Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 610

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology11 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement09.04.2019
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 15403     avg: 22761     median: 24487.5 (3%)     max: 25351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 975     avg: 1844     median: 1819 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1295     avg: 1746     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 267     avg: 1164     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1597 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 240     avg: 1027     median: 1029.5 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 205     avg: 402.5     median: 418 (0%)     max: 634 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.2     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 9.3     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 19.4     median: 19 (1%)     max: 24 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 24     avg: 35.9     median: 36 (0%)     max: 45 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (18%)     max: 21734 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (23%)     max: 20711 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.25     avg: 3.5     median: 3 (1%)     max: 6.42 Watt
0123456Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
42 59 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
40  fps    + Compare
ultra
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
26.3 37 37 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
15  fps    + Compare
ultra
11 14 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact331513
Armajet52
PUBG Mobile302525
Arena of Valor3838
Dead Trigger 262
Asphalt 9: Legends3020
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 20:20:56

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0.014s ... 0.06s

#7 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.108s ... 0.169s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.169s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.293s ... 0.462s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.462s

#11 Got 105 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.493s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.493s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.497s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.171s ... 0.669s

#15 return log +0.042s ... 0.711s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 610 graphics card

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | photo: Florian Schmitt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G smartphone review – The phone with an impressive display for around US$200

The cheapest model of the Redmi-Note-13 series continues to feature a bright 120-Hz AMOLED display and apart from this, it boasts decent features for around US$...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 6.67" | 188.5 g
Onyx Boox Tab X - Image: Florian Schmitt

Onyx Boox Tab X review - E-Ink tablet for big tasks?

At 13.3 inches, the Onyx Boox Tab X is one of the largest e-ink tablets on the market. Thanks to the Android operating system, it offers app support and therefo...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 13.30" | 570 g
Onyx Boox Note Air 3

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Review: A beautiful e-ink tablet with app support, even in black and white

With pen input, Android operating system, and a stylish metal casing, the Onyx Boox Note Air 3 aims to win over buyers looking at a capable e-ink tablet. We lik...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 10.30" | 430 g
Onyx Boox Palma

Onyx Boox Palma review - Palm tablet with e-ink display and camera

The Onyx Boox Palma looks like a cell phone but lacks essential functions such as mobile communications. So it's more of a very handy e-book reader with Android...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 6.13" | 170 g
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE review

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Tablet review - Downgrade instead of improvement?

An aluminum unibody case, four Dolby Atmos certified speakers and a 90-Hz display—all within a tablet for US$220. Xiaomi's Redmi Pad SE is an exciting package f...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 11.00" | 481 g

Onyx Boox Page: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 7.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » Onyx Boox Page review - Android-apps on a handy e-ink tablet

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.30", 0.4 kg
  Review » Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C review - E-Ink tablet with color display, stylus support and Android

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 review: Smartphone with 120 Hz AMOLED and 1,200 nits for under US$200

Huawei MatePad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  Review » Huawei MatePad SE tablet review - Small price, small battery

Oppo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36", 0.4 kg
  Review » Oppo Pad Air tablet review - Good speakers and ample battery

Honor Pad 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 12.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Honor Pad 8 tablet review: 12-inch tablet at a bargain price

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G42 smartphone review: OLED lightweight with 700 nits at a bargain price

Xiaomi Redmi 10C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10C Smartphone Review - Great color reproduction for the entry-level phone

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G52 smartphone review - Affordable 90-Hz OLED phone with stereo sound and 50 MP

Honor X8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor X8 review - Affordable mid-range smartphone with 64 MP camera

Huawei Nova 9 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Nova 9 SE Review: Chic smartphone with 108 MP camera

Oppo A76: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A76 review - Beautiful phone with light and shadow

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Redmi Note 11 review: Xiaomi smartphone with a 90 Hz OLED display and 1,000 nits at an absolute bargain price

Realme 9i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme 9i Smartphone review - Affordable mid-range model with stereo speakers

Honor 50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 50 Lite review: Entry-level smartphone with thick 64 MP camera

Motorola Defy: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Defy smartphone review - Affordable outdoor phone with interesting design

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A74 smartphone review: Potential Galaxy A killer?

