Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G710 MP7

ARM Mali-G710 MP7

The ARM Mali-G710 MP7 or MC7 is an integrated high-end graphics card for smartphones with 7 of the 16 possible cores. It is based on the third generation of the Valhall architecture by ARM which offers a 20% higher performance and energy efficiency than the previous generation. We first encountered it in the Google Tensor G2, which is manufactured in 5nm by Samsung.

The theoretical performance of the G710MC7 is about 9% better than the old ARM Mali-G78MC20 in the Tensor G1. Compared to modern high end smartphone GPUs, like the Apple A15 / A16 GPU or the Qualcomm Adreno 730, the G710 MP7 is noticeably slower. Still, modern demanding games like Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile can be played in 60fps fluently (see below).

Mali-G710 Series

Mali-G710 MP10 compare 10
Mali-G710 MP7 7
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines7 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement30.11.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G710 MP7GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Google Tensor G28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 115.49     avg: 117.4     median: 117.4 (1%)     max: 119.21 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4400     avg: 4617     median: 4595.5 (1%)     max: 4878 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.12     avg: 7.7     median: 8 (3%)     max: 8.99 Watt
01234567891011Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
44 58 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
29 40 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
high
58 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
114  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Genshin Impact515135
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile60606040
World of Tanks Blitz114
Battle Bay90
Subway Surfers120
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1
1


5
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 21. 10:47:55

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:32:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.056s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11433 +0.019s ... 0.075s

#7 got single benchmarks 11433 +0.015s ... 0.09s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.294s ... 0.384s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.417s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.417s

#12 Got 22 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.43s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.43s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.434s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.125s ... 0.559s

#16 return log +0.085s ... 0.643s

Performance Rating - Percent
Average Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
 
99.6 pt
Average Qualcomm Adreno 730
 
92.2 pt
Average ARM Mali-G710 MP10
 
88.4 pt
Average Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
 
84.6 pt
Average Apple A15 GPU 4-Core
 
77 pt
Average ARM Mali-G710 MP7
 
63.7 pt
Average ARM Mali-G78 MP20
 
62.7 pt
GFXBench - 2560x1440 GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
  (41 - 52, n=4)
45.9 fps
Average ARM Mali-G710 MP10
  (37 - 45, n=6)
42.2 fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 730
  (19 - 52, n=46)
41 fps
Average Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
  (37.9 - 41.2, n=6)
39.2 fps
Average Apple A15 GPU 4-Core
  (34.6 - 37.2, n=2)
35.9 fps
Average ARM Mali-G710 MP7
  (27 - 33, n=5)
30.2 fps
Average ARM Mali-G78 MP20
  (23 - 30, n=3)
27 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
Average Qualcomm Adreno 730
  (293017 - 479126, n=38)
423760 Points
Average Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
  (408723 - 434496, n=4)
418462 Points
Average ARM Mali-G710 MP10
  (352208 - 411958, n=5)
379075 Points
Average Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
  (296388 - 353729, n=6)