Oppo A52
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 4 scores (from 19 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo A52
After the release of the A91, Oppo expanded its A series with the A72 and the 50-Euro (~$59) cheaper A52, both of which look identical at first glance. In our review, we examine the differences between the A72 and the A52 to find out whether the price cut offered by the A52 is worth it.
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2021
Source: Gadgets Now Archive.org version
The Oppo A52 scores high on design and looks. The battery can go on for a day and a half on average and easily for one day on heavy usage. The security features work promptly and the UI makes for easy navigation. The gaming performance on Snapdragon 665 is also better than expected. The camera performance is, however, mixed, with scope of improvement in the night shots. At 19,990, the phone has a good chance to survive in an already overcrowded space.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Mobygyaan Archive.org version
The OPPO A52 primarily competes with the Samsung Galaxy M31, Redmi Note 9 Pro Max, realme 6 Pro, and the new Motorola One Fusion+ at the given price tag. Making a choice in this price range isn’t quite easy right now as you see a number of good smartphones coming from different brands.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2020
Source: Ausdroid Archive.org version
If you want a phone for general emailing, calls, messaging and web surfing which has more than a few fun features, the OPPO A52 is a great option. If you, like me, want to take more than the odd picture here and there, the camera quality is going to be an issue for you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent processor; nice cameras; great speakers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2020
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent cameras; very long battery life; quick charging; beautiful design.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice performance; elegant design; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful processor; large battery capacity; fast fingerprint sensor; beautiful design; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/22/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; attractive price; nice cameras; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful hardware; nice gaming performance; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/10/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; stylish design; decent battery life. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/05/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/04/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; elegant design; nice performance; decent autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high autonomy; quick charging; infinity-O display; nice quad cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; decent autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2020
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; long battery life; nice cameras; stylish design; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good processor; large battery capacity; nice quad cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/21/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/21/2020
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 665: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in a 11 nm LPP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.50":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.77.25%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.