Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Realme GT 5G Smartphone Review - Strong alternative to the Poco F3

More power! The realme GT 5G convinces with a strong performance in the test and directly attacks Xiaomi's Poco series, because the smartphone is already available for less than 400 Euros (~$472) despite its high-end SoC. Find out what else it has to offer and where savings were made in our review.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The realme GT 5G is an exciting budget flagship smartphone. The company is part of BBK Electronics, which also includes manufacturers like Oppo and OnePlus.

It is equipped with a 6.43-inch Super AMOLED display that can work at up to 120 Hz. It is powered by a Snapdragon 888 and can rely on 8 or 12 GB of RAM depending on the configuration. The internal storage is 128 or 256 GB. battery Dual speakers, a 64 MP triple camera, fast charging with 65 watts, and a 4,500 mAh battery are also offered.

The smaller model costs 449 Euros (~$530 RRP) and the larger one 549 Euros (~$648). Our review sample is the cheaper smartphone, which is sometimes offered for less than 400 Euros (~$472) via special offers.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
realme GT 5G (GT Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive, 10 Multi-Touch-Points, Super AMOLED, 360 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 158.5 x 73.3 ( = 0.33 x 6.24 x 2.89 in)
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Sony IMX682, f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/1.73", 0.8µm) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.3, 15.7 mm, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 26 mm, 1/3.0", 1.0 µm)
Additional features
Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W-Charger, USB-Kabel, Headset, Protect Case, SIM Card Tool, Screen Protect Film, Quick Start Guide, realme UI 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), QZSS (L1, L5), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), NavIC (L5); SAR: 1.470 W/kg, fanless
Weight
186 g ( = 6.56 oz / 0.41 pounds), Power Supply: 147 g ( = 5.19 oz / 0.32 pounds)
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.7 %
07/2021
realme GT 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.9 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.4 %
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
85.7 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
82.7 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

Case - Lots of glass and not too heavy

The realme GT 5G is not too heavy and fits well in the hand. The rounded back also gives a very slim impression. The cameras on the back protrude 1.35 millimeters (~0.05 inches), which ensures that the smartphone can tilt significantly on a flat surface.

The workmanship is pleasing. An unspecified glass is found on the front and back, while the frame is covered with a metallic-looking plastic. However, this does not diminish the high-quality impression. This is more the case for the black plastic frame that surrounds the display. The gaps are tight and even. The GT 5G does not suffer from torsional stress.

The realme smartphone is available in Dashing Blue, Dashing Silver and Racing Yellow, the latter with a leatherette back. The battery is permanently installed and there is no IP certification.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

168.4 mm / 6.63 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 207 g0.4564 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 76.4 mm / 3.01 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 196 g0.4321 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch 75.1 mm / 2.96 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.72 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 159 g0.3505 lbs158.5 mm / 6.24 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 186 g0.4101 lbs

Equipment - realme GT with audio jack, but without microSD

The realme GT 5G uses a USB 2.0 port with a Type-C design. Wired image output is not possible, but audio playback and the use of peripherals via OTG is. However, the function has to be enabled in the settings for the latter and turns off again after ten minutes of inactivity.

We find the integration of an audio jack and the use of current standards like NFC, Bluetooth 5.2 and Wi-Fi 6E positive.

Software - Android 11 and realme UI 2.0

The realme GT 5G is shipped with Google's Android 11, which the manufacturer covers with its realme UI 2.0. This is a slightly modified version of Oppo's ColorOS 11.1. There are hardly any differences in the menu in particular, but the integration of HeyTap Cloud is one of them.

Besides a few apps from realme, third-party apps like Facebook or Booking are also preinstalled, but all of them can be completely uninstalled. Google's user account control is also active.

At the time of the test, the smartphone was supplied with the latest security patches for June 2021, but realme does not provide exact information about the intervals or general update periods.

Communications and GNSS - realme GT with 5G and Wi-Fi 6E

In terms of communication connections, the realme GT 5G masters all current standards and can connect to all mobile networks without problems, which is not least due to the broad frequency equipment.

