Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

OnePlus Nord N10 5G Smartphone Review - Cheap 5G smartphone with a 90-Hz screen and stereo speakers

Not the best in its class. The OnePlus Nord N10 5G, which is powered by the new Snapdragon 690, proves to be quite compelling in our review. However, the N10 has several weaknesses, which other mid-range smartphones in this price range do not. To find out about the strengths of the OnePlus smartphone, read our review.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G

The Nord N10 5G is another interesting addition to OnePlus’s mid-range line-up. The N10 5G has an MSRP of 349 Euros (~$421) and features the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 690, which comes with Qualcomm’s so-called X51 5G Modem-RF system. 

The rest of the specifications are also quite impressive for a smartphone in this price range. Buyers of the OnePlus smartphone will get 6 GB of RAM, a quad-camera system, 128 GB of UFS storage and a 90-Hz 6.49-inch display. However, unlike the OnePlus Nord, which has an OLED panel, the N10 5G features a liquid-crystal display. Additionally, the N10 5G also supports Warp Charge, which is OnePlus’s proprietary fast-charging technology.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Nord Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2 GHz, Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.49 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 406 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm-jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (up to 512GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5GNR: n1,3,7,28,41,66,78/ LTE-FDD: B1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,20,28,66/ LTE-TDD: B38,39,40,41/ 5GNR: n1/3/7/41/78;/ LTE: B1/3/7/38/41/ WCDMA: B1,2,4,5,8/ GSM: 850/900/1800/1900, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.95 x 163 x 74.7 ( = 0.35 x 6.42 x 2.94 in)
Battery
4300 mAh, Warp Charge 30T
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.25, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, monochrome, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.05, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, Warp Charge Adapter, Warp Typ-C-cable, Oxygen OS, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, fanless
Weight
190 g ( = 6.7 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 102 g ( = 3.6 oz / 0.22 pounds)
Price
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
12/2020
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.49"2400x1080
80 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
SD 730G, Adreno 618
223 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.81"2400x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
83 %
07/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
84 %
09/2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.80"2340x1080
81 %
11/2020
realme 7 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
182 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080

Case - OnePlus smartphone with a punch-hole selfie camera

The OnePlus Nord N10 5G is only available in the colour scheme known as "Midnight Ice"
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G is only available in the colour scheme known as "Midnight Ice"

The front of the Nord N10 5G is made of scratch-resistant 2.5-D Corning Gorilla Glass 3 with slightly rounded edges. While the back of the sibling model OnePlus Nord consists of Gorilla Glass 5, the back of the N10 5G is made of glass-like plastic. 

The side bezels of the 6.49-inch screen are quite small. Nevertheless, the top and bottom bezels could have been smaller. The screen-to-body ratio of the N10 amounts to only 83.5 %, which is a below-average result in this price range.

The N10 5G is not IP-certified, but it is well-built. The hardware buttons do not wobble and offer a very clear actuation point. The N10 5G comes only in one colour scheme (Midnight Ice), which is quite unusual for a mid-range smartphone.

Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size Comparison

170 mm / 6.69 inch 78.1 mm / 3.07 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 223 g0.4916 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.95 mm / 0.3524 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 192 g0.4233 lbs160.9 mm / 6.33 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 182 g0.4012 lbs158.3 mm / 6.23 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 184 g0.4057 lbs144 mm / 5.67 inch 69.4 mm / 2.73 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 143 g0.3153 lbs

Connectivity - Nord N10 5G with a 3.5-mm audio jack

The Nord N10 5G has a fingerprint scanner on the back, a dual SIM card slot and a 3.5-mm headphone jack—we were not able to get Miracast to work in our review. The N10 5G does not support Always-on-Display functionality and does not have an LED indicator.

The 4300-mAh battery can be charged via the USB-C port on the bottom of the smartphone. The USB port supports OTG functionality, which is why external devices can be easily connected to the N10 5G. However, the port operates at only USB 2.0 speeds.

Our review device comes with 128 GB of UFS memory, of which only 100 GB is available to the user. The storage capacity of the Nord N10 5G can be expanded. 

