Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Qualcomm Adreno 650

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.

The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).

As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering). 

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Core Speed250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement04.12.2019
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 110875     avg: 149779     median: 149017 (15%)     max: 180392 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7970     avg: 9563     median: 9684 (42%)     max: 11492 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11617     avg: 13051     median: 12858 (28%)     max: 16809 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6960     avg: 8089     median: 8085 (34%)     max: 8975 Points
+ 38 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8593     avg: 9728     median: 9498 (24%)     max: 11999 Points
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 8215     avg: 8929     median: 8867 (79%)     max: 10046 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10599     avg: 11936     median: 11577.5 (69%)     max: 14283 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5996     avg: 7150     median: 7178 (35%)     max: 7881 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 6500     avg: 8287     median: 8299 (28%)     max: 9167 Points
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3789     avg: 4168     median: 4230 (2%)     max: 5039 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1103     avg: 1218     median: 1223 (1%)     max: 1246 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (5%)     max: 62 fps
+ 43 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (2%)     max: 103 fps
+ 43 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (5%)     max: 151 fps
+ 42 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
+ 42 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 214123     avg: 240087     median: 240035 (24%)     max: 276746 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
2688 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
2532 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
54110 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42627 Points (71%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18     avg: 8.2     median: 7.6 (3%)     max: 12.7 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60 119 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60 117 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60 118 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
60 144 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift908989
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact6060
Armajet71
PUBG Mobile61585340
Arena of Valor6160
Dead Trigger 2100
Asphalt 9: Legends4541
Real Racing 3102
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5

1


2
4

1
5






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.32
log 21. 13:15:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 20 Apr 2025 05:06:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.015s ... 0.053s

#8 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.086s ... 0.139s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.139s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.438s ... 0.577s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.577s

#12 Got 157 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.6s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.6s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.604s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.077s ... 0.681s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.684s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 650 graphics card

Xiaomi Pad 6 tablet review

Xiaomi Pad 6 review: Massively improved tablet with stylus support at the same affordable price

In our review, the Xiaomi Pad 6 midrange tablet shows itself improved in many areas compared to the Xiaomi Pad 5. The 11-inch tablet, which has an attractively ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 11.00" | 490 g
Huawei MatePad Pro 11

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 tablet review – A more affordable iPad Pro?

The MatePad Pro 11 is an affordable premium tablet with stylus support and an AMOLED display. There are a couple of drawbacks, since it is a Huawei device: It c...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 11.00" | 449 g
Xiaomi Poco F4 review: Great smartphone, but lacking innovation

Xiaomi Poco F4 review: Great smartphone, but lacking innovation

Poco smartphones stand for a good price-performance ratio. But the new Poco F4 is very similar to its F3 predecessor - even the processor is identical. Moreover...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 6.67" | 195 g
Black Shark 5

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 smartphone review - Gaming joy at an affordable price

As a cheaper gaming model, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 comes with a fast but not a top processor. However, the 144 Hz screen of the Pro model remains. Is the Black...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 6.67" | 220 g
realme GT Neo 3T

realme GT Neo 3T smartphone review: Colorful phone with bright AMOLED

The realme GT Neo 3T draws attention with its flashy colors and a "Dragon Ball Z" special edition case. Is this all just hype, or does the mid-range smartphone ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 6.62" | 194.5 g

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.60", 0.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Review: 5G Tablet Laptop Alternative with large 120 Hz Display

Xiaomi 12X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.28", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi 12X Smartphone Review - Xiaomi's Most Affordable 12-Series Premium Smartphone

Realme GT Neo 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme GT NEO 2 Smartphone Review - Challenge to the top class

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Tablet review: Fast iPad competitor with 120 Hz

Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Edge 20 Pro review: Budget flagship smartphone with a 144 Hz display and 12 GB of RAM

ZTE Axon 30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  Review » ZTE Axon 30 5G smartphone review: Significantly improved under-display camera

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 13.00", 0.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 tablet review – Multimedia pad with powerful sound

Huawei MatePad 11 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 10.95", 0.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MatePad 11 Review - Great tablet with few weaknesses

Vivo X60 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  Review » Vivo X60 Pro review - Upper-class smartphone with virtual RAM & gimbal camera

Xiaomi Black Shark 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 4 smartphone review - Mobile gaming with 144 Hz display

Xiaomi Poco F3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Poco F3 review: Power smartphone for little money

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » Camera comparison OnePlus 9 Pro vs. OnePlus 8 Pro as blind test - Progress at first glance?

Motorola Moto G100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G100 smartphone review: Fast 5G mobile phone as PC replacement

Oppo Find X3 Neo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X3 Neo smartphone in review: Focus on the camera

OnePlus 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 9 vs. OnePlus 8T smartphone camera comparison: Is Hasselblad the winner or is it OIS?

