's a fairly attractive price tag for a Galaxy mid-ranger. Some issues that are immediately obvious when you take the phone is the slightly lackluster performance (it doesn't take long for the phone to lag a little) and it's camera, which only has the bare minimum, but for $400, you can't fault Samsung for cutting that many corners. Should you buy the Galaxy A36 5G? If you're on a tight budget, there are certainly worse ways to spend your money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2025
Rating: Total score: 57% performance: 82% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Yugatech

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G retails for PHP 19,990 with 6GB RAM and 128GB of storage. There is also a unit with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage worth PHP 21,990. For our general consensus - this phone is still a great find! It stays true to what a mid-ranger should be, checking out all the essential boxes. It also gives you a little bit more at less than PHP 20,000. Potential buyers can expect an amazing multimedia consumption setup, good cameras, and an even better battery life. If users are looking for a bit more from Samsung under PHP 26,000, there's a clear alternative. The Samsung Galaxy A56 offers practically the same experience with a better build and more juice under the hood. Interested readers can feel free to check out our published review on the A56.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2025
Source: Tech Advisor

If you’re looking for the best value-for-money mid-range phone and don’t mind slightly slower charging, then the Galaxy A35 remains a great budget option. However, if you want the latest AI features, faster charging, and a noticeably brighter display, then the Galaxy A36 is worth the extra cost. The A36 feels more future-proof, thanks to its Qualcomm chip, AI tools, and better long-term usability, making it a better investment overall.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2025
Source: The Indian Express

When it comes to mid-range smartphones, brands like Nothing, OnePlus, and iQOO compete for consumer attention with superior build quality, impressive cameras, and a refined UI. With so many options at their disposal, it has become a tough call for consumers to zero in on a smartphone that is functional yet offers a glint of premium experience. South Korean smartphone maker Samsung recently launched its Galaxy A36 5G, making it the latest device to compete in the mid-range segment.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A36 is the most balanced Samsung midranger from the new series with an improved design, more powerful graphics, and faster charging over the Galaxy A35. It has been promised 6 major Android updates, which is a lot. The Galaxy A36 delivered excellent screen brightness, and it is indeed slightly faster to charge. We are happy with its speakers' loudness and quality, and its overall performance is adequate. The battery life is adequate too, though not chart-topping for sure. The disappointment came from the lack of improvement in the camera department and the photo and video quality. The model has been sort of stuck since the Galaxy A34.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2025
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: India Today

The Samsung Galaxy A56 is priced at Rs 41,999, while the Galaxy A36 comes in at Rs 32,999. While the Galaxy A36 is a good choice, the A56 offers better overall value, particularly due to its camera performance. Both smartphones deliver smooth day-to-day performance with long battery life and feature water resistance. Both the A56 and A36 are sleek, have large and attractive displays, and have a sturdy build, but if you care about smartphone photography, the A56 just makes a little more sense.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Yugatech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/19/2025
Source: 91mobiles

The Galaxy A36 starts at Rs 32,999 for the 8GB+128GB variant, with the top-end 12GB+256GB model priced at Rs 38,999. For what it offers, the A36 holds good value – especially if you prioritise a polished software experience (with AI features) and a premium-looking design. Its cameras are reliable, though low-light performance could have been better. And, as expected from a Samsung device, the multimedia experience remains one of its biggest strengths. Its closest competitors are the Vivo V50 (review) and Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (review). The Vivo V50 has an advantage with higher performance and slightly better cameras, though its software experience isn’t as refined. The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ also offers longer battery life, faster charging, and a more durable build, while its camera performance is on par with the A36.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Spurt

The camera hardware sounds mostly the same from those specs, but using the auto photo mode you'll get some good looking pics. HDR situations don't phase the Samsung A36 5G, although you will see some saturation at times. Plus, night photography often means noise. My main beef with this OneUI smartphone is the juddery performance, even when you're just using regular apps. The camera app exhibits plenty of slowdown at times, while gamers have to stick to optimised titles like PubG. I tried gaming with Wuthering Waves on the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G and the results weren't pretty. Battery life is solid enough, now with faster charging support thankfully. However, while Samsung has boosted the storage space for this 2025 phone, the Galaxy A36 5G has lost microSD memory card support. Booooo.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2025
Source: Think Digit

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G shines with its flawless display, offering flagship-level brightness and color accuracy, making it ideal for media lovers. It features a refined design, reliable battery life, and a decent camera setup, though performance lags in intensive gaming. Samsung birthed the Galaxy A series line of mid-range smartphones over 10 years ago and has shipped more than 89 million phones since. Samsung has thrown its hat in the ring once again with the Galaxy A36, priced at Rs 32,999 in India. On paper, it promises a lot: a stunning Super AMOLED display, a capable Snapdragon processor, and a powerful triple-camera setup. But is the Galaxy A36 5G just another mid-range device, or does it bring enough to the table to justify its price tag? Let’s see whether Samsung’s latest A series phone is a hit or miss.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/11/2025
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 66% performance: 57% workmanship: 74%
Source: Tech Spurt

