Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Oppo A94 5G smartphone in review: 5G Android phone for under 400 Euros

Slim build. With the A94 5G, Oppo launches an appealing smartphone with good features and long battery life in the mid-range. Our review reveals what sets this phone apart from numerous other 5G smartphones.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Oppo A94 5G

In our reviews of smartphones belonging to Oppo's A series, the A74 and the A73 5G showed that they are solid and suitable for everyday use while being reasonably priced. it's the A94 5G's turn now, which is a bit more expensive than the aforementioned models with a price of approximately 390 Euros (~$475). In return, it's equipped with a MediaTek Dimensity 800U SoC and its integrated ARM Mali-G57 MP3 graphics unit, 8 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of internal storage.

We compare it with the competition listed below, to which further smartphones from our database can be added for comparison under each section.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Oppo A94 5G (A Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 800U 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: combined 3.5 mm audio jack, USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (up to 256 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gravity, gyroscope, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G UMTS/WCDMA (1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/66), 5G FDD/TDD (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.1 x 73.4 ( = 0.31 x 6.3 x 2.89 in)
Battery
4310 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, 79°); 8 MP ultra wide (f/2.2, 119°); 2 MP macro (f/2.4, 89°); 2 MP depth (f/2.4, 89°), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, 78°)
Additional features
Speakers: single, Keyboard: on-screen, Keyboard Light: yes, power adapter, USB-C cable, protective case, wired headset, ColorOS 11.1, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 0.992 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.299 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
173 g ( = 6.1 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 144 g ( = 5.08 oz / 0.32 pounds)
Price
389 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
06/2021
Oppo A94 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
173 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80 %
11/2020
realme 7 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
81 %
05/2021
Nokia X20
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080

Case - Light 5G smartphone

Oppo has built the A94 5G with a plastic frame and a glass back. The front is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5. In addition, two color variants are available with "Fluid Black" and "Cosmic Blue". The low weight of 173 grams makes the A94 5G one of the lightest smartphones in our test field, and many competitors score worse in terms of thickness as well.

Oppo A94 5G
Oppo A94 5G
Oppo A94 5G
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

168.9 mm / 6.65 inch 79.7 mm / 3.14 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 220 g0.485 lbs162.2 mm / 6.39 inch 75.1 mm / 2.96 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs161.9 mm / 6.37 inch 77.3 mm / 3.04 inch 9.05 mm / 0.3563 inch 199 g0.4387 lbs160.1 mm / 6.3 inch 73.4 mm / 2.89 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.72 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 159 g0.3505 lbs

Connectivity - Dual SIM and microSD simultaneously available

The Oppo A94 5G can accommodate one microSD card and two nano SIM cards without them blocking each other. Both SIM slots support VoWLAN and VoWiFi, but only one card at a time can connect to 5G networks. The USB-C port transfers data using the USB 2.0 standard, and a 3.5 mm jack is also available. In addition, the Camera2 API supports Level 3. DRM Widevine L1 is also on board.

Left side: Volume rocker, nano SIM/microSD card slot
Left side: Volume rocker, nano SIM/microSD card slot
Bottom: 3.5 mm audio jack, microphone, USB-C, speaker
Bottom: 3.5 mm audio jack, microphone, USB-C, speaker

microSD card reader

According to the manufacturer, the microSD card reader in the A94 5G supports cards of up to 256 GB. Only average read and write speeds are achieved with our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference memory card, but other smartphones either don't have a card reader or are significantly slower like the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A94 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
41.56 MB/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s ∼44% -56%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859057.755.860.151.149.944.642.436.233.435.638.437.34237.734.635.335.43236.633.436.136.542.338.841.338.640.132.435.938.534.133.635.535.94133.936.13137.437.643.842.635.936.738.737.439.336.733.732.435.135.13536.139.535.339.636.735.336.635.635.138.635.136.334.235.733.532.733.83738.435.837.436.935.836.536.536.731.333.4343536.434.332.733.335.437.631.936.937.133.837.937.236.535.235.434.83136.634.637.84139.537.139.640.434.43932.337.733.631.535.935.936.734.338.8353436.936.840.137.135.335.538.457.755.860.151.149.944.642.436.233.435.638.437.34237.734.635.335.43236.633.436.136.542.338.841.338.640.132.435.938.534.133.635.535.94133.936.13137.437.643.842.635.936.738.737.439.336.733.732.435.135.13536.139.535.339.636.735.336.635.635.138.635.136.334.235.733.532.733.83738.435.837.436.935.836.536.536.731.333.4343536.434.332.733.335.437.631.936.937.133.837.937.236.535.235.434.83136.634.637.84139.537.139.640.434.43932.337.733.631.535.935.936.734.338.8353436.936.840.137.135.335.538.479.185.984.784.984.584.884.985.385.285.584.185.684.785.784.586.786.686.285.984.48685.98684.785.985.585.185.384.186.379.79285.18585.784.886.184.285.585.485.884.784.985.986.88684.186.486.886.385.684.786.485.386.584.185.485.884.985.283.586.582.486.385.78585.584.786.584.485.385.984.785.884.485.58786.184.286.385.386.585.484.486.285.985.284878584.586.985.486.184.486.585.984.786.385.485.484.385.28686.385.183.986.384.985.684.285.485.785.386.283.986.685.18684.685.62586.685.584.285.185.981.9Tooltip
; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø37.1 (31-60.1)
; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (25-92)

