Notebookcheck

Qualcomm Adreno 512

The Qualcomm Adreno 512 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

 

ManufacturerQualcomm
Adreno 500 Series
Adreno 540 (compare) @ 710 MHz
Adreno 530 (compare) @ 624 MHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510 (compare)
Adreno 509 (compare)
Adreno 508 (compare) @ 650 MHz
Adreno 506 (compare) @ 650 MHz
Adreno 505 (compare) @ 450 MHz
Adreno 504 (compare) @ 450 MHz
ArchitectureAdreno 500
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12.1
technology14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6608 x 2200 MHz? MHz850 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 25561     avg: 28566     median: 29090 (5%)     max: 29496 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 1887     avg: 2055.3     median: 2117 (16%)     max: 2151 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 1734     avg: 1933.7     median: 1991 (7%)     max: 2033 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 1270     avg: 1403.3     median: 1434 (23%)     max: 1442 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 1134     avg: 1235.2     median: 1263 (15%)     max: 1268 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 20     avg: 22.3     median: 23 (4%)     max: 23 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 19     avg: 21.3     median: 21 (6%)     max: 23 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - High Tier Onscreen
min: 3     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (3%)     max: 6 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
min: 3     avg: 3.5     median: 3 (3%)     max: 4 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 7     avg: 8.2     median: 8 (4%)     max: 9 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
8.6 fps (3%)
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 8     avg: 8.9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 7     avg: 8.6     median: 8 (5%)     max: 9 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6741     avg: 6820.5     median: 6820 (37%)     max: 6900 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2286     avg: 2288     median: 2288 (41%)     max: 2290 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 fps  fps    + Compare
med.
24 fps 30 fps ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high
30 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
30 60 fps ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
60 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra
30 fps 60 fps 60 fps ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
60 fps  fps    + Compare
high
60 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30 30 fps ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
28 fps 29 30 fps ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
28 fps 28 fps ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high
28 fps 28 fps 28 fps 30 fps ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list: