Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and uses 3 clusters (hence the MC3/MP3 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP3 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U / Realme 7 5G) is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines3 - unified
Shared Memoryno
technology7 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://developer.arm.com/ip-products/gr...
CPU in Mali-G57 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 800U8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 29682     avg: 32144     median: 32143.5 (4%)     max: 34605 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3377     avg: 4000     median: 4032.5 (21%)     max: 4467 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3497     avg: 4324     median: 4247.5 (10%)     max: 5012 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2653     avg: 2982     median: 3003.5 (19%)     max: 3291 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2561     avg: 2933     median: 2919 (2%)     max: 3304 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1207     avg: 1363     median: 1226 (1%)     max: 1586 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 352     avg: 423.7     median: 458 (1%)     max: 461 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 55     avg: 58.2     median: 58.5 (2%)     max: 60 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 67     avg: 74.7     median: 74 (1%)     max: 83 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 37     avg: 46.2     median: 47 (13%)     max: 54 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 44.2     median: 42.5 (2%)     max: 51 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 9.2     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 17 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 6.1     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (1%)     max: 8.1 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 15     avg: 19.6     median: 19 (3%)     max: 30 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 19.4     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 13     avg: 16.8     median: 16.5 (0%)     max: 23 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 17     median: 17 (0%)     max: 20 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 84032     avg: 92552     median: 92551.5 (12%)     max: 101071 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 33.05     avg: 37.4     median: 34.4 (1%)     max: 44.63 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9293     avg: 21578     median: 25659 (26%)     max: 29783 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3448     avg: 16034     median: 22192 (39%)     max: 22461 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.42     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.23 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.92.12.22.42.62.833.23.43.6Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
30 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
61  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 06. 19:42:05

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:14:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.062s ... 0.063s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.063s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.063s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10571 +0.017s ... 0.08s

#7 got single benchmarks 10571 +0.025s ... 0.105s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.235s ... 0.34s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.34s

#11 Got 20 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.347s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.347s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.35s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.06s ... 0.41s

#15 return log +0.061s ... 0.471s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G57 MP3 graphics card

Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

Motorola Edge 20 Lite review: Low-priced 5G smartphone with 108 MP camera & 90 Hz OLED

Motorola's Edge 20 Lite is an interesting mid-range phone on paper. The cheapest smartphone in the Edge 20 series has some features from the Edge 20 Pro, but th...
MediaTek Dimensity 720 | ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | 6.70" | 185 g
Vivo V21 5G smartphone review - Strong cameras on both sides

Vivo V21 5G smartphone review - Strong cameras on both sides

The Vivo V21 5G focuses on the cameras. The highlight is supposed to be the 44 MP front-facing camera, which is equipped with an OIS and dual LEDs. However, a p...
MediaTek Dimensity 800U | ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | 6.44" | 176 g
Oppo A94 5G

Oppo A94 5G smartphone in review: 5G Android phone for under 400 Euros

With the A94 5G, Oppo launches an appealing smartphone with good features and long battery life in the mid-range. Our review reveals what sets this phone apart ...
MediaTek Dimensity 800U | ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | 6.43" | 173 g
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G review: There's more than just progress in the 5G smartphone

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G review: There's more than just progress in the 5G smartphone

The Galaxy A32 5G offers a large 6.5-inch display, a big battery, a modern MediaTek SoC, and a quad-camera setup. However, it can't always outperform its predec...
MediaTek Dimensity 720 | ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | 6.50" | 205 g
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G smartphone review: 5G for the small budget

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G smartphone review: 5G for the small budget

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T costs 230 Euros (~$279) in the smallest version and is already sold for less than 200 Euros (~$243) in some places. The special feature...
MediaTek Dimensity 800U | ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | 6.53" | 199 g

Oppo A73 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A73 5G in review: Light 5G smartphone for 300 Euros (~$369)

Realme 7 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 7 5G Smartphone Review - Cheap Chinese cell phone with fast mobile communication

Vivo V21s: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V21s

ZTE Voyage 20 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Voyage 20 Pro

Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 20 Fusion

Motorola Edge 20 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 20 Lite

Oppo Reno5 Z: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno5 Z

Oppo Reno6 Z: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 Z

Honor Play5: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor Play5

Vivo V21 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V21 5G

Oppo A94 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A94 5G

Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G

Realme Narzo 30 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

Oppo A53 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A53 5G

Vivo iQOO U3: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO U3

Realme V15: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme V15

Realme Q2: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q2

Realme Q2 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q2 Pro

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G

Oppo A73 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A73 5G

Realme 7 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 7 5G

Oppo A94 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.43", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo A94 5G: The mid-range for the mid-range

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: One of the few alternatives with an LCD panel

   » Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: One of the few alternatives with an LCD panel

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800U, 6.53", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G: The review results in overview

Oppo A73 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 720, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo A73 5G: Long battery life thanks to new MediaTek SoC

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.