Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 620

Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
technology14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement09.04.2019
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 56690     avg: 67038     median: 68764 (7%)     max: 70216 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3678     avg: 4551     median: 4663 (20%)     max: 4893 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4036     avg: 5146     median: 5344 (12%)     max: 5437 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2934     avg: 3394     median: 3494 (15%)     max: 3605 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2814     avg: 3435     median: 3554 (9%)     max: 3592 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2972     avg: 4323     median: 4515 (40%)     max: 4693 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 2844     avg: 4859     median: 5115 (31%)     max: 5832 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2261     avg: 3146     median: 3267 (16%)     max: 3346 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2048     avg: 3116     median: 3277 (11%)     max: 3342 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.3     avg: 8.3     median: 8.5 (0%)     max: 13 fps
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 21.5     median: 23 (0%)     max: 24 fps
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 19.7     median: 21 (0%)     max: 21 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 22     avg: 35     median: 37 (1%)     max: 38 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 31     avg: 50.9     median: 54 (2%)     max: 56 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 48     avg: 88.4     median: 95 (1%)     max: 97 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
30.4 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
med.
52  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60 90 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
30 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
62 120 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Genshin Impact5223
Armajet75
PUBG Mobile384031
Arena of Valor4545
Dead Trigger 291
Asphalt 9: Legends3029
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.29
log 14. 21:37:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:17:12 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.056s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0.022s ... 0.078s

#8 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.072s ... 0.15s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.15s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.756s ... 0.905s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.905s

#12 Got 44 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.923s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.923s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.927s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.071s ... 0.998s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 1.002s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 620 graphics card

Oppo Find X3 Lite smartphone review: Fast mid-ranger with a 90 Hz OLED panel and a 65-watt power adapter

Oppo Find X3 Lite smartphone review: Fast mid-ranger with a 90 Hz OLED panel and a 65-watt power adapter

Oppo is still a relatively unknown player in Germany, but it's already number 4 in global smartphone sales after Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi. This means that the...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | 6.43" | 172 g
LG Wing smartphone

LG Wing Smartphone Review - An ingenious dual-screen concept?

With the Wing model, LG takes a completely new look at smartphone operation. Instead of using a foldable OLED panel, the Korean manufacturer implements a second...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | 6.80" | 260 g
Vivo X51 5G Review - The smartphone with gimbal camera for Europe

Vivo X51 5G Review - The smartphone with gimbal camera for Europe

Vivo launches the X51 5G in Europe, which is nominally the X50 Pro already known from Asia. Besides software modifications and an optimized camera, the review r...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | 6.56" | 181.5 g
Google Pixel 4a 5G Smartphone Review: The Pixel 5 on the cheap

Google Pixel 4a 5G Smartphone Review: The Pixel 5 on the cheap

The Google Pixel 4a 5G makes life harder for the Pixel 5. It features the same SoC and the same camera system. However, it has a bigger 6.2-inch screen and is m...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | 6.20" | 168 g
Google Pixel 5 smartphone review: Powerful mid-range with Android 11

Google Pixel 5 smartphone review: Powerful mid-range with Android 11

The Pixel 5 is the new smartphone flagship from Google, and it turned out extremely compact at 6 inches. In addition, the Android 11 phone is not equipped with ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | 6.00" | 151 g

Nokia 8.3 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.81", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 8.3 5G smartphone review – Good looks aren't enough

Oppo Reno4 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Reno4 Pro Review: Slim 5G smartphone with a quality camera

ZTE Axon 11 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.47", 0.2 kg
  Review » ZTE Axon 11 5G Review: Affordable 5G smartphone

Vivo X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  Review » Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone Review - Does the "revolutionary" gimbal camera make a difference?

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone Review - A battery giant with a 90Hz display

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Smartphone Review: 300-Euro Price-Performance Champion

OnePlus Nord: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus Nord Smartphone Review – Comeback of the Value Champion?