Software - A94 5G with ColorOS 11.1

Oppo has installed the Android 11-based ColorOS 11.1 on the A94 5G, which includes security patches at the level of April 5, 2021. Using the device is very similar to using a pure Android system, but there are manufacturer-specific apps and a modified menu structure. While some preinstalled apps, such as Netflix, can only be disabled, others, such as TikTok, can also be uninstalled.

Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software
Software Oppo A94 5G
Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software
Oppo A94 5G software

Communication and GNSS - Very accurate tracking

Besides GSM, 3G, and LTE, the A94 5G also supports the new 5G mobile standard. In close ranges, NFC, Bluetooth 5.1, and Wi-Fi 5 are also available. However, the data transfer rates that can be achieved in combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router are slightly below average.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼100% +203%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=293, last 2 years)
401 MBit/s ∼45% +36%
realme 7 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s ∼39% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
336 (271min - 355max) MBit/s ∼38% +14%
Oppo A94 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (148min - 304max) MBit/s ∼33%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
222 (126min - 326max) MBit/s ∼25% -24%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=293, last 2 years)
409 MBit/s ∼47% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
366 (336min - 379max) MBit/s ∼42% +1%
Oppo A94 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
361 (180min - 366max) MBit/s ∼41%
realme 7 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 (300min - 365max) MBit/s ∼41% -2%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
313 (190min - 343max) MBit/s ∼36% -13%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360180363362361356350360361361357365359361366365360360361358359357362355364354363359359364366180363362361356350360361361357365359361366365360360361358359357362355364354363359359364366148291296297292294295295296287293299298288288298292293293299282304296296289291292291292298Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø354 (180-366)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø289 (148-304)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

The Oppo A94 5G achieves a very high accuracy of up to one meter outdoors when using the GPS Test app to determine our location. GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, and Galileo are available for this.

The Android smartphone is also more accurate than our reference device, the Garmin Edge 500, on our routine bike ride.

GNSS Oppo A94 5G - Overview
GNSS Oppo A94 5G - Overview
GNSS Oppo A94 5G - Lake
GNSS Oppo A94 5G - Lake
GNSS Oppo A94 5G - Turning point
GNSS Oppo A94 5G - Turning point

Telephone and call quality - Good connectivity with the Oppo smartphone

The phone app on the A94 5G provides a direct view of saved favorites and allows a numeric keypad to be displayed. In addition, two further tabs show a list of recent calls and the user's contacts. The earpiece offers a high volume during calls, and ambient noise is filtered out well. The microphone also transmits speech clearly, so that users on both ends can be understood well.

Cameras - No optical zoom

Front-facing camera sample
Front-facing camera sample

Oppo equips the A94 5G with four camera sensors on the back. The 48 MP main sensor together with the 2 MP depth sensor produces detailed close-ups with natural-looking colors. In addition, the camera handles different brightness levels well in panoramic scenes. Under low-light conditions, objects in the picture are still easy to recognize, but colors look too dark, and moderate graininess is visible.

The A94 5G doesn't have an optical zoom, and zooming in on subjects through software results in a muddy texture. However, the image outcome is better when zooming in at close ranges than with the 2 MP macro sensor that is also available. Wide-angle pictures are taken with an 8 MP sensor, which produces vivid colors but washed out details. A Pro mode allows manual adjustment of image parameters.