Wi-Fi 6E is available for local networks, which not only enables high but also stable transmission rates in the test with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12. The range of the WLAN receiver is also convincing in the test.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1164 (603min - 1211max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s ∼59% -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=286, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s ∼24% -76%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
841 (768min - 888max) MBit/s ∼96%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s ∼90% -6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s ∼75% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=286, last 2 years)
465 MBit/s ∼53% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s ∼38% -61%
06513019526032539045552058565071578084591097510401105117085984287180182987987486186288081285085388882081777280477880388686787986487484383782976879185984287180182987987486186288081285085388882081777280477880388686787986487484383782976879160311931191118212111187118312101197119011661179120011871057110811411115115611291195120411481155112111351130111611581163Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø840 (768-888)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1144 (603-1211)
GPS test: outdoors
GPS test: outdoors
GPS test: in the building
GPS test: in the building
GPSTest: GNSS
GNSS

The realme GT 5G understands all common satellite networks for tracking and establishes a very fast satellite fix.

During a short test drive, the smartphone was compared with the Garmin Edge 500. The realme GT demonstrated a few unexpected weaknesses and was occasionally a bit off track, even though the connectivity options are so extensive. However, we do not expect any restrictions in daily navigation tasks.

GNSS test drive: Lake circumnavigation
GNSS test drive: Lake circumnavigation
GNSS test drive: Turning point
GNSS test drive: Turning point
GNSS test drive: summary
GNSS test drive: summary

Phone features and voice quality

The realme GT 5G uses the standard Android telephony app, but without direct SIP support. There is also no implementation for WLAN calling, but VoLTE is on board.

The voice quality is convincing with good communication in both directions as long as the smartphone is held to the ear. The noise suppression works reliably; even loud noises are not audible, but the user's voice is transmitted hollow and nasally in such a case. Those who use the speaker have to be prepared for a powerful reverberation.

Cameras - Nothing special from the triple optics in the realme GT

Selfie with the realme GT 5G
Selfie with the realme GT 5G

The front-facing camera of the realme GT 5G enables decent selfies with many setting options, but videos are recorded in Full HD at best. Movies can also be recorded with the front and rear lenses simultaneously via dual-view video.

The main camera relies on a promising 64 MP sensor. Pictures are quite decent in daylight, but they are characterized by a comparatively low dynamic range and unbalanced color reproduction, which especially captures blue and brown tones too darkly. Panoramic shots sometimes look artificial, oversaturated and only present a few details. We would have expected a bit more here, since the mediocre picture results are mainly due to immature image algorithms.

The macro optics are a nice idea. However, in most situations, a 2x digital zoom (max. twentyx magnification) will provide better results. The ultra-wide angle disappoints and is not only low in detail, but also shows strong aberrations in the peripheral areas.

Videos with the main camera are possible in Ultra HD with up to 60 FPS.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Ultra wide angleLow-Light
ColorChecker
15.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker realme GT 5G: 7.56 ∆E min: 2.1 - max: 15.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
43 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
60.6 ∆E
60.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
68.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker realme GT 5G: 42.81 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 69.08 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Only one year warranty

The manufacturer only grants a 12-month warranty on the realme GT 5G, this does not affect the statutory dealer warranty.

A bulky 65-watt fast-charging adapter, a USB cable, a silicone bumper, a SIM pin, and a few leaflets with warranty conditions and safety instructions are included. A display protection foil is already applied.

Input devices & operation - Reliable fingerprint sensor in the realme GT 5G

The capacitive touchscreen has good gliding properties and recognizes up to ten touches simultaneously. Google's GBoard is preinstalled as the keyboard layout, but it can be replaced with any from the Play Store.

For biometric security, an optical fingerprint scanner is available under the display, which is placed quite close to the lower display edge. This recognizes the stored fingerprints very quickly and reliably. Alternatively or additionally, facial recognition is possible via the front-facing camera.

The physical keys have a clear pressure point, short travel, and are well integrated into the bezel.

