Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE smartphone review: The top seller gets fine-tuned

Really new? Xiaomi has provided the popular Lite model of its 11 series with a slight upgrade. Read on to find out whether the newer SoC and the new color variants really justify the higher purchase price, and whether the upgrade is even worth it.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Not only does Xiaomi adapt the Lite model of the current 11 series to the latest naming convention with the New Edition (NE) model and remove the "Mi" from its name, but it also provides it with a newer SoC and new color variants. The slim phone has also become a bit lighter, and otherwise, it retains the virtues of its predecessor, the Mi 11 Lite 5G.

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE starts at an MSRP of 370 Euros (~$417). In return, the smartphone comes with 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage. The upgrade to 8 GB of RAM costs an additional 30 Euros (~$34). The 256 GB variant isn't officially sold in Germany at the moment, but it's available from a few retailers nevertheless, which usually charge between 407 Euros (~$459) and 420 Euros (~$473) for it. 

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, 10 multitouch points, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.24 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.81 x 160.53 x 75.73 ( = 0.27 x 6.32 x 2.98 in)
Battery
4250 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.79, 26 mm, 1/1.97", 0.7 µm) 8 MP (ultra wide, f/2.2, 119˚, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) 5 MP (macro, f/2.4, 50 mm, 1/5.0", 1.12 µm); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.24, 27 mm, 1/3.4", 0.8 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: on-screen, 33-watt charger, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM tool, silicon case, headphone adapter (USB Type-C to 3.5 mm audio jack), documentation, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), NavIC (L5); body SAR: 0.954 W/kg, head SAR: 0.594 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
158 g ( = 5.57 oz / 0.35 pounds), Power Supply: 109 g ( = 3.84 oz / 0.24 pounds)
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.3 %
12/2021
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.7 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83.2 %
07/2021
Sony Xperia 10 III
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2520x1080
85.4 %
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
84.9 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
84.9 %
09/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

Case - Slim and light Xiaomi smartphone

At best, the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE can be visually distinguished from its predecessor by its colors. With Bubblegum Blue, Mint Green, Peach Pink, Snowflake White, and Truffle Black, these options aren't only abundant, but also quite colorful. Moreover, the NE weighs one gram less.

Xiaomi specifies a build height of 6.81 millimeters, while we measure 7.1 millimeters. The camera protrudes up to 1.8 millimeters from the case, but all in all, the 11 Lite leaves a very slim impression. Workmanship appears to be of high quality as well. While the predecessor still used Corning Gorilla Glass 6, the NE model now uses the older 5 version. The matte glass back is visually very attractive, and it conceals fingerprints very well. The gap dimensions are close-fitting and even. Only the black plastic frame around the display diminishes the high-quality exterior a bit.

The IP53 certification, which at least indicates that the smartphone is splash-proof, is probably still there, but it doesn't appear in the official spec sheets anymore. The SIM slot isn't completely flush with the frame, since it's slightly recessed. It can either hold two nano SIM cards or a microSD card instead of the second SIM.

Size comparison

168.4 mm / 6.63 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 207 g0.4564 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch 75.1 mm / 2.96 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.73 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 158 g0.3483 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.72 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 159 g0.3505 lbs154 mm / 6.06 inch 68 mm / 2.68 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 169 g0.3726 lbs

Connectivity - Xiaomi 11 Lite NE with microSD and USB 2.0

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a USB 2.0 port that supports OTG and therefore allows the connection of storage devices and other peripherals.

A notification LED is not available, but this is compensated for with an always-on display. Furthermore, an IR blaster for controlling home multimedia products, air conditioners, and the like, as well as Bluetooth 5.2, and NFC are on board.

The only things missing are a radio receiver and an audio jack. However, headphones can be connected via USB, and Xiaomi includes the corresponding adapter.