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9T review: Entry-level smartphone with huge battery, NFC, and stereo sound

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G10 smartphone review: Stylish, sturdy, and affordable mobile phone

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G30 Review: 90-Hz smartphone with an IP certification and NFC for less than 180 Euros

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo Tab P11 tablet review - Starting at 250 Euros: The cheapest 11-inch tablet is also an all-rounder

Nokia 5.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 5.4 Smartphone Review - With Android One to the top of its class?

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G9 Power smartphone review: Motorola phone with enduring battery

Motorola Moto E7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto E7 Plus Smartphone Review - Cell phone upgrade in the entry-level class

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus Nord N100 smartphone review: 200-Euro phone with premium features?

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Poco M3 Smartphone Review: The 150-Euro smartphone

Vivo Y70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  Review » Vivo Y70 smartphone Review - Lots of memory and battery power in a slim design

Vivo Y20s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  Review » Vivo Y20s Review - Slim entry-level smartphone with thick battery

Nokia 3.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 3.4 Smartphone Review - Lightweight, Colorful Nokia Phone

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE Tablet Review: One of the best tablets for less than 300 Euros (~$356)

Motorola Moto G9 Play: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G9 Play Smartphone Review - Affordable Performance

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A52 Smartphone Review: cheaper, but not much weaker than its bigger brother A72

Sony Xperia 10 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » Sony Xperia 10 II smartphone in review: The rest of the mid-range does it better

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A72 Smartphone Review - The affordable Oppo smartphone turns out an endurance champion

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone Review - Inexpensive Stylus Smartphone

Nokia 5.3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 5.3 Smartphone Review - Slim Android-One mobile phone

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G8 Smartphone Review – $200 Smartphone with Versatile Camera

Motorola Moto G8 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G8 Power Smartphone Review: Plenty of battery life and good cameras

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Review - Smartphone with the small difference

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G8 Plus smartphone review – Mobile phone with action cam

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Smartphone Review: A display dream for the price-conscious buyer

Xiaomi Mi A3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi A3 Smartphone Review – The price-performance king again!

Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad 2024: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad 2024

Nokia C210: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia C210

Huawei Nova 11 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11 SE

Samsung Galaxy A05s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A05s

Huawei Enjoy 60X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Enjoy 60X

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

Honor Pad X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad X9

Huawei Nova Y91: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Y91

Huawei Nova 11i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11i

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

Vivo Y36: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.64", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y36

Huawei Nova 10 Youth: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 10 Youth

Chuwi HiPad Max: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Chuwi HiPad Max

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12

Huawei Nova 10 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 10 SE

Huawei MatePad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad SE

Oppo A77s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A77s

Motorola Moto Tab G62: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.60", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto Tab G62

Motorola Moto G32: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G32

Vivo Y22s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y22s

Oppo Reno8 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno8 4G

Huawei Nova Y90: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Y90

Honor Pad 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 12.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad 8

Oppo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Oppo Pad Air

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G42

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10 Power

Vivo iQOO U5x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO U5x

Honor X7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.74", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X7

Honor X8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X8

Oppo F21 Pro 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F21 Pro 4G

Honor X9 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.81", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X9 4G

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G52

TCL 10 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.47", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 10 Plus

Vivo Y55 2022: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y55 2022

Oppo Reno7 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno7 4G

Oppo K10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K10

Xiaomi Redmi 10C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10C

Realme 9 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9 4G

Oppo A76: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A76

Huawei Nova 9 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei nova 9 SE

Vivo Y21e: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y21e

Vivo Y33T: unknown, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y33T

Oppo A36: unknown, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A36

Oppo A11s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A11s

Vivo Y21T: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y21T

Vivo Y32: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y32

Oppo Reno6 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 Lite

Vivo Y20T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20T

Crosscall Action-X5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 5.45", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Crosscall Action-X5

Realme 9i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9i

Oppo A95 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A95 4G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

