Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines5 - unified
Shared Memoryno
technology5 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G68 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13808 x 2000 MHz? MHz950 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6103     avg: 6217     median: 6224 (27%)     max: 6317 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7030     avg: 7122     median: 7134 (16%)     max: 7189 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4894     avg: 4964     median: 4969 (21%)     max: 5043 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5024     avg: 5178     median: 5181 (13%)     max: 5323 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 5790     avg: 5815     median: 5792 (51%)     max: 5864 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 6630     avg: 6658     median: 6647 (40%)     max: 6698 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4629     avg: 4724     median: 4730.5 (23%)     max: 4805 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 4848     avg: 4966     median: 4972 (17%)     max: 5070 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2723     avg: 2880     median: 2904 (1%)     max: 2987 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 783     avg: 1174     median: 812 (1%)     max: 3001 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (2%)     max: 14 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 34.3     median: 34 (3%)     max: 35 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 30.7     median: 31 (3%)     max: 31 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 52.2     median: 52 (1%)     max: 53 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (3%)     max: 80 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 118     avg: 118.8     median: 119 (1%)     max: 120 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857     avg: 147409     median: 148214 (15%)     max: 149350 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 136035     avg: 136272     median: 136129 (11%)     max: 136930 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 41.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (1%)     max: 41.92 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971     avg: 3039     median: 3042.5 (1%)     max: 3098 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039     avg: 3084     median: 3093.5 (1%)     max: 3109 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
12517 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3997 Points (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32     avg: 5     median: 4.8 (2%)     max: 6.04 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
58.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
50 55.8 56 58 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
43 50 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
34.1 36 38 39.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 59.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 39.7 39.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.5
Genshin Impact554737
PUBG Mobile373034
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2


1
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 07. 05:15:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 06 Aug 2025 11:47:55 +0200 +0.007s ... 0.007s

#4 composed specs +0.137s ... 0.144s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.144s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.144s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0.018s ... 0.162s

#8 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.03s ... 0.192s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.192s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.558s ... 0.749s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.75s

#12 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.756s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.756s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.759s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.79s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.794s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G68 MP5 graphics card

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

The new Galaxy A smartphone brings a breath of fresh air to the mid-range: Samsung Galaxy A26 5G review

The new Galaxy A smartphones are here, including the Galaxy A26 5G as the most affordable model in 2025. Compared to its predecessor, it has a better processor,...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 6.70" | 200 g
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G review - A powerful all-rounder with Galaxy S design for under $300

With the Galaxy A35, Samsung has put together a strong smartphone package. The newest mid-range model in the popular Galaxy A series scores points for a wide ra...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 6.60" | 209 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G tablet review – Handy, robust and with removable battery

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G tablet review – Handy, robust and with removable battery

The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 is a water- and dust-resistant tablet with physical buttons, cellular connectivity and a bundled S Pen. It is suitable for those ...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 8.00" | 433 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE in review.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Tablet in review - The gap filler

Samsung is introducing a fan edition of the Galaxy Tab S9, called the Galaxy Tab S9 FE. With this move, Samsung aims to bridge the gap between its flagship mode...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 10.90" | 524 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) in review - Waterproof XXL tablet with S Pen and a bright display

The IP certification and extended upgrades make the Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus stand out among tablets in the upper mid-range segment. Large display and optional 5G ...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 12.40" | 627 g

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A54 5G review - A powerful, mid-range smartphone with many upgrades

Samsung Galaxy M36 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M36 5G

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A26 5G

Samsung Galaxy M35: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A35

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus

Samsung Galaxy F54 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F54 5G

Samsung Galaxy M54: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M54

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A26 5G verdict: Reliable daily driver

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 5 Pro: Rugged tablet sports larger battery and brighter display

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE drops to all-time low with $150 Amazon Black Friday discount

   » 256 GB Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE with sizeable discount challenges iPad 10th-Gen value

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy AI to launch soon for Galaxy A35 and Galaxy A55, but with limitations

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 – Rugged tablet with many qualities

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Android tablet hits record-low on Amazon

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » Review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: The Samsung tablet fits into the Galaxy universe

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE - Samsung tightens the performance screw

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-04-26)