Top: Microphone, IR blaster
Top: Microphone, IR blaster
Left side
Left side
Right: Volume rocker, power/fingerprint
Right: Volume rocker, power/fingerprint
Bottom: Speaker, USB, microphone, card reader
Bottom: Speaker, USB, microphone, card reader

microSD card reader

The microSD slot supports memory cards up to a size of 1,024 GB and is compatible with the exFAT file system. However, the copying speed is quite slow in combination with our Angelbird AV Pro V60 reference card.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s ∼100% +254%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.73 MB/s ∼64% +128%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s ∼35% +22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.81 MB/s ∼28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.4 (26-46.9)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø25.9 (16.8-37.8)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.3 (16.9-80.9)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø71.8 (50.1-75.6)

Software - Android 11 and MIUI 12.5 for the New Edition

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE runs Android 11 and MIUI 12.5. At the time of testing, the security updates are at the level of November 1, 2021 and are therefore quite up to date. The update to Android 12 and MIUI 13 is considered certain. Xiaomi has even promised major updates for three years and security updates for four years via its Indian Twitter channel. However, it's unclear whether this will also apply to the European models.

There are quite a few third-party apps that Xiaomi has preinstalled on the smartphone. Although this is a bit annoying, they can be uninstalled. Furthermore, advertisements are occasionally displayed in the system, especially in the file manager, and sometimes after installing apps.

Communication and GNSS - Strong positioning capabilities

The communication features remain nearly unchanged, although Xiaomi has added a few additional frequency bands for mobile networks compared with the predecessor. The reception quality is normal in the test.

With Wi-Fi 6, the 11 Lite 5G NE supports a modern Wi-Fi standard that delivers quite good data transfer rates in combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router; it's a bit slower than the Mi 11 Lite, though, but this difference won't be noticeable in everyday use.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s ∼95%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s ∼78% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
504 (479min - 524max) MBit/s ∼57% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=233, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s ∼54% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s ∼52% -45%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s ∼90% +3%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s ∼87%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (513min - 573max) MBit/s ∼63% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=233, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼53% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s ∼48% -45%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø754 (339-805)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (833-900)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (779-895)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (847-921)
GPS Test: Supported GNSS
GNSS
GPS Test: Indoors
Indoors
GPS Test: Outdoors
Outdoors

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE's positioning features are exemplary, and it even supports most satellite networks in dual- and tri-band mode. The satellite fix is correspondingly fast and precise.

Although the Xiaomi phone tracks the route comparatively accurately on our test drive, it has to admit defeat to the Garmin Venu 2 Watch. Nevertheless, there are no navigational limitations to be expected.

GNSS test ride: Lake
GNSS test ride: Lake
GNSS test ride: Turning point
GNSS test ride: Turning point
GNSS test ride: Summary
GNSS test ride: Summary

Telephone and call quality

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE offers good call quality when held to the ear. It reliably eliminates quieter background noises, but its noise suppression reaches its limits on busy streets. Although the noise is still barely audible, the user's voice is muffled and sounds a bit hollow, and there are also interruptions during transmission.

The speaker reverberates audibly, but it can still be used in quiet environments when the smartphone is in the immediate vicinity. At a distance of just over one meter from the phone, it's already difficult to understand the user.

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a hybrid SIM solution; it supports VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling, and it can also manage SIP accounts.

Cameras - Good triple solution in the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE

Selfie taken with the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Selfie taken with the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE

There are no noticeable changes compared to the predecessor in terms of cameras. The front-facing lens takes 20 MP selfies and can record videos at 1080p (at up to 60 FPS). The photos are quite appealing, and the smartphone manages a good bokeh effect in portrait mode. Only the transitions towards the subject aren't always entirely smooth.

The main camera on the back uses a 64 MP Samsung GW3 sensor. Photos in daylight show good details and vivid colors, but the AI likes to overdo it a bit with the correction, so that the light haze in the lake scene is simply no longer present. Xiaomi has improved when it comes to low-light performance, where the autofocus is better now. The ultra wide-angle lens shows a lot of post sharpening, but there are only a few aberrations at the edges of the picture. We would like to see better image stabilization when zooming. The digital zoom's quality (max. 6x) remains satisfactory up to a 2x or 3x magnification, but beyond that, the pictures become blurry quickly, and the results are not very attractive. An additional macro lens is also on board, and videos are recorded in Ultra HD at 30 FPS at best.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

Under controlled lighting conditions, the main camera of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE shows good image sharpness all the way into the peripheral areas without overdoing it. The situation is different in terms of color reproduction. Especially green tones and dark skin are displayed much too brightly. This also applies to light blue and lilac. The white balance is a bit warmer, but the grayscales are also too bright for the most part.

ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: 13.15 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 24.17 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.71 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Slim phone, thick box

33-watt charger included in the box of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
33-watt charger included in the box of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE still has a comparatively generous package. Besides the smartphone, the box contains a compatible silicon case, a modular 33-watt charger (USB-A), a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a SIM tool, and even an audio jack adapter.

Xiaomi doesn't offer optional accessories, but they are available via third-party suppliers. The smartphone only comes with a twelve-month warranty, but the retailer's warranty remains unaffected by this.

Input devices and handling - Smooth navigation on the Xiaomi smartphone

Unlike the predecessor, the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is equipped with Corning Gorilla Glass 5, and it also comes with a factory applied protective film. The screen is fast and precise, not least because of the high sampling rate of 240 Hz, but the protective film provides a slightly higher degree of gliding resistance to the fingers. The system is quick and smooth to navigate, especially when the 90 Hz mode is enabled.

A fingerprint scanner has been integrated into the power button for biometric security, and it offers good recognition rates and a satisfying unlocking speed. Alternatively, facial recognition via the front-facing camera is also available; this method is faster but less secure. Furthermore, features like double-tapping to wake up the display or a one-hand mode have also been implemented.

Display - Dim, but more accurate in return

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

Compared with the predecessor, there are no fundamental changes on the spec sheet, but the AMOLED panel has a slightly lower maximum brightness, and an even distribution of bright and dark areas (APL50) results in a peak brightness of 825 cd/m². This is still enough for a decent HDR reproduction; the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE supports HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, and DolbyVision in this respect. Users who only wish to adjust the brightness manually will only reach a maximum of 490 cd/m².

The refresh rate can be set to 60 or 90 Hz, and there's no adaptive adjustment. There's no DC-dimming mode either. On the other hand, we can observe OLED flickering in the test starting at minimum display brightness levels; the flickering is quite uniform and only fluctuates marginally between 337.8 and 373.1 Hz. The panel only operates at a constant 90 Hz above 53% of the adjustable brightness.

789
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
792
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
796
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
812
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 812 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 799.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Sony Xperia 10 III
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
-110%
-17%
-215%
-123%
-72%
Brightness middle
797
863
8%
536
-33%
562
-29%
594
-25%
736
-8%
Brightness
800
860
8%
540
-32%
535
-33%
594
-26%
751
-6%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
97
0%
90
-7%
99
2%
96
-1%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
3.2
-256%
1.1
-22%
3.99
-343%
2.74
-204%
2.18
-142%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2
5.2
-160%
1.9
5%
9.74
-387%
6
-200%
5.69
-185%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
3.9
-255%
1.3
-18%
6.5
-491%
4.2
-282%
2.1
-91%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.33 94%
2.27 97%
2.174 101%
2.278 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6397 102%
7299 89%
6494 100%
6882 94%
7322 89%
6563 99%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 373.1 Hz ≤ 53 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 53 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Color reproduction is almost perfect when the right setting is chosen. We achieve the values measured here by selecting the Original Colors color scheme with the standard white balance. However, the smartphone only uses the smaller sRGB color space in this case. The display is cooler and more saturated when using the factory settings.

Grayscales (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscales (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (schema: Original Colors, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

The display of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE always remains legible outdoors, but it shows pretty strong reflections even on cloudy days.