Which mid-range smartphone you opt for will likely depend on your budget, more than anything else.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: Unbox

This means that you’re also getting some of the AI functionality that we’ve been seeing on the new S series as well, like: Circle to Search with Audio, AI Select, and all the photography options we’ve come to know and love. We also got a chance to see their Best Face feature in action as well to make group shots a little easier at family gatherings.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: NDTV Gadgets

To conclude, the Samsung Galaxy A56 and Samsung Galaxy A36 do bring some interesting features to the table. Whether be it new design language or dependable cameras coupled with six years of OS and security updates, both devices have a lot to offer in this price segment. However, can they survive this tough competition? We will be able to answer this in our upcoming review. So, stay tuned.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: GSM Arena

We have very little doubt that the Galaxy A36 and A56 will enjoy plenty of mass popularity. As we said, Samsung isn't changing too much and rocking the boat too much, which is understandable. Well, except for the removal of the microSD expansion slots, which is quite a bummer. Samsung Glaxy A36 and Galaxy A56 hands-on review Other than that, we personally enjoy the new design. The new chipsets and better cooling offer a nice performance boost on both phones compared to last year's models, and the thermal management and stability are very impressive. The addition of 45W charging is a nice little bonus. The overall camera quality seems to come with a slight upgrade, though it's a bit early to judge.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: SuperSaf

