Notebookcheck

Oppo Find X2 Pro Smartphone Review - The burden of an astronomical price

A Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra killer? While the Find X2 Pro integrates a modern design and the most current hardware, Oppo is asking a hefty price for its high-end smartphone. Find out in our review of the Oppo Find X2 Pro how the Oppo smartphone fares in the comparison with the Galaxy S20 Ultra.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Mark Riege),
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Based on the current Snapdragon 865 in combination with 12 GB of RAM, the Find X2 Pro offers very powerful hardware. The newest representative of the Find X series uses a 6.67-inch AMOLED display that is rounded on both sides and offers a resolution of 3168x1440 pixels. A 32-megapixel selfie cam is hidden behind a punch-hole in front, while the camera arrangement in the back offers three different lenses. In addition, the Oppo smartphone offers 512 GB of UFS 3.0 storage.

Starting in May, you can purchase the high-end smartphone from Oppo at a recommended retail price of 1199 Euros (~$1287) in Europe.

Oppo Find X2 Pro (Find X2 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.7 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 519 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 459 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, movement sensor, digital compass, proximity sensor, USB-OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA: bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19, LTE FDD: bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/32/66, LTE TDD: bands 34/38/39/40/41/42, NR TDD: n40/41/77/78/79, NR FDD: n1/3/5/7/28A, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 165.2 x 74.4 ( = 0.37 x 6.5 x 2.93 in)
Battery
4260 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix wide-angle camera: Sony IMX689, 1/1.4 in. sensor size, f/1,7 aperture, 7P lens, omni-directional PDAF with all pixels, 12-bit True-Capture, Ultra Night Mode 3.0, Live-HDR video; 48-MP ultra-wide-angle, 13-MP periscope zoom-camera, camera 2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4 aperture, 5P lens, AI beautification, intelligent fill-light mode, night mode algorithm is supported
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, headset, charger, quick-start guide, SIM card tool, protective foil, protective case, ColorOS 7.1, 24 Months Warranty, A-GPS, Beidou, Glonass, Galileo, SAR: 0.88 W/kg (head), 1.15 W/kg (body), fanless, waterproof
Weight
202 g ( = 7.13 oz / 0.45 pounds), Power Supply: 145 g ( = 5.11 oz / 0.32 pounds)
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
03/2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3168x1440
89 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
219 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.9"3200x1440
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
11/2019
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440

Case - An Oppo smartphone covered in vegan leather

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

The front of the Find X2 Pro consists of Corning Gorilla Glass of the sixth generation, and due to the slim display bezels, 91% of the front consists of the OLED panel. The workmanship of the case shows a very high quality level, and the operation keys offer well-defined pressure points. The Oppo smartphone also offers protection against dust and water according to the IP68 standard. However, the particular haptic of our test unit that is covered in artificial leather is probably not the right choice for everyone.  

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Size Comparison

166.9 mm / 6.57 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 219 g0.4828 lbs165.2 mm / 6.5 inch 74.4 mm / 2.93 inch 9.5 mm / 0.374 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs162.6 mm / 6.4 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs158.1 mm / 6.22 inch 73.1 mm / 2.88 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 198 g0.4365 lbs

Equipment - The Find X2 Pro offers 512 GB of UFS 3.0 storage

Thanks to Widevine DRM Level L1, video content can be enjoyed in HD quality. However, the equipment of the Find X2 Pro does not include a notification LED, a desktop mode, a classic 3.5-mm audio port, or the option to expand the storage. You can connect external storage media to the USB-3.1 connector via USB OTG. 

Software - An Oppo smartphone with Android 10

Google's Android version 10 is preinstalled on the Find X2 Pro. In addition, there is the manufacturer's own ColorOS 7.1 user interface. At the time of our testing, the security updates were at the level of February 2020. 

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Communication and GPS - The Oppo Find X2 with 5G

In terms of communication, you hardly have to make any compromises with the dual-SIM smartphone. The Oppo smartphone connects to the mobile Internet via 5G as well as the LTE standard. As you can expect for a smartphone of this price range, the amount of frequency bands supported by the X2 Pro is high, and the high-end phone supports 25 LTE bands. For wireless communication, there is Bluetooth version 5.1, and there is also a chip for near-field communication. 