Bottom (3.5-mm headphone jack, microphone hole, USB-C port, speaker cutouts)
Bottom (3.5-mm headphone jack, microphone hole, USB-C port, speaker cutouts)
Left side (SD card slot, volume rocker)
Left side (SD card slot, volume rocker)
Left side (power button)
Left side (power button)
Top (microphone hole)
Top (microphone hole)

Software - OnePlus smartphone with Android 10

Straight out of the box, the N10 5G runs Android 10 with OnePlus’s proprietary launcher known as Oxygen OS (version 10.5). The N10 5G will not be updated beyond Android 11, according to OnePlus’s statements. The security patches of our review device are up to date (security patch level: November, 2020). 

Oxygen OS is a well-optimised launcher, which offers many customisation options and does not include any bloatware. Users will not be able to stream video in HD quality with the N10 5G, because it only supports Widevine L3 DRM. However, the OnePlus smartphone supports various Google Play services such as Google Pay and Google Protect.

Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G

Communication and Geolocation - Nord N10 5G with Wi-Fi 5

The N10 5G comes with a dual SIM card slot, a Bluetooth 5.1 module and an NFC chip.  

In addition to the LTE modem, as the name suggests, the N10 5G also features a 5G modem, which allows the smartphone to achieve very high download and upload speeds. The 5G modem supports Band C and Band n1. For a smartphone in this price range, the N10 supports a large number of LTE frequency bands (16 in total). All 4G bands relevant in Germany are supported. 

Despite the fact that the N10 comes with a Wi-Fi 5 module, it is still able to achieve very good data transfer rates of over 600 Mb/s with our reference-grade router Netgear Nighthawk AX12. We did not experience any issues with connection stability in our testing.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼97% +1%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (596min - 664max) MBit/s ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years)
403 MBit/s ∼60% -38%
realme 7 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 (286min - 339max) MBit/s ∼49% -49%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼46% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (604min - 684max) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years)
390 MBit/s ∼58% -41%
realme 7 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (299min - 338max) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665604628626632628659649648653596629644642662655650652662658628658659650664653650653661656655604628626632628659649648653596629644642662655650652662658628658659650664653650653661656655604674666668672664676669666670667669668664684667670666664672671660670666669630663670669666Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø645 (596-664)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø665 (604-684)
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors

In order to determine how accurate our review device is when it comes to geolocation, we take it with us on a bike ride. During this ride, we are also accompanied by the professional navigator Garmin Edge 520. The N10 5G proves to be quite accurate when compared to our reference-grade navigator. Howbeit, the route that we took was not mapped perfectly on the Android smartphone. Nevertheless, the N10 5G is good enough for daily navigation.

For geolocation, the N10 5G relies on the following global navigation satellite systems: GPS, GLONASS, Beidou and Galileo. Dual-band (L1+L5) GNSS is supported. Outdoors, the Android smartphone has a margin of error of 3 metres. Indoors, our review device acquires the user’s position quickly and reliably, but has a higher margin of error.

Geolocation: Garmin Edge 520
Geolocation: Garmin Edge 520
Geolocation: Garmin Edge 520
Geolocation: Garmin Edge 520
Geolocation: Garmin Edge 520
Geolocation: Garmin Edge 520
Geolocation: OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Geolocation: OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Geolocation: OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Geolocation: OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Geolocation: OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Geolocation: OnePlus Nord N10 5G

Telephony & Call Quality - OnePlus Nord N10 with VoLTE

Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G

Users can insert two Nano SIM cards into the N10 5G. WiFi Calling is supported. However, there does not appear to be a way to enable VoLTE functionality the settings menu.

The call quality of the N10 5G is on a good level. The voices on either end of the call sound clear and intelligible. Video calling also works well with the built-in microphones.

Cameras - OnePlus smartphone with a quad-camera module

Shot taken with the front-facing camera of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Shot taken with the front-facing camera of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G

We were somewhat disappointed with the rear carema system of the N10 5G. The 64-megapixel main image sensor does not come from Sony or Samsung. Instead, it comes from OmniVision. The main camera has an f/1.79 aperture, supports electronic image stabilisation and utilises pixel binning. 

The 16-megapixel shots taken with the main camera appear somewhat blurry even in good lighting conditions. In direct sunlight, bright surfaces are not always properly exposed. In poor lighting conditions, the main shooter performs even worse. The images appear blurry and the colours look washed-out. 

