Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 660

Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement02.12.2020
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5094     avg: 8458     median: 8757 (44%)     max: 9839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7930     avg: 11518     median: 11676 (35%)     max: 12914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959     avg: 5583     median: 5762 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974     avg: 1422     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27 (5%)     max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 69     median: 70.5 (5%)     max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 42     avg: 58.8     median: 62 (7%)     max: 74 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 92.6     median: 95 (2%)     max: 126 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 134.9     median: 134 (8%)     max: 180 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 161     avg: 239.8     median: 250.5 (2%)     max: 294 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 200834     avg: 296369     median: 306160 (38%)     max: 321314 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25     avg: 9.5     median: 10.1 (4%)     max: 13.1 Watt
01234567891011121314Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
118  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
91  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
166  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011860
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Armajet72
PUBG Mobile67605440
Dead Trigger 2166
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4


1

1
4
1

1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list: