Notebookcheck

Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review - Solid mid-ranger with weak haptics

Haptics as dealbreaker? The Find X2 Lite, like its Find X2 Neo sibling model, is powered by a Snapdragon 765G, but at a current price of 440 Euros (~$495), it is clearly cheaper. The Lite variant's otherwise watered-down interior is also visible on the outside, since Oppo uses a lot of plastic instead of glass in the Find X2 Lite.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain),
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

After having reviewed the Oppo Find X2 Neo, we now take a closer look at the Find X2 Lite, a 5G version of the Reno3. The differences between the two Oppo models aren't very pronounced. The cheaper Find X2 Lite also has an AMOLED panel, but the refresh rate is only 60 Hz, and instead of a punch hole, the Lite model has a notch. 

Just like its big brother, the Find X2 Lite features the VOOC Flash Charge 4.0 technology, a Snapdragon 765G and a slightly different quad-camera setup. Configured with 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage, the Oppo mobile phone is available at an MSRP of 499 Euros (~$561).

Oppo Find X2 Lite (Find X2 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.4 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Geomagnetic sensor, proximity sensor, accelerometer, gravity sensor, gyroscope, Miracast, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; WCDMA bands: 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; FDD-LTE bands: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/66; TD-LTE bands: 38/39/40/41 (2496-2690MHz); 5G: NSA n40/78 (subsequent OTA upgrades: 5G NSA n1/3/5/7/28), LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.96 x 160.3 x 74.3 ( = 0.31 x 6.31 x 2.93 in)
Battery
4025 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, Sony IMX586) 8 MP (f/2.2, wide-angle lens) 2 MP (f/2.4, monochrome) 2 MP (f/2.4, retro filter); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, modular power adapter, USB cable, headphones, protective case, ColorOS 7, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.88 W/kg (head), 1.22 W/kg (body), Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, fanless
Weight
180 g ( = 6.35 oz / 0.4 pounds), Power Supply: 90 g ( = 3.17 oz / 0.2 pounds)
Price
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
07/2020
Oppo Find X2 Lite
SD 765G, Adreno 620
180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2400x1080
80 %
06/2020
Oppo Reno3
Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446
170 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2400x1080
84 %
06/2020
Nubia RedMagic 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.65"2340x1080
82 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
84 %
01/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
02/2020
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Externally, the Find X2 Lite and its sibling model, the X2 Neo, are less similar than the technical data would suggest. The front of the Lite variant is characterized by the notch design of the front-facing camera, and the ratio of the screen to the overall front side is only 84% - in comparison, the Find X2 Neo reaches 90%.

The workmanship of the Lite model is on a satisfactory level, and the stability of the case also makes a decent impression. However, the plastic material on the back is also clearly noticeable as such and isn't comparable to a glass rear cover. The plastic frame (or plastic coating, at least) doesn't exactly add to the perceived quality either.

The Oppo phone doesn't offer protection against water or dust through an IP certification.

Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

Size comparison

168.56 mm / 6.64 inch 78 mm / 3.07 inch 9.75 mm / 0.3839 inch 218 g0.4806 lbs165.3 mm / 6.51 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 8.79 mm / 0.3461 inch 208 g0.4586 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 199 g0.4387 lbs160.3 mm / 6.31 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 7.96 mm / 0.3134 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs160.2 mm / 6.31 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 170 g0.3748 lbs157.8 mm / 6.21 inch 74.2 mm / 2.92 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 208 g0.4586 lbs

Connectivity - Oppo Find X2 Lite with 3.5 mm audio jack

The Find X2 Lite is equipped with a 3.5 mm headphone jack as well as a fingerprint scanner, Miracast and USB OTG. When it comes to the storage options, buyers have to settle for 128 GB of storage space. The Oppo phone doesn't offer an SD card slot or a 256 GB version.

Software - Find X2 Lite with Android 10

The Chinese manufacturer has installed Android 10 as its operating system, which is complemented by the ColorOS 7 user interface. At the level of May 2020, the security patches are up to date at the time of conducting our review.

Out of the box, the system is relatively restrictive - similar to MiUI from Xiaomi - so that active apps that are running in the background are closed quite quickly, causing push notifications to often arrive late or not at all.

Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

Communication and GPS - Oppo smartphone with NFC

Oppo uses Bluetooth 5.1 in the Find X2 Lite, and near-field communication is also possible. The integrated WLAN module supports the IEEE 802.11 standard according to the a/b/g/n/ac specification and operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency ranges. In combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, the mid-range mobile phone offers good transfer speeds for this price class at over 600 Mb/s.

The single-SIM smartphone accesses mobile Internet with the fast 5G standard. But the Find X2 Lite also covers all LTE frequencies relevant to Germany in the 4G network, a total of 15 LTE bands.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
946 (min: 911, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼73% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
671 (min: 652, max: 683) MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (min: 342, max: 372) MBit/s ∼39% -45%
Oppo Reno3
PowerVR GM9446, Helio P90, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
353 (min: 297, max: 367) MBit/s ∼37% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
329 (min: 284, max: 350) MBit/s ∼35% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼28% -60%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
926 (min: 463, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
620 (min: 300, max: 635) MBit/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (min: 295, max: 452) MBit/s ∼45% -33%
Oppo Reno3
PowerVR GM9446, Helio P90, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (min: 331, max: 352) MBit/s ∼37% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (min: 280, max: 399) MBit/s ∼37% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 (min: 306, max: 319) MBit/s ∼34% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼27% -59%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (652-683)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (300-635)
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
GPS indoors
GPS indoors

Outdoors, the GPS module determines the current position without delay and with an accuracy of 3 meters. It's also possible to determine the position inside a building.

To get a better overview of the GPS performance, we take our Oppo mobile phone on a bike tour. On the test track, the Find X2 Lite scores points with a small deviation from the Garmin Edge 500 and a solid route accuracy.

Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Oppo Find X2 Lite GPS
Oppo Find X2 Lite GPS
Oppo Find X2 Lite GPS
Oppo Find X2 Lite GPS
Oppo Find X2 Lite GPS
Oppo Find X2 Lite GPS

Telephone and call quality - Oppo Find X2 Lite with Wi-Fi calling

Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

The option for Voice over LTE, which allows voice calls over the 4G network, is not available in the settings of our test device - but it is available, in principle, upon request from Oppo Germany. On the other hand, Wi-Fi calling is supported by the Find X2 Lite.

We find the quality of the built-in microphone satisfactory. Voices are reproduced clearly and understandably.

Cameras - Oppo phone with a pseudo quad-camera setup

32 MP front-facing camera
32 MP front-facing camera

The main camera of the "quad-camera setup" in the Find X2 Lite consists of a 48 MP wide-angle module with the Sony IMX586 as image sensor and an aperture of f/1.7. In daylight, the Sony camera sensor offers quite a lot of detail and good image sharpness. As our review of the Find X2 Neo already revealed, the Sony IMX sensor in the Lite model also has visible weaknesses in low-light conditions.

The main camera is complemented by an 8 MP ultra wide-angle lens since the other two lenses are only responsible for photos taken with filters (monochrome, retro). The wide-angle lens is probably the same as in the Neo model; at least the quality is on a similarly poor level.

The 32 MP camera on the front is no selfie expert; the image sharpness in particular could be a bit more pronounced. However, the pictures are definitely suitable for social media content.

Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Wide angle
Wide angle
2x zoom
2x zoom
5x zoom
5x zoom
10x zoom
10x zoom
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelLow-LightUltraweitwinkelWeitwinkel5-facher-Zoom
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
47.8 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
56.6 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
27 ∆E
58 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Lite: 41.26 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 65.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Lite: 6.61 ∆E min: 1.5 - max: 12.73 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Find X2 Lite with headphones

In addition to the smartphone itself, a USB cable, a protective silicon case, a headset and a modular power adapter (30 watts) are included in the box.

There is also a 24-month warranty.

Input devices and handling - Oppo phone with fingerprint scanner under the display

The capacitive multi-touch screen recognizes inputs quickly and precisely. The active fingerprint scanner under the display isn't one of the fastest sensors on the market, but it unlocks the Find X2 Lite reliably - the same applies to the 2D face-unlock function. Similar to the Find X2 Neo, the fingerprint scanner deactivates itself (even while being used) as soon as a user is recognized by the front-facing camera, which can be quite annoying in everyday use. 

In terms of quality, the built-in vibration motor doesn't convince us in the test. The vibrations seem inaccurate; the Find X2 Lite doesn't offer precise haptic feedback.

Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

Display - Find X2 Lite with AMOLED panel

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The 6.4-inch OLED display in the Oppo mobile phone has a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels and reaches, therefore, a pixel density of a good 400 PPI. Since organic light-emitting diodes almost never radiate at their maximum brightness, the luminance is reduced. Oppo uses pulse width modulation (PWM) to control the display brightness. Moreover, we detect screen flickering at the maximum display brightness. The frequency of the flickering is between 116 and 248 Hz, which can cause problems like headaches or dizziness for sensitive users. An extra DC-dimming mode can be activated on the Oppo phone.

