Notebookcheck

Oppo A73 5G in review: Light 5G smartphone for 300 Euros (~$369)

Subtle black or neon colored. The Oppo A73 5G is another affordable 5G smartphone. The Android phone is supposed to set itself apart from the competition with a new mid-range SoC from MediaTek. We will show how well this works in our review.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Oppo A73 5G intro

Besides the high-priced Reno4 Pro and the extremely affordable A52, Oppo is well positioned in the mid-range too. This also includes the Oppo A73 5G, which is equipped with a MediaTek Dimensity 720 SoC and 8 GB of RAM in addition to the new mobile network standard. Furthermore, it has 128 GB of UFS 2.1 storage and an ARM Mali-G57 MC3 graphics unit.

With this equipment, the A73 5G has to face the comparison with the rival devices listed below. Other smartphones from our database can also be added under each section.

Oppo A73 5G (A Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 720 8 x - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: combined audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, USB-C
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz),3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G LTE TDD/FDD: (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G TDD/FDD (N1/N3/N5/N7/N8/N20/N28/N38/N40/N41/N77/N78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162 x 75 ( = 0.31 x 6.38 x 2.95 in)
Battery
15.55 Wh, 4040 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Sensor: OV16A10 (1/3.06", f/2.2, 81.3°); 8 MP ultra wide-angle sensor: Hi846 (f/2.2, 119°); 2 MP sensor: GC02M1B (f/2.4, 88.8°)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 79°)
Additional features
Speakers: 1 speaker, Keyboard: on-screen, Keyboard Light: yes, power adapter, USB-C cable, wired stereo headphones, protective case, ColorOS 7.2, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 0.99 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.29 W/kg, fanless
Weight
177 g ( = 6.24 oz / 0.39 pounds), Power Supply: 103 g ( = 3.63 oz / 0.23 pounds)
Price
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81 %
12/2020
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.49"2400x1080
80 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
82 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
12/2020
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"1600x720

Case - Thin 6.5-inch smartphone

Oppo has made the case of the A73 5G out of plastic and given the smartphone a metal frame. The front is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, whereas the back is only made of polycarbonate. The build quality is very high, and we couldn't determine any defects in our review sample. Thanks to the materials used, Oppo's smartphone is also very light and weighs just 177 grams. In combination with the other dimensions, it's not only the lightest but also the slimmest phone in our test field.

Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G
Oppo A73 5G

Size comparison

168 mm / 6.61 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 207 g0.4564 lbs165.38 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 215 g0.474 lbs164.4 mm / 6.47 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.6 mm / 0.3386 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.95 mm / 0.3524 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs162 mm / 6.38 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs

Connectivity - No memory card reader

Besides the hardware mentioned at the beginning, the Oppo A73 5G also offers a dual-SIM slot. This can accommodate a 5G-capable SIM card in both slots, and the VoLTE and VoWiFi functions are also available. However, a microSD card reader for memory expansion has been omitted. The USB Type-C port transfers data with the USB 2.0 standard, and a 3.5 mm audio jack is also available. While the Camera2 API supports the "Full" level, DRM Widevine L1 allows streaming video content in high resolutions.

Left side: Volume buttons, dual-SIM slot
Left side: Volume buttons, dual-SIM slot
Top: Microphone
Top: Microphone
Right side: Power button with integrated fingerprint scanner
Right side: Power button with integrated fingerprint scanner
Bottom: 3.5 mm audio jack, microphone, USB Type-C port, speaker
Bottom: 3.5 mm audio jack, microphone, USB Type-C port, speaker

Software - ColorOS 7 based on Android 10

The Oppo A73 5G runs Android 10 with security patches at the level of November 5, 2020 and ColorOS 7 as the user interface. The latter is very similar to pure Android and only differs in terms of customized icons and manufacturer-specific apps for accessing photos, files, and more. In addition, there are various third-party apps that can be uninstalled without any problems.

Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software
Oppo A73 5G software

Communication and GPS - 5G on board

The Oppo A73 5G can establish mobile connections via GSM, 3G, LTE, and 5G networks. NFC, Bluetooth 5.1, and Wi-Fi 5 are available in close ranges. In combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, average speeds of 340 Mb/s are possible for data reception and 341 Mb/s for sending data. As a result, the inexpensive 5G smartphone can place itself just ahead of the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G in our test field, but it lags behind the other contenders by a considerable margin.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (596min - 664max) MBit/s ∼97% +90%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 (307min - 340max) MBit/s ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=664)
295 MBit/s ∼44% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (604min - 684max) MBit/s ∼100% +95%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼97% +89%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼83% +62%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
328 (323min - 332max) MBit/s ∼49% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=664)
281 MBit/s ∼42% -18%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360349334348342349335344342349347343322323345313351343341349347335329352323332318339353350331349334348342349335344342349347343322323345313351343341349347335329352323332318339353350331338346335345347330345347346328344339340341338323361331348334345351341332342336348330345349Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (313-353)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (323-361)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

Users of the A73 5G can use GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo to determine their location. In combination with the GPS Test app, the device could pinpoint its location with an accuracy of up to three meters in our test.

During our required bike ride, Oppo's smartphone showed some significant deviations in comparison to the Garmin Edge 500 reference device on long straight roads. However, curves were registered comparatively well. Overall, the Oppo A73 5G is only suitable for very simple navigation tasks.

GNSS - Oppo A73 5G
GNSS - Oppo A73 5G
GNSS - Oppo A73 5G
GNSS - Oppo A73 5G
GNSS - Oppo A73 5G
GNSS - Oppo A73 5G
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Telephone and call quality - Clear communication possible

Phone calls are made via the standard Android phone app on the Oppo A73 5G. During calls, the 5G phone shows high volume and a clear transmission of speech on both sides. Ambient noise is filtered out to a certain degree, which can lead to interference in somewhat louder environments.

Cameras - 16 MP is enough

Front-facing camera sample
Front-facing camera sample

The Oppo A73 5G's main camera allows users to take pictures with a resolution of 16 MP, and a 2 MP sensor is added for depth information. Details and fine structures are reproduced very well, and colors look vivid. Panoramic shots also show many details, but the camera has problems balancing very bright and very dark areas. This impression is further strengthened by our low-light photo, since only just a few details of our test subject can be recognized here. When the digital zoom is used, details are shown with slightly blurred edges. Moreover, ultra wide-angle shots are possible with the available 8 MP sensor; it reproduces subjects with a medium quality and also shows a weak contrast in dark image areas. A front-facing camera with an 8 MP sensor is available for selfie fans as well. It takes detailed pictures, but the contrast in dark picture areas is clearly weak here as well. Besides some beautification modes, further adjustments are possible via the Pro mode of the camera app, although this is reserved for the main camera. Manual settings for ISO, shutter speed, white balance, focus, and brightness can be configured here.

Video recordings offer a similar quality to the one shown in our sample photographs. The image is also kept shake-free by a stabilizer that works reliably, and the transition between bright and dark areas is balanced well too. The settings menu offers the choice of 4K, 1080p, and 720p resolutions. In addition, a high frame-rate mode or the like is not available.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-upPanoramaWide angleZoom (5x)Low light
click to load images

The ColorChecker Passport image shows that the Oppo A73 5G's camera captures colors a bit darker than they should be. The test chart is reproduced a bit too dark as well but with clearly recognizable details. A slight contrast weakness is also noticeable in the lower corners.

ColorChecker
29.3 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
36 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A73 5G: 47.48 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 93.72 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A73 5G: 8.13 ∆E min: 2.72 - max: 18.8 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Headset and case included in the box

The Oppo A73 5G comes with a USB power adapter with a matching USB Type-C cable, a protective silicon case, a wired stereo headset, and a SIM needle.

Oppo grants buyers a warranty period of 24 months.

Input devices and handling - Face recognition and fingerprint scanner

Oppo uses Google's GBoard for text input. Text can be entered quickly and easily with it, and the keyboard can also be customized to the user's preferences. While GBoard appears as a docked keyboard in portrait mode, it's detached in landscape mode and can be dragged freely. However, users can change this setting at will. The touchscreen reacts reliably to touches and only offers fingertips a slight resistance. Consequently, even longer swipe gestures are possible without any problems.

The fingerprint scanner of the A73 5G is integrated into the power button and responds moderately well to stored prints. In our test, two to three attempts were often necessary to unlock the smartphone. Unlocking via facial recognition, on the other hand, worked without problems.

Oppo A73 5G - Input
Oppo A73 5G - Input

Display - Flicker-free IPS with good contrast

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The display of the Oppo A73 5G consists of a 6.5-inch IPS panel and offers a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels. The average brightness of 499 cd/m² ranks second in our test field, but it drops to a maximum of 459 cd/m² when the ambient light sensor is disabled. A good value of 514 cd/m² is achieved in the APL50 test. In addition, the lowest configurable brightness is 1.54 cd/m².