As expected, the panel's viewing-angle stability is very good. The display content only gets a bit warmer at very flat viewing angles. We are hardly able to detect the shimmering effect that is typically found in many OLED panels.

Outdoors
Outdoors
Viewing-angle stability of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Viewing-angle stability of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE

Performance - SoC downgrade in the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is powered by a Snapdragon 778G 5G, which can make use of the integrated Adreno 642L graphics unit. The Mi 11 Lite is equipped with a Snapdragon 780G, which is actually two months older on paper, but still runs faster. This is both due to the higher clock rates and its more modern structural width.

Therefore, the older smartphone is slightly faster in the benchmarks in all areas, and it can show a significant advantage in the 3DMark graphics tests in particular. Only in individual physics tests does the SD780G fall slightly behind, but it still remains ahead of the SD778G in the overall rating. This isn't very noticeable in everyday use, but we would have expected a more powerful SoC from a New Edition device.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
787 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼83% +3%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
590 Points ∼61% -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points ∼83% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
771 Points ∼79% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=7)
780 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=261, last 2 years)
654 Points ∼67% -17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2962 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼100% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1716 Points ∼57% -42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points ∼96% -3%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points ∼82% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2808 Points ∼94% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=7)
2864 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=261, last 2 years)
2152 Points ∼72% -27%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2281 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼62% +23%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
921 Points ∼20% -60%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points ∼75% +48%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points ∼100% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2216 Points ∼49% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2423, n=7)
2293 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=200, last 2 years)
2485 Points ∼55% +9%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2207 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼59% +27%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
965 Points ∼20% -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points ∼75% +61%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points ∼100% +114%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2359 Points ∼50% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2207 - 2359, n=7)
2249 Points ∼48% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2476 Points ∼52% +12%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10755 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points ∼89% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8273 Points ∼66% -23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points ∼67% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12625 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=6)
11639 Points ∼92% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼80% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6389 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points ∼100% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3215 Points ∼46% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6352 Points ∼91% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6340 - 6409, n=6)
6373 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=195, last 2 years)
3412 Points ∼49% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7238 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3204 Points ∼37% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7241 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7189 - 7276, n=6)
7235 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=195, last 2 years)
3932 Points ∼46% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4529 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3254 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4442 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=6)
4493 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=195, last 2 years)
2844 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6458 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼70% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3122 Points ∼39% -52%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6559 Points ∼82% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=6)
6566 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=239, last 2 years)
4809 Points ∼60% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7608 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼62% +10%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3315 Points ∼24% -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7496 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=6)
7488 Points ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=239, last 2 years)
6615 Points ∼49% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4224 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼52% -39%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2593 Points ∼53% -39%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points ∼68% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4563 Points ∼93% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=6)
4895 Points ∼100% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=237, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼65% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5036 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points ∼100% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2178 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4967 Points ∼97% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5065, n=6)
5029 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=193, last 2 years)
2561 Points ∼50% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5213 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1992 Points ∼33% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5140 Points ∼84% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5140 - 5218, n=6)
5192 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=193, last 2 years)
2671 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4501 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3236 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4444 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4592, n=6)
4509 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=193, last 2 years)
2858 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5236 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼64% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2308 Points ∼33% -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5355 Points ∼77% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=6)
5317 Points ∼76% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=243, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼57% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5651 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼60% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2120 Points ∼21% -62%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5591 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=6)
5540 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=243, last 2 years)
4844 Points ∼47% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4166 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼50% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3344 Points ∼72% -20%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points ∼71% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4664 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=6)
4634 Points ∼99% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=243, last 2 years)
3212 Points ∼69% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4299 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points ∼100% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2023 Points ∼43% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4250 Points ∼90% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=6)
4320 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=172, last 2 years)
2397 Points ∼51% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5338 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points ∼100% +8%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1878 Points ∼32% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5263 Points ∼91% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=6)
5321 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=172, last 2 years)
2655 Points ∼46% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2557 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points ∼100% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2775 Points ∼99% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2539 Points ∼91% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=6)
2654 Points ∼95% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=172, last 2 years)
2574 Points ∼92% +1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2505 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼76% +28%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
826 Points ∼20% -67%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points ∼99% +66%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2490 Points ∼59% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2465 - 2505, n=6)
2490 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=172, last 2 years)
3282 Points ∼78% +31%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2500 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼76% +28%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
826 Points ∼20% -67%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points ∼99% +66%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2485 Points ∼59% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2321 - 2501, n=6)
2466 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=170, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼80% +35%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