The same applies to the 8-megapixel ultra wide-angle lens, even in good lighting conditions. It is possible to get a good shot with this camera. However, the very wide field of view (119 °), excessive noise and blurriness limit the usefulness of the ultra wide-angle camera.

The 16-megapixel front-facing punch-hole camera performs rather well in good lighting conditions. Both the sharpness and the colour reproduction are on a good level. There are no major issues with exposure and the dynamic range is quite good.  

When it comes to shooting video, the OnePlus smartphone does quite well. Users can switch between the ultra wide-angle and the wide-angle lens. 4K video can only be recorded at 30 FPS, though.

Main camera
Main camera
Wide-angle camera
Wide-angle camera
10X zoom (max)
Main camera
Wide-angle camera
Main camera - Night mode
Wide-angle camera - Night mode
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraLow-light photographyMain cameraUltra wide-angle lens

In our lab, we take a closer look at the camera performance of the N10 5G. The colours in the photograph of the ColorChecker Passport appear slightly overbrightened. The colour accuracy is also very poor especially in the shot taken under good lighting conditions. 

To assess the sharpness of the images, we photograph our test chart under controlled lighting conditions. The sharpness is very good in the centre of the image, but starts to decline at the edges.

ColorChecker
21.6 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
30 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord N10 5G: 22.94 ∆E min: 12.74 - max: 30.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord N10 5G: 9.61 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 17.5 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty - Nord N10 5G comes without a protective case

Warp Charge 30T power adapter
Warp Charge 30T power adapter

The box of the Nord N10 5G contains a Warp Charge 30T power adapter, a USB cable from OnePlus and a SIM card removal tool. However, a protective case is not included in the box. Curiously enough, OnePlus offers protective cases for the Nord in its online store, but not for the Nord N10 5G.

The Nord N10 5G comes with a 24-month warranty. 

Input Devices & Handling - OnePlus smartphone with a classical fingerprint reader

The 6.49-inch IPS screen of the N10 5G refreshes at 90 Hz instead of 60 Hz, which is why the smartphone feels more responsive. On the N10, the screen content refreshes 50 % faster than on a standard 60-Hz display.

The rear fingerprint sensor feels a little sluggish and does not work reliably all of the time. The FaceLock feature works better, at least in good lighting conditions. However, it uses simple 2D-based facial recognition technology, which is why it is not very secure.

Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Review of the OnePlus Nord N10 5G

Display - Nord N10 5G with a 90-Hz panel

Pixel arrangement
Pixel arrangement
There is some darkening around the camera hole
There is some darkening around the camera hole

The 6.49-inch IPS panel of the N10 5G has a resolution of 2400x1080 and a pixel density of over 400 PPI. This is why the screen appears sufficiently sharp in everyday use.

The maximum level of brightness is satisfactory. However, many competing devices offer brighter screens. The brightness distribution is not ideal for a smartphone in this price range. Moreover, the screen of the N10 5G suffers from backlight bleeding and there is some darkening around the camera hole.

With the ambient light sensor enabled, the screen brightness peaked at 450 cd/m² with a pure white background in auto mode. In the realistically oriented APL50 test, in which the screen displays a pattern of alternating black and white squares of equal size, we measured a brightness of only 408 cd/m². 

403
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 450 cd/m² Average: 421.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 450 cd/m²
Contrast: 789:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.274
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.49
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80
realme 7 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Screen
-23%
34%
17%
51%
20%
Brightness middle
450
390
-13%
584
30%
529
18%
705
57%
507
13%
Brightness
422
377
-11%
583
38%
531
26%
707
68%
508
20%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
97
9%
94
6%
96
8%
97
9%
Black Level *
0.57
0.66
-16%
Contrast
789
591
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.67
3.39
-27%
1.17
56%
2.53
5%
0.9
66%
1.88
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.76
5.22
23%
2.95
56%
4.52
33%
1.9
72%
3.63
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
4.3
-115%
1.7
15%
1.7
15%
1.3
35%
2
-0%
Gamma
2.274 97%
2.506 88%
2.231 99%
2.249 98%
2.26 97%
2.338 94%
CCT
6859 95%
6033 108%
6341 103%
6462 101%
6576 99%
6665 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9672 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Because an LCD screen always has to use a backlight, it can never achieve the same deep blacks as an OLED display. The N10 5G has a rather poor black value of 0.57 cd/m². The contrast ratio of less than 1000:1 is also quite poor. We use a spectrometer with CalMAN software to measure the colour accuracy of the display. The deviations for both the mixed colours (2.7) and the grayscale (2) are well within the norm for a device in this price range. At about 6900 Kelvin, the colour temperature of the display can be described as good.