The front-facing camera takes 16 MP pictures and shows many details. Brightness differences in the picture are also balanced well here. Besides an enhancement mode, various color filters can be applied to the picture, but a professional mode is not available here.

Videos are recorded with a similar quality as our test photos. An electronic image stabilizer compensates for camera shake, and the image can be adjusted using color filters and enhancement modes. An expert mode isn't available here either, but the resolution can be set between 720p, 1080p, and 4K at 30 fps in each case.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-upPanorama photoUltra wide-angleZoom (5x)Low-light

Our test picture with the ColorChecker Passport shows that the Oppo A94 5G's camera captures colors too brightly. Although the test chart is captured in rich detail, a contrast weakness is visible in the lower corners.

ColorChecker
14.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A94 5G: 8.53 ∆E min: 3.01 - max: 20.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.8 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
50.9 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A94 5G: 36.74 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 53.11 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Protective case included in the box

The Oppo A94 5G comes with a USB power adapter and a compatible USB-C cable, a SIM needle, a wired stereo headset, and a protective silicone case.

Furthermore, the manufacturer offers a 24-month warranty for the 5G smartphone.

Input devices and handling - Reliable fingerprint scanner

The versatile keyboard app GBoard is available for text input. It automatically switches to an undocked mode in landscape orientation, but this can be changed in the settings menu. The touchscreen responds very quickly to touches, and drag-and-drop gestures can also be executed smoothly.

The optical in-screen fingerprint sensor responds well to stored fingerprints, and face recognition also worked reliably in our test.

Oppo A94 5G - Input
Oppo A94 5G - Input
Oppo A94 5G - Input
Oppo A94 5G - Input

Display - AMOLED with optional DC dimming

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The screen of the A94 5G consists of a 6.43-inch AMOLED panel and offers a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels. The maximum brightness is 586 cd/m² on average and reaches up to 764 cd/m² in the APL50 test. When the brightness sensor is disabled, only up to 421 cd/m² is possible. Furthermore, the lowest adjustable brightness level is 1.9 cd/m². With these rates, the Oppo smartphone places itself in the middle of our test field.

PWM is used for brightness control below 42%. Here, the frequencies between 0% and 9% go from 59.67 Hz to 215.5 Hz, and between 9% and 42% from 235.8 Hz to 250 Hz. Beyond that, DC dimming is used, and we only detect the refresh rate of 60 Hz. A "flicker-free display mode" can be enabled in the settings menu, which also uses DC dimming for regulation at low brightness levels.

PWM at 42%
PWM at 42%
DC dimming
DC dimming
PWM at 9%
PWM at 9%
580
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
593
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
588
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 600 cd/m² Average: 586.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 577 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Oppo A94 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
realme 7 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Nokia X20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
-25%
-1%
-59%
-27%
Brightness middle
577
490
-15%
863
50%
646
12%
572
-1%
Brightness
586
455
-22%
860
47%
617
5%
540
-8%
Brightness Distribution
96
84
-12%
93
-3%
89
-7%
90
-6%
Black Level *
0.69
0.7
0.42
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
4.01
-49%
3.2
-19%
5.71
-111%
4.1
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7
8.1
-16%
5.2
26%
8.9
-27%
11.2
-60%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
2.6
-37%
3.9
-105%
6.2
-226%
2.5
-32%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
2.122 104%
2.24 98%
CCT
6617 98%
6828 95%
7299 89%
8256 79%
6525 100%
Contrast
710
923
1362

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 42 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 42 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9716 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

As is typical for OLEDs, the contrast ratio and black level are excellent. The CalMAN analysis also shows that colors are reproduced in a particularly balanced way when the white balance is set to "warmer".

CalMAN - Color accuracy ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Color accuracy ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Color space ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Color space ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Grayscales ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Grayscales ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Saturation ("Warmer", P3)
CalMAN - Saturation ("Warmer", P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.2 ms).

The display brightness of the Oppo A94 5G is high enough to display screen content legibly even in direct sunlight.

Oppo A94 5G in outdoor use
Oppo A94 5G in outdoor use
Oppo A94 5G in outdoor use
Oppo A94 5G in outdoor use

The AMOLED panel of the A94 5G is very viewing-angle stable. This allows viewing content even from flat angles without it becoming distorted or displayed with incorrect colors. The system always runs smoothly in everyday use and doesn't exhibit any micro stutters or the like.