Thanks to the ax standard and MIMO technology, the WLAN module is also convincing with high transfer rates in our WLAN test. However, the values we measured with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router are inconsistent.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (763min - 855max) MBit/s ∼82% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (346min - 881max) MBit/s ∼75%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
409 (352min - 468max) MBit/s ∼40% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼28% -63%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +90%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (425min - 890max) MBit/s ∼85% +61%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (264min - 571max) MBit/s ∼53%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
275 (139min - 310max) MBit/s ∼28% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼28% -47%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø753 (346-881)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø509 (264-571)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

In order to evaluate the locating accuracy of our test unit in practice, we record a route in parallel with the Garmin Edge 500 bicycle computer for comparison. At the end of our about 9-km test route (~5.6 miles), the difference of the recorded route between the Find X2 Pro GPS module and the navigation device is about 90 meters (~295 ft.). While the deviations of the route are small, they are still noticeable in the details of the GPS recording. 

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - The Oppo Find X2 Pro offers Wi-Fi calling

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

The voice quality of the Find X2 Pro is inconspicuous. Voices are transmitted clearly and are also characterized by our conversation partner as clear. Video calls via Skype using the built-in front camera also work without any problems. The voice quality of the built-in microphone is also convincing. Wi-Fi calling is also available. 

Cameras - The Find X2 Pro with Sony IMX 689

Picture taken with the 32-MP selfie cam
Picture taken with the 32-MP selfie cam

Contrary to the manufacturer specifications, the optically stabilized 48-MP main camera is based on the new Sony IMX689 and only the ultra-wide-angle camera uses the IMX586. The significantly larger 1/1.4-inch Sony IMX689 with 1.12 micrometer pixels also offers 12-MP recordings due to 4-in-1 pixel binning, which score with a richness in detail and beautiful contrast during daylight. However, the Oppo smartphone has some trouble with the exposure, and the colors also appear fairly pale.   

Like the Redmi K30 with the IMX686, the Sony sensor in the Find X2 Pro also shows some visible weaknesses in dark surroundings. Particularly the focusing and image sharpness do not fit with the otherwise good overall impression of the camera sensor.    

In addition, there are the 5x periscope zoom and the 10x hybrid zoom of the 13-MP camera which offer real added value in everyday usage. The optical image stabilization allows taking attractive pictures under good light conditions even at high zoom levels. 

The camera arrangements of the Find X2 Pro are completed by a 32-MP selfie cam. The camera in front offers solid selfie quality in good light conditions. However, the quality level of the exposure in particular is a rather mixed bag.   

Picture taken with the Sony IMX586
Picture taken with the Sony IMX586
Picture taken with the Sony IMX689
Picture taken with the Sony IMX689
5x zoom
5x zoom
10x zoom
10x zoom
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
35 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Pro: 24.6 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 34.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Pro: 7.81 ∆E min: 2.71 - max: 17.82 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Oppo smartphone with a case

The box of the Oppo smartphone includes a modular 65-Watt charger, a USB cable, and a protective case. 

The warranty duration is 24 months after the purchase date.

Input Devices and Operation - The Find X2 Pro offers a high touch sampling rate

Touch input on the 6.67-inch display is implemented fast and accurately up into the corners. The Find X2 Pro has an optical fingerprint sensor below the OLED panel, as well as biometric identification via 2D face recognition in the front camera. Both methods unlock the Oppo smartphone fast and reliably. 

As in the OnePlus 7T Pro, the built-in vibration motor is at such a high quality level that only Apple's Taptic Engine is able to keep up. The high precision of the mechanical feedback allows a forceful key press when typing. 

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Display - Find X2 Pro with OLED panel

Sub-pixel grid
Sub-pixel grid
DC dimming function
DC dimming function

The built-in Ultra Vision display is one of the highlights of the Find X2 Pro. The 6.67-inch AMOLED panel in the 19.8:9 format has a resolution of 3168x1440 pixels, resulting in a pixel density higher than 500 ppi, and it offers a high frame rate of 120 Hz.

In terms of its brightness, the Oppo smartphone is also able to convince. In automatic mode with the brightness sensor activated, we measure a maximum of 778 cd/m² with a pure white background. In the more realistic APL50 measurement, which simulates an even distribution of bright and dark areas on the panel, it is a very good 1115 cd/m². However, when the brightness sensor is deactivated, the Find X2 Pro offers noticeably less brightness (492 cd/m²).

As is typical for OLED panels, the Find X2 Pro uses PWM to control brightness, but at 476.2 to 480.8 Hz, the frequency is quite high. This is the same in the 60-Hz as well as the 120-Hz mode, which makes us think that the 120 Hz setting cannot be deactivated using the current software. While the frequency becomes more even with more active DC dimming, the flickering is not completely eliminated.

778
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
773
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
773
cd/m²
777
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 778 cd/m² Average: 775 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 778 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.9
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Screen
15%
14%
12%
Brightness middle
778
734
-6%
592
-24%
606
-22%
Brightness
775
748
-3%
605
-22%
611
-21%
Brightness Distribution
99
95
-4%
96
-3%
95
-4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
3.2
27%
2.5
43%
3.46
21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.7
6.8
22%
5.5
37%
5.64
35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.6
2.7
52%
2.6
54%
2
64%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
CCT
7250 90%
6299 103%
6173 105%
6779 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480.8 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 480.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 480.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

We perform the color analysis of the display using a photo spectrometer and the CalMAN software. Considering the price class, the deviations in the color (4.4) and grayscale display (5.6) are high. At 7250 Kelvin, the color temperature of the panel is also not calibrated optimally.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB)
Color space (target color space: sRGB)
Color space (target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Outdoors, the Find X2 Pro leaves a very good impression in automatic mode. The high contrast ensures good readability, and the display content should be sufficiently recognizable even in direct sunlight in summer. 

The drop in brightness as well as the distortions are very low, even from extremely steep viewing angles. 

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Performance - A Snapdragon 865 and 12 GB of RAM

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 used in the Find X2 Pro combines a fast "primary core" of up to 2.84 GHz and three additional Cortex-A77 based performance cores with a clock speed of up to 2.42 GHz. To save power, four additional ARM Cortex-A55 cores were also integrated (1.8 GHz). In addition, a powerful Adreno 650 graphics unit is also built into the Qualcomm SoC, which according to the manufacturer offers a 25% performance increase compared to the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855

As expected, the system performance of the Find X2 Pro is very attractive. In combination with 12 GB of working memory, the Snapdragon 865 ensures smooth operation in everyday usage, although some slight drops in the multi-tasking performance can be noticed at maximum frame rates and display resolution. Thanks to the fast universal flash storage, apps also open very fast. Corresponding to the storage type, the access rates are very high. The speed of the internal storage is at the level of the UFS-3.0 competitors. 

The Oppo smartphone also delivers a very good performance in the benchmarks. However, there is no performance gap between the measurements of a Samsung Exynos 990 in the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra or a HiSilicon Kirin 990 in the Huawei Mate 30 Pro on one hand, and the Find X2 Pro on the other hand. Particularly in the Geekbench tests, the Find X2 Pro does not score well. 

In the graphical area, the Snapdragon 865 also offers a significantly better performance compared to the Snapdragon 855 Plus in the OnePlus 7T Pro, but particularly the onscreen values in GFXBench turn out unexpectedly low.   

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2641 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3804 Points ∼94% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points ∼67% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1668 Points ∼41% -37%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2960 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4491 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1789 Points ∼40% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2815 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3076 - 3449, n=14)
3306 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=121)
1945 Points ∼58% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (889 - 924, n=14)
911 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=121)
553 Points ∼59% -39%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8648 Points ∼71% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9443 - 9739, n=5)
9559 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=357)
4918 Points ∼40% -48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12557 Points ∼94% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (13186 - 13589, n=5)
13396 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=420)
5027 Points ∼38% -62%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼81% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4261 - 4304, n=5)
4281 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=420)
1539 Points ∼32% -64%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10255 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
10700 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=15)
11364 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=524)
5973 Points ∼52% -48%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14307 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼97% +4%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
12907 Points ∼90% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=14)
13898 Points ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=682)
6555 Points ∼46% -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3201 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1788 - 4061, n=12)
3605 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=175)
2664 Points ∼69% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8659 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼74% -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼75% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8064 - 8372, n=12)
8233 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9047, n=175)
3054 Points ∼35% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6280 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4604 - 6754, n=13)
6368 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=175)
2722 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4447 Points ∼80% -14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4683 Points ∼84% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5187 - 5780, n=13)
5449 Points ∼98% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=527)
2229 Points ∼40% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9157 Points ∼97% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8006 Points ∼85% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼85% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9157 - 9567, n=13)
9416 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=527)
2160 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7412 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼79% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
6916 Points ∼85% -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼85% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7957 - 8269, n=14)
8100 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=528)
2014 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4436 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4604 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=13)
5161 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=559)
2145 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9470 Points ∼74% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -37%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
11448 Points ∼90% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (12547 - 12993, n=13)
12739 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=559)
2908 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7563 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8605 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=13)
9589 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=559)
2441 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4267 Points ∼86% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼99% +7%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4519 Points ∼91% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼91% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=13)
4979 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=608)
2107 Points ∼42% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8257 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
7044 Points ∼85% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼85% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7854 - 8432, n=13)
8255 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9032, n=608)
1821 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6836 Points ∼95% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼84% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
6266 Points ∼87% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼87% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6943 - 7400, n=14)
7195 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=609)
1732 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3889 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4503 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=13)
4859 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=651)
1977 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11488 Points ∼97% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼65% -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
10637 Points ∼90% -7%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼90% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11175 - 12611, n=13)
11822 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12632, n=650)
2412 Points ∼20% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8010 Points ∼89% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼76% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8165 Points ∼91% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9549, n=13)
8958 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=653)
2068 Points ∼23% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42135 Points ∼97% +50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +54%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
30561 Points ∼70% +9%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=13)
33371 Points ∼77% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=795)
15577 Points ∼36% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
79572 Points ∼54% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼51% -48%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
118129 Points ∼80% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (143643 - 154375, n=13)
148121 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=793)
27196 Points ∼18% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
66452 Points ∼81% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼79% -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
72173 Points ∼88% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=13)
81923 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=793)
21154 Points ∼26% -72%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
200 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 207, n=14)
202 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=796)
45.8 fps ∼23% -77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
119 fps ∼100% +98%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 138, n=14)
76.3 fps ∼64% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=805)
31.5 fps ∼26% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
100 fps ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 127, n=14)
122 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=701)
27.1 fps ∼22% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
59 fps ∼82% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼84% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 109, n=14)
71.6 fps ∼100% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=709)
22.7 fps ∼32% -61%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
72 fps ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 88, n=15)
84.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=564)
21.8 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
58 fps ∼79% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 77, n=15)
59.6 fps ∼82% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=566)
19.7 fps ∼27% -56%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
33 fps ∼100% +83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼79% +44%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
17 fps ∼52% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 32, n=15)
28.1 fps ∼85% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=320)
11.4 fps ∼35% -37%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼86% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
19 fps ∼86% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=15)
20 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=318)
8.12 fps ∼37% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
51 fps ∼100% +82%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼78% +43%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
25 fps ∼49% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼51% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=15)
43.8 fps ∼86% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=324)
17.1 fps ∼34% -39%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
56 fps ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼88% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
47 fps ∼84% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼84% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 55, n=15)
51.4 fps ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=323)
19.6 fps ∼35% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
50 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 53, n=15)
50.1 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=489)
14.6 fps ∼29% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
44 fps ∼100% +69%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼77% +31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼55% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 46, n=15)
39.6 fps ∼90% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=493)
13 fps ∼30% -50%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
498708 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (538107 - 607937, n=15)
577346 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=118)
322814 Points ∼54% -46%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps ∼65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
45.28 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼42%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
28.5 fps ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼51%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps ∼76%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
44.62 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼45%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4957 Score ∼75% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼76% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4988 - 7649, n=3)
6598 Score ∼100% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=89)
2609 Score ∼40% -48%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1270 Points ∼86% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼99% +8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼84% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1650, n=14)
1471 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=735)
826 Points ∼56% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10781 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼87% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11399 - 12073, n=14)
11675 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=735)
2543 Points ∼22% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4497 Points ∼62% -29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼84% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼70% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5564 - 8874, n=14)
7297 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=735)
1895 Points ∼26% -70%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9478 Points ∼97% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼96% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=14)
9731 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=735)
3495 Points ∼36% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4915 Points ∼83% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼91% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼85% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6273, n=14)
5893 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=735)
1787 Points ∼30% -68%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 77, n=14)
64.1 Points ∼97% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
51.826 Points ∼79% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=195)
41.1 Points ∼62% -36%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (79.1 - 126, n=13)
113 Points ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
89.62 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=625)
47.6 Points ∼41% -58%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼100% +4%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=14)
64.1 runs/min ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
63.7 runs/min ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=177)
43 runs/min ∼58% -39%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 120, n=14)
105 Points ∼88% +5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼72% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=262)
70 Points ∼59% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (15745 - 24467, n=14)
21833 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
19122 Points ∼81% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=793)
7954 Points ∼34% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=819)
9707 ms * ∼100% -375%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
2344.7 ms * ∼24% -15%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1860 - 2538, n=15)
1961 ms * ∼20% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X2 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 UltraHuawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T Pro McLaren EditionAverage 512 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
1%
-39%
-6%
-79%
Random Write 4KB
204.98
221.37
8%
259.21
26%
25.5
-88%
197 (34.4 - 319, n=5)
-4%
36.4 (0.14 - 319, n=890)
-82%
Random Read 4KB
202.63
202.43
0%
226.38
12%
168.5
-17%
211 (158 - 324, n=5)
4%
59.7 (1.59 - 324, n=890)
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
728.72
697.08
-4%
401.79
-45%
404.8
-44%
565 (386 - 911, n=5)
-22%
129 (2.99 - 911, n=890)
-82%
Sequential Read 256KB
1605.6
1632.02
2%
1780.5
11%
1489
-7%
1593 (1303 - 1802, n=5)
-1%
345 (12.1 - 1802, n=890)
-79%