The brightness of the Find X2 Lite is slightly above average for its price range at 633 cd/m². With the ambient light sensor deactivated to control the display brightness, we measure a luminance of 440 cd/m². The next step in our test is to check the panel's luminosity with an evenly distributed share of dark to bright areas (APL 50). We determined a maximum brightness of 827 cd/m² here.

635
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
631
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 648 cd/m² Average: 632.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 638 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Oppo Find X2 Lite
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Oppo Reno3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Nubia RedMagic 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
3%
-29%
-18%
5%
25%
Brightness middle
638
595
-7%
593
-7%
510
-20%
579
-9%
658
3%
Brightness
633
598
-6%
601
-5%
536
-15%
576
-9%
643
2%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
92
-3%
91
-4%
89
-6%
93
-2%
Black Level *
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
4.96
11%
8.1
-45%
6.6
-18%
4.61
18%
1.8
68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
8.54
4%
16.2
-82%
17.56
-97%
7.72
13%
4.4
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
4.2
21%
7.1
-34%
2.9
45%
4.2
21%
3.8
28%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.307 95%
2.28 96%
2.242 98%
2.244 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7118 91%
7072 92%
7566 86%
6989 93%
7201 90%
6255 104%
Contrast
1343

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 247.5 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 247.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 247.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17927 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The interaction of the high display luminance and the absolute black level of the OLED panel results in a very good contrast. However, the display analysis performed with a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software shows significant deviations in the reproduction of colors (5.6) and grayscales (5.3) in the default settings. Furthermore, the measured color temperature of 7,118 kelvin is too cool. However, the latter can be adjusted in the settings.

CalMAN color accuracy (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN color accuracy (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN color space (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN color space (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN grayscales (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN grayscales (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN color saturation (sRGB target color space)
CalMAN color saturation (sRGB target color space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).

The viewing-angle stability of the AMOLED panel in the Find X2 Lite is absolutely sufficient for everyday use, but a brightness decrease when viewing the screen from the sides can be clearly noticed and color fogging is visible at flat angles.  

In outdoor use, the display in the Oppo mobile phone cuts a fine figure due to its high brightness and very good contrast.

Performance - Oppo smartphone with the Snapdragon 765G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G integrates two fast Cortex-A76 cores (Prime core and Gold core) as well as six Cortex-A55 cores at a clock frequency of 1.8 GHz. The Adreno 620 integrated into the Snapdragon 765G forms the graphics subsystem. The G version of the Snapdragon 765 also includes select Snapdragon gaming features such as the Game Smoother and Game Fast Loader.

The CPU performance is largely on par with the Redmi K30 5G's results in our benchmark measurements. However, the system benchmarks and partly also the browser benchmarks are considerably lower with the Find X2 Lite. The Snapdragon 765G's GPU performance stays clearly behind the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 865, but it can come out on top against the Mali-G72 MP18 in the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite.

