Notebookcheck Logo

realme GT Neo 3T smartphone review: Colorful phone with bright AMOLED

Kamehameha. The realme GT Neo 3T draws attention with its flashy colors and a "Dragon Ball Z" special edition case. Is this all just hype, or does the mid-range smartphone also prove itself in our review?
realme GT Neo 3T

The realme GT Neo 3T is the slightly cheaper variant of the GT Neo 3 that we reviewed a short while ago. It is also more daring in terms of color options: Potential buyers can choose between an eye-catching yellow or the "Dragon Ball Z" edition in blue and orange that we have as our review sample.

At a price between US$ 430 - 470 (depending on the configuration), the phone falls into the mid-range and faces strong competitors such as the OnePlus Nord 2T or the Samsung Galaxy A53. Find out if Realme's colorful smartphone proves itself in the following review. 

realme GT Neo 3T (GT Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.62 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 360Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.65 x 162.9 x 75.8 ( = 0.34 x 6.41 x 2.98 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 80W UltraDart Charge
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.25, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, screen protector, USB-C cable, SIM card, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.730W/​kg (head), 0.990W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
194.5 g ( = 6.86 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
470 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.7 %
07/2022
realme GT Neo 3T
SD 870, Adreno 650
194.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.62"2400x1080
86.3 %
06/2022
realme GT Neo 3
Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6
188 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.4 %
06/2022
OnePlus Nord 2T
Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.3 %
02/2022
Motorola Moto G200 5G
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
202 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080

Case: Bold choice of colors available

As previously mentioned, it doesn't get boring when it comes to color selection: Our review sample is the "Dragon Ball Z" edition, which only differs from the standard version of the GT Neo 3T in visual details: An orange back with a logo and blue sides gives the smartphone a unique look. The phone also has a special design for the user interface in anime style and a special charging animation.

The normal realme GT Neo 3T already stands out in terms of color choice: the yellow variant with fluorescent particles has a racing flag design on the back. The white variant also uses the racing flag design. Only the black variant is more reserved with a uniform matte design on the back.

The GT Neo 3T differs only minimally from the GT Neo 3 in terms of dimensions, but is considerably heavier. The smartphone can be twisted minimally and creaks quietly under torsion, but overall case stability is good.

IP certification is lacking, so you can't be sure if the phone will survive a fall into water.

Color variants: Drifting White
Color variants: Drifting White
Dash Yellow
Dash Yellow
Shade Black
Shade Black
realme GT Neo 3T
realme GT Neo 3T
realme GT Neo 3T
realme GT Neo 3T
realme GT Neo 3T
realme GT Neo 3T

Size Comparison

168.1 mm / 6.62 inch 75.5 mm / 2.97 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.65 mm / 0.3406 inch 194.5 g0.4288 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 75.6 mm / 2.98 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 188 g0.4145 lbs159.6 mm / 6.28 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.73 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 158 g0.3483 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 73.2 mm / 2.88 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs

Equipment: 3 versions of the realme GT Neo 3T

In total, realme offers its smartphone in 3 price ranges:

  • realme GT Neo 3T 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage: US$ 430 (estimated)
  • realme GT Neo 3T 8 GB RAM / 256 GB storage: US$ 470 (estimated)
  • realme GT Neo 3T Dragon Ball Z Edition 8 GB RAM / 256 GB storage: US$ 500 (estimated)

There is no microSD reader for memory expansion, but dual-SIM is possible. NFC is also on board, so nothing stands in the way of using the smartphone as a mobile means of payment. Bluetooth 5.2 is a fairly up-to-date version of the wireless interface for audio and data transmission.

Bottom: speaker, USB-C port, microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: speaker, USB-C port, microphone, SIM slot
Top: microphone
Top: microphone
Right: standby button
Right: standby button
Left: volume rocker
Left: volume rocker

Software: Standard update timeframe

The realme UI 3 is based on Android 12. The manufacturer promises 2 Android updates and 3 years of security patches, but other manufacturers such as Samsung are now going well beyond that. At the time of review, the last security update was from May 2022 and thus already a few months old. Buyers therefore cannot expect monthly patches.

The realme UI is quick and easy to use for Android connoisseurs, even if some details are designed a little differently than on stock Android. However, the manufacturer generally uses Google's applications for most apps, so adjustment shouldn't prove problematic.