Games - The Find X2 Pro masters games, but not at 120 fps

The position sensors integrated in the Find X2 Pro work without any problems in gaming operation, and the touchscreen operates accurately. The graphics performance of the Adreno 650 also offers sufficient performance to play demanding games such as PUBG Mobile smoothly even at the highest detail settings. With high graphics settings, the first-person shooter is displayed at a relatively constant 40 FPS - we determine our frame rates with the app from GameBench. However, the full 120 Hz of the OLED panel is not available in our test games, and Oppo seems to limit the frame rates at 60 FPS here. Also, some apps from the Play Store such as Asphalt 9 Legends are incompatible with the Find X2 Pro.  

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (37-41)
; HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)
Real Racing 3
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.9 (59-60)

Emissions - The Oppo smartphone offers stereo sound

Temperature

Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

In everyday operation, the case of the Find X2 Pro warms up noticeably only under load. In order to test the heat development of the Oppo smartphone under constant load, we use the battery test of the GFXBench app. The Manhattan-3.1 test shows that the frame rate hardly drops with increasing load, which makes performance drops under load unlikely.

Max. Load
 35.4 °C
96 F
35.4 °C
96 F
33.9 °C
93 F
 
 35.6 °C
96 F
35.7 °C
96 F
34.2 °C
94 F
 
 35.6 °C
96 F
36.1 °C
97 F
33.6 °C
92 F
 
Maximum: 36.1 °C = 97 F
Average: 35.1 °C = 95 F
30.9 °C
88 F
32.6 °C
91 F
33.7 °C
93 F
32 °C
90 F
33.2 °C
92 F
35 °C
95 F
31.3 °C
88 F
33.7 °C
93 F
35.4 °C
96 F
Maximum: 35.4 °C = 96 F
Average: 33.1 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  26.5 °C = 80 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone
Oppo Find X2 Pro smartphone

