Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Oppo A54 5G smartphone in review: Solid camera in budget 5G phone

With a 90 Hz display. Cheap 5G smartphones are no longer a rarity. But the Oppo A54 5G offers very promising features that go beyond the latest mobile standard for less than 300 Euros (~$354). Our review clarifies exactly what these are.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Oppo A54 5G

Whether it's the A94 5G, the A73 5G, or our current review sample, the A54 5G, Oppo always strives to achieve a good compromise between price, performance, and features. For a price of approximately 270 Euros (~$318), the Oppo A54 5G features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G with its integrated Adreno 619 for system and graphics performance. In addition, there's 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of internal storage.

With this equipment, the relatively cheap 5G smartphone has to face the competition listed below. Other smartphones from our database can also be added for comparison under each section.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

Oppo A54 5G (A Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 46 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: combined audio jack, USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: e-compass, gravity, acceleration, proximity, gyroscope
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/ 12/17/18/19/20/26/28/38/39/40/41/66), 5G (1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/n77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 162.9 x 74.7 ( = 0.33 x 6.41 x 2.94 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7); 8 MP (f/2.2, ultra wide); 2 MP (f/2.4, macro); 2 MP (f/2.4, depth)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, 79.3°; fixed focus)
Additional features
Speakers: speaker, earphone, Keyboard: on-screen, Keyboard Light: yes, power adapter, USB-C cable, wired headphone, protective case, SIM tool, ColorOS 11.1, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 0.922 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.29 W/kg, fanless
Weight
190 g ( = 6.7 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 82 g ( = 2.89 oz / 0.18 pounds)
Price
269 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
07/2021
Oppo A54 5G
SD 480, Adreno 619
190 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
05/2021
realme 8 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
76 %
06/2021
Samsung Galaxy M12
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
214 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
81 %
07/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79 %
07/2021
Motorola Moto G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
192 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720

Case - Light 5G smartphone

The Oppo A54 5G features narrow screen bezels and a plastic case. The fingerprint sensor is located on the side, so the back is only distinguished by the rectangular camera element. Fluid Black and Fantastic Purple are offered as colors.

Compared with our review sample, the A54 5G is slightly thinner than the Poco M3 Pro 5G, for example, and its dimensions are almost identical to those of the realme 8 5G. At 190 grams, it's also a rather light smartphone.

Size comparison

164.9 mm / 6.49 inch 74.9 mm / 2.95 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 192 g0.4233 lbs164 mm / 6.46 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 214 g0.4718 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs162.5 mm / 6.4 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs161.81 mm / 6.37 inch 75.34 mm / 2.97 inch 8.92 mm / 0.3512 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Connectivity - Budget 5G phone with audio jack

Besides the aforementioned hardware, the Oppo A54 5G also has a microSD card reader that doesn't block any of the two SIM slots in addition. The latter support VoLTE and VoWLAN. The USB-C port supports the USB 2.0 standard, and a 3.5 mm audio jack is included as well as DRM Widevine L1. The Camera2 API Level 3 is supported.

