Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16

The ARM Immortalis-G925 MP16 (MC16) is a high-end GPU for smartphones and tablets, which can be found in this form for the first time in the Xiaomi Xring 01. It uses 16 cores (up to 24 possible) and is based on the 5th generation GPU architecture. It is said to work 30% more efficiently than its predecessor and offer up to 37% more performance. The Immortalis-G925 GPUs support Variable Rate Shading (VRS), Deferred Vertex Shading (DVS) and hardware-based ray tracing. The GPU is manufactured in 3 nanometers.

Immortalis-G925 Series

Immortalis-G925 MC16 12
Immortalis-G925 MC12 compare 12
Immortalis-G925 MC11 compare 11
Architecture5th Gen
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines12 - unified
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Man. Technology3 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.2, ASTC, AFBC
Date of Announcement09.10.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Immortalis-G925 MC16GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Xiaomi Xring O110 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2435     avg: 2504     median: 2443 (6%)     max: 2634 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21162     avg: 21750     median: 21789 (11%)     max: 22298 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 6121     avg: 6320     median: 6294 (7%)     max: 6546 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 9463     avg: 9683     median: 9604 (4%)     max: 9983 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 50     avg: 51.7     median: 50 (19%)     max: 55 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 104     avg: 109.7     median: 111 (20%)     max: 114 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 255     avg: 273.3     median: 278 (21%)     max: 287 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 169     avg: 177.7     median: 182 (17%)     max: 182 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 298     avg: 310.3     median: 299 (6%)     max: 334 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 371     avg: 386.7     median: 378 (16%)     max: 411 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 818     avg: 839     median: 834 (7%)     max: 866 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 998639     avg: 1033650     median: 1013030 (70%)     max: 1089280 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
21132 points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
20984 points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.92     avg: 13.6     median: 15.5 (6%)     max: 16.4 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
114 120 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact60
PUBG Mobile606040
Dead Trigger 2117
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





2

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 24. 19:55:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Mar 2026 13:16:09 +0100 +0.006s ... 0.006s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.016s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.016s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13072 +0.022s ... 0.038s

#8 got single benchmarks 13072 +0.009s ... 0.047s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.524s ... 0.571s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.571s

#12 Got 17 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.575s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.575s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.576s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.039s ... 0.615s

#16 return log +0.326s ... 0.942s

Notebook reviews with ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16 graphics card

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Android tablet review

An extremely fast 12.5-inch Android tablet at a top price - Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro review

For a mid-range tablet, the Pad 7S Pro's specs promise excellent value. A high-resolution display with stylus support, optionally available with an anti-reflective coating, a flagship processor, and up to 1 TB of storage. Has Xiaomi managed to create the perfect iPad killer?
Xiaomi Xring O1, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12.5", 576 g
Xiaomi 15S Pro test (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone

The Xiaomi 15S Pro features the new XRing O1 processor, Leica-branded cameras and an advanced silicon-carbon battery, all at a compelling price. In this Notebookcheck review, we explore how it compares to the Xiaomi 15 Pro and whether it’s worth your money.
Xiaomi Xring O1, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16, 6.73", 216 g
The best Android tablet - Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

The best Android tablet isn't from Samsung – Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra review

The 14-inch Pad 7 Ultra is a superlative tablet, stealing the show from the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. With its optional matte finish, the outstanding OLED panel offers the perfect conditions for stylus-based mobile use. But can the new XRing O1 keep up with the Snapdragon 8 Elite?
Xiaomi Xring O1, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16, 14", 609 g

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro: Xiaomi Xring O1, 12.50", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro

Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra: Xiaomi Xring O1, 14.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

Xiaomi 15S Pro: Xiaomi Xring O1, 6.73", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 15S Pro

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro: Xiaomi Xring O1, 12.50", 0.6 kg
   » Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro is a great choice especially without OLED - review conclusion

Xiaomi 15S Pro: Xiaomi Xring O1, 6.73", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Xiaomi 15S Pro: One of the best smartphones in 2025

   » Xiaomi already working on XRing O2 processor

Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra: Xiaomi Xring O1, 14.00", 0.6 kg
   » Xiaomi already working on XRing O2 processor

   » Verdict on the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra: The best Android tablet is not from Samsung

Xiaomi 15S Pro: Xiaomi Xring O1, 6.73", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi XRing O1 review sneak peek: This is how Xiaomi's new SoC compares to the Snapdragon 8 Elite

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 935 *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)