Oppo Reno7 4G
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, 24mm, 0.8µm
Price comparison
Average of 24 scores (from 42 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo Reno7 4G
Source: GSM Arena
The Reno7 left a pretty positive impression on us after a couple of weeks of reviewing. It feels nice in hand, the faux leather and color team up to create a design unlike the mainstream midranger, and the splash resistance is a welcome checkmark on the spec sheet. The roomy 128GB base storage and the 8gigs of RAM don't hurt its case either, while battery life is a particularly strong suit. We even got more than what we expected out of the camera, particularly in terms of zoom results, and even the microscope is fun, if a little gimmicky. The microscope is no ultrawide camera, unfortunately, and the omission of that particular camera, which we know to be one of the cheaper components (for a modest one befitting the Reno7's stature), is rubbing us the wrong way. Low-light results out of the main camera aren't spectacular either, and the barebones video recording capabilities are another manifestation of what is a relatively low-end chipset. All things considered, the Reno7 can't be a straight-up recommendation simply because more well-rounded alternatives exist, often at the same or lower price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unbox
A shift to a plastic chassis is not a bad deal, as OPPO brought back things like the headphone jack and MicroSD card slot on the Reno7. Together with a bump in internal storage and battery capacity, the Reno7 offers better value than its predecessor despite having the same launch SRP.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Gadgets Now
Priced at Rs 28,999, the Oppo Reno 7 is a smart buy for anyone looking for a feature rich smartphone under Rs 30,000. Although the specifications of the smartphone are similar to its predecessor, Oppo Reno 6, it still stands tall compared to other smartphones in the price range. With lightweight design, simple user interface and impressive battery life, the Oppo Reno 7 is a 5G smartphone with a fabulous camera.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unbox
While it does feel like a slight downgrade to the Reno6 that arrived in the Philippines several months ago, the OPPO Reno7 does have its advantages: it has a headphone jack and a MicroSD card slot, and that LED notification light on the camera module is a unique touch. While it has a lot of similarities with its predecessor, the most crucial part about the Reno7 is how much OPPO plans to price it in the Philippines. OPPO will reveal the price of the phone on March 18, 2022.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2022
Foreign Reviews
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tudo Celular PT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 40%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 65% performance: 75% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2022
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 65% features: 100%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2022
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 82%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN
Positive: Nice display; decent processor. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2022
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN
Positive: Big screen; beautiful display; decent processor; good autonomy; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2022
Source: Techprincess IT IT→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; great autonomy; nice selfie camera. Negative: Poor main camera; average gaming performance; unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/12/2022
Source: Journal du Geek FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Presse Citron FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85%
Source: Charles Tech FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80%
Source: Charles Tech FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Presse Citron FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 85%
Source: Les Numeriques FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 40% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Nextpit France FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN
Positive: Stylish design; beautiful display; high performance; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2022
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2022
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 64% display: 90% mobility: 93% workmanship: 44%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: 3DNews.ru RU→EN
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful AMOLED display; great cameras; excellent autonomy; fast charging; miin-jack. Negative: Weak hardware; unsupported waterproof; mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/15/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN
Positive: Low price; modern design; compact size; light weight; beautiful display; decent performance. Negative: Unsupported 5G; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2022
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN
Positive: Impressive design; great built quality; decent hardware; attractive price; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2022
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Expandable RAM; decent processor; nice gaming performance; excellent display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/27/2022
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; decent processor; high gaming performance; nice cameras; good battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2022
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; decent hardware; attractive price.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2022
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Modern design; great triple cameras; nice selfile camera; quick charging; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2022
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Modern design; nice triple cameras; decent processor; attractive price; beautiful display; good battery life; quick charging.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN
Positive: Modern design; excellent cameras; decent autonomy; quick charging.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; decent hardware; nice cameras; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN
Positive: Modern design; good hardware; attractive price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 680: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 265 cores (four fast 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 based cores in a cluster and four power saving ARM Cortex-A53 based cores at 1.8 GHz) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in 6 nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.43":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.74.54%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.