Software of the realme GT Neo 3T
Software of the realme GT Neo 3T
Software of the realme GT Neo 3T
Software of the realme GT Neo 3T
Software of the realme GT Neo 3T
Software of the realme GT Neo 3T

Communication & GNSS: Good WLAN speed

The real-world GT Neo 3T supports a lot of 4G frequencies, so you can use it for mobile internet access in many countries around the world. 5G is also on board with a fairly wide frequency spectrum. During testing, we randomly checked the smartphone's reception quality and we were very satisfied: even flagship phones don't perform better in many situations, and the reception is usually good, even indoors.

WiFi 6 is available as the fastest WLAN standard. The realme phone thus enables fast data transfer, as confirmed under testing with our Asus ROG AXE11000 reference router: The smartphone beats all comparison devices in the send direction. In the receive direction, however, it ranks in the middle in terms of speed.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (630min - 853max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
707 (654min - 807max) MBit/s ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=115, last 2 years)
610 MBit/s ∼76% -14%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
451 (397min - 461max) MBit/s ∼56% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼43% -51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
899 (804min - 933max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (867min - 902max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
860 (787min - 887max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=116, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼30% -70%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (759min - 906max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1368, n=148, last 2 years)
485 MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (809min - 863max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 953, n=149, last 2 years)
458 MBit/s ∼55%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø707 (654-807)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø899 (804-933)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

After a short delay, the realme phone is pinpointed outdoors at an accuracy of up to 3 meters. Numerous satellite networks are used to determine the location of the smartphone, including GPS, Galileo, Glonass or Beidou, but not the SBAS support system, which increases accuracy.

In our practical test, a bike ride on which we also took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch for comparison, the realme GT Neo 3T proves to be a good navigation device. Occasionally the location was slightly off-route, placing us in front yards or making it appear as if though we were riding through houses. The Garmin Venu 2 is a little more accurate here, especially in the narrow streets of the old town. But those who do not need absolute precision will find the localization capabilities of the realme smartphone sufficient enough for navigational tasks. 

Tracking the realme GT Neo 3T - overview
Tracking the realme GT Neo 3T - overview
Tracking the realme GT Neo 3T - loop
Tracking the realme GT Neo 3T - loop
Tracking the realme GT Neo 3T - bridge
Tracking the realme GT Neo 3T - bridge
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 - overview
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 - overview
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 - loop
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 - loop
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 - bridge
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 - bridge

Telephony & Voice Quality: Clear communication

realme uses Google's phone app by default, which is familiar from other Android phones and should make switching smartphones easier.

Communication with the other party via the earpiece works clearly and smoothly. Callers can also understand each other very clearly via the speaker and hands-free microphone, except when we speak too quietly, which then causes problems for the microphone of the realme GT Neo 3T. 

Cameras: Hybrid zoom is missing

Photo with the front camera
Photo with the front camera

The camera system consists of 3 cameras, including a wide-angle camera and a macro lens. It is thus quite similar to the camera setup of the realme GT Neo 3. The only difference is the sensor of the main camera: while the GT Neo 3 uses the Sony IMX766, the cheaper model uses the OV64B from OmniVision.

This allows you to take decent photos, but the GT Neo 3T uses very strong colors that sometimes look very bright. Also, the white flowers of the fuchsia in the first picture overshine, so that some details are lost.

More details can also be seen in the photo of the surroundings with the high-end cameras, and the sky also looks much less grainy here than in the pictures from the realme phone. We quite like the sharpness in low light, but the dark areas are not brightened as well here.

The wide-angle camera takes decent snapshots. However, there are much better photos from other smartphones, such as the Honor Magic4 Pro, which gives much sharper detail of the roof of the large building on the opposite side of the river than the camera in the realme phone, which only produces pixel mush.

As with the GT Neo 3, we are also bothered by the fact that a hybrid zoom between the ultra-wide-angle and main camera is not possible, but only a direct switching. Other camera systems offer more flexibility here.

Videos can be recorded in 4K at a maximum of 60 fps with the main camera. Autofocus and brightness adjustment worked quite well in our tests. Recordings are also possible with the wide-angle camera, but you have to decide on a lens in advance, since this cannot be changed during recording.