Oppo A94 5G - Viewing-angle stability
Oppo A94 5G - Viewing-angle stability
Oppo A94 5G - Viewing-angle stability
Oppo A94 5G - Viewing-angle stability

Performance - On par with the competition

The MediaTek Dimensity 800U built into the Oppo A94 5G achieves results in the benchmarks that are on par with our test field. The SoC even scores slightly above average in graphics-heavy tests, but it's consistently outperformed by the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
596 Points ∼74%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
598 Points ∼74% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
510 Points ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
600 Points ∼74% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (596 - 600, n=3)
598 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=217, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼69% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1776 Points ∼59%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1778 Points ∼59% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼100% +69%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1663 Points ∼55% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1781 Points ∼59% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1776 - 1781, n=3)
1778 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=217, last 2 years)
1923 Points ∼64% +8%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2086 Points ∼74%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1575 Points ∼56% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
995 Points ∼35% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1459 Points ∼52% -30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1459 - 2086, n=3)
1707 Points ∼61% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=109, last 2 years)
2032 Points ∼72% -3%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2078 Points ∼74%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
2089 Points ∼74% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼100% +35%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1082 Points ∼39% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1935 Points ∼69% -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1935 - 2089, n=3)
2034 Points ∼72% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=113, last 2 years)
2125 Points ∼76% +2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7087 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points ∼100% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
7087 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 16564, n=27, last 2 years)
9764 Points ∼87% +38%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4204 Points ∼60%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4299 Points ∼62% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points ∼100% +66%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3461 Points ∼50% -18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4204 - 4299, n=2)
4252 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼48% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4818 Points ∼56%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4609 Points ∼54% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points ∼100% +78%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3647 Points ∼42% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4609 - 4818, n=2)
4714 Points ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3904 Points ∼45% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2908 Points ∼69%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3479 Points ∼82% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points ∼100% +46%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2938 Points ∼69% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2908 - 3479, n=2)
3194 Points ∼75% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2719 Points ∼64% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4467 Points ∼80%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4206 Points ∼75% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼100% +25%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3639 Points ∼65% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4206 - 4467, n=2)
4337 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=270, last 2 years)
3809 Points ∼68% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5012 Points ∼60%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4457 Points ∼53% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼100% +67%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3842 Points ∼46% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4457 - 5012, n=2)
4735 Points ∼57% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=270, last 2 years)
4799 Points ∼57% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3236 Points ∼92%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3512 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼73% -21%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3070 Points ∼87% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3236 - 3512, n=2)
3374 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=268, last 2 years)
2844 Points ∼81% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3142 Points ∼62%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3146 Points ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points ∼100% +62%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2419 Points ∼47% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3142 - 3146, n=2)
3144 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼51% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3226 Points ∼53%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3063 Points ∼50% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2289 Points ∼38% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3063 - 3226, n=2)
3145 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼46% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2881 Points ∼83%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3473 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points ∼91% +9%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3017 Points ∼87% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2881 - 3473, n=2)
3177 Points ∼91% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼80% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3291 Points ∼73%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3262 Points ∼73% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2536 Points ∼57% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3262 - 3291, n=2)
3277 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼69% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3300 Points ∼54%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3201 Points ∼52% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼100% +86%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2440 Points ∼40% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3201 - 3300, n=2)
3251 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼56% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3259 Points ∼93%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3497 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼67% -28%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2941 Points ∼84% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3259 - 3497, n=2)
3378 Points ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼83% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2955 Points ∼63%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3027 Points ∼64% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points ∼100% +59%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2267 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2955 - 3027, n=2)
2991 Points ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=210, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼56% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3096 Points ∼54%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3029 Points ∼52% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points ∼100% +87%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2186 Points ∼38% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3029 - 3096, n=2)
3063 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=210, last 2 years)
2969 Points ∼51% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼84%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3022 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points ∼92% +10%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2606 Points ∼86% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2550 - 3022, n=2)
2786 Points ∼92% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=210, last 2 years)
2645 Points ∼88% +4%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1602 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼100% +100%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
980 Points ∼31% -39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
1602 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=76, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼87% +74%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1579 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼100% +103%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