Those who are unhappy with the colour reproduction can adjust it in the settings menu. 

Colour accuracy (sRGB)
Colour accuracy (sRGB)
Colour accuracy (AdobeRGB)
Colour accuracy (AdobeRGB)
Colour accuracy (P3)
Colour accuracy (P3)
Colour space coverage (sRGB)
Colour space coverage (sRGB)
Grayscale (sRGB)
Grayscale (sRGB)
Saturation (sRGB)
Saturation (sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).

Outdoors, the N10 5G leaves a rather mixed impression. The low contrast ratio and maximum brightness make the screen hard to read on sunny days. However, the display can be comfortably read in the shade or on cloudy days.

The viewing angles of the IPS panel are very stable. The brightness does not drop off and the colours do not become distorted when the screen is viewed at acute angles.

The viewing angles of the Nord N10 5G
The viewing angles of the Nord N10 5G

Performance - OnePlus smartphone with the Snapdragon 690

The N10 5G features the new 5G-capable Snapdragon 690. It is 20 % faster and more energy-efficient than its 4G-capable predecessor Snapdragon 675, because it is made using the 8-nm LPP manufacturing process. 

The Snapdragon 690 in the OnePlus smartphone has two high-performance Cortex A77-based Kryo 560 cores that are clocked at 2 GHz and four high-efficiency Cortex A55-based cores. The Adreno 619L serves as the graphics unit. It is 60 % faster than the GPU in the Snapdragon 675.

The N10 5G achieves great results in our suite of benchmarks. All in all, the Snapdragon 690 provides the same level of performance as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. However, the Snapdragon 765G in the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G performs much better, especially in GPU-intensive applications. The OnePlus smartphone does surprisingly poorly in the browser benchmarks. Howbeit, in day-to-day use, the scrolling is smooth and webpages and media content load quickly. All in all, the N10 5G performs about as well as the rest of the mid-range competition.

Together with 6 GB of RAM, the mid-range CPU offers a solid level of system performance. The smartphone feels smooth most of the time. However, under high load, the system can become unresponsive. 

Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
981 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1113 Points ∼54% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼62% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼60% +27%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1249 Points ∼60% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
981 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=97, last 2 years)
2075 Points ∼100% +112%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
905 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
987 Points ∼51% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼61% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼60% +29%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1030 Points ∼53% +14%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1138 Points ∼58% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
905 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=95, last 2 years)
1948 Points ∼100% +115%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1873 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1786 Points ∼91% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼97% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points ∼84% -12%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1798 Points ∼91% -4%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1331 Points ∼68% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
1873 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=200, last 2 years)
1912 Points ∼97% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
610 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
551 Points ∼82% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points ∼82% -10%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
570 Points ∼85% -7%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
349 Points ∼52% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
610 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=200, last 2 years)
553 Points ∼82% -9%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8049 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
8411 Points ∼94% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8968 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6475 Points ∼72% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
8049 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1535 - 12228, n=78, last 2 years)
6199 Points ∼69% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
7401 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6987 Points ∼90% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7765 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5164 Points ∼67% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
7401 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=91, last 2 years)
7275 Points ∼94% -2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2817 Points ∼98%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2556 Points ∼89% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2863 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1624 Points ∼57% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
2817 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=91, last 2 years)
2356 Points ∼82% -16%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8021 Points ∼79%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
7737 Points ∼76% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼76% -3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼93% +18%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points ∼85% +8%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10181 Points ∼100% +27%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7387 Points ∼73% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
8021 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=269, last 2 years)
7692 Points ∼76% -4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
10321 Points ∼75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
9956 Points ∼72% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼63% -15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼79% +5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10200 Points ∼74% -1%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13821 Points ∼100% +34%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9458 Points ∼68% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
10321 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=246, last 2 years)
9824 Points ∼71% -5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2769 Points ∼96%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2775 Points ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼99% +4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2720 Points ∼94% -2%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2701 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
2769 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=208, last 2 years)
2646 Points ∼91% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1932 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2199 Points ∼69% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% +66%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼100% +65%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2150 Points ∼67% +11%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2267 Points ∼71% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
1932 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (210 - 11259, n=208, last 2 years)
3002 Points ∼94% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2081 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2310 Points ∼74% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼99% +49%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2255 Points ∼72% +8%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2351 Points ∼75% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
2081 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (262 - 6977, n=208, last 2 years)
2650 Points ∼85% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3374 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3391 Points ∼96% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼99% +4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points ∼93% -2%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3321 Points ∼94% -2%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼78% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3374 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=269, last 2 years)
2863 Points ∼81% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2187 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2471 Points ∼69% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% +64%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼99% +63%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points ∼69% +13%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2550 Points ∼71% +17%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1611 Points ∼45% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
2187 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=269, last 2 years)
3386 Points ∼94% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2348 Points ∼65%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2701 Points ∼75% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +54%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼99% +51%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points ∼73% +11%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2689 Points ∼75% +15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1772 Points ∼49% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
2348 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=269, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼84% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3984 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3352 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼84% -16%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3263 Points ∼82% -18%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2771 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3984 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=267, last 2 years)
2821 Points ∼71% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3307 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3773 Points ∼70% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼100% +61%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼100% +62%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points ∼70% +13%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3810 Points ∼71% +15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2533 Points ∼47% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3307 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=269, last 2 years)
4717 Points ∼88% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3327 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3704 Points ∼76% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼98% +45%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼75% +10%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3673 Points ∼75% +10%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2582 Points ∼53% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3327 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=269, last 2 years)
3753 Points ∼77% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3265 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3328 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼98% +5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points ∼93% -1%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3241 Points ∼93% -1%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2728 Points ∼78% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3265 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=260, last 2 years)
2753 Points ∼79% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1982 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2293 Points ∼69% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +68%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼99% +66%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points ∼70% +17%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2384 Points ∼72% +20%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1482 Points ∼45% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
1982 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=260, last 2 years)
2785 Points ∼84% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2198 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2489 Points ∼74% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +52%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼100% +52%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points ∼74% +12%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2533 Points ∼76% +15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1651 Points ∼49% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
2198 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=260, last 2 years)
2608 Points ∼78% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3257 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3349 Points ∼96% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼99% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points ∼94% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3247 Points ∼93% 0%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2708 Points ∼78% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3257 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2716 Points ∼78% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3197 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3678 Points ∼63% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +82%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼89% +62%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points ∼62% +14%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3655 Points ∼63% +14%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2419 Points ∼41% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3197 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3919 Points ∼67% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3208 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3556 Points ∼76% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼99% +45%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points ∼75% +10%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3556 Points ∼76% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2477 Points ∼53% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3208 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼71% +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
19976 Points ∼88%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
20382 Points ∼89% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼90% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼92% +5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15527 Points ∼68% -22%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
20000 Points ∼88% 0%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
18523 Points ∼81% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
19976 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=231, last 2 years)
22801 Points ∼100% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
44899 Points ∼65%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
53182 Points ∼77% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100% +55%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% +54%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53548 Points ∼77% +19%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53689 Points ∼77% +20%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35401 Points ∼51% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
44899 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=230, last 2 years)
55452 Points ∼80% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
35182 Points ∼77%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
39572 Points ∼86% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼99% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼100% +30%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
34678 Points ∼76% -1%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
39066 Points ∼85% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29229 Points ∼64% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
35182 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=230, last 2 years)
38643 Points ∼84% +10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
73 fps ∼74%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
86 fps ∼88% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼97% +30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼99% +33%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼86% +15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼59% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
73 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=219, last 2 years)
98 fps ∼100% +34%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
57 fps ∼95% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
52 fps ∼87% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
58 fps ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=219, last 2 years)
53.3 fps ∼89% -8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
37 fps ∼65%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
42 fps ∼74% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼86% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼96% +49%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼72% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼51% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
37 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=218, last 2 years)
57.1 fps ∼100% +54%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
33 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
38 fps ∼69% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +67%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% +52%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼69% +15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
27 fps ∼49% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
33 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=217, last 2 years)
41.7 fps ∼76% +26%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
30 fps ∼77% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼97% +46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼97% +46%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼77% +15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼51% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
26 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=215, last 2 years)
39 fps ∼100% +50%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
23 fps ∼68%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
27 fps ∼79% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼97% +43%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +48%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼82% +22%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼56% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
23 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
32.6 fps ∼96% +42%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8.7 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
10 fps ∼72% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼94% +49%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼94% +49%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼80% +26%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼80% +26%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7 fps ∼51% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
8.7 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=271, last 2 years)
13.8 fps ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼61%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6.3 fps ∼66% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼90% +47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼90% +47%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps ∼70% +14%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.9 fps ∼73% +19%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.4 fps ∼46% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
5.8 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=270, last 2 years)
9.48 fps ∼100% +63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼76% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +50%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% +21%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼81% +21%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼52% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
14 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=270, last 2 years)
20.8 fps ∼99% +49%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
18 fps ∼75% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +60%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼100% +60%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼75% +20%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼75% +20%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼50% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
15 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=270, last 2 years)
23.8 fps ∼99% +59%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
17 fps ∼72% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼89% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼89% +50%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼72% +21%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼47% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
14 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
23.5 fps ∼100% +68%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼78% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼88% +38%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼93% +46%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼78% +23%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
10 fps ∼49% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
13 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=214, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼100% +58%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
282385 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
251673 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼96% +13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼100% +18%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
269238 Points ∼81% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
282385 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=170, last 2 years)
331449 Points ∼100% +17%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1899 Score ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
1899 Score ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=54, last 2 years)
3208 Score ∼100% +69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1354 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1347 Points ∼92% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% +6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1283 Points ∼88% -5%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1229 Points ∼84% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
1354 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=204, last 2 years)
1225 Points ∼84% -10%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3321 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3984 Points ∼77% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼100% +57%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼100% +57%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3840 Points ∼74% +16%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2818 Points ∼54% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3321 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=204, last 2 years)
5170 Points ∼99% +56%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4297 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
4029 Points ∼71% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% +23%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4544 Points ∼80% +6%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3288 Points ∼58% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
4297 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=204, last 2 years)
3988 Points ∼70% -7%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6617 Points ∼97%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6612 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼89% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6796 Points ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5480 Points ∼81% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
6617 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=204, last 2 years)
6309 Points ∼93% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3387 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3412 Points ∼83% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼99% +20%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3512 Points ∼86% +4%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2811 Points ∼69% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
 
