Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrost
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines10 - unified
Shared Memoryno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Man. Technology7 nm
Date of Announcement31.08.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G76 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98258 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 98208 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 65614     avg: 68730     median: 68654 (7%)     max: 72022 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4052     avg: 4561     median: 4618 (20%)     max: 5048 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 5066     median: 5083 (11%)     max: 5605 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4529     avg: 4827     median: 4720.5 (20%)     max: 5300 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5358     avg: 5606     median: 5394.5 (13%)     max: 6087 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4015     avg: 4653     median: 4502 (40%)     max: 5186 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4507     avg: 5329     median: 5303 (32%)     max: 6058 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4383     avg: 4639     median: 4528 (22%)     max: 5003 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5152     avg: 5349     median: 5196 (17%)     max: 5712 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 43.8     median: 45 (3%)     max: 48 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 21     avg: 35.5     median: 39 (4%)     max: 43 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 58.7     median: 59 (1%)     max: 67 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 80     median: 85 (4%)     max: 89 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 50     avg: 103.7     median: 96.5 (1%)     max: 143 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
7354 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
6315 Points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
58  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
38 39 40 40 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
58 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
29 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile583939
Arena of Valor6060
Shadow Fight 36060
Battle Bay60
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
2

1


2
3


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 17. 14:17:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Feb 2026 18:09:29 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0.015s ... 0.044s

#8 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.015s ... 0.06s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.345s ... 0.405s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.405s

#12 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.41s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.41s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.413s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.065s ... 0.478s

#16 return log +0.544s ... 1.022s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G76 MP12 graphics card

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Smartphone Review: Optimised SoC promises better runtimes

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Smartphone Review: Optimised SoC promises better runtimes

The S-Pen and stunning display once again distinguish the Galaxy Note from its Galaxy S sibling. This year’s Galaxy Note is the first to feature a newer SoC than the Galaxy S that preceded it, so it will be intriguing to see what improvements the Exynos 9825 brings over the Exynos 9820. In many ways, the Note 10+ is a re-bodied Galaxy S10+ with a few tweaks and omissions. Read on to find out how the Note 10+ performs in this live review.
Update: Live Review completed.
Samsung Exynos 9825, ARM Mali-G76 MP12, 6.8", 196 g
Samsung Galaxy Note 10

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Smartphone Review: Still the best business smartphone?

Is the Galaxy Note 10 merely a smaller version of the Note 10+, or is there more at hand? Well, the smaller battery, display, RAM, and storage all suggest so, but the Note 10 is more than just a scaled-down Note 10+. The inclusion of an S Pen should still help the Note 10 appeal to business users, as will it being cheaper than the Note 10+ too. Read on in this live review to find out our thoughts on this year’s baby Galaxy Note.
Update: Live Review finished.
Samsung Exynos 9825, ARM Mali-G76 MP12, 6.3", 168 g
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Smartphone Review: A turbocharged S10 with a cutting-edge addition

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Smartphone Review: A turbocharged S10 with a cutting-edge addition

Samsung announced the Galaxy S10 5G at MWC 19, but it has taken a while to arrive in Europe. It is bigger, has more cameras and has a larger battery than its S10 siblings, but there are some trade-offs too. Samsung has not managed to eradicate the issues we had with the rest of the S10 series, either. Read on to find out more in this detailed review.
Samsung Exynos 9820, ARM Mali-G76 MP12, 6.7", 198 g
Samsung Galaxy S10e

Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone Review

The smallest new flagship from Samsung should appeal to people for whom spending almost €1,000 (~$1,125) on a smartphone is abhorrent. The S10e has many of the features that its more expensive siblings do, but Samsung has made some compromises to keep the costs down. Read on to find out how the S10e performs in our tests and whether it offers better value for money than the Galaxy S10 or S10+.
Samsung Exynos 9820, ARM Mali-G76 MP12, 5.8", 150 g
Samsung Galaxy S10 Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy S10 Smartphone Review

Samsung has priced the smaller version of the top-tier S10 models more attractively than the S10+. In addition to its smaller display comes a lower capacity battery, a single front-facing camera along with less internal storage. Likewise, there is no option for a ceramic back as there is with the S10+. Read on to find out how the Galaxy S10 compares against its Plus namesake and how it stands up against other modern flagships.
Update: Additional battery life tests added.
Samsung Exynos 9820, ARM Mali-G76 MP12, 6.1", 157 g

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus: Samsung Exynos 9820, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy S10+ Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy M62: Samsung Exynos 9825, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M62

Samsung Galaxy F62: Samsung Exynos 9825, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F62

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Star Wars Edition: Samsung Exynos 9825, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Star Wars Edition

Samsung Galaxy Note10 5G: Samsung Exynos 9825, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note10 5G

Samsung Galaxy Note10+: Samsung Exynos 9825, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note 10+

Samsung Galaxy Note10: Samsung Exynos 9825, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note 10

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G: Samsung Exynos 9820, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S10 5G

Samsung Galaxy S10e: Samsung Exynos 9820, 5.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S10e

Samsung Galaxy S10: Samsung Exynos 9820, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S10

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus: Samsung Exynos 9820, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-02-22)