Nubia Focus Pro
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 6 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Nubia Focus Pro
Source: GSM Choice
The phone is beautiful. As long as you buy the version I got for testing. The second one is black and less beautiful. And for the third time: it's worth remembering that in order for the smartphone to remain beautiful, you need to stick a foil on its screen. In addition to a beautiful device, you will get the ability to take good photos, reasonable operating time, fast charging and good technical capabilities. The display could be brighter, microSD support would be nice, and the interface translation could use a few final touches, but Nubia Focus Pro 5G is an opportunity that probably doesn't come around very often. I'm writing this after about 3 weeks spent with this smartphone and in this context: I recommend it with all my might.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/31/2024
Source: Mezha EN
The category of affordable smartphones is extremely competitive, and it's hard for manufacturers to stand out with something really interesting. But nubia Focus Pro 5G has several features that may be of interest to potential owners. The smartphone has an original and unusual design that resembles retro-style cameras. The main camera takes very good pictures. An additional two-position switch and a touch-sensitive camera button may also come in handy. The nubia Focus Pro 5G also has a 120 Hz refresh rate and an acceptable level of performance for the price. But the smartphone has a number of drawbacks. It doesn't have a MicroSD slot and a 3.5 mm headphone jack, which most competitors in this price category have. It also lacks even basic moisture protection. In addition, the smartphone runs on Android 13 when the current version is 15, and the manufacturer does not say whether there will be an update.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2024
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Mag
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2024
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 82% display: 74% mobility: 62% workmanship: 80%
Source: Nextpit Germany
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2024
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computerhoy
ES→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/21/2024
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobileworld 24
PL→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2024
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: GSM Maniak
PL→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 77% display: 78% mobility: 80%
Source: Unite4buy
PL→ENPositive: Attractive design; great display; high performance; impressive battery life; quick 33W charging; excellent cameras; NFC module; 5G. Negative: Mediocre speakers; plastic case; no MicroSD card slot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2024
Source: Jagat Review
ID→ENPositive: Affordable price; great cameras; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2024
Comment
ARM Mali-G57 MP4: Integrated mid range graphics card with 4 clusters. Based on the Valhall architecture.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
T8100 (T760): Mid range SoC with four A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit) and the whole chip is produced on 6nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.72":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.71.83%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