In combination with 8 GB of RAM, the Find X2 Lite provides a subjectively good system performance in everyday use. Animations look smooth, and system freezes are rare. The fast UFS 2.1 memory also ensures short loading times for demanding apps.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1162 Points ∼47%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2487 Points ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼42% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼44% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼66% +41%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1263 Points ∼43%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2954 Points ∼100% +134%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼41% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼60% +39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1815 Points ∼59%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1524 Points ∼50% -16%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3076 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼49% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=9)
1810 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=90)
1990 Points ∼65% +10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
572 Points ∼63%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
407 Points ∼45% -29%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼63% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=9)
600 Points ∼66% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=90)
568 Points ∼62% -1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7754 Points ∼60%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
7129 Points ∼55% -8%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12879 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼45% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7551 Points ∼59% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼78% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7754 - 9989, n=9)
8494 Points ∼66% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=491)
5840 Points ∼45% -25%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9756 Points ∼70%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
8736 Points ∼63% -10%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13954 Points ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼47% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9240 Points ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼77% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=9)
9797 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=649)
6378 Points ∼46% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2757 Points ∼73%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2770 Points ∼73% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3793 Points ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼82% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2752 Points ∼73% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼68% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2893, n=9)
2695 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=150)
2637 Points ∼70% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3177 Points ∼38%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1377 Points ∼17% -57%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8321 Points ∼100% +162%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points ∼50% +32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2145 Points ∼26% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼38% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 3198, n=9)
3123 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=150)
2915 Points ∼35% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3072 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1550 Points ∼24% -50%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6590 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points ∼55% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2256 Points ∼34% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼45% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3130, n=9)
3006 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=150)
2627 Points ∼40% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3325 Points ∼60%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2784 Points ∼50% -16%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼56% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼58% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼54% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3544, n=9)
3186 Points ∼58% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=497)
2178 Points ∼39% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3568 Points ∼38%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1116 Points ∼12% -69%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9467 Points ∼100% +165%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼51% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2492 Points ∼26% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼38% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3165 - 3589, n=9)
3503 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=497)
2077 Points ∼22% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3524 Points ∼43%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1287 Points ∼16% -63%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8154 Points ∼100% +131%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼53% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2567 Points ∼31% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=9)
3409 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=498)
1929 Points ∼24% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3114 Points ∼56%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2776 Points ∼50% -11%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3155 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼58% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3555, n=9)
3171 Points ∼57% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=527)
2087 Points ∼38% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5356 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2410 Points ∼19% -55%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12750 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼31% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3648 Points ∼29% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4865 - 5437, n=9)
5263 Points ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=527)
2766 Points ∼22% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4663 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2483 Points ∼25% -47%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9877 Points ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼38% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3522 Points ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=9)
4558 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=527)
2325 Points ∼24% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼63%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2687 Points ∼52% -17%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼59% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼61% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3233 - 3503, n=9)
3350 Points ∼64% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=577)
2064 Points ∼40% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3302 Points ∼39%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1083 Points ∼13% -67%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8432 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼52% +34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2245 Points ∼27% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼39% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2963 - 3321, n=9)
3237 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=577)
1737 Points ∼21% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼45%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1249 Points ∼17% -62%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7305 Points ∼100% +124%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼55% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼33% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼45% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3015 - 3346, n=9)
3251 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=578)
1660 Points ∼23% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3074 Points ∼61%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2685 Points ∼53% -13%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5049 Points ∼100% +64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼61% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3228 Points ∼64% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼68% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3498, n=9)
3162 Points ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=619)
1927 Points ∼38% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5136 Points ∼41%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2308 Points ∼18% -55%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12494 Points ∼100% +143%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼45% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3485 Points ∼28% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4654 - 5832, n=9)
5097 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=618)
2281 Points ∼18% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4478 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2382 Points ∼25% -47%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9492 Points ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼50% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3424 Points ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼49% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3576 - 4693, n=9)
4430 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=621)
1965 Points ∼21% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19521 Points ∼75%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
21123 Points ∼81% +8%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26182 Points ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼89% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18769 - 23203, n=9)
20299 Points ∼78% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=767)
15269 Points ∼58% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68456 Points ∼45%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
30124 Points ∼20% -56%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
150654 Points ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼46% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (62756 - 69645, n=9)
67791 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=765)
25945 Points ∼17% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43965 Points ∼60%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
27518 Points ∼38% -37%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
73143 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼65% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (42735 - 47824, n=9)
44579 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=765)
20395 Points ∼28% -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼46%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps ∼39% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼46% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (86 - 97, n=7)
94 fps ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=773)
43.9 fps ∼21% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps ∼64% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼96% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (60 - 86, n=7)
66 fps ∼73% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=782)
30.5 fps ∼34% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
56 fps ∼44%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼100% +125%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps ∼58% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (49 - 56, n=7)
53.6 fps ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=678)
25.9 fps ∼21% -54%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps ∼57%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps ∼65% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼55% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (44 - 55, n=7)
49.1 fps ∼56% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=686)
21.8 fps ∼25% -56%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
38 fps ∼51%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
74 fps ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼32% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼50% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (33 - 38, n=7)
37 fps ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=541)
20.8 fps ∼28% -45%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
34 fps ∼67%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps ∼90% +35%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼65% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (29 - 34, n=7)
32.7 fps ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=543)
19 fps ∼37% -44%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼46%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
5.8 fps ∼21% -55%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼61% +31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼36% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼32% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.9 - 13, n=9)
12.2 fps ∼44% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼40% -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps ∼43%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
3.8 fps ∼19% -56%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +133%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼55% +28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼34% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼65% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7.5 - 13, n=9)
8.89 fps ∼44% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼40% -7%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼48%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
9.3 fps ∼21% -56%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼100% +110%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼64% +33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼48% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18 - 21, n=9)
20.4 fps ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼38% -21%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
11 fps ∼20% -54%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +125%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼57% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼33% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 24, n=9)
23.3 fps ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼36% -20%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼41%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100% +143%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps ∼57% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (19 - 21, n=7)
20.7 fps ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=466)
14 fps ∼27% -33%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps ∼43%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
42 fps ∼100% +133%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps ∼60% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼45% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (16 - 19, n=7)
18.1 fps ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=470)
12.5 fps ∼30% -31%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
323940 Points ∼53%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
607937 Points ∼100% +88%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points ∼54% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼49% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (279244 - 332074, n=7)
312646 Points ∼51% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=95)
314806 Points ∼52% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1196 Points ∼79%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1505 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points ∼86% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼92% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=7)
1367 Points ∼91% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=710)
808 Points ∼54% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5172 Points ∼44%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11648 Points ∼100% +125%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points ∼55% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼44% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4697 - 5216, n=7)
5104 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=710)
2431 Points ∼21% -53%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5214 Points ∼62%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8398 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points ∼33% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼63% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=7)
5094 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=710)
1810 Points ∼22% -65%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6856 Points ∼71%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9723 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points ∼59% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6069 - 6870, n=7)
6637 Points ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=710)
3379 Points ∼35% -51%
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3856 Points ∼63%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6149 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points ∼55% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3674 - 4094, n=7)
3921 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=710)
1719 Points ∼28% -55%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
61.492 Points ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼86% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (39.3 - 58.7, n=7)
48.6 Points ∼79% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=172)
40.2 Points ∼65% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
39.522 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.259 Points ∼52% -18%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼81% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (72 - 101, n=7)
79.6 Points ∼80% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points ∼73% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
72 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=237)
69.9 Points ∼71% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
21048 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼89% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (16302 - 19143, n=7)
17967 Points ∼85% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
17890 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points ∼61% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=768)
7701 Points ∼37% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=794)
9883 ms * ∼100% -256%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3188.8 ms * ∼32% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼28% -0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
2778 ms * ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2602 - 2835, n=7)
2732 ms * ∼28% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
2401.34 ms * ∼24% +14%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X2 LiteOppo Reno3Nubia RedMagic 5GSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10 ProXiaomi Redmi K30 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
29%
-25%
-40%
-28%
-28%
-70%
Random Write 4KB
146.1
143.9
-2%
193.57
32%
142
-3%
108.5
-26%
100.99
-31%
106 (18.2 - 250, n=58)
-27%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=857)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
169.44
127.3
-25%
201.64
19%
132
-22%
119.2
-30%
96.8
-43%
142 (96.8 - 179, n=58)
-16%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=857)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
475.23
227.3
-52%
388.38
-18%
190.8
-60%
205.1
-57%
312.76
-34%
234 (182 - 503, n=58)
-51%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=857)
-74%
Sequential Read 256KB
910.45
504.2
-45%
1654.41
82%
776.7
-15%
499.2
-45%
889.67
-2%
760 (427 - 980, n=58)
-17%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=857)
-64%