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.65", 0.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo Legion Phone Duel Smartphone Review- Gaming phone with 144 Hz screen

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Camera comparison: Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Samsung's Allstars

Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G review: Has almost everything that defines a top smartphone

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra smartphone review - Is the hype around the Xiaomi phone justified?

Asus ROG Phone 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.59", 0.2 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Phone 3 Review - The smartphone with the extra performance

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10T smartphone review: Flagship power for little money

Sony Xperia 5 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Sony Xperia 5 II smartphone in review – On its way with 5G and cinema format

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Smartphone Review: After Community feedback, the best Galaxy S20

Nubia RedMagic 5S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nubia RedMagic 5S Review: Gaming smartphone with active cooling

Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Asus Zenfone 7 Pro (ZS671KS) Smartphone Review: Flip camera - take two

OnePlus 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 8T Smartphone Review – Faster charging for less money

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 7.60", 0.3 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Smartphone Review - A great and expensive foldable phone

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 11.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Tablet Review - Doubtlessly the best 11-inch Android tablet

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 12.40", 0.6 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Review - Finally a great Android tablet

Sony Xperia 1 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Sony Xperia 1 II Smartphone Review: The Alpha-camera flagship

Motorola Edge Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Edge Plus Smartphone Review – High-End Again at Last

Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition Review - A true gaming smartphone

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Smartphone Review - Mid-range Phone with an HDR AMOLED Display and >1000 nits

Xiaomi Black Shark 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Smartphone Review – Gaming Power with LED Effects

Nubia RedMagic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nubia RedMagic 5G smartphone review - Strong as a gaming phone, weaknesses in everyday life

OnePlus 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 8 in Review: Great smartphone even in the non-pro version

Realme X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme X50 Pro Smartphone Review - Price-performance Hit?

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » Camera comparison OnePlus 8 Pro vs. 7T Pro: Test results completely different than expected

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 7.10", 0.3 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Smartphone Review - Powerful Gaming Smartphone with a Drawback

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro review: GCam port vs. stock camera – Serious differences to some extent

Xiaomi Mi 10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Smartphone Review: More Megapixels

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » Camera Test: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Huawei P40 Pro vs OnePlus 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro – low-light fiasco for Samsung

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Camera Test: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Huawei P40 Pro vs OnePlus 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro – low-light fiasco for Samsung

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 8 Pro Smartphone Review: Now also charges wirelessly

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro vs. Mi 9 camera comparison: A result couldn't be clearer?

  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Smartphone Review: Xiaomi has joined the smartphone elite

Oppo Find X2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X2 Pro Smartphone Review - The burden of an astronomical price

Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad Pro 12.7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.70", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad Pro 12.7

Vivo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Vivo Pad Air

Xiaomi Pad 6: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 6

Huawei MatePad 11 2023: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 11 2023

Vivo S16: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S16

ZTE Axon 30s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 30s

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Huawei Matepad Pro 11 2022

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4

Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE

Vivo T2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T2

ZTE Axon 40 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 40 Pro

Vivo S15: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S15

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F4

Realme GT Neo 3T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Neo 3T

Realme Q5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q5 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 5

Vivo iQOO Neo6: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo6

Nubia RedMagic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia RedMagic 5G

Xiaomi Redmi K40S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K40S

Vivo Pad: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Vivo Pad

  External Review » Oppo Pad

Xiaomi 12X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.28", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 12X

Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE

Xiaomi Black Shark 4S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 4S

Meizu 18X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 18X

Realme GT Neo 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Neo 2

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.60", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

Oppo Reno6 Pro+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 Pro+

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro

Realme GT Explorer Master Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Explorer Master Edition

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 13.00", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Tab 13

Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 20 Pro

ZTE Axon 30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 30 5G

Huawei MatePad 11 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 10.95", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 11 2021

Oppo Find X3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X3

Vivo X60: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X60

Vivo iQOO Neo5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo5

Xiaomi Mi 11X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 11X

OnePlus 9R: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 9R

Motorola Moto G100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G100

Xiaomi Black Shark 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 4

Meizu Flyme 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu Flyme 9

Xiaomi Redmi K40: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K40

Xiaomi Mi 10S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10S

Xiaomi Poco F3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F3

Oppo Find X3 Neo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X3 Neo

Motorola Edge S: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge S

Sony Xperia Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia Pro

Vivo X60 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X60 Pro

Oppo Reno5 Pro+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno5 Pro+

Xiaomi Redmi K30S Extreme: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30S Extreme

Samsung W21 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 7.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung W21 5G

