Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920

Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Xclipse 900 Series

Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (1%)     max: 31 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (1%)     max: 77 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (1%)     max: 72 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
58.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 103 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile4439.532
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.29
log 17. 20:46:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Mar 2025 06:04:34 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.016s ... 0.057s

#8 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.014s ... 0.071s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.165s ... 0.236s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.032s ... 0.268s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.035s ... 0.303s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.032s ... 0.335s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.316s ... 0.652s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.652s

#16 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.659s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.659s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.661s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.038s ... 0.699s

#20 return log +0.003s ... 0.702s

Notebook reviews with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics card

(photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE review - The smartphone as a fan service

After a year hiatus, Samsung revives its Fan Edition with the Galaxy S23 FE. Find out in our test how much of a fan service you will really get or whether it si...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.40" | 209 g
Samsung Galaxy S22+ smartphone review: The big version of the Galaxy S22

Samsung Galaxy S22+ smartphone review: The big version of the Galaxy S22

The plus (+) in the product name suggests additional features, and the Samsung Galaxy S22+ delivers as ordered. It offers all the features that distinguish the ...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.60" | 196 g
Samsung Galaxy S22 review - One of the best compact Android smartphones

Samsung Galaxy S22 review - One of the best compact Android smartphones

The 6.1-inch Samsung Galaxy S22 is the smallest and most affordable model in the new Galaxy S22 series. Despite the smaller size, it offers the same high-end So...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.10" | 167 g
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G review - The fusion of two smartphone models

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G review - The fusion of two smartphone models

With the Galaxy S22 Ultra, Samsung combines the top models of the S and the Note series. The smartphone uses high-end components in all areas and splurges in su...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.80" | 228 g

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S24 FE price leak teases near-flagship US pricing

   » Samsung Galaxy S24 FE details revealed in new leak

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.10", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung CEO: Galaxy S22 series could also get Galaxy AI features

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung CEO: Galaxy S22 series could also get Galaxy AI features

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung CEO: Galaxy S22 series could also get Galaxy AI features

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S23 FE – The falling price makes it attractive

   » Deal | Samsung S23 FE 128 GB drops to US$399 just for Black Friday

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S22, Galaxy S22 Plus and Galaxy S22 Ultra start receiving Android 14 with One UI 6 updates

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S22+: High-end smartphone and the golden mean in the new Galaxy S line-up

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.10", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S22: Compact all-rounder and iPhone competitor

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S22 Ultra: Samsung's top smartphone still needs to work out some kinks

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-03-27)