Display - Super AMOLED with 120 Hz

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure
OLED flickering above 59 percent
OLED flickering above 59 percent

The OLED screen of the realme GT 5G measures 6.43 inches (16.33 cm) and offers a crisp display due to its high pixel density. The panel can work with 60 or 120 Hz, but adaptive control is not available. Besides HLG, HDR10 and HDR10+ are also supported.

However, a few more brightness reserves could be available for an optimal HDR display, because the panel achieves an average of 606 cd/m² with an activated ambient light sensor, and 762 cd/m² in the center of the screen with an even distribution of bright and dark areas (APL50). In this respect, the Poco F3 (up to 1,175 cd/m²) has considerably more reserves. If you want to adjust the brightness manually, you can reach up to 421 cd/m².

Even a Super AMOLED screen is not immune to the typical OLED flickering. Although the real GT nominally does not have an activatable DC dimming, the panel control is comparatively easy on the eyes. Below 60% of the adjustable brightness, it operates between 235.8 and 242.7 Hz. This is not particularly high for a 120 Hz panel, but the amplitude curve is quite even, so the stress for sensitive people should be low. Above 60 percent, the panel operates constantly in a 120 Hz mode.

606
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 616 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 605.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
realme GT 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
27%
-141%
-56%
-35%
Brightness middle
605
889
47%
562
-7%
863
43%
744
23%
Brightness
606
902
49%
535
-12%
860
42%
749
24%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
90
-7%
93
-4%
98
1%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
3.99
-207%
3.2
-146%
2.2
-69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.1
1.9
39%
9.74
-214%
5.2
-68%
7
-126%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
6.5
-400%
3.9
-200%
2.1
-62%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.174 101%
2.33 94%
2.06 107%
CCT
6372 102%
6614 98%
6882 94%
7299 89%
6516 100%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz ≤ 59 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21103 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

If you want to achieve the most natural display of your content, you should select the Mild screen mode in the realme GT 5G, but then you will only use the smaller sRGB color space. The default setting is Vivid, which controls DCI-P3 and covers 91.6% of it (CalMAN measurement).

Grayscale (Profile: Mild, Target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Profile: Mild, Target color space: sRGB)
Color representation (profile: Mild, target color space: sRGB)
Color representation (profile: Mild, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Mild, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Mild, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (Profile: Mild, Target Color Space: sRGB)
Saturation (Profile: Mild, Target Color Space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

The realme smartphone copes with most light situations outdoors without any problems. We would only wish for a few more brightness reserves on very bright summer days.

The viewing-angle stability of the OLED panel is very good. Only very flat viewing angles result in a shimmering that is common for this type of display. However, this should not be bothersome in everyday use.

outdoors
outdoors
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance - realme GT with Snapdragon 888

The realme GT 5G is powered by a Snapdragon 888 which is the fastest SoC for Android smartphones at the time of the test. Thus, a lot of computing power is guaranteed and the system can use 8 or 12 GB of LPDDR5 RAM depending on the configuration. The graphics calculations are handled by the integrated Adreno 660, which guarantees a smooth display in the highest detail level for all games.