3387 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=204, last 2 years)
3409 Points ∼83% +1%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼100% +257%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
50.582 Points ∼86% +208%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼86% +206%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
47.8 Points ∼81% +191%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
47.798 Points ∼81% +191%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
16.421 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
16.4 Points ∼28% 0%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼100% +298%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼99% +294%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
87.731 Points ∼93% +269%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
86.541 Points ∼92% +264%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=190, last 2 years)
85.5 Points ∼90% +260%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
23.745 Points ∼25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
23.7 Points ∼25% 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼100% +303%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼95% +281%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
49.1 runs/min ∼92% +269%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
44.2 runs/min ∼82% +232%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
43.3 runs/min ∼81% +226%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
13.3 runs/min ∼25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
13.3 runs/min ∼25% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼100% +248%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% +162%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
75.9 Points ∼75% +162%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
71 Points ∼70% +145%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
68 Points ∼67% +134%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
29 Points ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
29 Points ∼29% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼100% +336%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼97% +322%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
17768 Points ∼93% +304%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
16729 Points ∼87% +281%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
16282 Points ∼85% +270%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
4395 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
4395 Points ∼23% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
12192.2 ms * ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
12192 ms * ∼100% -0%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
4424 ms * ∼36% +64%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
2949.9 ms * ∼24% +76%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼23% +77%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
2783.1 ms * ∼23% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼21% +79%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus Nord N10 5GMotorola Moto G9 PlusXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GOnePlus NordGoogle Pixel 4arealme 7 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
53%
39%
22%
1%
4%
3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
59.6 (8.4 - 72.4, n=43)
-8%
58.4 (1.7 - 83.3, n=193, last 2 years)
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
86.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
76 (13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
-12%
76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=193, last 2 years)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
106.01
98.12
-7%
138.47
31%
104.5
-1%
187.39
77%
129.1
22%
117 (18.2 - 290, n=79)
10%
109 (4.78 - 319, n=275, last 2 years)
3%
Random Read 4KB
136.98
134.77
-2%
156.45
14%
126.7
-8%
162.89
19%
159.8
17%
145 (92.6 - 239, n=79)
6%
127 (13.5 - 325, n=275, last 2 years)
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.24
186.23
-1%
476.87
155%
473.1
153%
246.79
32%
198.1
6%
257 (182 - 511, n=79)
37%
302 (11.9 - 1321, n=275, last 2 years)
61%
Sequential Read 256KB
865.23
489.37
-43%
979.54
13%
955.5
10%
502.06
-42%
520.6
-40%
778 (427 - 999, n=79)
-10%
710 (41.9 - 2037, n=275, last 2 years)
-18%