microSD card reader

With our Toshiba Exceria pro M501 reference memory card, the SD card reader achieves speeds of 33.62 MB/s for copying data. Although this isn't particularly fast, it's better than the rest of our test field.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A54 5G
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.62 MB/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.66 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
12.3 MB/s ∼37% -63%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859054.854.855.34853.851.453.645.548.644.74641.945.943.937.844.849.951.547.144.94238.840.840.539.745.846.348.643.93446.342.645.641.539.64545.142.943.14846.247.247.24840.145.941.142.844.145.837.444.346.948.742.246.445.447.138.542.545.941.138.941.737.840.743.739.744.446.247.749.245.244.541.346.848.64746.548.44748.939.442.83944.141.243.343.146.247.344.94745.542.847.741.94744.239.942.5463846.836.94743.747.244.843.547.445.843.147.441.447.646.443.944.249.847.24348.445.148.742.348.343.554.854.855.34853.851.453.645.548.644.74641.945.943.937.844.849.951.547.144.94238.840.840.539.745.846.348.643.93446.342.645.641.539.64545.142.943.14846.247.247.24840.145.941.142.844.145.837.444.346.948.742.246.445.447.138.542.545.941.138.941.737.840.743.739.744.446.247.749.245.244.541.346.848.64746.548.44748.939.442.83944.141.243.343.146.247.344.94745.542.847.741.94744.239.942.5463846.836.94743.747.244.843.547.445.843.147.441.447.646.443.944.249.847.24348.445.148.742.348.343.528.990.188.588.588.38879.788.685.883.2888787.589.486.888.488.583.382.678.966.679.681.979.88377.883.288.181.287.466.586.987.28888.384.979.487.184.689.788.384.787.861.183.677.886.669.688.288.887.787.788.887.779.88591.587.376.26676.18868.487.981.287.786.887.477.574.366.76362.479.787.288.485.275.470.392.662.484.889.487.379.987.388.887.283.384.181.871.674.688.982.356.270.671.866.281.473.375.981.777.168.37568.465.671.366.371.584.674.587.287.673.887.48682.986.488.387.786.185.58780.988.453.5Tooltip
; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø44.8 (34-55.3)
; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø80.8 (28.9-92.6)

Software - ColorOS based on Android

The Oppo A54 5G runs Android 11 with security patches a the level of May 5, 2021. The manufacturer's proprietary ColorOS 11.1 is used as the user interface, and it's very similar to pure Android. However, custom apps are implemented to view photos and for the file explorer, for example.

In addition, the structure of the settings menu has been modified. With Facebook and TikTok, third-party apps are also preinstalled, but they can be easily deleted.

Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software
Oppo A54 5G software

Communication and GNSS - With NFC and Wi-Fi 5

The A54 5G can establish mobile connections over GSM, 3G, LTE, and 5G. The supported bands are very extensive, and up to 800 Mb/s is achieved for downloading data and up to 225 Mb/s for uploading data using LTE Cat. 15.

For communication in close ranges, Oppo's smartphone has NFC, Bluetooth 5.1, and Wi-Fi 5 at its disposal. The latter achieves average speeds of 276 Mb/s for sending data and 312 Mb/s for receiving data in combination with our reference router. This score ranks at the lower end of our test field and is only undercut by the Samsung Galaxy M12.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
438 MBit/s ∼100% +59%
realme 8 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (332min - 353max) MBit/s ∼79% +26%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
312 (292min - 320max) MBit/s ∼71% +13%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
292 (236min - 352max) MBit/s ∼67% +6%
Oppo A54 5G
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (230min - 328max) MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 (8min - 65max) MBit/s ∼9% -85%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
435 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
realme 8 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
362 (335min - 367max) MBit/s ∼83% +16%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 (177min - 358max) MBit/s ∼81% +13%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (256min - 332max) MBit/s ∼73% +2%
Oppo A54 5G
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
312 (107min - 337max) MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
45 (33min - 51max) MBit/s ∼10% -86%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320107188197247323325327337325325331312319325320327327328327327325334328331331328330327331328107188197247323325327337325325331312319325320327327328327327325334328331331328330327331328267270279274268283270269273230328274275276269279275278278279279283278278277278279278278279Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (107-337)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø276 (230-328)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

The A54 5G can make use of GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS to determine its location. In combination with the app "GPS Test", the smartphone can achieve a positioning accuracy of up to four meters outdoors.

On our routine bike ride, the distance covered is tracked with an inaccuracy similar to that of our reference device, the Garmin Edge 500.

Oppo A54 5G - GNSS (summary)
Oppo A54 5G - GNSS (summary)
Oppo A54 5G - GNSS (lake)
Oppo A54 5G - GNSS (lake)
Oppo A54 5G - GNSS (turning point)
Oppo A54 5G - GNSS (turning point)

Telephone and call quality - Clear connection with the A54 5G

Calls can be made on the Oppo A54 5G with Android's standard phone app. The volume is relatively high during calls, and background noise is blocked out well. Users can be understood well on both sides.

Cameras - Good photos with 48 MP

Front-facing camera sample
Front-facing camera sample

Portraits with a resolution of 16 MP can be taken with the Oppo A54's front-facing camera. Colors look natural with it, and strong contrast differences are balanced well. However, fine details and structures become a bit blurry as soon as lighting is no longer optimal. Color filters and beautification modes can be used to adjust the resulting image.