695 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points ∼67% +24%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
252 Points ∼20% -64%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points ∼54% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (690 - 695, n=6)
693 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=124, last 2 years)
1000 Points ∼78% +44%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
688 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points ∼63% +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
247 Points ∼20% -64%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
687 Points ∼55% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (684 - 690, n=6)
688 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=121, last 2 years)
978 Points ∼78% +42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
89 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼83% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
54 fps ∼50% -39%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼83% +1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps ∼55% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
108 fps ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=7)
91.3 fps ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=203, last 2 years)
67.4 fps ∼62% -24%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
133 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼68% +15%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
72 fps ∼32% -46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps ∼100% +68%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps ∼79% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
132 fps ∼59% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=7)
132.9 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=203, last 2 years)
133.8 fps ∼60% +1%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
69 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼89% +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
30 fps ∼34% -57%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
69 fps ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=7)
65.9 fps ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=202, last 2 years)
54.6 fps ∼61% -21%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
79 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼69% +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
36 fps ∼27% -54%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps ∼100% +66%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps ∼95% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
77 fps ∼59% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=7)
78 fps ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=203, last 2 years)
76.9 fps ∼59% -3%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
51 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼72% +12%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
21 fps ∼27% -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps ∼73% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
49 fps ∼62% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=7)
49.9 fps ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=202, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼53% -17%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
57 fps ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼71% +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼28% -54%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps ∼100% +61%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps ∼84% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
56 fps ∼61% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 57, n=7)
56.4 fps ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=203, last 2 years)
52 fps ∼57% -9%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
29 fps ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼74% +21%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
12 fps ∼26% -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼100% +62%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps ∼87% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps ∼60% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=7)
28.9 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=202, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼56% -9%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼70% +21%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼26% -55%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +73%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps ∼82% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps ∼58% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 33, n=7)
33 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=202, last 2 years)
31.5 fps ∼55% -5%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼86% +27%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼27% -61%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +48%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps ∼98% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps ∼61% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=7)
31.6 fps ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=258, last 2 years)
27.9 fps ∼57% -15%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
39 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼88% +28%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
16 fps ∼28% -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +46%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps ∼95% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps ∼60% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=7)
36 fps ∼63% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=259, last 2 years)
33.5 fps ∼59% -14%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼84% +30%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8 fps ∼26% -60%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps ∼61% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=259, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼62% -4%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
14 fps ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼82% +29%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼26% -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼100% +57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps ∼95% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps ∼59% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=7)
13.4 fps ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=259, last 2 years)
12.9 fps ∼59% -8%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
509185 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points ∼77% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
344070 Points ∼51% -32%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points ∼89% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
438254 Points ∼65% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 520706, n=7)
495281 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼81% +8%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points ∼5%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
40708 Points ∼29%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
139024 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (136987 - 140376, n=4)
138589 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼46%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4809 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼86% +5%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3092 Points ∼52% -36%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points ∼87% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4349 Points ∼74% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4321 - 5002, n=7)
4688 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=179, last 2 years)
4143 Points ∼70% -14%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10455 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6586 Points ∼63% -37%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9089 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=7)
9755 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
7353 Points ∼70% -30%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4957 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼85% +25%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3176 Points ∼44% -36%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points ∼93% +36%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4269 Points ∼59% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=7)
5217 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years)
4780 Points ∼66% -4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6729 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼63% +7%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3334 Points ∼29% -50%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points ∼100% +70%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points ∼68% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6783 Points ∼59% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6654 - 6783, n=7)
6714 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=179, last 2 years)
7045 Points ∼62% +5%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1534 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼87% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1311 Points ∼73% -15%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points ∼71% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1359 Points ∼76% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1295 - 1534, n=7)
1419 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1374 Points ∼77% -10%
CrossMark
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
678 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (621 - 678, n=2)
650 Points ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=45, last 2 years)
748 Points ∼100% +10%
Productivity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
706 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (662 - 706, n=2)
684 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (37 - 1140, n=45, last 2 years)
732 Points ∼100% +4%
Creativity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
607 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (549 - 607, n=2)
578 Points ∼76% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (201 - 1321, n=45, last 2 years)
758 Points ∼100% +25%
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
839 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (735 - 839, n=2)
787 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (227 - 1213, n=45, last 2 years)
748 Points ∼89% -11%