The realme smartphone mostly operates in the expected performance range in the benchmarks, but it is somewhat slower in the Geekbench multi-core test. The system benchmarks deliver very good results and confirm our subjective impression of smooth operation. Weaknesses are seen in web surfing. The GT falls short of expectations in most benchmarks, but this is not noticeable in practice.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1132 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=21)
1121 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=257, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼54% -46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3379 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points ∼94% 0%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points ∼80% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼83% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points ∼52% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=21)
3599 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=257, last 2 years)
2063 Points ∼57% -39%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4620 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points ∼75% -22%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points ∼71% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼59% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1272 Points ∼27% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=20)
4777 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=157, last 2 years)
2289 Points ∼48% -50%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4658 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points ∼77% -23%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1304 Points ∼28% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4764, n=20)
4582 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=158, last 2 years)
2325 Points ∼50% -50%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14457 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points ∼92% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points ∼76% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11705 - 17085, n=15)
14724 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=77, last 2 years)
10261 Points ∼70% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11018 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points ∼72% -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8257 - 11302, n=15)
10026 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=257, last 2 years)
4344 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
16863 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points ∼71% -29%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=15)
14739 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=257, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4978 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points ∼73% -27%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3562 - 5344, n=15)
4792 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (640 - 5784, n=255, last 2 years)
3056 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8987 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=16)
8738 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=259, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12714 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points ∼75% -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=16)
11691 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=259, last 2 years)
4176 Points ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4436 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points ∼88% -7%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points ∼70% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼50% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points ∼73% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=16)
4723 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (626 - 5793, n=259, last 2 years)
3090 Points ∼65% -30%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5942 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points ∼72% -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼19% -81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=20)
5653 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=124, last 2 years)
3065 Points ∼52% -48%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5925 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points ∼72% -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼19% -81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=20)
5574 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=121, last 2 years)
3181 Points ∼54% -46%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1559 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1559, n=15)
1503 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=72, last 2 years)
985 Points ∼63% -37%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1555 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (997 - 1555, n=15)
1417 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=71, last 2 years)
1008 Points ∼65% -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps ∼69% +18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼87% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼87% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
53 fps ∼51% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=15)
103 fps ∼100% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=202, last 2 years)
63.4 fps ∼62% +6%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps ∼75% -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
56 fps ∼21% -79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 290, n=15)
248 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=202, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼45% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼65% 0%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼86% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼36% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 120, n=15)
92.3 fps ∼100% +54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=201, last 2 years)
50.7 fps ∼55% -15%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
162 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼73% -27%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=15)
143 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=202, last 2 years)
69.9 fps ∼43% -57%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼75% -2%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
25 fps ∼32% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=15)
70.9 fps ∼90% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=200, last 2 years)
39.5 fps ∼50% -34%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
119 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps ∼68% -32%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=15)
98.9 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=200, last 2 years)
48 fps ∼40% -60%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼75% -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=15)
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=199, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼42% -58%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
72 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼67% -33%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=15)
59.5 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=199, last 2 years)
28.9 fps ∼40% -60%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps ∼83% -17%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=20)
55.1 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25 fps ∼42% -58%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps ∼80% -20%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼28% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=21)
71 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼41% -59%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
44 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps ∼75% -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=20)
37.4 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
16.8 fps ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
28 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps ∼27% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=20)
27.7 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.4 fps ∼41% -59%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
811533 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points ∼84% -16%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
393060 Points ∼48% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 815441, n=12)
774425 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=62, last 2 years)
515980 Points ∼64% -36%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
263702 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points ∼2% -98%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
42629 Points ∼16% -84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=11)
240122 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=84, last 2 years)
68835 Points ∼26% -74%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6031 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points ∼98% +5%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points ∼91% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼78% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3459 Points ∼53% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5908 - 6959, n=15)
6507 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=187, last 2 years)
3884 Points ∼60% -36%
System (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10443 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points ∼92% -4%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points ∼81% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼88% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6242 Points ∼57% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=15)
10888 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=187, last 2 years)
7033 Points ∼65% -33%
Memory (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5352 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points ∼100% +44%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points ∼88% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼80% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4211 Points ∼55% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=15)
7341 Points ∼95% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=187, last 2 years)
4579 Points ∼60% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15346 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points ∼83% -17%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3989 Points ∼26% -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=15)
13581 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=187, last 2 years)
6185 Points ∼40% -60%
Web (sort by value)
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1543 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points ∼93% +7%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼87% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1365 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=15)
1699 Points ∼95% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=187, last 2 years)
1319 Points ∼74% -15%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (119 - 210, n=14)
167 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.92 Points ∼96% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.67 Points ∼81% +14%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
118.55 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points ∼63% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=187, last 2 years)
99.8 Points ∼60% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
92.34 Points ∼55% -22%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 166, n=13)
140 Points ∼95% +33%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points ∼85% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼72% +1%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
105 Points ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=193, last 2 years)
83.1 Points ∼57% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
82 Points ∼56% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 46075, n=15)
34811 Points ∼100% +48%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points ∼98% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼77% +15%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points ∼76% +13%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
23491 Points ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=200, last 2 years)
19512 Points ∼56% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
17730 Points ∼51% -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=202, last 2 years)
3648 ms * ∼100% -98%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
2393.3 ms * ∼66% -30%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
1841.4 ms * ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802.32 ms * ∼49% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1743.8 ms * ∼48% +5%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589.3 ms * ∼44% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (919 - 1841, n=15)
1368 ms * ∼38% +26%