The front camera has a resolution of 16 megapixels. Selfies are successful in good lighting conditions and can also be enlarged somewhat without losing too much detail.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: flowerMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low lightWide angle camera
click to load images

The main camera does a solid job in the photo lab. Slight blurring in texts is only visible upon closer examination. Pictures become quite noisy at 1 lux illumination. We really like the color reproduction under perfect lighting conditions, but it is a little too bright.

ColorChecker
17.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker realme GT Neo 3T: 10.5 ∆E min: 3.14 - max: 17.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
23.3 ∆E
34 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
36 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker realme GT Neo 3T: 29.85 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 43.44 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty: 80-watt power supply included

Inclusion of the charging device upon purchase is no longer standard among all manufacturers. The GT Neo 3T, on the other hand, includes a quick charger and everything else you need, including a protective case out of silicone. However, we would have liked a little more creativity in the "Dragon Ball Z" edition: The protective case is a simple anthracite color. But the SIM tool has an appropriate design.

The warranty is 24 months when purchased in the EU. This may differ in other countries and regions.

Input Devices & Operation: Fingerprint sensor placed deep

Operating the 120 Hz touchscreen is a pleasure. realme specifies a 1,000 Hz sampling rate, meaning that the touchscreen is scanned 1,000 times per second for touches. The display can adjust its frame rate to the respective content in 4 steps, which worked reliably and without noticeable jerks in our tests.

Below the screen is the fingerprint sensor, which can also measure the heart rate (as a nice gimmick). But this feature is primarily used to unlock the smartphone or individual apps, which it does so with good accuracy after the finger is registered and with a barely noticeable delay. However, the sensor is placed a bit too low for our taste.

Face recognition can also be used for the biometric security check. However, this is a software solution that works reliably but is not quite as secure as hardware-based 3D recognition of the face.

Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode

Display: OLED screen with optional DC dimming

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
0% brightness with DC dimming
0% brightness with DC dimming

Like its more expensive sibling, the realme GT Neo 3T features a bright AMOLED screen with expanded Full HD resolution. Most other phones in this price range also offer such a screen, but the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE offers even more brightness with a fully exposed brightness sensor.

We achieved up to 1010 cd/m² of brightness in APL-18 mode, so the smartphone is suitable for playing HDR content, as stated by the manufacturer.

Since the OLED display can completely switch off individual pixels, a complete black is theoretically possible and with it, an infinite contrast ratio.

745
cd/m²
766
cd/m²
759
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
754
cd/m²
764
cd/m²
755
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
765
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 766 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 758 cd/m² Minimum: 1.87 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 754 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.57 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.165
realme GT Neo 3T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.62
realme GT Neo 3
AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
OnePlus Nord 2T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G200 5G
IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.80
Screen
9%
-6%
24%
-50%
-58%
Brightness middle
754
759
1%
718
-5%
797
6%
561
-26%
512
-32%
Brightness
758
758
0%
730
-4%
800
6%
573
-24%
488
-36%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
92
-5%
97
0%
96
-1%
87
-10%
Black Level *
0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.57
1.3
17%
1.62
-3%
0.9
43%
2.67
-70%
3.42
-118%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.51
2.73
22%
4.21
-20%
2
43%
6.15
-75%
5.9
-68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.7
15%
2
-0%
1.1
45%
4.1
-105%
3.7
-85%
Gamma
2.165 102%
2.232 99%
2.156 102%
2.26 97%
2.245 98%
7154 0%
CCT
6506 100%
6616 98%
6545 99%
6397 102%
7104 91%
1.944 334362%
Contrast
1422

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 471.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 471.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 471.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19625 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

0% brightness
0% brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness with DC dimming
50% brightness with DC dimming
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Messreihe mit fixer Zoomstufe und unterschiedlichen Helligkeitseinstellungen

In our measurements with the CalMAN software and the spectrophotometer, the phone proves to be very color-accurate, so you could also evaluate printing ink colors on the screen with the appropriate settings. The response times are very short and thus optimal for demanding users.

We noticed the usual PWM flickering in OLED screens at low brightness levels, which can be cushioned by a DC dimming mode, but this is hidden in the developer settings. At 50% brightness and above there are hardly any differences between the two modes.

CalMAN grayscale – color profile "natural"
CalMAN grayscale – color profile "natural"
CalMAN color accuracy – color profile "natural"
CalMAN color accuracy – color profile "natural"
CalMAN color space: sRGB
CalMAN color space: sRGB
CalMAN color space: DCI P3
CalMAN color space: DCI P3
CCalMAN color space: AdobeRGB
CCalMAN color space: AdobeRGB
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36 ms).