The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE performs well in the browser benchmarks and only has to admit defeat to the more powerful Moto G100.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.2 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.2 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.8 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=7)
74.6 Points ∼82% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.8 Points ∼79% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)
60.1 Points ∼66% -30%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points ∼56% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
45.36 Points ∼50% -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.9 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
155.3 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.7 Points ∼84% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (102.6 - 155.3, n=7)
132.5 Points ∼82% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.1 Points ∼73% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
111.5 Points ∼69% -28%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.8 Points ∼68% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
82.5 Points ∼51% -47%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min ∼96% +15%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.5 runs/min ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=162, last 2 years)
59.4 runs/min ∼81% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=5)
56.7 runs/min ∼77% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.2 runs/min ∼72% -13%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min ∼68% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
41.2 runs/min ∼56% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points ∼73% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=7)
106.1 Points ∼72% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼72% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=188, last 2 years)
90.1 Points ∼61% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
74 Points ∼50% -35%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼47% -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=7)
28217 Points ∼83% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼79% -16%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points ∼77% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points ∼74% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years)
22284 Points ∼65% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 III
16866 Points ∼49% -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=194, last 2 years)
3274 ms * ∼100% -147%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
2506 ms * ∼77% -89%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * ∼55% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802 ms * ∼55% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802 ms * ∼55% -36%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589 ms * ∼49% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=7)
1569 ms * ∼48% -19%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1323 ms * ∼40%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi uses fast UFS 2.2 storage in its smartphone, which is a good foundation for a fast system speed. However, other competitors have access to faster storage, and the Nord 2 in particular literally pulls ahead of the comparison field.

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GSony Xperia 10 IIIMotorola Moto G100OnePlus Nord 2 5GSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
6%
-13%
38%
55%
-10%
-22%
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB
944
949
1%
840
-11%
1730
83%
1827
94%
951
1%
753 ?(482 - 999, n=18)
-20%
897 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=258, last 2 years)
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB
679
710
5%
400.8
-41%
717
6%
1256
85%
486.5
-28%
434 ?(105.3 - 857, n=18)
-36%
435 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=258, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Read 4KB
208.7
207.9
0%
172.3
-17%
253.6
22%
223.7
7%
168.2
-19%
163.4 ?(104.5 - 253, n=18)
-22%
159.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=258, last 2 years)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
178.8
206.9
16%
210.7
18%
252.9
41%
239
34%
192.5
8%
162.7 ?(120.4 - 213, n=18)
-9%
151.6 ?(269 - 449, n=259, last 2 years)
-15%

Games - Good mid-range gaming phone

The Adreno 642L in the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE delivers good gaming performance, and it's powerful enough to handle most games even in higher graphics settings, but it also has its limits. For example, the Ultra HD setting can't be chosen in PUBG. However, the frame rates that we determined with GameBench are at a good and, above all, stable level. Nevertheless, we were unable to squeeze frame rates above 60 FPS out from the Xiaomi phone.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Dead Trigger 2
Dead Trigger 2
Game Turbo
Game Turbo