* ... smaller is better

realme GT 5GXiaomi Poco F3Motorola Moto G100Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A52 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
21%
-3%
-21%
14%
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB
1587.31
1378.12
-13%
1729.8
9%
949.43
-40%
926.67
-42%
1585 ?(1330 - 1790, n=25)
0%
831 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=272, last 2 years)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
575.05
684.13
19%
716.8
25%
710.31
24%
484.62
-16%
740 ?(233 - 1095, n=25)
29%
376 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=272, last 2 years)
-35%
Random Read 4KB
198.72
208.02
5%
253.6
28%
207.95
5%
176.05
-11%
232 ?(126 - 317, n=25)
17%
146 ?(13.5 - 325, n=272, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
208.42
170.57
-18%
252.9
21%
206.89
-1%
179.23
-14%
231 ?(121 - 306, n=25)
11%
135 ?(5.5 - 330, n=272, last 2 years)
-35%

Emissions - Weak SoC cooling

Temperature

The realme GT 5G warms up noticeably in idle mode and gets up to 37.7 °C (~100 °F) under permanent load. This is quite noticeable, but absolutely harmless.

The cooling of the SoC is more problematic because the 3DMark stress tests reveal heavy performance losses here. Thus, the actual performance advantage of the Snapdragon 888 hardly remains, because even though the Poco F3 has the nominally slower processor (Snapdragon 870), its minimum value is significantly higher than that of the GT and even the Mi 11 Lite 5G (Snapdragon 780) is hardly slower in this scenario in the long run.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 (3150min - 3144max) % ∼100% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (1097min - 1100max) % ∼100% +82%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 (4109min - 4141max) % ∼99% +81%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (3521min - 4286max) % ∼82% +50%
realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.7 (3251min - 5948max) % ∼55%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (1002min - 1219max) % ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82.1 (683min - 832max) % ∼100% +50%
realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.9 (861min - 1568max) % ∼67%
Max. Load
 37.7 °C
100 F
37.1 °C
99 F
35.7 °C
96 F
 
 37.3 °C
99 F
37.5 °C
100 F
35.2 °C
95 F
 
 37 °C
99 F
36.2 °C
97 F
35.5 °C
96 F
 
Maximum: 37.7 °C = 100 F
Average: 36.6 °C = 98 F
34.8 °C
95 F
36.7 °C
98 F
36.5 °C
98 F
34.7 °C
94 F
36.7 °C
98 F
37.1 °C
99 F
34.8 °C
95 F
35.7 °C
96 F
36.3 °C
97 F
Maximum: 37.1 °C = 99 F
Average: 35.9 °C = 97 F
Power Supply (max.)  31.8 °C = 89 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Speaker

The two speakers of the realme GT 5G provide a decent sound, but lack depth in particular. At a loud level, the trebles are not rendered accurately, which gives the sound a hollow character.

The smartphone's audio jack (3.5 mm, SNR: 87.60 dBFS) leaves a good impression and delivers the sound with low noise and in a balanced way.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.742.12531.837.43126.527.84023.629.75038.542.2633030.48027.629.410024.535.712514.834.416018.344.320015.947.325016.652.731515.359.440014.262.450015.167.763014.168.880012.574.3100014.775.7125015.173.8160014.774.1200014.374.8250014.777.5315014.579.4400014.382.9500014.182.9630014.379.9800014.473.51000014.372.81250014.363.11600013.154.5SPL26.790.1N0.879.5median 14.5median 72.8Delta0.79.728.323.923.320.520.3241926.529.835.717.225.712.926.219.426.112.139.51149.99.548.812.655.313.660.210.562.31167.99.768.411.174.811.576.812.778.913.479.112.775.813.676.314.180.41380.113.276.813.978.613.475.213.773.214.467.816.76525.189.40.679.5median 13median 73.20.99.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme GT 5GXiaomi Poco F3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme GT 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Poco F3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Good runtimes, despite 120 Hz

Energy consumption

The power consumption of the realme GT 5G shows a slight increase in the idle measurements, but it is lower especially under full load, which will be due to the heat-related SoC throttling. This is also very clearly shown in our GFXBench measurements with adjusted display brightness.