974 Points ∼30% -38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
1579 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=73, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼95% +93%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
470 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points ∼89% +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
470 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=24, last 2 years)
969 Points ∼100% +106%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
458 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points ∼77% +72%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
458 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=22, last 2 years)
1016 Points ∼100% +122%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
59 fps ∼66%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
59 fps ∼66% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +53%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
59 fps ∼66% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
58 fps ∼64% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
55.8 fps ∼62% -5%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
82 fps ∼54%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
83 fps ∼54% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼100% +87%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
81 fps ∼53% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
79 fps ∼52% -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (79 - 83, n=3)
81.3 fps ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼67% +26%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
44 fps ∼56%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
48 fps ∼61% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +80%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼33% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
47 fps ∼59% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (44 - 48, n=3)
46.3 fps ∼59% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
44 fps ∼56% 0%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
51 fps ∼57%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
51 fps ∼57% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +76%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
41 fps ∼46% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
44 fps ∼49% -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (44 - 51, n=3)
48.7 fps ∼54% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
60.6 fps ∼67% +19%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
31 fps ∼54%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
31 fps ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +84%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼46% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼54% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (31 - 31, n=3)
31 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=211, last 2 years)
34.5 fps ∼61% +11%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
34 fps ∼52%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
35 fps ∼54% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼100% +91%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
29 fps ∼45% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
33 fps ∼51% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (33 - 35, n=3)
34 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=211, last 2 years)
41.5 fps ∼64% +22%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼49%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼51% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼100% +106%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
14 fps ∼40% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼46% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (16 - 18, n=3)
17 fps ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=210, last 2 years)
21.7 fps ∼62% +28%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
20 fps ∼50%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼40% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼43% -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (17 - 20, n=3)
19 fps ∼48% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=210, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼62% +24%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
19 fps ∼45%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼48% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +121%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼38% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼45% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (19 - 20, n=3)
19.3 fps ∼46% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=271, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼51% +13%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
21 fps ∼42%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
22 fps ∼44% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼100% +138%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
18 fps ∼36% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼42% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (21 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=271, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼50% +18%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
12 fps ∼46%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼46% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9.9 fps ∼38% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12 fps ∼46% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (12 - 12, n=3)
12 fps ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=272, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼55% +19%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
8.1 fps ∼45%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
8 fps ∼44% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼100% +122%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6.5 fps ∼36% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
7.3 fps ∼41% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (7.3 - 8.1, n=3)
7.8 fps ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=271, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼55% +21%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
366649 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points ∼100% +42%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
325785 Points ∼62% -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
366649 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=27, last 2 years)
473150 Points ∼91% +29%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3442 Points ∼68%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3350 Points ∼66% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼100% +47%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3260 Points ∼64% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3379 Points ∼67% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3350 - 3442, n=3)
3390 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=199, last 2 years)
3536 Points ∼70% +3%
System (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6975 Points ∼73%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
6052 Points ∼63% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6308 Points ∼66% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6380 Points ∼67% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (6052 - 6975, n=3)
6469 Points ∼68% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=199, last 2 years)
6486 Points ∼68% -7%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4528 Points ∼73%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4877 Points ∼79% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3484 Points ∼56% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4838 Points ∼78% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4528 - 4877, n=3)
4748 Points ∼77% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=199, last 2 years)
4129 Points ∼67% -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3400 Points ∼47%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3161 Points ∼44% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼100% +112%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3780 Points ∼52% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3205 Points ∼45% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3161 - 3400, n=3)
3255 Points ∼45% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=199, last 2 years)
5466 Points ∼76% +61%
Web (sort by value)
Oppo A94 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1307 Points ∼84%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1349 Points ∼86% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼100% +20%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1360 Points ∼87% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1318 Points ∼84% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1307 - 1349, n=3)
1325 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=199, last 2 years)
1252 Points ∼80% -4%