No PWM is used for brightness control, which is convenient for users with sensitive eyes.

475
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 528 cd/m² Average: 498.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 527 cd/m²
Contrast: 1387:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.49
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.60
Screen
-7%
13%
2%
12%
Brightness middle
527
450
-15%
461
-13%
606
15%
466
-12%
Brightness
499
422
-15%
458
-8%
574
15%
462
-7%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
93
7%
89
2%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.38
0.57
-50%
0.52
-37%
0.44
-16%
Contrast
1387
789
-43%
887
-36%
1377
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.5
2.67
24%
1.01
71%
2.4
31%
2.06
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.3
6.76
7%
2.1
71%
5.3
27%
6.14
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.9
2
31%
1.5
48%
4.5
-55%
1.8
38%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.274 97%
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
2.105 105%
CCT
6502 100%
6859 95%
6701 97%
6224 104%
6444 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9693 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display settings
Display settings

Our measurements show that the Oppo A73 5G has a very good contrast ratio of 1,387:1 and a barely increased black level of 0.38 cd/m². Therefore, it scores better than most of the rivals in our test field and is only relegated to second place by the AMOLED display of the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G.

Users can influence the color reproduction of the A73 5G via the settings menu. The most balanced option is achieved when the slider for the display color temperature is moved in the warmer direction but not pushed all the way to the end. The adjacent screenshot shows the optimal position.

CalMAN - Color accuracy (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Color accuracy (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Color space (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Color space (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Grayscales (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Grayscales (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Saturation (warm, sRGB)
CalMAN - Saturation (warm, sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

The Oppo A73 5G can be used well outdoors. Depending on the viewing angle, however, there can be significant reflections and glare.

Oppo A73 5G - Outdoor use
Oppo A73 5G - Outdoor use
Oppo A73 5G - Outdoor use
Oppo A73 5G - Outdoor use

The Oppo smartphone's IPS panel is very viewing-angle stable, and even from very flat angles, it doesn't display image content with distortions or inaccurate colors.

Oppo A73 5G - Viewing-angle stability
Oppo A73 5G - Viewing-angle stability

Performance - New MediaTek SoC for the mid-range

The MediaTek Dimensity 720 installed here can only occasionally assert itself against the competition in the benchmarks. Consequently, the result is only sufficient for the last place in our test field in many system performance disciplines. In a direct SoC comparison, the CPU performance of the Dimensity 720 is on par with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, and the GPU performance is between an Adreno 618 and an Adreno 619L.

Both the Geekbench 5.3 OpenCL score and the 3DMark results show that the internal ARM Mali-G57 MP3 in the Oppo A73 5G performs slightly better than the Adreno 619L in the OnePlus Nord N10, for example. However, the system still runs smoothly in everyday use, and we didn't experience any stuttering or the like.

Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points ∼76%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
981 Points ∼48% -36%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼54% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1227 Points ∼60% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1252 Points ∼62% -19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1525 - 1537, n=2)
1531 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=77)
2032 Points ∼100% +32%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
905 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1081 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1120 Points ∼62%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
1418 Points ∼79%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=79)
1797 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points ∼82%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1873 Points ∼93% +14%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼97% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1979 Points ∼99% +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1511 - 1638, n=2)
1575 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=184)
1934 Points ∼96% +18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points ∼78%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
610 Points ∼93% +18%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼91% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
658 Points ∼100% +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (472 - 516, n=2)
494 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=184)
558 Points ∼85% +8%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8021 Points ∼92% +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8063 Points ∼92% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (6145 - 7395, n=2)
6770 Points ∼77% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=582)
6148 Points ∼70% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
10321 Points ∼97% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼83% -17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (7158 - 10673, n=2)
8916 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=730)
6783 Points ∼64% -36%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points ∼37%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
809 Points ∼25% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1094 Points ∼33% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1207 - 1215, n=2)
1211 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=43)
3271 Points ∼100% +171%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points ∼41%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
821 Points ∼27% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼37% -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1233 - 1245, n=2)
1239 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=43)
2995 Points ∼100% +143%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points ∼92%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2769 Points ∼97% +5%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼98% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2864 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2858 Points ∼100% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2631 - 2651, n=2)
2641 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=226)
2632 Points ∼92% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points ∼78%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1932 Points ∼64% -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼95% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2510 Points ∼84% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2548 Points ∼85% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2354 - 2461, n=2)
2408 Points ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=226)
2999 Points ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points ∼86%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2081 Points ∼74% -14%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2581 Points ∼92% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2611 Points ∼93% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2410 - 2501, n=2)
2456 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=226)
2642 Points ∼94% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points ∼83%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3374 Points ∼92% +11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼95% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3636 Points ∼100% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2901 - 3037, n=2)
2969 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=589)
2309 Points ∼63% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points ∼81%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2187 Points ∼69% -15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼89% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2845 Points ∼90% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2561 - 2597, n=2)
2579 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=589)
2342 Points ∼74% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼82%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2348 Points ∼73% -11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼92% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2990 Points ∼92% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2653 - 2659, n=2)
2656 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=590)
2154 Points ∼67% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points ∼76%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3984 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼88% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼92% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3597 Points ∼90% +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3014 - 3018, n=2)
3016 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=616)
2213 Points ∼56% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points ∼72%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3307 Points ∼68% -5%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼88% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4298 Points ∼88% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3497 - 3975, n=2)
3736 Points ∼77% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=618)
3161 Points ∼65% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points ∼75%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3327 Points ∼74% -1%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼92% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4120 Points ∼92% +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3377 - 3713, n=2)
3545 Points ∼79% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=618)
2597 Points ∼58% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3265 Points ∼91% +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼96% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼99% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3588 Points ∼100% +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2765 - 3011, n=2)
2888 Points ∼80% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=665)
2167 Points ∼60% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points ∼82%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1982 Points ∼67% -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼88% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2667 Points ∼90% +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2418 - 2525, n=2)
2472 Points ∼83% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=665)
1910 Points ∼64% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2198 Points ∼73% -13%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼92% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2828 Points ∼94% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2529 - 2575, n=2)
2552 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=666)
1811 Points ∼60% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3257 Points ∼90% +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼97% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼98% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3607 Points ∼100% +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2730 - 3024, n=2)
2877 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=708)
2044 Points ∼57% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points ∼79%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3197 Points ∼69% -13%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼87% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4189 Points ∼90% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3694 - 3805, n=2)
3750 Points ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=707)
2563 Points ∼55% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points ∼80%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3208 Points ∼73% -9%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼64% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4044 Points ∼92% +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3499 - 3521, n=2)
3510 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=710)
2186 Points ∼50% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13664 Points ∼68%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
19976 Points ∼99% +46%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19708 Points ∼98% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
13664 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=852)
16095 Points ∼80% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
29682 Points ∼47%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
44899 Points ∼72% +51%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼100% +111%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼89% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
56286 Points ∼90% +90%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
29682 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=850)
29331 Points ∼47% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23548 Points ∼55%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
35182 Points ∼82% +49%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼94% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39850 Points ∼93% +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
23548 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=850)
22459 Points ∼53% -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps ∼74%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
73 fps ∼80% +9%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼95% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
90 fps ∼99% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
91 fps ∼100% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (67 - 68, n=2)
67.5 fps ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=844)
49.5 fps ∼54% -26%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps ∼73%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
58 fps ∼77% +5%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
50 fps ∼67% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
60 fps ∼80% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (55 - 60, n=2)
57.5 fps ∼77% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=853)
33 fps ∼44% -40%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼74%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
37 fps ∼74% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
45 fps ∼90% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
46 fps ∼92% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (37 - 41, n=2)
39 fps ∼78% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=749)
29.6 fps ∼59% -20%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼63%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
33 fps ∼56% -11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼75% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40 fps ∼68% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +59%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (37 - 54, n=2)
45.5 fps ∼77% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 119, n=757)
24.3 fps ∼41% -34%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼82%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼79% -4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (26 - 27, n=2)
26.5 fps ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=612)
23.6 fps ∼72% -13%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼43%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
23 fps ∼41% -4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼52% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼52% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
56 fps ∼100% +133%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (24 - 51, n=2)
37.5 fps ∼67% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=614)
21.1 fps ∼38% -12%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps ∼44%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8.7 fps ∼41% -5%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼52% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼52% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +128%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (9.2 - 17, n=2)
13.1 fps ∼62% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=381)
12 fps ∼57% +30%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼73%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼70% -5%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼90% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼89% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.4 fps ∼89% +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (6.1 - 6.2, n=2)
6.15 fps ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=379)
8.34 fps ∼100% +37%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼45%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼42% -7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼55% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼52% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +120%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (15 - 30, n=2)
22.5 fps ∼68% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 64, n=385)
17.9 fps ∼54% +19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼81%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼71% -12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼95% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20 fps ∼95% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=385)
20.4 fps ∼97% +20%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼79%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼74% -7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (13 - 15, n=2)
14 fps ∼74% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=537)
15.7 fps ∼83% +5%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps ∼39%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼39% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼48% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼48% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +154%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (13 - 23, n=2)
18 fps ∼55% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=541)
13.8 fps ∼42% +6%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points ∼76%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
282385 Points ∼85% +12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼84% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
331554 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
299167 Points ∼90% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
253013 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16982 - 700592, n=160)
328523 Points ∼99% +30%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2506 Score ∼97%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1899 Score ∼73% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2568 Score ∼99% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2589 Score ∼100% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
2506 Score ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=102)
2592 Score ∼100% +3%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points ∼27%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4989 Points ∼10% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4989 Points ∼10% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4993 Points ∼10% -62%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
13120 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4490 - 228879, n=40)
48246 Points ∼100% +268%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
18.02 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
23.36 fps ∼61% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
38.22 fps ∼100% +112%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
18 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 61.5, n=30)
27.1 fps ∼71% +50%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
44.63 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.85 (12.92min - 52.46max) fps ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26.49 fps ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
27.04 fps ∼61% -39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
44.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.71 - 84.4, n=32)
31.7 fps ∼71% -29%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
198.56 (77.43min - 1345.87max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
194.39 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
195.78 fps ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22.7 - 452, n=28)
190 fps ∼96%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
20.93 fps ∼51%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
20.52 (11.64min - 35.95max) fps ∼50% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
24.34 fps ∼60% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
40.66 fps ∼100% +94%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
20.9 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 67.2, n=31)
28.7 fps ∼71% +37%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23.47 fps ∼73%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.91 (13.01min - 32.04max) fps ∼71% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
27.32 fps ∼85% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
27.25 fps ∼85% +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
23.5 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 98.8, n=34)
32.1 fps ∼100% +37%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points ∼88%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1354 Points ∼92% +4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼99% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1422 Points ∼97% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1468 Points ∼100% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
1297 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=773)
848 Points ∼58% -35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points ∼57%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3321 Points ∼71% +24%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3947 Points ∼84% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4017 Points ∼86% +49%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
2687 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=773)
2673 Points ∼57% -1%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points ∼88%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4297 Points ∼90% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4687 Points ∼98% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4543 Points ∼95% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
4185 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=773)
2010 Points ∼42% -52%
System (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points ∼81%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6617 Points ∼94% +16%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼96% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7033 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7052 Points ∼100% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
5692 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 49782, n=773)
3690 Points ∼52% -35%
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points ∼79%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3387 Points ∼88% +12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3688 Points ∼96% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3708 Points ∼96% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
3019 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=773)
1871 Points ∼49% -38%