The main camera has 48 MP for simple pictures plus 2 MP for depth information. This allows taking good pictures of objects in close ranges, and many details as well as vivid colors are offered. Panoramic subjects show similar characteristics but tend to show dark areas in the picture if the illumination is uneven. Ultra wide-angle photos are captured with an 8 MP sensor that also delivers rich colors. But details are only visible when they're clearly separated from the objects around them.

If you want to bring objects closer in the picture, only digital zoom is available. It's definitely functional, and it shows a solid result with objects in the picture being moderately well separated from each other. Under poor lighting conditions, subjects can only be recognized vaguely, and colors are heavily misrepresented. A professional mode is available for the manual adjustment of the image quality, allowing the user to make changes to the ISO, shutter speed, white balance, focus, and brightness settings. A 2 MP macro sensor rounds off the camera setup.

Videos are recorded with a similar quality as in our test pictures. Color filters are also available here, but no professional mode. The available resolutions are 720p and 1080p at 30 fps in each case.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-upPanoramaUltra winde-angleZoom (5x)Low-light

The ColorChecker Passport image shows that the Oppo A54 5G's camera reproduces colors brighter than they should be. The test chart is captured sharply under controlled lighting conditions, but it shows weaknesses in contrast in the lower corners.

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A54 5G: 7.28 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 13.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
53 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
64 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
75.9 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
91 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A54 5G: 46.17 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 90.97 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Headset and protective case included in the box

The Oppo A54 5G comes with a USB power adapter with a corresponding USB-C cable, a protective silicone case, a SIM tool, and a stereo headset with a 3.5 mm connector.

The manufacturer states a warranty period of 24 months.

Input devices and handling - Side-mounted fingerprint scanner

Oppo uses Google's GBoard as the keyboard app, which allows inputs without issues. The touchscreen responds reliably to taps and is also suitable for occasional drag-and-drop gestures.

In addition to the good facial recognition, the A54 5G can also be unlocked via the side-mounted fingerprint sensor. It responded quickly to stored fingerprints in the test, and a second attempt was rarely necessary.

Oppo A54 5G - Input
Oppo A54 5G - Input
Oppo A54 5G - Input
Oppo A54 5G - Input

Display - Bright and with 90 Hz, but low in contrast

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The Oppo A54 5G's screen consists of a 6.5-inch IPS panel and offers a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels. With the brightness sensor enabled, we measured a maximum brightness of 504 cd/m² on average. 438 cd/m² is still reached without the sensor. The minimum brightness is 1.38 cd/m², and the maximum value in the APL50 test is 514 cd/m².

PWM is only used to control brightness at levels below 14% and at a comparatively high frequency of 2,404 Hz.

507
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 520 cd/m² Average: 504.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 498 cd/m²
Contrast: 778:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo A54 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
realme 8 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M12
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G50
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Screen
-63%
-82%
35%
-49%
Brightness middle
498
576
16%
426
-14%
427
-14%
340
-32%
Brightness
504
550
9%
428
-15%
404
-20%
325
-36%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
89
-6%
87
-8%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.64
0.7
-9%
0.46
28%
0.17
73%
0.18
72%
Contrast
778
823
6%
926
19%
2512
223%
1889
143%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
3.58
-156%
4.89
-249%
1.5
-7%
4.75
-239%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.6
6.95
-167%
9.42
-262%
2.1
19%
7.53
-190%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
5.7
-200%
4.8
-153%
1.6
16%
3.9
-105%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.141 103%
2.27 97%
2.3 96%
2.224 99%
CCT
6440 101%
7922 82%
7669 85%
6652 98%
7384 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 14 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15366 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

According to our measurements, the contrast ratio of 778:1 and the black level of 0.64 cd/m² are only sufficient for a place at the lower end of our test field. Furthermore, the CalMAN analysis shows that colors are reproduced in the most balanced way when the "Warmer" display profile is selected - alternatively, the "Standard" and "Cooler" variants are also available.

