Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (1.12 µm, f/2.0), 1.080p-Video
Price comparison
Average of 31 scores (from 50 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
We are testing the sister model of the Redmi Note 8 for the western markets. The equipment is nominally identical, but in addition to NFC, there are also other adaptations to keep the customer satisfied. But the smartphone also has a surprise of the unpleasant kind in its luggage.
Source: Gearbest
Archive.org versionThe updated model of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T smartphone is almost no different from Redmi Note 8, except for the presence of the NFC module. Considering its budget price, the Redmi Note 8T model is worth its attention, it received an attractive appearance with a strong and solid design. In addition, the model has good screen quality, a high performance due to the Snapdragon 665 processor, high battery life and picture quality at a decent level.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2020
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionIf you’re looking for the best cheap phone for you, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T is a decent contender but it’s not without flaws. While its camera capabilities are impressive for its price tag, and it’s got decent battery life, you might find it quite slow to use at times.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: What Mobile
Archive.org versionOverall, the Redmi Note8T gives you a largely dependable device that will hold its own in the budget sector. The Note8T delivers a good user experience for a fraction of the price of most flagships nowadays and will continue to be one of the most popular phones around.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: GSM Arena
Archive.org versionThe Redmi Note 8T is one of the best smartphones €180 can buy you today. But we strongly recommend spending some extra €20 and getting the 4GB+64GB model as 3GB of RAM is often not enough and may lead to bottlenecks. Plus, the 32GB storage in the base model (22GB user-available) will be depleted in no time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionThe first Redmi 8-series phone to make its way to the UK, the Redmi Note 8T offers extraordinary value at £179. This is a mid-ranger with a budget price, offering a 48Mp quad-lens camera, a 6.3in AMOLED display, a 4,000mAh battery and a capable Snapdragon 665 processor. It adds NFC and 18W wired charging to the Redmi Note 8 elsewhere. You won’t find better value for money anywhere else.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority
Archive.org versionOverall, the Redmi Note 8T is one of the best budget devices available in Europe and the UK. Its versatile (if occasionally unreliable) quad-camera setup separates it from the pack, but what ultimately makes it worth purchasing is that coveted NFC support. For those on a tight budget looking to make use of Google Pay, you won’t regret buying the Redmi Note 8T.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/15/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionThe Redmi Note 8T’s value just can’t be beaten on paper, and it impresses in the flesh too. For under £200, it delivers a splash-resistant, good looking body with a scratch-resistant glass front and back, and respectable internals. All combined with a big battery and four cameras, Xiaomi’s at the head of the pack when it comes to balancing budget phone affordability and quality.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2019
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T feels like any other mid-range device, but for its price, that's actually a marvel: it has a design and specs you'd typically pay much more for, and feels relatively snappy too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/27/2020
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/25/2020
Source: Inside Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2020
Source: Allround-PC.com
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2020
Source: Teltarif
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 100% performance: 30% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/03/2019
Source: Andro 4 All
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Hipertextual
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery life; elegant design; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 69% mobility: 93% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 99% features: 83%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice performance; NFC chip.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice performance; NFC chip.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: Meilleurmobile
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: 01Net
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Journal du Geek
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet France
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Decent hardware; nice performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2019
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 100% features: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Antyweb
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice display; beautiful design; decent autonomy. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2019
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2019
Source: Helpix
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hitech Vesti
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Great speakers; nice display; good main camera; large battery capacity; quick charging; NFC chip; headphone jack; attractive price. Negative: Bulky case; slippery; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/28/2020
Source: DGL.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice cameras; quick charging; NFC chip. Negative: Average performance; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/23/2019
Source: Smartmania.cz
CZ→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 84% features: 73% mobility: 89% workmanship: 83%
Source: Smartmania.cz
CZ→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 84% features: 73% mobility: 89% workmanship: 83%
Source: Svet Androida
CZ→EN Archive.org versionPositive: NFC chip; nice cameras; large battery capacity; headphone jack; loud speakers. Negative: No LED notification.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2020
Source: Svet Androida
CZ→EN Archive.org versionPositive: NFC chip; nice cameras; long battery life; headphone jack; good speakers. Negative: No LED notification.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2019
Source: Danviet
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; long battery life; quick charging; support NFC chip.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/07/2019
Source: M3 PC för alla
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Arena IT
→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 665: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in a 11 nm LPP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.