Xiaomi Redmi K30S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30S

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3S

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G

Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G

OnePlus 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 8T

Sony Xperia 5 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 5 II

Asus Zenfone 7 ZS670KS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenfone 7 ZS670KS

Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS

Vivo iQOO 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO 5

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition

Vivo X50 Pro+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50 Pro+

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 7.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Phone Duel

Asus ROG Phone 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Phone 3

Xiaomi Black Shark 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Realme X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme X50 Pro

Meizu 17 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 17 Pro

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro

Oppo Reno Ace 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno Ace 2

Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro

Vivo Apex 2020: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.45", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Apex 2020

Sony Xperia 1 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 1 II

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 7.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi BlackShark 3 Pro

ZTE Nubia Red Magic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Nubia Red Magic 5G

Motorola Edge Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge+

Vivo Nex 3S 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.89", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Nex 3S 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 7.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3

OnePlus 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 8

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 8 Pro

Vivo iQOO 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO 3

LG V60 ThinQ 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG V60 ThinQ 5G

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro

Oppo Find X2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X2 Pro

Xiaomi Mi 10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10

Oppo Realme X50 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme X50 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Pad 6: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Test verdict on the Xiaomi Pad 6: More of a tablet isn't necessary

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Poco F5 Pro unboxing video and Poco F5 live images surface ahead of May 9 launch

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » Xiaomi Pad 6 and Pad 6 Pro tablets debut with appealing price tags and solid hardware

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Alleged Poco F5 Pro specs leak with a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and 64 MP camera on the cards

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » New Xiaomi Pad 6 series info leaks with a new Redmi tablet seemingly imminent

   » Xiaomi Pad 6: New leak reveals SoC options and launch date info for Xiaomi's next-gen tablets

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.4 kg
   » Huawei MatePad Pro 11: A cheaper iPad Pro that performs better in a few areas

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » F4 or X4 GT: Poco mid-range smartphones in comparison

Realme GT Neo 3T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
   » realme GT Neo 3T: Why we find the mid-range smartphone quite bold

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.60", 0.6 kg
   » Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Review Verdict: Premium Tablet with Compelling Business Features

Xiaomi 12X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.28", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 12X: The smallest 12-series smartphone steals the show

Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Edge 20 Pro flagship smartphone review verdict: Are the compromises too big?

ZTE Axon 30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
   » ZTE Axon 30 5G: The smartphone with the best under-display camera

Huawei MatePad 11 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 10.95", 0.5 kg
   » Huawei MatePad 11: Price-to-performance champion!

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 13.00", 0.8 kg
   » Yoga Tab 13: Lenovo forgot the camera in its entertainment tablet

Xiaomi Poco F3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Poco F3: The new king of the mid-range?

Motorola Moto G100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » The Motorola Moto G100 shows why we might no longer need a PC soon

Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro: The test results in overview

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi's fast-charging technology used in the Mi 10 Ultra is a game changer

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Mi 10T: The test results in overview

Sony Xperia 5 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.10", 0.2 kg
   » Sony Xperia 5 II: The software does it

Nubia RedMagic 5S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
   » Nubia RedMagic 5S: Gaming smartphone with only a small amount of competitors

Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Asus ZenFone 7 Pro: An overview of the results

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 7.60", 0.3 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G: Too expensive for mass appeal?

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 LTE: The best 11-inch Android tablet gets even better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: The drawbacks and advantages of the large Samsung tablet

Sony Xperia 1 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Xperia 1 II: Sony focuses on its strengths

Motorola Edge Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Edge+ did not fully entice us

Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.59", 0.2 kg
   » Asus ROG Phone 3: Not only hardware makes the difference

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Poco F2 Pro proves itself in our review: A 60-Hz panel can still deliver a great visual experience

Xiaomi Black Shark 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Black Shark 3: This black shark isn't a long-distance swimmer

OnePlus 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » OnePlus 8: Does anyone even still need the Pro version?

Nubia RedMagic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
   » Battery-killing 144 Hz display in the Nubia RedMagic 5G: Is it all just marketing?

Realme X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
   » Realme X50 Pro leaves a lot of its potential untapped due to camera deficits

Nubia RedMagic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
   » Are gaming smartphones such as the Black Shark 3 and Nubia RedMagic the new flagship killers?

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 7.10", 0.3 kg
   » Are gaming smartphones such as the Black Shark 3 and Nubia RedMagic the new flagship killers?

Xiaomi Mi 10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Mi 10: Without good software, a lot of megapixels won't help

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » OnePlus 8 Pro: Is the high price justified?

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Opinion: Xiaomi's high prices were inevitable and Huawei's ban is a blessing

   » The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro's display simultaneously impresses and disappoints

OnePlus 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Do smartphones really need 120-Hz screens?

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-12-22)