The smartphone can be used outdoors on bright days without issue, but a shady spot is preferable due to strong reflections on the display.

Viewing angles are impeccable thanks to the OLED panel, even when looking at the display from a very flat viewing angle.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance: A lot of power for the mid-range

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 is a high-end SoC that offers slightly less performance than the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 that realme installed in the GT Neo 3. Nevertheless, differences should rarely be noticeable in practice, especially when using less demanding applications.

Overall, navigating through the menus and apps on the realme GT Neo 3T is smooth and problem-free. The smartphone only reaches its limits in very performance-intensive apps. Compared to other phones in this price range, the GT Neo 3T offers more power. Only the Motorola Moto G200 once again proves to be a powerhouse that is hard to beat.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1076 Points ∼100% +7%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1006 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (955 - 1046, n=14)
991 Points ∼92% -1%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
971 Points ∼90% -3%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
787 Points ∼73% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼69% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=265, last 2 years)
731 Points ∼68% -27%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
415 Points ∼39% -59%
Multi-Core
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
4012 Points ∼100% +47%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3286 Points ∼82% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (2725 - 4455, n=14)
3231 Points ∼81% +19%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2962 Points ∼74% +9%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2725 Points ∼68%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2700 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=265, last 2 years)
2357 Points ∼59% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼47% -31%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
819433 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
794271 Points ∼97% +13%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
701949 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (662980 - 716502, n=11)
692527 Points ∼85% -1%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
600384 Points ∼73% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=157, last 2 years)
581402 Points ∼71% -17%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
509185 Points ∼62% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼50% -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
18567 Points ∼100% +41%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
14650 Points ∼79% +12%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13127 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (10829 - 16054, n=13)
13115 Points ∼71% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼62% -13%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10755 Points ∼58% -18%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
10678 Points ∼58% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=211, last 2 years)
10338 Points ∼56% -21%
CrossMark - Overall
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
798 Points ∼100%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
789 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (719 - 844, n=6)
768 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=95, last 2 years)
767 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
678 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points ∼73% -27%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6015 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (5448 - 6369, n=11)
5973 Points ∼99% +10%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5711 Points ∼95% +5%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5448 Points ∼91%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4856 Points ∼81% -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4809 Points ∼80% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 8753, n=178, last 2 years)
4615 Points ∼77% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼60% -33%
System
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
11696 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10455 Points ∼89% +22%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9996 Points ∼85% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (8563 - 10489, n=11)
9482 Points ∼81% +11%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8563 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8546 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=178, last 2 years)
8154 Points ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼61% -16%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (5689 - 8167, n=11)
7213 Points ∼100% +27%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6356 Points ∼88% +12%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5689 Points ∼79%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5648 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=178, last 2 years)
5195 Points ∼72% -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4957 Points ∼69% -13%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4699 Points ∼65% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼53% -32%
Graphics
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13865 Points ∼100% +9%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
12670 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (10386 - 12801, n=11)
12045 Points ∼87% -5%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
10106 Points ∼73% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=178, last 2 years)
8881 Points ∼64% -30%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8672 Points ∼63% -32%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6729 Points ∼49% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼37% -59%
Web
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
1742 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1665 Points ∼96% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (1315 - 1791, n=11)
1549 Points ∼89% +9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1534 Points ∼88% +7%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1427 Points ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=178, last 2 years)
1407 Points ∼81% -1%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1365 Points ∼78% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼69% -15%
AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
286905 Points ∼100% +144%
realme GT Neo 3T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
117724 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (111838 - 123847, n=9)
117183 Points ∼41% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58244 Points ∼20% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=156, last 2 years)
51806 Points ∼18% -56%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6893 Points ∼2% -94%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼2% -96%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 delivers very good results for the class and puts the smartphone in a respectable position in the benchmarks.

