Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP4 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP4

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP4

The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP4

The ARM Mali-G68 MP4 (or G68MC4) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP4 version uses four of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Mediatek Dimensity 900. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

ARM Mali-G57 MP4ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureBifrostValhall
Pipelines4 - unified4 - unified
Shared Memorynono
technology7 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020 14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G57 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
UNISOC T8208 x 2100 MHz? MHz850 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7708 x 2000 MHz? MHz780 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7608 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
min. - max.? MHz650 - 850 MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 10808 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 850 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
37882 Points (4%)
48592 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4259     avg: 4459     median: 4459 (19%)     max: 4659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4497     avg: 4609     median: 4609 (10%)     max: 4721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3410     avg: 3484     median: 3483.5 (17%)     max: 3557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3353     avg: 3361     median: 3360.5 (10%)     max: 3368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1620     avg: 1631     median: 1630.5 (1%)     max: 1641 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
8.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
22 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
20 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 33.8     median: 34 (1%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 51.3     median: 51.5 (3%)     max: 55 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 73     avg: 82.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 88 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 92378     avg: 101623     median: 105516 (13%)     max: 106975 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
34.2 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2304     avg: 2340     median: 2322 (1%)     max: 2394 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2301     avg: 2326     median: 2301 (1%)     max: 2375 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
24573 Points (25%)
min: 13104     avg: 21339     median: 23126 (23%)     max: 26121 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
22448 Points (39%)
min: 4174     avg: 20568     median: 23564 (41%)     max: 27937 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 120% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G68 MP4:
30.5 37 ~ 34 fps
ultra
Mali-G68 MP4:
27 35 ~ 31 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
61  fps
125%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 59 60 60 60 79 108 112 115 118 ~ 76 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
163%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 40 59 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 49 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP4:
40 40 40 60 ~ 45 fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
123%
Mali-G68 MP4:
28 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G68 MP4:
71  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G68 MP4:
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 122%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 143%

ARM Mali-G68 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Genshin Impact3431
Armajet76
PUBG Mobile494537
Dead Trigger 271
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers80
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4


1


2
3

2







ARM Mali-G57 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile3030
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2





2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 15:33:40

#0 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10953 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.081s ... 0.082s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.082s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.082s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.027s ... 0.11s

#8 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.017s ... 0.126s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10953 +0.002s ... 0.128s

#10 got single benchmarks 10953 +0.066s ... 0.194s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.194s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.114s ... 0.308s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.308s

#14 Got 60 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.328s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.328s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.332s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.017s ... 0.349s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.349s

#19 return log +0.084s ... 0.433s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)