Games - Find X2 Lite with the Adreno 620

More complex 3D games from the Android Play Store such as PUBG Mobile or Asphalt 9 Legends can be played smoothly with high graphics details - at least for the most part. At high detail levels, the Gameloft racing game repeatedly experiences short frame-rate drops. 

Thanks to the good sensor technology and the satisfactory accuracy of the display, you can control the games through inputs without any issues.

Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

Emissions - Oppo phone with loud-sounding body

Temperature

The surface temperatures are pronounced in our measurements but not high. In everyday use, however, reaching temperatures above 40 °C (~104 °F) only happens during prolonged periods of load.

Max. Load
 39.7 °C
103 F
39.8 °C
104 F
37.1 °C
99 F
 
 40.1 °C
104 F
39.8 °C
104 F
37.4 °C
99 F
 
 39.4 °C
103 F
39.7 °C
103 F
36.5 °C
98 F
 
Maximum: 40.1 °C = 104 F
Average: 38.8 °C = 102 F
35.1 °C
95 F
35.9 °C
97 F
37.1 °C
99 F
35.3 °C
96 F
36.6 °C
98 F
37.7 °C
100 F
35 °C
95 F
36.4 °C
98 F
38.1 °C
101 F
Maximum: 38.1 °C = 101 F
Average: 36.4 °C = 98 F
Power Supply (max.)  29 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review

Speaker

Speaker test: Pink Noise
Speaker test: Pink Noise
3.5 mm audio jack output
3.5 mm audio jack output

With a maximum volume of over 91 dB, the mono speaker is very loud. In terms of quality, the sound output is alright; super high tones and basses are not present. Our measurements also show a less-linear frequency response for the mids and highs.