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1453 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1295 Points ∼89% +6%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1222 Points ∼84%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1152 Points ∼79% -6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
688 Points ∼47% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼43% -49%
Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1564 Points ∼100% +27%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1481 Points ∼95% +20%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1324 Points ∼85% +7%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1236 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
695 Points ∼44% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼41% -49%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5711 Points ∼100% +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4548 Points ∼80% +8%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4230 Points ∼74%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3406 Points ∼60% -19%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2500 Points ∼44% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼40% -46%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5765 Points ∼100% +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4623 Points ∼80% +8%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4273 Points ∼74%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3336 Points ∼58% -22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2505 Points ∼43% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼40% -46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps ∼74% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼67% +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% 0%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% 0%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
274 fps ∼100% +18%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
233 fps ∼85%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps ∼73% -14%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
161 fps ∼59% -31%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps ∼49% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼34% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps ∼85% +15%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼74% 0%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼74%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼69% -7%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps ∼100% +19%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
142 fps ∼84%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps ∼76% -9%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼54% -35%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps ∼47% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼36% -57%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100% 0%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼90% -10%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼58% -42%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps ∼100% +10%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps ∼91%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼72% -20%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼57% -37%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps ∼52% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼35% -62%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼100% +4%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼96%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps ∼77% -20%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps ∼55% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼38% -61%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼100% 0%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼39% -61%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼100% +24%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼81%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼79% -3%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼74% -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼48% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼36% -56%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼64% -36%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼45% -55%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps ∼44% -56%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼100% +11%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼90%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼80% -11%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼71% -21%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼56% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼39% -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps ∼100% +15%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼87%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps ∼81% -7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps ∼57% -35%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼57% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼38% -57%

Internet browsing is also smooth. Websites appear rapidly and pictures pop up after short loading times, even while scrolling.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)
103.827 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 108.3, n=10)
90.1 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.2 Points ∼83% -17%
realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)
80.505 Points ∼78% -22%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
75.9 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=175, last 2 years)
73.4 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
66.955 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼61% -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
79.8 runs/min ∼100% +4%
realme GT Neo 3T (Chome 103)
77.04 runs/min ∼97%
realme GT Neo 3 (Chome 103)
72.4 runs/min ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=163, last 2 years)
70.3 runs/min ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 77, n=10)
68.4 runs/min ∼86% -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.5 runs/min ∼77% -20%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chome 102)
59.7 runs/min ∼75% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼64% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)
150 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
147 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (99 - 155, n=11)
129.9 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=175, last 2 years)
102.1 Points ∼68% -32%
realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)
101 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼46% -54%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
65 Points ∼43% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)
37977 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
33879 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 41256, n=11)
33492 Points ∼88% -12%
realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)
33238 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points ∼84% -16%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
28695 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=194, last 2 years)
26791 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼64% -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=184, last 2 years)
2599 ms * ∼100% -140%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼74% -77%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
1406.4 ms * ∼54% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1055 - 1792, n=11)
1394 ms * ∼54% -28%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
1358 ms * ∼52% -25%
realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)
1326.2 ms * ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1323 ms * ∼51% -22%
realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)
1084.9 ms * ∼42%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS 3.1 storage also ensures quick loading times. It does not work quite as fast when writing as in the realme GT Neo 3 or in the OnePlus Nord 2T, but it is still very conducive to the system speed.

realme GT Neo 3Trealme GT Neo 3Samsung Galaxy A53Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEOnePlus Nord 2TMotorola Moto G200 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
33%
-37%
-29%
16%
-5%
11%
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB
1619.7
1779
10%
510.1
-69%
944
-42%
1891.3
17%
1898
17%
1773 ?(1014 - 2037, n=64)
9%
986 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=257, last 2 years)
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
754.5
1421
88%
486.7
-35%
679
-10%
1300.6
72%
712
-6%
1034 ?(452 - 1776, n=64)
37%
560 ?(11.9 - 1776, n=257, last 2 years)
-26%
Random Read 4KB
283.8
331
17%
229.9
-19%
208.7
-26%
235.8
-17%
155.9
-45%
273 ?(173.5 - 543, n=64)
-4%
181.8 ?(13.5 - 543, n=257, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
286
330
15%
210.8
-26%
178.8
-37%
262.2
-8%
322.5
13%
293 ?(197.5 - 490, n=65)
2%
183.1 ?(18.4 - 503, n=258, last 2 years)
-36%

Gaming: 60 fps mostly possible

Regarding gaming, you can hope for 60 fps in the vast majority of games. Even high settings in PUBG Mobile are no exception. Frame rates were measured with the GameBench tool.

However, more frame rates are only rarely possible. While games that support 90 or 120 Hz do exist, they also have to be explicitly supported by the smartphone manufacturer in order for faster frame rates to be possible. GT mode, which is supposed to increase the performance even more and is available in the manufacturer's gaming overlay, doesn't help either.