The A73 5G also shows rather low results in the browser benchmarks. However, at least the OnePlus Nord N10 5G can be outperformed here. In everyday use, nonetheless, websites are displayed quickly, and media content is made available comparatively promptly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
54.661 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
52.656 Points ∼96% +55%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼89% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=236)
43.2 Points ∼79% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (34 - 36.3, n=2)
35.2 Points ∼64% +4%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34.002 Points ∼62%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
16.421 Points ∼30% -52%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
94.517 Points ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
93.023 Points ∼98% +33%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94% +26%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
70.069 Points ∼74%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (67.3 - 70.1, n=2)
68.7 Points ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=667)
50.8 Points ∼54% -28%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
23.745 Points ∼25% -66%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chome 87)
47.6 runs/min ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
46.2 runs/min ∼97% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=212)
45.5 runs/min ∼96% +21%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼95% +20%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
37.7 runs/min ∼79%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
37.7 runs/min ∼79% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
13.3 runs/min ∼28% -65%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
76 Points ∼97% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
75 Points ∼96% +53%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=306)
71.3 Points ∼91% +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (49 - 51, n=2)
50 Points ∼64% +2%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
49 Points ∼63%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
29 Points ∼37% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
17899 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
17809 Points ∼99% +20%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼91% +10%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
14886 Points ∼83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (14156 - 14886, n=2)
14521 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=839)
8528 Points ∼48% -43%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
4395 Points ∼25% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
12192.2 ms * ∼100% -200%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=865)
9422 ms * ∼77% -132%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
4059.1 ms * ∼33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (3467 - 4059, n=2)
3763 ms * ∼31% +7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼23% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
2665 ms * ∼22% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
2622.8 ms * ∼22% +35%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo installs a 128 GB UFS 2.1 storage device in the A73 5G. However, it achieves rather moderate read and write speeds in the storage benchmark, which are only sufficient for the last place in our test field. Furthermore, there is no option to expand storage.