The 4,500 mAh strong battery can be recharged in a flash (about 45 minutes) with the 65 watt power adapter. However, wireless charging is not supported.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.14 / 1.84 / 1.87 Watt
Load midlight 4.21 / 8.07 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
13%
-7%
4%
11%
-4%
3%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
0.76
33%
0.9
21%
0.83
27%
0.92
19%
1.042 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=19)
9%
0.933 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=217, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Average *
1.84
1.29
30%
1.5
18%
1.92
-4%
1.78
3%
1.552 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=19)
16%
1.794 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=217, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
1.45
22%
2.1
-12%
1.97
-5%
1.81
3%
1.719 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=19)
8%
2.02 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=217, last 2 years)
-8%
Load Average *
4.21
4.6
-9%
6.7
-59%
3.84
9%
3.86
8%
5.44 ?(4.21 - 6.44, n=19)
-29%
4.45 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=217, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Maximum *
8.07
8.87
-10%
8.5
-5%
8.6
-7%
6.14
24%
9.85 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=19)
-22%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=217, last 2 years)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910114.664.794.624.514.514.521.4414.652.784.144.285.084.651.6422.674.091.5182.452.591.884.911.4385.021.7815.715.835.871.8263.151.7035.117.357.214.881.7261.8165.425.422.421.8915.195.365.452.992.074.665.65.865.775.331.6655.255.741.7072.743.493.58.678.529.138.838.678.948.749.518.878.759.148.968.944.489.319.446.961.5615.929.148.498.969.152.674.788.117.339.512.028.59.743.649.481.8289.689.588.061.6869.725.034.349.441.7179.299.241.7459.877.292.679.781.6719.689.559.462.175.339.523.139.869.319.819.169.67.862.143.574.389.889.589.849.8710.810.410.210.29.4210.110.22.014.895.25.210.210.11010.19.6210.21.6899.81.4652.883.643.53.543.352.61.6273.32.262.033.173.973.84.11.4353.541.6021.6623.73.653.581.5713.711.3913.361.3584.714.484.564.441.4363.281.6345.3755.052.731.4622.314.34.241.4524.221.4983.763.922.351.7962.513.753.713.773.653.954.082.674.784.341.6892.233.691.4797.587.217.87.757.247.897.346.987.477.127.527.61.5717.887.117.441.8553.145.797.987.988.027.8651.4534.673.399.251.3818.929.631.4921.4021.3789.099.910.61.5349.943.444.747.891.9447.647.281.48111.14.381.5488.141.6910.29.558.459.531.4919.29.331.4510.810.9119.0910.72.852.149.955.0310.91110.710.58.93106.3610.47.7910.39.91.593.613.393.458.798.147.899.338.558.5510.11.52210.41.5951.686Tooltip
realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.16 (1.438-10.8)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.28 (1.358-11.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789108.259.599.539.499.649.5910.410.710.69.599.539.679.649.569.629.699.699.759.589.629.749.799.729.669.659.739.749.789.699.669.649.719.729.749.749.79.779.739.749.749.729.729.739.689.656.548.448.438.448.438.468.518.458.468.468.458.468.498.468.458.448.488.518.485.925.645.856.1810.510.610.610.510.610.710.710.610.710.510.610.610.810.810.810.710.610.910.810.610.610.710.710.610.610.710.710.710.810.710.710.810.610.710.710.810.710.710.710.710.710.710.710.610.610.610.610.610.610.610.710.610.610.510.610.610.610.510.610.810.710.610.710.65.948.259.599.539.499.649.5910.410.710.69.599.539.679.649.569.629.699.699.759.589.629.749.799.729.669.659.739.749.789.699.669.649.719.729.749.749.79.779.739.749.749.729.729.739.689.656.548.448.438.448.438.468.518.458.468.468.458.468.498.468.458.448.488.518.485.925.645.856.1810.510.610.610.510.610.710.710.610.710.510.610.610.810.810.810.710.610.910.810.610.610.710.710.610.610.710.710.710.810.710.710.810.610.710.710.810.710.710.710.710.710.710.710.610.610.610.610.610.610.610.710.610.610.510.610.610.610.510.610.810.710.610.710.65.941.4681.5921.4791.3971.5411.6771.5951.4521.4791.5981.3921.6081.5511.661.6231.4821.8151.4621.5131.4331.451.6511.4961.5571.5571.5311.5591.4911.4561.4561.6371.5171.4251.511.5981.3971.6571.4621.5931.4451.3641.6151.6791.3781.4811.3941.5161.4771.371.471.4931.391.4881.3961.481.4941.7211.5611.3151.6711.4041.7811.561.3581.4131.6481.5521.4091.5571.2011.2261.4911.2581.511.7151.7151.2381.2011.5511.7011.5691.5161.2841.4141.581.231.2921.2531.281.3851.3631.2431.261.2171.2461.241.2641.2371.2181.2461.2451.2331.2141.2891.5761.531.4671.2791.2391.2221.2321.61.3181.6071.3161.2391.4271.4211.2711.591.7291.3191.3451.3981.3161.562Tooltip
realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.3 (6.54-10.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.3 (5.64-10.9)
realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.518 (1.315-1.815)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.377 (1.201-1.729)