Speaker

Pink Noise diagram
Pink Noise diagram

The stereo speakers achieve a maximum volume of almost 86 dB(A) in our test. The sound output of the speakers is dominated by mid-range frequencies and shows itself as less linear than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in our measurements. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.431.62529.623.93129.829.84025.525.45033.232.96326.825.98025.529.710023.727.412519.12916018.948.720017.247.325017.553.83151757.340015.162.15001562.563014.767.580015.571.3100015.572.7125014.773.1160014.574.8200014.674.6250014.576.9315013.776.7400014.776.8500014.574.6630014.570.7800014.565.21000014.864.91250014.955.91600015.550.1SPL26.985.9N0.962.7median 14.9median 65.2Delta1.311.133.431.529.629.329.828.525.526.133.232.126.824.925.523.323.724.319.13318.953.317.250.917.552.81757.515.159.7156414.764.315.565.715.567.314.771.514.575.114.675.714.574.313.775.714.772.314.572.314.569.814.570.614.869.514.962.715.55626.984.40.958.1median 14.9median 65.71.38.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X2 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - The Find X2 Pro has high power consumption

Power Consumption

Due to Super VooC 2.0, the Find X2 Pro fully recharges in a legendary 38 to 40 minutes at 65 watts. Compared to the competitors, the power consumption of the Find X2 Pro is slightly high. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.45 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.47 / 3.43 / 3.52 Watt
Load midlight 6.2 / 10.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
4085 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
33%
43%
2%
21%
41%
Idle Minimum *
1.47
0.76
48%
0.87
41%
2.1
-43%
1.243 (0.53 - 2.2, n=16)
15%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
39%
Idle Average *
3.43
1.91
44%
1.75
49%
3
13%
2.12 (1.19 - 3.43, n=16)
38%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
49%
Idle Maximum *
3.52
1.96
44%
1.83
48%
3.5
1%
2.4 (1.23 - 4, n=16)
32%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
42%
Load Average *
6.2
4.72
24%
3.85
38%
5.3
15%
5.36 (3.5 - 7.4, n=16)
14%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
34%
Load Maximum *
10.63
10.15
5%
6.64
38%
8.3
22%
9.9 (7.68 - 12.3, n=16)
7%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
43%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

In our WLAN test at an adjusted display brightness, the 4260-mAh battery of the Oppo smartphone lasts for almost 11 hours. In the 60-Hz mode, we achieve a similar battery life of about 11 hours, which confirms our suspicion that you currently cannot adjust it to 60 Hz. 

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 54min
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
4085 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
654
720
10%
823
26%
912
39%

Pros

+ design
+ workmanship
+ high LTE band coverage
+ fast SoC and storage
+ bright OLED panel with 120 Hz

Cons

- cameras are not at the high-end level
- storage cannot be expanded
- no wireless charging
- battery life is only average
- color calibration of the display
- no 120 Hz when gaming (apps?)

Verdict - A very good Oppo smartphone, but not top of its class

In review: Oppo Find X2 Pro. Test unit provided by Oppo Germany.
In review: Oppo Find X2 Pro. Test unit provided by Oppo Germany.

With the Find X2 Pro, the Chinese manufacturer has succeeded in creating a really beautiful smartphone. While the artificial leather version feels slightly cheap, this is probably a matter of taste. However, what might really be more of a step backwards in terms of the design rather than an individual preference is the punch-hole design compared to the "clean look" of the predecessor with its pop-up camera.   

The Find X2 Pro is a great smartphone, but the price point is questionable for a manufacturer that is still fairly unknown in some countries.    

In terms of the hardware, there are hardly any compromises, even if some people may mind the lack of a status LED, wireless charging, or a 3.5-mm audio port. The software restrictions of ColorOS as well as the limitation to 60 Hz while gaming (and in other apps) are a bit regrettable.  

But finally, the price point of the Find X2 Pro is too high, because the cameras in particular are not at the highest level.   

Oppo Find X2 Pro - 03/26/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 75%
Weight
88%
Battery
89%
Display
85%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 95%
Application Performance
81 / 86 → 95%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
72%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oppo Find X2 Pro Smartphone Review - The burden of an astronomical price
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-03-29 (Update: 2020-03-29)
Marcus Herbrich
Editor of the original article: Marcus Herbrich - Editor
My great passion has always been mobile technologies, especially smartphones. As a technology enthusiast, the half-life of my devices is not exactly high and the latest hardware is just good enough - manufacturer or operating system plays a minor role, the main thing is state-of-the-art