Thanks to the 3.5 mm jack, it's easy to use your own headphones. The sound output is loud and low-noise.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.531.42529.428.83122.819.94025.323.65030.235.16323.325.68021.925.31001924.612519.629.81601939.320016.144.725018.95131516.656.340014.359500156363015.260.780014.365.8100014.371.1125014.273.3160014.874.6200014.876.9250014.477.9315014.380.2400014.684.2500014.784.3630014.981800014.977.41000014.674.21250014.8721600015.456.9SPL26.891.1N0.978median 14.8median 71.1Delta1.412.945.841.541.436.931.231.43635.635.635.331332627.723.723.321.726.619.137.118.243.317.149.415.655.515.359.116.161.8146313.666.41471.613.674.614.872.714.472.214.666.613.763.813.865.414.16814.369.814.670.21564.715.37015.757.365.526.681.718.50.849.8median 14.8median 64.71.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X2 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X2 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Find X2 Lite with Flash Charge

Energy consumption

The Find X2 Lite's 4,025-mAh battery is fully recharged in just over an hour using the Super VOOC 4.0 charging technology with 30 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.55 / 2.58 Watt
Load midlight 3.21 / 5.29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-43%
-26%
-17%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
1.1
-47%
0.9
-20%
0.66
12%
1.096 (0.66 - 1.8, n=7)
-46%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
-18%
Idle Average *
2.55
1.5
41%
1.6
37%
2.37
7%
2.16 (1.58 - 2.55, n=7)
15%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
31%
Idle Maximum *
2.58
1.71
34%
1.9
26%
2.42
6%
2.42 (1.6 - 2.9, n=7)
6%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
21%
Load Average *
3.21
4.84
-51%
8.4
-162%
6.8
-112%
4.42 (3.14 - 6.8, n=7)
-38%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
-27%
Load Maximum *
5.29
10.42
-97%
10.3
-95%
7.5
-42%
6.47 (5.2 - 9.2, n=7)
-22%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The Oppo phone lasts a good 12 hours in our WLAN test, which is a good runtime even though the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro has much more endurance.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 08min
Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3
4025 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
5260 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
728
802
10%
614
-16%
904
24%
1112
53%
802
10%

Pros

+ bright OLED panel
+ fast WLAN
+ good battery life

Cons

- only single SIM/no SD card support
- haptics
- wide bezels
- wide-angle camera
- 60 Hz panel only
- no premium features (wireless charging, IP rating, e-SIM, etc...)

Oppo Find X2 Lite verdict - Haptics and design mar the overall concept

In review: Oppo Find X2 Lite. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.
In review: Oppo Find X2 Lite. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.

Like with its sibling model, the Find X2 Lite's bright, evenly illuminated and high-contrast OLED panel is the highlight of the mid-range mobile phone. With the Find X2 Neo's case - high-quality, thin and sophisticated in appearance - the concept of the Lite model from Oppo would have been perfectly understandable. Compared to the Snapdragon 865 devices in the price range of around 500 Euros (~$562), such as the Pocophone F2 Pro or the Nubia RedMagic 5G, the Find X2 Lite would have been able to position itself with its premium look. But this didn't happen due to the "plastic feeling" and the relatively poor screen-to-body ratio.

It's a shame that Oppo has downgraded the visual aspect of its Lite model. With the sibling model's premium look, the Find X2 Lite would have been an interesting option in the price range between 400 (~$449) and 500 Euros (~$562).

What remains is a solid mid-range smartphone with clear deficits in terms of cameras, because from the rear quad-camera setup, only the main camera offers any real added value. Furthermore, the Find X2 Lite lacks any premium features like wireless charging, an IP rating, or e-SIM. The support for SD cards or two SIM cards as well as the inclusion of stereo speakers are missing features too. 

 

 

Oppo Find X2 Lite - 06/22/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
90%
Battery
89%
Display
83%
Games Performance
36 / 64 → 56%
Application Performance
75 / 86 → 87%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
68%
Average
76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review - Solid mid-ranger with weak haptics
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-07- 2 (Update: 2020-07- 3)
Marcus Herbrich
Editor of the original article: Marcus Herbrich - Editor
My great passion has always been mobile technologies, especially smartphones. As a technology enthusiast, the half-life of my devices is not exactly high and the latest hardware is just good enough - manufacturer or operating system plays a minor role, the main thing is state-of-the-art