CalMAN - Color accuracy (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Color accuracy (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Color space (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Color space (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Grayscales (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Grayscales (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Saturation (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Saturation (Warmer, P3)
CalMAN - Settings for our measurements
CalMAN - Settings for our measurements
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

The Oppo A54 5G can be used well outdoors as long as places in the shade are preferred. Direct sunlight leads to strong glare and reflections, which limits the view of the screen's content.

Oppo A54 5G outdoors
Oppo A54 5G outdoors
Oppo A54 5G outdoors
Oppo A54 5G outdoors

The IPS panel of the Oppo A54 5G is very viewing-angle stable, and it shows image content even from flat angles without it becoming distorted or showing the wrong colors.

Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability

Performance - Suitable for everyday apps

The Oppo A54 5G is a budget 5G smartphone of the lower mid-range, and it's equipped with the corresponding hardware. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G used here is a modern SoC that offers enough performance for everyday applications.

In the benchmarks, the results in system-heavy disciplines are usually slightly higher than those of the Motorola Moto G50, but the latter performs much better in graphics-demanding tests. Overall, the A54 5G can place itself in the middle of our test field.

A high-performance mode can also be activated in the settings menu, which was used for the results achieved here as well. With 978 to 981 points in 3DMark Wildlife, for example, this only led to a slight increase in performance, though.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
519 Points ∼90%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
574 Points ∼99% +11%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
178 Points ∼31% -66%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
454 Points ∼79% -13%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
507 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (504 - 520, n=6)
511 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=245, last 2 years)
578 Points ∼100% +11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1673 Points ∼84%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1775 Points ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1042 Points ∼53% -38%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1347 Points ∼68% -19%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1627 Points ∼82% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1627 - 1713, n=6)
1671 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=245, last 2 years)
1980 Points ∼100% +18%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1029 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
625 Points ∼29% -39%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1397 Points ∼64% +36%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
999 Points ∼46% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (926 - 1029, n=6)
982 Points ∼45% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=140, last 2 years)
2178 Points ∼100% +112%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1074 Points ∼48%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1507 Points ∼67% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
664 Points ∼30% -38%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1346 Points ∼60% +25%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1048 Points ∼47% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1048 - 1099, n=6)
1081 Points ∼48% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=143, last 2 years)
2250 Points ∼100% +109%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8402 Points ∼81%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10433 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6065 Points ∼58% -28%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9100 Points ∼87% +8%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8351 Points ∼80% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6928 - 8402, n=5)
7557 Points ∼72% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=60, last 2 years)
9953 Points ∼95% +18%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7713 Points ∼70%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10981 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8311 Points ∼76% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6380 - 7713, n=2)
7047 Points ∼64% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=260, last 2 years)
7923 Points ∼72% +3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3499 Points ∼97%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3340 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1252 Points ∼35% -64%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3149 Points ∼88% -10%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3461 - 3596, n=6)
3516 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3439 Points ∼96% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3650 Points ∼91%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3463 Points ∼86% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1130 Points ∼28% -69%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3319 Points ∼82% -9%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3767 Points ∼93% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3647 - 3767, n=6)
3684 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4029 Points ∼100% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3058 Points ∼99%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2971 Points ∼96% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2007 Points ∼65% -34%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2669 Points ∼86% -13%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2938 - 3103, n=6)
3034 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼90% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3602 Points ∼87%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3544 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1260 Points ∼30% -65%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3277 Points ∼79% -9%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3647 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3602 - 3656, n=6)
3636 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4136 Points ∼100% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3817 Points ∼73%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3637 Points ∼69% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1133 Points ∼22% -70%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3435 Points ∼66% -10%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3839 Points ∼73% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3817 - 3845, n=6)
3835 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5238 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3008 Points ∼93%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3251 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2079 Points ∼64% -31%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2824 Points ∼87% -6%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼95% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3008 - 3118, n=6)
3076 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2982 Points ∼92% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2435 Points ∼92%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2343 Points ∼89% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
864 Points ∼33% -65%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2411 Points ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2478 Points ∼94% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2419 - 2478, n=6)
2436 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2640 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2299 Points ∼82%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2206 Points ∼79% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
746 Points ∼27% -68%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2313 Points ∼83% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2338 Points ∼84% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2287 - 2338, n=6)
2302 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2791 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3068 Points ∼98%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2991 Points ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1942 Points ∼62% -37%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2829 Points ∼90% -8%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3136 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3017 - 3136, n=6)
3059 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2819 Points ∼90% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2563 Points ∼76%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2453 Points ∼73% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
866 Points ∼26% -66%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2449 Points ∼73% -4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2563 Points ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2536 - 2566, n=6)
2559 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3358 Points ∼100% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2445 Points ∼64%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2295 Points ∼61% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
744 Points ∼20% -70%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2336 Points ∼62% -4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2447 Points ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2440 - 2448, n=6)
2445 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3792 Points ∼100% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3084 Points ∼95%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3234 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2042 Points ∼63% -34%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2948 Points ∼91% -4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3076 Points ∼95% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2941 - 3098, n=6)
3060 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3027 Points ∼94% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2268 Points ∼87%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2224 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
947 Points ∼36% -58%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2188 Points ∼84% -4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2284 Points ∼87% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2267 - 2322, n=6)
2281 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=213, last 2 years)
2618 Points ∼100% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2184 Points ∼74%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2138 Points ∼73% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
820 Points ∼28% -62%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2136 Points ∼73% -2%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2195 Points ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2184 - 2250, n=6)
2199 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=213, last 2 years)
2933 Points ∼100% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2620 Points ∼98%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2586 Points ∼97% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2071 Points ∼78% -21%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2391 Points ∼90% -9%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2664 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2606 - 2664, n=6)
2624 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=213, last 2 years)
2647 Points ∼99% +1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