Control via the precise touchscreen and the position sensor works without issue.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.4 (53-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.0.0: Ø59.5 (56-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.0.0: Ø59.6 (55-61)

Emissions: Hi-Res Audio certification for the sound system

Temperature

The realme GT Neo 3T can sometimes get noticeably warm. Up to 44.5 °C is possible on the front of the smartphone, especially when lots of performance is required over longer periods of time. This may be problematic in hot ambient temperatures.

Nevertheless, this does not seem to have any effect on performance: The 3DMark Stress Test shows consistent performance, even during 20 runs of Wild Life Extreme.

Max. Load
 44.5 °C
112 F
40.6 °C
105 F
37.6 °C
100 F
 
 44.2 °C
112 F
42.3 °C
108 F
37.6 °C
100 F
 
 42.1 °C
108 F
40.3 °C
105 F
39.6 °C
103 F
 
Maximum: 44.5 °C = 112 F
Average: 41 °C = 106 F
38.7 °C
102 F
43.1 °C
110 F
43.2 °C
110 F
38.6 °C
101 F
42.4 °C
108 F
42.1 °C
108 F
38.6 °C
101 F
42.2 °C
108 F
43.8 °C
111 F
Maximum: 43.8 °C = 111 F
Average: 41.4 °C = 107 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C = 104 F | Room Temperature 21.6 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (13.7min) % ∼100% 0%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 (25.4min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 (14.8min) % ∼100% 0%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.1 (19.7min) % ∼90% -9%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80.4 (27.4min) % ∼81% -19%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.1 (16.4min) % ∼59% -41%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (4.14min) % ∼100% 0%
realme GT Neo 3T
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 (7.35min) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 (3.75min) % ∼98% -2%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.5 (8.28min) % ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 (7.1min) % ∼79% -21%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.9 (5.25min) % ∼66% -34%
051015202530Tooltip
realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.35 (7.35-7.39)
realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø8.63 (8.28-8.85)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.17)
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.7 (5.25-7.97)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.57 (7.1-8.98)
realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.4 (25.4-25.5)
realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.6 (29.7-33)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.1 (16.4-27.7)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.8 (27.4-34.2)

Speakers

The realme GT Neo 3T uses the earpiece as a second speaker and so attempts to make stereo effects possible. This works to some extent, but the hybrid is significantly quieter than the main speaker, so it cannot completely replace a full-fledged second speaker.

The sound is good, does not boom at high volumes and allows you to enjoy the occasional pop song. Even classical music sounds quite decent. But film sound lacks bass, so external speakers or headphones are better here. These can be connected via Bluetooth or USB-C.

All current aptX codecs are available for wireless communication, as are LHDC and LDAC. The phone is certified for Hi-Res Audio and also supports a 3D audio format thanks to Dolby Atmos.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.7372535.736.33127.329.54033.3325037.434.16325.222.28018.216.510020.517.612513.524.216017.336.320013.544.425013.551.931513.154.340012.956.650013.362.263015.46480014.163.6100012.969.712509.672.3160010.672.9200010.369.825001164.7315012.666.9400015.263.4500016.865.9630016.466.2800016.563.51000016.663.61250015.957.61600016.646.8SPL26.380N0.744.7median 13.5median 63.5Delta1.98.835.742.539.24130.933.133.739.93740.930.23421.423.819.922.114.628.712.539.29.9459.348.38.254.88.556.99.360.99.861.314.56811.473.710.371.69.368.39.270.410.668.511.766.211.464.512.165.912.670.612.87113.572.91464.714.453.323.881.20.549.8median 11.4median 64.72.19.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme GT Neo 3TMotorola Moto G200 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme GT Neo 3T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G200 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery life: Good stamina and fast recharging

Power Consumption

Power consumption is on the usual level and only increased in the absolute maximum power range.

