Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G77 MP11

ARM Mali-G77 MP11

The ARM Mali-G77MP11 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Samsung Exynos 990 (e.g. Galaxy S20 series). It integrates 11 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines11 - unified
Shared Memoryno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Man. Technology7 nm
Date of Announcement19.03.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G77 MP11GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 9908 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4162     avg: 4222     median: 4221.5 (2%)     max: 4281 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1391 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 48476     avg: 74951     median: 82052.5 (8%)     max: 87223 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7385     avg: 7798     median: 7576 (33%)     max: 8485 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9470     avg: 10329     median: 9536 (21%)     max: 11868 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6638     avg: 7083     median: 7076 (30%)     max: 7459 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 870     avg: 7112     median: 8239 (21%)     max: 9190 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 5646     avg: 6920     median: 7152 (64%)     max: 8097 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 6388     avg: 9004     median: 9480 (57%)     max: 11488 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 6544     avg: 6733     median: 6732 (33%)     max: 6896 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 8005     avg: 8260     median: 8257 (28%)     max: 8469 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 21.8     median: 22 (4%)     max: 23 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 53.4     median: 56 (4%)     max: 58 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 47.6     median: 50 (5%)     max: 51 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 65     avg: 77.4     median: 80 (2%)     max: 85 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 96     avg: 108.8     median: 108 (5%)     max: 126 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 145     avg: 186.8     median: 199 (2%)     max: 200 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
222645 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
71.6 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40 40 60 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
87  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59 59 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile474040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor6060
Dead Trigger 287
Asphalt 9: Legends6059
Real Racing 360
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3

1


2
5


2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 14. 23:01:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 14 Feb 2026 19:53:39 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10328 +0.014s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 10328 +0.016s ... 0.052s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.375s ... 0.428s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.428s

#12 Got 34 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.432s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.432s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.436s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.056s ... 0.492s

#16 return log +0.565s ... 1.057s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G77 MP11 graphics card

Comparison test: Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra vs Galaxy Note20 Ultra vs Galaxy S20 FE 5G

Camera comparison: Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Samsung's Allstars

Xiaomi's Mi 11 relies on a camera sensor from Samsung. In this camera comparison with Samsung's Galaxy S21 Ultra, Galaxy Note20 Ultra and Galaxy S20 FE 5G, we will find out whether the Chinese are even better at this than the manufacturer itself.
Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 6.9", 208 g
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Review - Not always better than the Note10

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Review - Not always better than the Note10

The Samsung Galaxy Note20 is more than $300 less than the Ultra model. Looking at the specs sheet we can spot a few cut corners, but it is not immediately clear whether or not the more expensive Note20 is really worth its premium or, more importantly, whether the Note20 worth switching to from the Note10.
Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 6.7", 192 g
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra review - Smartphone with powerful features and S Pen included

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra review - Smartphone with powerful features and S Pen included

The Note20 Ultra raises the bar, especially with the display, but it also repeats old mistakes found in the Galaxy S20 Ultra. With a larger battery, a new design, an improved camera, and the S Pen, the most powerful Note model wants to win buyers' hearts over. Our review reveals whether there are any obstacles to this.
Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 6.9", 208 g
Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Huawei P40 Pro vs OnePlus 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro

Camera Test: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Huawei P40 Pro vs OnePlus 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro – low-light fiasco for Samsung

4 categories, 3 winners. The crème de la crème of Android smartphone photography in comparison: Samsung's and Xiaomi's pixel behemoths Galaxy S20 Ultra and Mi 10 Pro, a P40 Pro, and the new OnePlus 8 Pro pitted against each other to find out which one offers the best camera.
Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 6.9", 219 g
Samsung Galaxy S20+

Samsung Galaxy S20+ Smartphone Review: A handset with 8K video capabilities

The Plus model of the Samsung Galaxy S20 series offers a bit more of everything than the Galaxy S20 does. There is a bit more screen here, more battery there, and an additional rear-facing camera too. With a launch price from 1,000 Euros (~$1,094) upwards, you should expect a lot from the Galaxy S20+ too. Accordingly, we shall examine the Galaxy S20+ in detail to see what it has to offer.
Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 6.7", 188 g

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - High-End Smartphone Reeks of Poor Implementation

Samsung Galaxy S20: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy S20 Smartphone Review – High-Quality Smartphone with Quirks

Huawei Nova 8 Pro 5G: unknown, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 8 Pro 5G

Huawei Nova 8 5G: unknown, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 8 5G

Honor V6: unknown, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor V6

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Note20: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note20

Huawei Nova 7: unknown, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 7

Huawei Nova 7 Pro: unknown, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 7 Pro

Honor 30: unknown, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 30

Samsung Galaxy S20+: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S20+

Samsung Galaxy S20: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S20

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

   » Galaxy S20 Ultra: Samsung exceeds its own update policy and still provides monthly Android patches

Samsung Galaxy Note20: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Note20: The Display makes a Difference

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.90", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy Note20 Ultra: Does the new lens make it the zoom master?

Samsung Galaxy S20+: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S20+: The fourth camera does not make a difference, nor does its fake zoom

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.90", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: The 120 Hz Dilemma

Samsung Galaxy S20: Samsung Exynos 990, 6.20", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S20: The Exynos Predicament

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-03-23)