Honor 50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 50 Lite

Oppo F19s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F19s

Vivo Y11s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y11s

Huawei Nova 8i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 8i

Chuwi HiPad Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.80", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi HiPad Pro

TCL 20S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20S

Lenovo K13 Note: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K13 Note

Motorola Defy: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Defy

TCL 20L+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20L+

TCL 20L (20 Lite): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20L (20 Lite)

TCL 10L: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 10L

Oppo F19: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F19

TCL 20 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20 SE

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A74

Motorola Moto G10 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G10 Power

Lenovo K12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K12 Pro

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G10

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G30

Vivo Y31: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y31

Motorola Moto G Play 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Play 2021

Motorola Moto G Power 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Power 2021

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P11

Lenovo K12 Note: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K12 Note

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9T

Vivo Y51: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y51

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G9 Power

Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power

Nokia 5.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 5.4

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord N100

Vivo X50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50 Lite

Vivo Y70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y70

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco M3

Realme Narzo 20A: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 20A

Oppo A53s: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A53s

Oppo F17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F17

Motorola Moto E7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E7 Plus

Vivo V20 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V20 SE

Realme C17: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C17

Vivo Y20s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20s

Nokia 3.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 3.4

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)

Oppo A53: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A53

HTC Desire 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » HTC Desire 20 Pro

Motorola Moto G9 Play: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G9 Play

Vivo Y20: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20

Vivo Y20i: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20i

Motorola Moto G9: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G9

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Pro

Motorola Moto G Fast: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Fast

Vivo U3x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.35", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo U3x

Nokia 5.3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 5.3

Oppo A92: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A92

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A72

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A52

Vivo Y50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y50

Sony Xperia 10 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 10 II

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G8

Motorola Moto G Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Power

Motorola Moto G Stylus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Stylus

Oppo A11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A11

Oppo Realme 5i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme 5i

Motorola Moto G8 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G8 Power

Vivo V17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V17

Oppo Realme 5s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme 5s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G8 Plus

Xiaomi Mi CC9e : Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.01", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi CC9e

Oppo A5 2020: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A5 2020

Vivo U10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.35", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo U10

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Oppo A9 2020 (A11x): Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A9 2020 (A11x)

Oppo Realme 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme 5

Xiaomi Mi A3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi A3

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Motorola Edge Plus smartphone on sale with free Lenovo Tab P11 tablet on top of discount

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G – Not much new apart from its looks

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi surprises us with its mid-range smartphone: Review summary of the Redmi Note 12

   » New global Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 series details leak

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G42: Budget 4G smartphone with OLED panel and a 50 MP camera

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict Motorola Moto G52 - This signature Moto feature is missing from the mid-range phone

Honor 50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Honor 50 Lite: Only attractive at a discount?

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo A74: The review results in overview

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
   » Review verdict on the Redmi 9T: The low-priced Xiaomi smartphone is the better Poco M3?!

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G10: Why we're excited about the case

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » The low-priced mid-range smartphone Motorola Moto G30 has a big problem

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Lenovo Tab P11: The cheapest 11-inch tablet at the moment scores points with good features and versatility

Nokia 5.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.39", 0.2 kg
   » The latest Android One smartphone from HMD Global, Nokia 5.4, shows how not to do product maintenance

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G9 Power: Battery life is good, but...

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.52", 0.2 kg
   » Nord N100: Is the cheapest smartphone from OnePlus cheap enough?

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Poco M3: An overview of the test results

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.40", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Overview of the Test Results

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo A52: ColorOS 11 is coming to the low-priced A series smartphone in the fourth quarter

Sony Xperia 10 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00", 0.2 kg
   » Sony Xperia 10 II: The same strengths, the same weaknesses

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo's Efforts in the Mid-Range are More Promising than in the Premium Segment

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G Pro: Affordable stylus smartphone makes a good impression in our review

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Moto G8: Good Cameras for Cheap?

Motorola Moto G8 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G8 Power: A decent midrange smartphone that skimps on Wi-Fi connectivity

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Moto G8 Plus: Cheaper mid-ranger with rotated camera

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Qualcomm Adreno 610 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-09- 2)