, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Adreno 620 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 642
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 12
technology14 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.04.2019 07.05.2021
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

5587 Points (41%)
8380 Points (20%)
4478 Points (46%)
6148 Points (24%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
90 fps (3%)
90 fps (10%)
79 fps (22%)
26 fps (17%)
18 fps (7%)
42 fps (20%)
50 fps (9%)
40 fps (9%)
35 fps (13%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
30.4 fps (3%)
48 fps (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (22%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (37%)     max: 27981 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 173% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 620:
60 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 620:
60 fps  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 620:
60 fps  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
med.
100%
Adreno 620:
52 fps  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 620:
23 fps  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 620:
60 fps 90 fps ~ 75 fps
40%
Adreno 642:
30 fps  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 620:
30 fps 40 fps 40 fps 40 fps 40 fps 40 fps ~ 38 fps
158%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 620:
40 fps 40 fps 40 fps ~ 40 fps
148%
Adreno 642:
59 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 620:
30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 40 fps ~ 31 fps
194%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
ultra
Adreno 642:
40 fps  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 620:
30 fps 60 fps ~ 45 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 620:
30 fps 60 fps ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 620:
62 fps 120 fps ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 620:
29 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 620:
21 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 29 fps
207%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 158%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 181%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 08:21:02

#0 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0.024s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.028s ... 0.058s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0s ... 0.058s

#10 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.005s ... 0.064s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.076s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.076s

#14 Got 51 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.091s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.091s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.092s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.011s ... 0.103s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.103s

#19 return log +0.05s ... 0.153s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)