Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines4 - unified
Shared Memoryno
technology7 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G57 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Unisoc T9100 (T820)8 x 2100 MHz? MHz850 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7708 x 2000 MHz? MHz780 MHz
Unisoc T8100 (T760)8 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
min. - max.? MHz650 - 850 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
37882 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4259     avg: 4459     median: 4459 (19%)     max: 4659 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4497     avg: 4609     median: 4609 (10%)     max: 4721 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3216     avg: 3394     median: 3410 (14%)     max: 3557 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3016     avg: 3246     median: 3353 (8%)     max: 3368 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4497     avg: 4544     median: 4544 (40%)     max: 4591 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4722     avg: 4764     median: 4764 (29%)     max: 4806 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3288     avg: 3334     median: 3334 (16%)     max: 3380 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3145     avg: 3193     median: 3193 (11%)     max: 3241 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1599     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (1%)     max: 1641 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
434 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.5     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.3 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 8.3     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.9 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 21     median: 22 (2%)     max: 26 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 20.7     median: 20 (2%)     max: 23 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 31     avg: 34.3     median: 34 (1%)     max: 38 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 52     median: 51.5 (2%)     max: 58 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 73     avg: 82.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 88 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 92378     avg: 101623     median: 105516 (11%)     max: 106975 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 84104     avg: 92827     median: 92826.5 (7%)     max: 101549 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
34.2 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
24573 Points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
22448 Points (37%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
61  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile3030
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2





2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 22. 05:11:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 May 2025 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.014s ... 0.048s

#8 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.016s ... 0.064s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.406s ... 0.47s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.47s

#12 Got 5 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.472s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.473s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.473s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.011s ... 0.485s

#16 return log +0.002s ... 0.487s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G57 MP4 graphics card

Motorola Moto G35 smartphone review – Yes, the processor is slow but it's still a fun device.

Motorola Moto G35 smartphone review – Yes, the processor is slow but it's still a fun device.

With the Moto G35, Motorola is bringing a smartphone to the market with a big screen, decent resolution and a modern case. It can be yours for quite a bit less ...
Unisoc T8100 (T760) | ARM Mali-G57 MP4 | 6.72" | 188 g
Blackview BL6000 Pro

Blackview BL6000 Pro Smartphone Review - Cell phone for outdoor fans with 5G

Do you want your smartphone to be robust, but you do not want to do without the fastest mobile standard? Then the Blackview BL6000 Pro is the right choice. It c...
MediaTek Dimensity 800 | ARM Mali-G57 MP4 | 6.36" | 273 g
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G smartphone Review - 5G phone with good main camera

Oppo launches a low-priced 5G phone with the Reno4 Z 5G. A 120 Hz display and a price of around 300 Euros (~$300) seem attractive, but we take a closer look in ...
MediaTek Dimensity 800 | ARM Mali-G57 MP4 | 6.57" | 184 g

Blackview Oscal Tiger 13: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview Oscal Tiger 13

Nubia Focus 5G: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia Focus 5G

ZTE Blade A75 5G: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade A75 5G

HMD Crest: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » HMD Crest

Motorola Moto G35: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G35

Nubia Focus Pro: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia Focus Pro

Nubia Neo 2 5G: Unisoc T9100 (T820), 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia Neo 2 5G

ZTE Blade V50 Design: Unisoc T8100 (T760), 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade V50 Design

Nubia Neo 5G: Unisoc T9100 (T820), 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia Neo 5G

Ulefone Armor 11T 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800, 6.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 11T 5G

Ulefone Armor 11: unknown, 6.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 11

Blackview BL6000 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 800, 6.36", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BL6000 Pro

Oukitel WP10 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800, 6.67", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP10 5G

Ulefone Armor 10 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800, 6.67", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 10 5G

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 800, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno4 Z 5G

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-12-29)