LG Velvet: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  Review » LG Velvet 5G Smartphone Review - High-class comeback for the camera mope

Oppo Find X2 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X2 Lite smartphone review - Solid mid-ranger with weak haptics

Oppo Find X2 Neo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review - Model confusion at Oppo

Oppo Reno3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Reno3 Pro Smartphone Review – Mid-range Mobile Phone with Four Cameras

Motorola Edge: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Edge Smartphone Review – 5G without Bezels

Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Smartphone Review – Affordable Phone with 5G

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Smartphone Review: A 5G smartphone with a 120 Hz screen at a bargain price

Realme Q3 Pro Carnival: unknown, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q3 Pro Carnival

Oppo K9: unknown, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K9

Google Pixel 5a: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.34", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel 5a

TCL 10 5G UW - T790S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 10 5G UW - T790S

Vivo iQOO Z3: unknown, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z3

Oppo Reno5 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno5 5G

ZTE Blade X1 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade X1 5G

Oppo Find X3 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X3 Lite

Oppo Reno4 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno4 5G

Nokia 8 V 5G UW: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.81", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 8 V 5G UW

Vivo V20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V20 Pro

Vivo X51 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X51 5G

Google Pixel 4a 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel 4a 5G

Motorola One 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola One 5G

Vivo X50e 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50e 5G

ZTE Axon 20 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 20 5G

Google Pixel 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel 5

Motorola Razr 2020 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Razr 2020 5G

LG Wing: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.80", 0.3 kg
  External Review » LG Wing LMF100N

Xiaomi Redmi K30 Extreme: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30 Extreme

Vivo iQOO Z1x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z1x

Vivo S7 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S7 5G

Oppo K7 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K7 5G

Vivo X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50 Pro

Vivo X50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

OnePlus Nord: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord

Realme X50 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme X50 5G

Oppo Reno4 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno4 Pro

Oppo Reno4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno4

Xiaomi Redmi K30i 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30i 5G

Oppo Reno3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno3 Pro

ZTE Nubia Play 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Nubia Play 5G

Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth

Oppo Realme X50m 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme X50m 5G

Oppo Find X2 Neo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X2 Neo

LG Velvet: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG Velvet

Motorola Edge: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge

Oppo Find X2 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X2 Lite

ZTE Axon 11 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.47", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 11 5G

Vivo Z6 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Z6 5G

Nokia 8.3 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.81", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 8.3

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G

Oppo Reno3 Vitality Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno3 Vitality Edition

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G

Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno3 Pro

Google Pixel 4a 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.20", 0.2 kg
   » Battery capacity of Google Pixel 4a was halved to prevent battery fires

   » Google Pixel 4a battery: "Update from hell" cuts capacity in half and reduces voltage

   » Pixel 4a software update causes massive battery issues, Google pays $50 and offers other solutions

Google Pixel 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.00", 0.2 kg
   » Google pushes new updates to older Pixel smartphones with undisclosed improvements

LG Wing: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.80", 0.3 kg
   » LG Wing starts receiving final Android OS upgrade with new update

Google Pixel 4a 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.20", 0.2 kg
   » New Google Pixel Feature Drop arrives with improvements across Pixel 4, Pixel 5, Pixel 6 and Pixel 7 series smartphones

Google Pixel 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.00", 0.2 kg
   » New Google Pixel Feature Drop arrives with improvements across Pixel 4, Pixel 5, Pixel 6 and Pixel 7 series smartphones

Oppo Find X3 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X3 Lite: The smallest and most affordable model in Oppo's new flagship family

LG Wing: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.80", 0.3 kg
   » Courageous concept, but is the LG Wing niche smartphone simply too expensive?

Google Pixel 4a 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.20", 0.2 kg
   » Google Pixel 4a 5G: Review results

Google Pixel 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.00", 0.2 kg
   » Google Pixel 5: An overview of the test results

Nokia 8.3 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.81", 0.2 kg
   » The Nokia 8.3 5G is outdated and some people will love it for this very reason

Oppo Reno4 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Reno4 Pro: Slim 5G smartphone without an SD card reader

ZTE Axon 11 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.47", 0.2 kg
   » ZTE Axon 11 5G: A 5G smartphone like many others

Vivo X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X50 Pro Mid-Range Smartphone with Gimbal Camera: Please, May We Have Some More?

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Gamers should not use the Motorola Moto G 5G - Anomalies with the Snapdragon 765

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite & Mi Note 10 Lite: Xiaomi is the master of displays for mid-range smartphones

OnePlus Nord: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
   » OnePlus Nord: Is the high-end Smartphone worth its mid-range price?

LG Velvet: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » The LG Velvet is not for YouTube fans

Oppo Find X2 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » The Oppo Find X2 Lite lacks unique selling points – AMOLED alone is not enough

Oppo Find X2 Neo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » The noble Oppo Find X2 Neo struggles with its very high RRP

Motorola Edge: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Edge: Can the expensive Moto impress?

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Redmi K30: Xiaomi brings 64 MP cameras, 5G connectivity and 120 Hz to the mid-range

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-02-17)