Gaming - Nord N10 5G only supports 60 FPS

The N10 5G comes with the Adreno 619L, which can run even demanding 3D games from the Google Play Store. We use Gamebench to record frame rates for our gaming benchmarks.

The Android smartphone proves to be a capable gaming device. In PUBG and Asphalt 9 Legends, our review device is able to achieve a stable 30 FPS on high settings. On lower settings, the N10 5G can hit 40 FPS in PUBG most of the time. 

Even in less demanding titles such as Real Racing 3, the Android smartphone is limited to 60 FPS, which is quite unfortunate, given the fact that the N10 5G has a 90-Hz screen.

Real Racing 3
Real Racing 3
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends
PUBG mobile
051015202530354040403940404040404040404039414040403941404040404039414040404040394040403940403940413941404040384040404041384040404040414039394040404140394040404040413940404040404039413941404040394040404040403941404040404039414039403940404040404040403940404039404040404040404040394140404039414040404040394140404040403940404039404039404139414040403840404040413840404040404140393940404041403940404040404139404040404040394139414040403940404040404039414040404040394140394039404040404040404039404040404040394040403941403941404039404041404040394040404040404040404040393939394040374139403840404039404040404040404040404040384038404039404040404139404040404140394040404139413940404040404039384139414036404040403939403939404041404039403940403221394040404040403841394040404139404040404039404040404040404040394140404039414040404040394140404040403940404039404039404139414040403840404040413840404040404140393940404041403940404040404139404040404040394139414040403940404040404039414040404040394140394039404040404040404039404040404040394040403941403941404039404041404040394040404040404040404040393939394040374139403840404039404040404040404040404040384038404039404040404139404040404140394040404139413940404040404039384139414036404040403939403939404041404039403940403221394040404040403841394040404139404040312930303030303029303030293129303030293030303030303029303030303030303030303030303030312930303030303030303030303030293031303030302931303030303029303030303030303030303030302930303030303030293130303030303030303030303030302930303031293030303030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.9 (38-41)
; Balanced: Ø39.6 (21-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (29-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
05101520253027272730293130293028313031293030303030303129303030303031302926252531292929303030303029252631303130293030302930303030303030293030293029302620192930292830313029282726252530303130282520212425273027322530272524282928272931302929262426283130303129303129Tooltip
: Ø28.6 (19-32)
Real Racing 3
051015202530354045505560595960606060606052596060606060596060606060605960606060606059606060606060596057606060595960606060606059606060606060596060606060605960606060606059606060605760Tooltip
: Ø59.7 (52-60)

Emissions - Nord N10 5G gets warm

Temperature

Under sustained load, the surface temperatures of the N10 5G exceed the 40-°C (104 °F) mark. However, in day-to-day use, the smartphone never gets hot.

We use a battery testing utility known as GFXBench to examine how well our review device performs under continuous load. The battery benchmark is run three times in a row, and both the frame rates and the battery level are recorded.

The OnePlus smartphone manages to maintain 99 % of its performance in the demanding Manhatten section of the GFXBench benchmark. This means that the Android smartphone should not throttle when gaming or performing other very demanding tasks.