Honor X7
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 6 scores (from 19 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor X7
Source: Yugatech
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2022
Source: Unbox
While puzzling at first, it’s clear that the X7, X8, and X9 are meant to cater to different markets as part of HONOR’s strategy in its return to the Philippines. The X7 is the most affordable of the three and is made for those who prioritize battery life and are a fan of HONOR’s older phone designs. The X8 is geared towards those who want a slim phone that offers a large display thanks to its razor-thin bezels, while the X9 is made to be an affordable version of the Magic4 Pro flagship by offering a number of high-end features and having a very good camera performance when compared against the competition. Having a good set of features for their price, we do hope that HONOR stays true to its commitment with software upgrades and updates the X7, X8, and X9 to Android 12–or maybe get them upgraded to HONOR’s upcoming MagicOS 7.0 in the near future.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 09/27/2022
Source: DxOMark
The Honor X7’s global battery score ranks it above average in our entire database. The autonomy was really optimized when testing in factory default settings. Indeed, it showed excellent performance during the typical usage scenario, with low discharge currents, day and night, and excellent autonomy on the go, especially when scrolling on social apps and using GPS navigation. When tested in calibrated mode, the gaming and calling tests showed decent autonomy, but the device struggled when streaming video and music. We noticed that the battery levels 8%, 28%, 48%, 68%, and 88% displayed by the UI lasted only 30 seconds, whatever the use case, even during the charging tests. When the device reached 2%, the device would automatically turn off after 30 seconds.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/18/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News
The Honor X7 smartphone holds decent performance, high refresh rate, and battery capacity. Rest specs like camera, display, sensor, etc. are just average and there is nothing unique about that. Though there are downsides too such as no Full HD resolution support. Considering the price, some of the specs are manageable while some are not. Whether the phone is right for you depends on what you need out of a phone. With this budget, you can’t expect world-class performance. If you are looking for performance and mediocre gaming, then this device can be an option while you can check the alternatives for a better deal. The Poco M3 Pro 5G is also a great alternative and comes with a decent battery, camera, display, and chipset support plus you get 5G, which is in demand these days.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News
The Honor X7 was released in April 2022 and the phone attained a rough price figure of $170 (Rs 12,000 in India) approx. It brings the standard 6.74-inches IPS LCD panel that renders an impressive 90 Hz refresh rate and decent pixel density. It also includes an 8MP selfie camera. As for the backside, the phone provides a quad-camera setup including a 48MP primary, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth lens. The phone weighs roughly 198-grams and can record 1080p videos at 30fps from both cameras. As for the performance end, the smartphone equips a 6nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G chipset that goes up to a 2.4Ghz clocking speed. The Android 11 OS is provided with Magic UI 4.2 UI and the Honor X7 is available in 4GB RAM and 128GB internal storage. For security, the device offers a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. The phone has a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery capacity with 22.5 W fast charging support. The Honor X7 smartphone arrives in Ocean Blue and Titanium Silver color options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/20/2022
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 3/23
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 06/01/2023
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 69% display: 54% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: Long battery life; nice display; 128GB ROM; great cameras; Google services. Negative: Hybrid slot; poor display; relatively heavy and bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/18/2023
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: Large battery capacity; fast charging; 128GB ROM; great cameras; Google services. Negative: Hybrid slot; poor display; relatively heavy and bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/18/2023
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: Long battery life; quick charging; beautiful display; 128GB ROM; nice cameras; Google services. Negative: Hybrid slot; poor display; relatively bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/19/2023
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: Large battery capacity; big screen; 128GB ROM; nice cameras; Google services. Negative: Hybrid slot; poor display; relatively heavy and bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/13/2023
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: Large battery capacity; nice display; 128GB ROM; great cameras; Google services. Negative: Hybrid slot; poor display; bulky size.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/23/2022
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 66% features: 68%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Techprincess IT IT→EN
Positive: Excellent autonomy; big screen; solid workmanship. Negative: Poor cameras; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2022
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2023
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 100% display: 30% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN
Positive: Very good price; elegant design; great built quality; big screen; nice display; long battery life; mini jack; NFC chip. Negative: Average gaming performance; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2022
Source: MobilArena HU HU→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/03/2022
Rating: price: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 680: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 265 cores (four fast 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 based cores in a cluster and four power saving ARM Cortex-A53 based cores at 1.8 GHz) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in 6 nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.74":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Honor:
In 2014 Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. Occasionally the products are also called Huawei Honor.
The market share of Honor products is manageable, but there are several reviews on Honor smartphones with average ratings (as of 2016).
69.33%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.