981 Points ∼35%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1103 Points ∼39% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
422 Points ∼15% -57%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
986 Points ∼35% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (980 - 986, n=6)
981 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=104, last 2 years)
2836 Points ∼100% +189%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
973 Points ∼33%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1078 Points ∼37% +11%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
423 Points ∼14% -57%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
974 Points ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (969 - 978, n=6)
974 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 8672, n=100, last 2 years)
2948 Points ∼100% +203%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
291 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
119 Points ∼13% -59%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
290 Points ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (290 - 294, n=5)
292 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=52, last 2 years)
895 Points ∼100% +208%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
117 Points ∼13% -59%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (284 - 287, n=5)
285 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=50, last 2 years)
900 Points ∼100% +217%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
58 fps ∼69%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
57 fps ∼68% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
34 fps ∼40% -41%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
51 fps ∼61% -12%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
84 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (58 - 84, n=5)
63.8 fps ∼76% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=217, last 2 years)
58.9 fps ∼70% +2%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
81 fps ∼76%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
63 fps ∼59% -22%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼22% -70%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
55 fps ∼51% -32%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
81 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (81 - 81, n=5)
81 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 319, n=217, last 2 years)
107 fps ∼100% +32%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
37 fps ∼56%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
35 fps ∼53% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
28 fps ∼42% -24%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
32 fps ∼48% -14%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
66 fps ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (26 - 66, n=5)
40.2 fps ∼61% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=215, last 2 years)
46.4 fps ∼70% +25%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
41 fps ∼65%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
38 fps ∼61% -7%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼26% -61%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
34 fps ∼54% -17%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
41 fps ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (41 - 41, n=5)
41 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=216, last 2 years)
62.7 fps ∼100% +53%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
26 fps ∼49%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22 fps ∼42% -15%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼36% -27%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
21 fps ∼40% -19%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
53 fps ∼100% +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (26 - 53, n=5)
31.4 fps ∼59% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=214, last 2 years)
36.3 fps ∼68% +40%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼67%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
25 fps ∼58% -14%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.4 fps ∼22% -68%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼51% -24%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (29 - 29, n=5)
29 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=214, last 2 years)
43.1 fps ∼100% +49%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
14 fps ∼50%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps ∼46% -7%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼39% -21%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12 fps ∼43% -14%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
28 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (14 - 28, n=5)
16.8 fps ∼60% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)
22.5 fps ∼80% +61%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼62%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼58% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6.1 fps ∼24% -62%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼50% -19%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼62% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 16, n=5)
16 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=213, last 2 years)
25.9 fps ∼100% +62%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼53%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
14 fps ∼47% -12%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼47% -12%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 30, n=6)
18.3 fps ∼61% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=282, last 2 years)
22.9 fps ∼76% +43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼68%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼57% -17%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6.2 fps ∼23% -66%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼53% -22%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼64% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (17 - 19, n=6)
18 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=281, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼100% +47%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10 fps ∼53%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.7 fps ∼46% -13%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼37% -29%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps ∼46% -12%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (9.9 - 19, n=6)
11.5 fps ∼61% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=282, last 2 years)
15.1 fps ∼79% +51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.7 fps ∼65%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼54% -16%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼21% -67%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.5 fps ∼53% -18%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.4 fps ∼62% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6.4 - 6.7, n=6)
6.55 fps ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=282, last 2 years)
10.3 fps ∼100% +54%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
260758 Points ∼77%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
261067 Points ∼78% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
133391 Points ∼40% -49%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
257336 Points ∼76% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (257336 - 264533, n=5)
261519 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=193, last 2 years)
336601 Points ∼100% +29%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
Score ∼0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2672 Score ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=55, last 2 years)
3157 Score ∼100%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4894 Points ∼8%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5225 Points ∼8% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4427 Points ∼7% -10%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12011 Points ∼19% +145%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4787 Points ∼7% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (4707 - 4894, n=5)
4765 Points ∼7% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=72, last 2 years)
64453 Points ∼100% +1217%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1902 fps ∼100%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
29.53 fps ∼2% -98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (25.7 - 1902, n=2)
964 fps ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1902, n=47, last 2 years)
78.1 fps ∼4% -96%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1736 fps ∼100%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
26 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
1736 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 1736, n=46, last 2 years)
70.5 fps ∼4% -96%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2982 fps ∼100%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
141.5 fps ∼5% -95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (210 - 2982, n=2)
1596 fps ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (66.1 - 2982, n=41, last 2 years)
307 fps ∼10% -90%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1962 fps ∼100%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
27.66 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (26.8 - 1962, n=2)
994 fps ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1962, n=45, last 2 years)
80.5 fps ∼4% -96%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1746 fps ∼100%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
24.27 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (23.5 - 1746, n=2)
885 fps ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 1746, n=45, last 2 years)
69.8 fps ∼4% -96%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3197 Points ∼86%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3011 Points ∼81% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1587 Points ∼43% -50%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3107 Points ∼84% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3197 - 3265, n=4)
3238 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=202, last 2 years)
3709 Points ∼100% +16%
System (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6330 Points ∼94%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6712 Points ∼99% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3042 Points ∼45% -52%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6148 Points ∼91% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6296 - 6330, n=4)
6308 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=202, last 2 years)
6761 Points ∼100% +7%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3331 Points ∼75%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
4428 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1904 Points ∼43% -43%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4264 Points ∼96% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3331 - 3847, n=4)
3559 Points ∼80% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=202, last 2 years)
4372 Points ∼99% +31%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3817 Points ∼66%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2401 Points ∼42% -37%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1219 Points ∼21% -68%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2626 Points ∼46% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3765 - 3843, n=4)
3801 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15628, n=202, last 2 years)
5764 Points ∼100% +51%
Web (sort by value)
Oppo A54 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1298 Points ∼96%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1152 Points ∼85% -11%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
897 Points ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1353 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1247 - 1360, n=4)
1290 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=202, last 2 years)
1280 Points ∼95% -1%

