Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines5 - unified
Shared Memoryno
Man. Technology5 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G68 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13808 x 2000 MHz? MHz950 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2723     avg: 2894     median: 2955 (1%)     max: 2987 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 783     avg: 1127     median: 825 (1%)     max: 3001 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6103     avg: 6217     median: 6224 (27%)     max: 6317 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7030     avg: 7122     median: 7134 (16%)     max: 7189 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4894     avg: 4964     median: 4969 (21%)     max: 5043 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5024     avg: 5178     median: 5181 (13%)     max: 5323 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 5790     avg: 5815     median: 5792 (51%)     max: 5864 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 6630     avg: 6658     median: 6647 (40%)     max: 6698 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4629     avg: 4724     median: 4730.5 (23%)     max: 4805 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 4848     avg: 4966     median: 4972 (17%)     max: 5070 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.4     median: 13 (2%)     max: 14 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 34.4     median: 34 (3%)     max: 35 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 30.7     median: 31 (3%)     max: 31 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 51     avg: 52     median: 52 (1%)     max: 53 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (3%)     max: 80 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 118     avg: 119     median: 119 (1%)     max: 120 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857     avg: 147409     median: 148214 (15%)     max: 149350 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 136035     avg: 136441     median: 136147 (9%)     max: 137281 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 41.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (1%)     max: 41.92 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3069 (1%)     max: 3098 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039     avg: 3092     median: 3102 (1%)     max: 3123 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
12517 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3997 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32     avg: 5.5     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 8.71 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
58.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
50 55.8 56 58 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
43 50 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
34.1 36 38 39.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 59.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 39.7 39.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.5
Genshin Impact554737
PUBG Mobile373034
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2


1
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 20. 12:46:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Mar 2026 05:30:18 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0.015s ... 0.041s

#8 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.018s ... 0.059s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.067s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.059s ... 0.126s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.448s ... 0.574s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.574s

#14 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.579s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.579s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.581s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.613s

#18 return log +0.196s ... 0.808s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G68 MP5 graphics card

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

An open and transparent 5G Android tablet with a stylus and low price - Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite review

The new Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite is the affordable alternative to the Galaxy Tab S11, but still comes with the S Pen. Thanks to AI and an optional keyboard cover, the Samsung Tab aims to be the ideal companion for school or university on a budget. Read on to find out whether this plan works in our mid-range tablet review.
Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 10.9", 524 g
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

The new Galaxy A smartphone brings a breath of fresh air to the mid-range: Samsung Galaxy A26 5G review

The new Galaxy A smartphones are here, including the Galaxy A26 5G as the most affordable model in 2025. Compared to its predecessor, it has a better processor, a waterproof case, AI functions and now 6 years of updates. Its price is $300, with a strong downward trend.
Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 6.7", 200 g
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G review - A powerful all-rounder with Galaxy S design for under $300

With the Galaxy A35, Samsung has put together a strong smartphone package. The newest mid-range model in the popular Galaxy A series scores points for a wide range of features at a budget price and manages to do a few things better than its predecessor. In addition to more processing power and eSIM support, it also comes with a premium glass case for the first time, just like the design language used in the Galaxy S models.
Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 6.6", 209 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G tablet review – Handy, robust and with removable battery

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G tablet review – Handy, robust and with removable battery

The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 is a water- and dust-resistant tablet with physical buttons, cellular connectivity and a bundled S Pen. It is suitable for those who work in rough environments and need a reliable companion. Read our test to find out whether the compact, rugged tablet is a compelling option.
Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 8", 433 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE in review.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Tablet in review - The gap filler

Samsung is introducing a fan edition of the Galaxy Tab S9, called the Galaxy Tab S9 FE. With this move, Samsung aims to bridge the gap between its flagship models and the more budget-friendly A-series. The Galaxy Tab S9 FE foregoes OLED technology and Snapdragon processing power but comes with a more affordable price tag. We explored for whom this cost-effective option is more suitable.
Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 10.9", 524 g

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) in review - Waterproof XXL tablet with S Pen and a bright display

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A54 5G review - A powerful, mid-range smartphone with many upgrades

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite

Samsung Galaxy M36 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M36 5G

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A26 5G

Samsung Galaxy M35: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A35

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus

Samsung Galaxy F54 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F54 5G

Samsung Galaxy M54: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M54

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung cuts corners on the Galaxy Tab S10 Lite

   » Galaxy Tab S10 Lite: The "play it safe" tablet with 7 years of updates at an affordable price

   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, Tab S11 Ultra and Tab S10 Lite: All Euro prices, specs and configurations leaked

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A26 5G verdict: Reliable daily driver

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 5 Pro: Rugged tablet sports larger battery and brighter display

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE drops to all-time low with $150 Amazon Black Friday discount

   » 256 GB Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE with sizeable discount challenges iPad 10th-Gen value

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy AI to launch soon for Galaxy A35 and Galaxy A55, but with limitations

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 – Rugged tablet with many qualities

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Android tablet hits record-low on Amazon

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » Review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: The Samsung tablet fits into the Galaxy universe

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE - Samsung tightens the performance screw

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 935 *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)