The A94 5G also shows good results in the browser benchmarks, but it also has to place itself behind the Nokia X20 alongside the Mi 11 Lite 5G. In everyday use, websites scroll smoothly, and media content is made available quickly.

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.67 Points ∼100% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=191, last 2 years)
88.1 Points ∼65% +6%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
84.271 Points ∼62% +1%
Oppo A94 5G (Chrome 90)
83.457 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
78.952 Points ∼58% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (51.4 - 83.5, n=3)
71.3 Points ∼53% -15%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
51.389 Points ∼38% -38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼100% +83%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=201, last 2 years)
77.1 Points ∼73% +33%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
70 Points ∼66% +21%
Oppo A94 5G (Chrome 90)
58 Points ∼55%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (45 - 58, n=3)
50 Points ∼47% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
47 Points ∼44% -19%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
45 Points ∼42% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼100% +49%
Oppo A94 5G (Chrome 90)
18123 Points ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17018 Points ∼63% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
16629 Points ∼62% -8%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
15958 Points ∼59% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (9999 - 18123, n=3)
14917 Points ∼55% -18%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
9999 Points ∼37% -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
4695.3 ms * ∼100% -56%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
4185 ms * ∼89% -39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3013 - 4695, n=3)
3669 ms * ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
3298.1 ms * ∼70% -9%
Oppo A94 5G (Chrome 90)
3012.8 ms * ∼64%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
2748.8 ms * ∼59% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802.32 ms * ∼38% +40%

* ... smaller is better

According to the spec sheet, Oppo has installed a 128 GB UFS 2.0 storage drive in the A94 5G. The read and write speeds achieved in the storage benchmark lie in the middle of our test field and point to the use of UFS 2.1 storage.

Oppo A94 5Grealme 7 5GXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GNokia X20Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-37%
28%
-14%
8%
-40%
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB
940.76
877.1
-7%
949.43
1%
489.3
-48%
912.54
-3%
511 (409 - 941, n=29)
-46%
729 (41.9 - 2037, n=277, last 2 years)
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB
465.85
188.4
-60%
710.31
52%
462.7
-1%
483.45
4%
209 (143 - 466, n=29)
-55%
316 (11.9 - 1321, n=277, last 2 years)
-32%
Random Read 4KB
163.18
92.6
-43%
207.95
27%
165.4
1%
171.12
5%
127 (88.4 - 173, n=29)
-22%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=277, last 2 years)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
156.06
95.1
-39%
206.89
33%
144.6
-7%
197.02
26%
96 (13.5 - 187, n=29)
-38%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=277, last 2 years)
-27%

Games - Uninterrupted gaming with Game Space

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 graphics unit in the Oppo A94 5G can run modern games smoothly. However, somewhat more demanding titles, such as the tested Asphalt 9: Legends, can lead to occasional stutters that make it necessary to reduce the graphics levels.

Oppo's app "Game Space" allows you to optimize the system with profiles tailored to games. For example, a performance mode is available, or push notifications are temporarily disabled.

Armajet
Armajet
Asphalt 9: Legends
Asphalt 9: Legends

Emissions - Only one speaker

Temperature

The Oppo A94 5G's surfaces heat up to a maximum of 34 °C (~93 °F) under load. According to the results of the Wild Life endurance stress tests, performance remains very stable here. Therefore, you don't have to expect restrictions due to excessively high temperatures.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 (3150min - 3144max) % ∼100% 0%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (973min - 977max) % ∼100% 0%
Oppo A94 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.6 (1602min - 1609max) % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo A94 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.4 (471min - 474max) % ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82.1 (683min - 832max) % ∼83% -17%
Max. Load
 33.9 °C
93 F
33.5 °C
92 F
31.6 °C
89 F
 
 34 °C
93 F
33.7 °C
93 F
31.3 °C
88 F
 
 33.7 °C
93 F
33.2 °C
92 F
31.1 °C
88 F
 
Maximum: 34 °C = 93 F
Average: 32.9 °C = 91 F
31.6 °C
89 F
32.7 °C
91 F
32.9 °C
91 F
31 °C
88 F
31.6 °C
89 F
33.1 °C
92 F
29.6 °C
85 F
31.2 °C
88 F
32.8 °C
91 F
Maximum: 33.1 °C = 92 F
Average: 31.8 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  24.9 °C = 77 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Heat map - Top
Heat map - Top
Heat map - Bottom
Heat map - Bottom

Speaker

The speaker in the A94 5G offers a relatively high volume and a sound spectrum with pronounced upper mids. This makes it possible to reproduce voice content well, for example, but headphones or external speakers should be preferred for music and media content. However, the audio jack (SNR: 58.06 dBFS) only leaves a mediocre impression.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.337.92523.339.93120.345.94019365029.8446317.2448012.943.410019.445.412512.145.31601149.72009.550.425012.655.731513.659.940010.566.95001170.76309.771.280011.173.8100011.576.8125012.779.6160013.482.9200012.783.4250013.685315014.181.240001380.5500013.280.2630013.973.5800013.474.31000013.774.31250014.472.51600016.758.2SPL25.192.3N0.688.5median 13median 73.5Delta0.910.833.136.22826.324.123.525.325.53626.12425.520.627.414.530.410.333.613.646.311.748.411.456.412.46110.16311.766.711.569.710.172.810.376.410.978.112.476.810.777.311.98012.780.113.180.213.179.513.672.814.365.913.665.614.163.314.654.724.589.20.575.1median 12.4median 66.71.311.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo A94 5GXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo A94 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery life - More endurance than the competition