It takes about 40 minutes to fully charge the battery with the included 80-watt power adapter. If you are short on time, 10 minutes of charging will give you enough power for a few hours of use, which fits well with the phone's racing design.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 4.8 / 10.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
realme GT Neo 3T
5000 mAh
realme GT Neo 3
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-4%
2%
0%
10%
9%
-26%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.1
-22%
0.9
-0%
0.78
13%
0.9
-0%
0.6
33%
1.194 ?(0.7 - 3, n=11)
-33%
0.891 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=195, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
1.3
-8%
1.97
-64%
1.3
-8%
0.9
25%
1.919 ?(0.9 - 4.3, n=11)
-60%
1.575 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=195, last 2 years)
-31%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.1
-17%
1.6
11%
1.99
-11%
1.7
6%
1.5
17%
2.21 ?(1.2 - 4.31, n=11)
-23%
1.789 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=195, last 2 years)
1%
Load Average *
4.8
3.8
21%
5.7
-19%
3.23
33%
4
17%
7
-46%
5.82 ?(3.78 - 9.9, n=11)
-21%
4.35 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=195, last 2 years)
9%
Load Maximum *
10.1
7.8
23%
7.3
28%
7.08
30%
6.8
33%
8.4
17%
9.15 ?(5.5 - 13.8, n=11)
9%
7.15 ?(3.56 - 11.7, n=195, last 2 years)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
: Ø6.23 (1.463-11)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.16 (8.63-9.73)
; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.397 (1.241-1.841)

Battery Life

Thanks to a 5,000 mAh battery, the realme managed a runtime of about 16 hours in our WLAN test. This is very good for the class, and the smartphone also scores well in all other battery tests.

Those looking for an smartphone with stamina that lasts up to 2 days on a single charge under normal use should consider the realme GT Neo 3T.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 46min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 28min
realme GT Neo 3T
5000 mAh
realme GT Neo 3
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
-3%
-16%
-4%
6%
Reader / Idle
2386
2432
2%
2431
2%
1648
-31%
1936
-19%
2695
13%
H.264
1133
1206
6%
1146
1%
1215
7%
1158
2%
1501
32%
WiFi v1.3
963
989
3%
886
-8%
705
-27%
949
-1%
905
-6%
Load
268
295
10%
246
-8%
233
-13%
279
4%
229
-15%

Pros

+ bold design for colorful minds
+ good battery runtimes
+ true color AMOLED display
+ DC dimming
+ good performance values without throttling
+ fast recharging
+ mobile internet available in many countries

Cons

- case creaks under pressure
- no IP certification
- comparatively short update timeframe
- no hybrid zoom for the camera

Verdict: Good mid-range offering with mediocre cameras

In review: realme GT Neo 3T. Review device provided by realme Germany.
In review: realme GT Neo 3T. Review device provided by realme Germany.

The realme GT Neo 3T has some differences compared to its bigger sibling, the realme GT Neo 3. First and foremost, the somewhat older and slower SoC, which still offers a lot of performance. The camera systems are also very similar in terms of image quality despite a different main sensor, so there is hardly any real argument in favor of the more expensive model.

Sure, the case comes only in plastic instead of the glass chassis of the GT Neo 3, and the super-fast 150-watt charging is not available in the GT Neo 3T either, but the battery recharges very quickly, even with 80 watts.

For a savings of at least US$ 130, the GT Neo 3T is a decent alternative, especially since it gives other devices in its price range a run for their money. With fast WLAN, 60 Hz gaming, good performance rates without throttling, great-sounding hybrid stereo speakers and a DC dimming mode (albeit somewhat hidden) for the OLED display, the realme GT Neo 3T offers a good overall package. We did encounter a few drawbacks in the review process: Hybrid zoom between the wide-angle and main camera is missing, IP certification is absent and the update timeframe is relatively short. The creaking sounds emitted under torsion slightly reduces our quality impression of the case.

The realme GT Neo 3T is boldly designed and has everything a mid-range smartphone needs. However, there are better models in terms of camera image quality.

Lots of other alternatives exist in this price range: Those wanting to connect their smartphone to the PC to facilitate workflow should take a look at the Motorola Moto G200. The Google Pixel 6, the price of which has dropped considerably lately, offers a much better camera.

Price and Availability

Similarly to the realme GT Neo 3, availability of the GT Neo 3T around the globe appears to be sporadic. Readers are therefore advised to regularly check via Google or Amazon for availability.

Amazon UK offers the smartphone for £369.00 (pricing as of 11.07.2022).

realme GT Neo 3T - 08/30/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 72%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
59 / 64 → 92%
Application Performance
83 / 86 → 97%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
67%
Average
79%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > realme GT Neo 3T smartphone review: Colorful phone with bright AMOLED
Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-11 (Update: 2022-07-11)