Battery life

We determined the battery runtimes with enabled 120 Hz mode and they are on a good level. If a refresh rate of 60 Hz is sufficient, you will be able to get even longer runtimes out of the realme GT 5G.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 91)
12h 35min
realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
39%
-3%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1562
2846
1509
1917
WiFi v1.3
755
805
7%
1049
39%
734
-3%
710
-6%
Load
329
302
223
324
H.264
918
1285
1248
1052

Pros

+ 120 Hz display with good PWM control
+ Wi-Fi 6E and 5G
+ good audio jack
+ nominally fast SoC ..

Cons

- ... with heavy performance losses under continuous load
- weak additional lenses for the camera
- only 12-months warranty
- no microSD support

Verdict - a challenge to Poco

In review: realme GT 5G. Test device provided by realme Germany.
In review: realme GT 5G. Test device provided by realme Germany.

On the spec sheet, the realme GT 5G promises flagship level for little money, and indeed, the total package offered with a Snapdragon 888, dual speakers, 120 Hz OLED display, 64 MP camera and powerful battery is considerably more expensive in most competitors. With the low entry price of 449 Euros (~$530), the GT is also a self-confident challenge to the Poco F3, which is very similar in concept, but has a different focus.

The realme GT 5G offers an attractive overall package, but also has potential for improvement.

It is regrettable that realme does not manage to cool the powerful SoC well enough, but this will only be noticeable in demanding games. In return, the system performance is really good. However, the BBK subsidiary also has to accept criticism for the triple camera. The additional lenses are weak and the image algorithms of the main camera also need improvement.

Nevertheless, realme manages to build a good smartphone with the GT 5G, which is a strong overall package considering its price. Only the surcharge for the larger storage variant is a bit high. Strong alternatives besides the Poco F3 are the Galaxy A52 5G and the Nord CE 5G.

Price and availability

The realme GT 5G is available in all variants in the manufacturer's online store. It is also available at Amazon (DE) and Kaufland.

realme GT 5G - 07/14/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 76%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
59 / 64 → 91%
Application Performance
79 / 86 → 92%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
64%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Daniel Schmidt
Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt - Managing Editor Mobile - 400 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 206819 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Realme GT 5G Smartphone Review - Strong alternative to the Poco F3
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-07-18 (Update: 2021-07-18)