Oppo A73 5GOnePlus Nord N10 5GMotorola Moto G 5G PlusXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
13%
17%
77%
73%
23%
-43%
Random Write 4KB
88.11
106.01
20%
119.3
35%
162.33
84%
147.7
68%
115 (18.2 - 290, n=74)
31%
42 (0.14 - 319, n=953)
-52%
Random Read 4KB
102.16
136.98
34%
138.14
35%
176.59
73%
168.5
65%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=74)
41%
64.7 (1.59 - 325, n=953)
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.04
187.24
-3%
180.21
-7%
463.5
140%
476
147%
250 (182 - 511, n=74)
30%
144 (2.99 - 1321, n=953)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB
859.98
865.23
1%
885.34
3%
938.14
9%
963
12%
779 (427 - 999, n=74)
-9%
370 (12.1 - 2037, n=953)
-57%

Games - Suitable for gaming with reduced settings

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 used here is a mid-range graphics unit, and it can bring modern games smoothly onto the screen. However, the theoretically possible high frame rates of the 90 Hz panel are not achieved here. Users can expect a stable 40 fps with slightly reduced graphics settings in the games that we tested with Gamebench, but the frame rates can still drop in very demanding titles.

Armajet
Armajet
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9: Legends
Asphalt 9: Legends
05101520253035404550556056596060606160606061596060616060606160595960616060605958585961606060615960605957606060595759606160605960606060615958575760586059616060595659606060616060606159606061606060616059596061606060595858596160606061596060595760606059575960616060596060606061595857576058605961606059414040403840404040394040394040404040404040394139403940393940404039383938403939403938403938393939393937404040404039403940394040404040404040394039413940384140394040413939404039404040404039414039404140393941404039403940394040394040404040384040404041394040404040394140403939413940404140394040403939403940383840393940404040403541403839404040394040413941404039404041394041394139404041394040404039413940394140394041404039394040404041394040403939404140383941394039404040403940394040404039394040394041403940414039403940404040403940404040404040403940413940404056596060606160606061596060616060606160595960616060605958585961606060615960605957606060595759606160605960606060615958575760586059616060594140404038404040403940403940404040404040403941394039403939404040393839384039394039384039383939393939374040404040394039403940404040404040403940394139403841403940404139394040394040404040394140394041403939414040394039403940403940404040403840404040413940404040403941404039394139404041403940404039394039403838403939404040404035414038394040403940404139414040394040413940413941394040413940404040394139403941403940414040393940404040413940404039394041403839413940394040404039403940404040393940403940414039404140394039404040404039404040404040404039404139404040302931303029312930303030303030303030303029303031302930303030303030302931293030303030302930303030303030303129303030303030303029303030303031302930303030303030293030312930303030302931303029303130293030302930303030303030302930303030303030303030303030303029312931293130302931293129312931302930312930293130293031293030303030303030312930303030303030303031302930303030303030303030303029303129303031302930313030302930313029303030303031302931293030302930303031293029303129312930303030303030293031305659606060616060606159606061606060616059596061606060595858596160606061596060595760606059575960616060596060606061595857576058605961606059414040403840404040394040394040404040404040394139403940393940404039383938403939403938403938393939393937404040404039403940394040404040404040394039413940384140394040413939404039404040404039414039404140393941404039403940394040394040404040384040404041394040404040394140403939413940404140394040403939403940383840393940404040403541403839404040394040413941404039404041394041394139404041394040404039413940394140394041404039394040404041394040403939404140383941394039404040403940394040404039394040394041403940414039403940404040403940404040404040403940413940404030293130302931293030303030303030303030302930303130293030303030303030293129303030303030293030303030303030312930303030303030302930303030303130293030303030303029303031293030303030293130302930313029303030293030303030303030293030303030303030303030303030302931293129313030293129312931293130293031293029313029303129303030303030303031293030303030303030303130293030303030303030303030302930312930303130293031303030293031302930303030303130293129