The Oppo A54 5G can lead our test field in the browser benchmarks. Only in Octane v2 does the realme 8 perform slightly better. In everyday use, this means that websites scroll smoothly and media content loads quickly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
49.6 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91)
48.13 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (44 - 49.4, n=5)
46.8 Points ∼94% -3%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
46.02 Points ∼93% -4%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
40.447 Points ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
35.973 Points ∼73% -25%
Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90)
18.419 Points ∼37% -62%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=196, last 2 years)
89.4 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (78.6 - 84.3, n=5)
81.2 Points ∼91% 0%
Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91)
80.845 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
78.6 Points ∼88% -3%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
77.921 Points ∼87% -4%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
69.546 Points ∼78% -14%
Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90)
27.408 Points ∼31% -66%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=169, last 2 years)
49 runs/min ∼100% +25%
Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91)
39.22 runs/min ∼80%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chome 91)
38.4 runs/min ∼78% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (37.6 - 39.2, n=5)
38.4 runs/min ∼78% -2%
realme 8 5G (Chome 90)
38.3 runs/min ∼78% -2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
36 runs/min ∼73% -8%
Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chome 90)
15.6 runs/min ∼32% -60%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91)
80 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=204, last 2 years)
78.1 Points ∼98% -2%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
72 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (67 - 80, n=5)
71.6 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
54 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90)
35 Points ∼44% -56%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=211, last 2 years)
17627 Points ∼100% +10%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
17380 Points ∼99% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (15636 - 17816, n=5)
16270 Points ∼92% +1%
Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91)
16078 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
15976 Points ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
15861 Points ∼90% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90)
5060 Points ∼29% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90)
9256.8 ms * ∼100% -247%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=213, last 2 years)
3923 ms * ∼42% -47%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
3387.3 ms * ∼37% -27%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
3145.4 ms * ∼34% -18%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
2694.4 ms * ∼29% -1%
Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91)
2669 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (2383 - 2749, n=5)
2639 ms * ∼29% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo equips the A54 5G with 64 GB of UFS 2.1 storage that come with a simple and consequently quite slow interface. The read and write rates achieved are in the middle of our test field.