Energy consumption

The Oppo A94 5G shows the lowest maximum power consumption under load in our test field. The remaining power-consumption values are also low and make the Android smartphone a very economical device.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.77 / 1.75 / 1.78 Watt
Load midlight 3.85 / 4.96 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo A94 5G
4310 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-20%
-9%
-5%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.83
-8%
0.68
12%
0.725 (0.68 - 0.77, n=2)
6%
0.931 (0.37 - 2.5, n=229, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Average *
1.75
1.92
-10%
2.16
-23%
1.955 (1.75 - 2.16, n=2)
-12%
1.846 (0.82 - 3.94, n=229, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
1.97
-11%
2.2
-24%
1.99 (1.78 - 2.2, n=2)
-12%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=229, last 2 years)
-19%
Load Average *
3.85
3.84
-0%
3.63
6%
3.74 (3.63 - 3.85, n=2)
3%
4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=229, last 2 years)
-15%
Load Maximum *
4.96
8.6
-73%
5.78
-17%
5.37 (4.96 - 5.78, n=2)
-8%
7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=229, last 2 years)
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

In our real-world Wi-Fi test, the A94 5G achieves a runtime of just over 17 hours. Consequently, it makes good use of its 4,310 mAh battery and performs better than comparable devices with a larger battery capacity.

The Oppo smartphone is fully recharged after about an hour with the included 30-watt power adapter.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 90)
17h 06min
Oppo A94 5G
4310 mAh
realme 7 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Nokia X20
4470 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1026
1026
0%
734
-28%
879
-14%
1133
10%

Pros

+ slim design
+ good battery life
+ microSD and dual SIM can be used simultaneously

Cons

- redundant macro sensor

Verdict - The Oppo A94 5G provides good battery life

In review: Oppo A94 5G. Test device provided by: Oppo Germany
In review: Oppo A94 5G. Test device provided by: Oppo Germany

The Oppo A94 5G places itself exactly where it wants to be. It has a mid-range performance and is on par with other 5G smartphones priced around 400 Euros (~$487). The build quality is high, the camera quality is good, and the system runs smoothly. Furthermore, it's possible to use dual SIM with a microSD card at the same time.

With the A94 5G, Oppo introduces a device with good battery life to the range of 5G-capable mid-range smartphones.

Many competing devices offer similar performance, are also equipped with an AMOLED display, and have an appealing design. However, what still provides an advantage in the Oppo smartphone's slim build is the good endurance of the 4,000 mAh battery. The biggest rival in terms of features, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, can't keep up in this regard at least. Smartphones like the realme 7 5G and the Redmi Note 9T 5G also offer a similar configuration.

Price and availability

If you're in the United States, it's currently hard to find the Oppo A94 5G smartphone, since you'll only find listings for the less powerful A94 model. You can keep tabs on online stores such as Amazon or newegg and wait for the device to pop up there. You can tell the difference between the regular A94 model and the official 5G model in their CPUs: The A94 comes with a MediaTek Helio P95, while the A94 5G is equipped with a MediaTek Dimensity 800U.

Oppo A94 5G - 06/04/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
88%
Games Performance
35 / 64 → 54%
Application Performance
69 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
61%
Average
76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Mike Wobker
Editor of the original article: Mike Wobker - Senior Tech Writer - 387 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
I carried out my first IT experiments with a 386-based system and a whole 4 MB RAM. This was followed by work on various PCs and laptops that I maintained and repaired for friends and acquaintances. After training to become a Telecommunications Systems Technician and gaining a few years of experience, I graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Currently, I pursue my fascination for IT, technology, and mobile devices by writing reviews and articles for Notebookcheck. I have also worked for Gamestar, Netzwelt, and Golem, among others.
contact me via: @mornoc_mw, Xing
Stephanie Chamberlain
Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 333 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
I've been fascinated with technology ever since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I'm currently also interested in specializing in Java programming.
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oppo A94 5G smartphone in review: 5G Android phone for under 400 Euros
Mike Wobker, 2021-06- 9 (Update: 2021-06- 9)