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: The Tech Chap

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: Expert Reviews

These phones aren’t the sexiest devices on God’s green Earth, and there’s nothing really groundbreaking here in terms of new features and design. They are a little improved on the design front, which is nice, but ultimately, they’re not all that much different from last year’s handsets from a hardware point of view. And that’s not a huge problem, of course. We liked these phones last year and we’re likely to like them this year as well. Samsung fans will love them. But we preferred the Nothing Phone (2a) last year and Google’s Pixel 8a delivers longer support and (currently) much lower prices with handsets available from around £330. With new Nothing mid-rangers and the Google Pixel 9A on the horizon, I’d respectfully suggest you hold onto your wallet.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerbild
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/19/2025
Rating: Total score: 94%
Source: Computerbild
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 94%
Source: WinFuture
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/24/2025
Source: PC Welt
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tablet Blog
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Nextpit Germany
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2025
Source: PC Welt
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computerbild
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2025
Rating: Total score: 94%
Source: Computerbild
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2025
Rating: Total score: 94%
Source: Smartzone
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Gamestar
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2025
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% display: 78% ergonomy: 91%
Source: Computerhoy
ES→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tudo Celular
PT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80%
Source: Target HD
PT→ENNegative: No microSD card slot; without headphone jack; average processor; poor secondary camera; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2025
Source: Target HD
PT→ENPositive: Premium design; high performance; great cameras; decent autonomy; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2025
Source: Smart World
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2025
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 50% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% display: 82% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2025
Rating: features: 80%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Evo smart
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tecno Cino
IT→ENPositive: Decent hardware; good cameras; smart Galaxy AI Features. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2025
Source: Techprincess IT
IT→ENPositive: Elegant design; affordable price; beautiful display; smart Galaxy AI Features; smooth performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2025
Source: Diskidee.nl
NL→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% display: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: Nextpit France
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Clubic
FR→ENComparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→ENPositive: Great built quality; beautiful screen; quick charging; waterproof. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2025
Source: Telepolis
PL→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techno Strefa
PL→ENComparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PurePC
PL→ENPositive: Good cooling and silent system; beautiful AMOLED 120Hz display; waterproof IP67; support eSIM; stereo speakers. Negative: Short battery life; poor ultra-wide angle camera; 6GB RAM only; without MicroSD card slot; no charger included.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2025
Source: Co Nowego
PL→ENPositive: Modern design; big screen; sharp display; long battery life; waterproof and dust avoiding; stereo speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2025
Source: Unite4buy
PL→ENPositive: Decent processor; high autonomy; quick charging; microSD card slot; good main camera; stereo speakers; NFC; 5G; waterproof IP67. Negative: Average gaming performance; dark display; poor secondary camera; thick frames.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2025
Source: ITC UA
RU→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→ENPositive: Smooth performance; elegant design. Negative: Average cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2025
Source: MobilArena HU
HU→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2025
Rating: price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Zive
CZ→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/13/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Viettelstore
VN→ENPositive: Stylish design; beautiful display; long battery life; nice cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/09/2025
Source: Viettelstore
VN→ENPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; trendy design; excellent cameras; smart Galaxy AI Features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/26/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→ENPositive: Awesome performance; tough device; high security; beautiful design; smart Galaxy AI Features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→ENPositive: Elegant design; decent processor; nice gaming performance; high security; quick charging; excellent cameras; smart Galaxy AI Features.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2025
Source: Viettelstore
VN→ENPositive: Great AMOLED 120Hz display; powerful processor; 8GB RAM; high performance; decent battery life; quick 45W charging; good connectivity. Negative: Only 128GB ROM; average secondary camera.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/27/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→ENPositive: Modern design; solid workmanship; high performance; smart AI Features; powerful processor; beautiful display; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2025
Source: FPT shop
VN→ENPositive: Trendy design; nice cameras; affordable price; decent performance.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2025
Source: Viettelstore
VN→ENPositive: Modern design; great AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; decent battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/21/2025
Source: Viettelstore
VN→ENPositive: Elegant design; nice performance; great cameras; tough device; smart AI Features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2025
Source: The Gioididong
VN→ENPositive: Modern design; powerful processor; decent performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2025
Source: Jagat Review
ID→ENPositive: Quick charging; waterproof IP67; beautiful 120Hz AMOLED display; elegant design. Negative: Average CPU; mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2025
Source: Laptop.bg
BU→ENPositive: Bright AMOLED 120Hz display; slim size; light weight; premium design; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent battery life; quick 45W charging; great main camera; stereo speakers; smart AI Features; affordable price. Negative: Thick frames; poor secondary camera; plastic case; no telephoto lens.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2025
Source: Komputer for alle
DA→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2025
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Komputer for alle
DA→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2025
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2025
Rating: Total score: 74% display: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla
SV→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobile-com JP
JA→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/19/2025
Rating: performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Go4it.ro
→ENPositive: Big screen; nice Super AMOLED display; great main camera; quick 45W charging; long battery life; support 5G. Negative: Poor secondary camera; unsupported wireless charging; without headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/09/2025
Source: Computerblog.ro
→ENPositive: Premium design; great built quality; waterproof IP67; decent battery life; good cameras; affordable price. Negative: Average CPU; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2025
Comment
Model:
The latest to join the Samsung family is none other than the Samsung Galaxy A56. It has been shaped up to be a solid mid-range contender with a range of notable features, following in the footsteps of its predecessor, the Galaxy A55. While the A55 did not reach the U.S. market in 2024, the A56 has generated excitement with its rumoured upgrades and improvements. Talking about its design and display, the A56 is expected to continue the Galaxy A series' sleek design, featuring an aluminium frame with a glass back. Furthermore, the display is expected to likely sport a 6.4-inch AMOLED screen with FHD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colours and smooth scrolling, much like the A55. This combination of design and display is set to provide an excellent viewing experience, especially for a mid-range device. The rear camera array on the A56 will reportedly consist of a 50MP primary lens, a 12MP ultrawide, and a 5MP macro lens, just like its predecessor the Galaxy A55 and A54. This setup offers solid versatility for photography, from wide-angle shots to close-ups. However, the selfie camera might be a downgrade, rumoured to be 12MP, compared to the 32MP camera on the A55. This would be a surprising move, if it turns out to be true.
As for its processor, under the hood, the Galaxy A56 will be powered by the Exynos 1580 chipset, a step up from the Exynos 1480 in the A55. Since the Exynos 1480 struggled to match the performance of competitors like the Google Pixel 7a, the Exynos 1580 is expected to deliver improved performance, boosting benchmarking scores and ensuring smoother multitasking and app performance. In terms of its performance, this device will offer a choice of 8GB or 12GB of RAM which can be paired with either 128GB or 256GB of internal storage. This ensures ample memory and storage for most users, even with demanding apps and media files. One of the standout upgrades in the Samsung Galaxy A56 has to be its battery and charging capabilities. The phone will feature a 5,000 mAh battery, similar to its predecessor, but with a significant improvement in charging speeds, offering 45W fast charging. This is a major leap from the 25W charging speeds on the A55 and even matches the charging speeds of the flagship Galaxy S24 Ultra, which is definitely impressive for a mid-range phone. In a nutshell, the Samsung Galaxy A56 appears to be a strong contender in the mid-range market, with a great display, solid camera performance, improved processor, and faster charging—all at an affordable price point. It is definitely a great phone to be explored, depending on the need and preference of the users.
Hands-on article by Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Qualcomm Adreno 710: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SoC. According to Qualcomm, 2x faster than the old Adreno 644 in the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 6 Gen 1: Mid-range SoC with 8 Kryo cores (4x ARM Cortex A78 2.4 GHz performance cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 with 1.8 efficiency cluster) and a 5G modem (up to 2900 Mbps download). The chip is manufactured using the modern 4nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.