Oppo A54 5Grealme 8 5GSamsung Galaxy M12Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GMotorola Moto G50Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
37%
-25%
61%
-19%
-4%
23%
Sequential Read 256KB
493.54
969
96%
311.4
-37%
953.73
93%
392
-21%
697 (392 - 895, n=49)
41%
780 (41.9 - 2037, n=290, last 2 years)
58%
Sequential Write 256KB
248.08
201
-19%
249.3
0%
489.13
97%
204.4
-18%
217 (133 - 512, n=49)
-13%
345 (11.9 - 1321, n=290, last 2 years)
39%
Random Read 4KB
136.81
192
40%
120.9
-12%
155.75
14%
89.2
-35%
136 (78.2 - 192, n=49)
-1%
139 (13.5 - 325, n=290, last 2 years)
2%
Random Write 4KB
134.8
175
30%
67.2
-50%
186.06
38%
131.7
-2%
79.1 (8.77 - 168, n=49)
-41%
125 (5.2 - 330, n=290, last 2 years)
-7%

Games - High frame rates only possible when graphics demand is low

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 internal graphics unit is responsible for displaying image content in the Oppo A54 5G. It can run modern games smoothly even at higher settings. As our test with Gamebench shows, frame rates significantly above 30 fps are only possible at lower detail settings and in older titles.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
Dead Trigger 2
Dead Trigger 2
GameSpace
GameSpace
GameSpace
GameSpace
GameSpace
GameSpace
0510152025303540455055603030302931293031303030303030303030293030303030312931303030302930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030312930313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303031303030303029312931303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303029313030303030303030303030303030303029312930313030303030303030302930303030303129313030303029303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303129303130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030313030303030293129313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030303030293130303030303030303030303030596060606060606060606060606060606060606057606060616060606060606060596060506060606051606060616060596060606060606060606060606060606059606160606060606060606060606060606060606060606061606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606160606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060605960606060606060615960606060606060606060606060606060606059606061605960603030302931293031303030303030303030293030303030312931303030302930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030312930313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303031303030303029312931303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303029313030303030303030303030303059606060606060606060606060606060606060605760606061606060606060606059606050606060605160606061606059606060606060606060606060606060605960616060606060606060606060606060606060606060606160606060606060606060606060606060606060606060616060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060596060606060606061596060606060606060606060606060606060605960606160596060394040404039404040404040393840403940394140393839403941394040403940404039404040404040393940404040384039414040383940404040403940404039404040393940404040404041394040404039404040404039414040403940404040404139404040