Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Maleoon 920

Qualcomm Maleoon 920

The HiSilicon Maleoon 920 is an iGPU that is integrated in the HiSilicon Kirin 9020 SoC. Unfortunately, Huawei has not provided any detailed information. In the Kirin 9020, the GPU is clocked at 840 MHz. Compared to the older Maleoon 910 the performance has been significantly increased.

What is certain is that it does not support hardware-based ray tracing and only the older Vulkan 1.0 standard.

Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology10 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement12.02.2018
CPU in Maleoon 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin T9212 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 902012 x 1600 MHz? MHz840 MHz
min. - max.? MHz840 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 427     avg: 492.2     median: 493.5 (1%)     max: 557 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 5079     avg: 6274     median: 6131.5 (3%)     max: 7428 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1427     avg: 1717     median: 1757 (2%)     max: 1863 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 11003     avg: 11035     median: 11034.5 (46%)     max: 11066 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 13499     avg: 13754     median: 13754 (34%)     max: 14009 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 14.3     median: 14.5 (5%)     max: 17 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 33.2     median: 35 (6%)     max: 39 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 91.8     median: 94.5 (7%)     max: 112 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 71     median: 68.5 (6%)     max: 83 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 142     avg: 149.5     median: 150.5 (3%)     max: 155 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 208     avg: 214     median: 213.5 (9%)     max: 221 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 371     avg: 387     median: 389.5 (3%)     max: 398 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 211844     avg: 244914     median: 242877 (17%)     max: 281269 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
141 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 3734     avg: 4451     median: 4842 (1%)     max: 4923 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 2018     avg: 3834     median: 3996 (1%)     max: 4766 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.92     avg: 9     median: 9 (3%)     max: 10.1 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59.3 59.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.7 39.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
59.9 59.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile59.95940
World of Tanks Blitz60
Dead Trigger 260
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 09. 11:30:05

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Feb 2026 05:30:33 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13019 +0.016s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 13019 +0.016s ... 0.05s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.335s ... 0.386s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.386s

#12 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.389s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.389s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.39s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.411s

#16 return log +0.554s ... 0.965s

Notebook reviews with HiSilicon Maleoon 920 graphics card

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra in review

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Smartphone Review: Camera monster with compromises

Movable extra-large camera sensors, a 9.4x optical zoom, and excellent photos at any time of day or night — the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra is made for photo enthusiasts and is nearly without competition for this target group. Huawei's €1,400 behemoth also has a number of flaws, however, making it only suitable as an everyday smartphone with restrictions.
HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 6.8", 233.5 g
Huawei Pura 80 Pro smartphone review

Android smartphone with the best camera hardware requires compromises - Huawei Pura 80 Pro review

Photo enthusiasts will get their money's worth with the Pura 80 Pro thanks to its large 1-inch sensor and adjustable aperture. Along with premium covers and a big OLED screen, the Android phone aims to make you forget the issues with Google services. Read our review to see if the high-end phone without 5G justifies its price.
HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 6.8", 219 g
Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) review - Creative tablet with matte display and Pencil Pro

Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) review - Creative tablet with matte display and Pencil Pro

The Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) features an innovative PaperMatte display that minimizes reflections and creates a paper-like writing surface. Under the hood, a new Kirin processor ensures balanced performance, while 12 GB of RAM enables smooth multitasking. It also supports the new M-Pencil Pro.
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12", 555 g
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) review: Matte tandem OLED with high brightness as a highlight

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) review: Matte tandem OLED with high brightness as a highlight

The Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 is a large tablet with a matte display that achieves high brightness, making it ideal for outdoor use. The tablet also includes a keyboard and stylus. We didn't miss much in the test.
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12.2", 508 g
The top-of-the-range tablet with a nanotextured glass display - Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte (2025) review

The top-of-the-range tablet with a nanotextured glass display - Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte (2025) review

Visually, the MatePad Pro 13.2 has hardly changed compared to its predecessor, but it now also uses a fully-fledged PaperMatte display, reducing reflections to a minimum. During our test, it was additionally revealed to have a faster processor, while struggling with the same old problems.
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 13.2", 580 g

Huawei Mate X6: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 7.93", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Mate X6 review - The spearhead of foldables with Google if desired and good cameras?

Huawei Mate 70 Air: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 7.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate 70 Air

Huawei MatePad 12 X 2025: HiSilicon Kirin T92, 12.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 12 X 2025

Huawei Pura 80 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Pura 80 Pro

Huawei Nova 14 Ultra: unknown, 6.81", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 14 Ultra

Huawei Nova 14 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 8020, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 14 Pro

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Huawei Pura X: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Pura X

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025: HiSilicon Kirin T92, 12.20", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025): HiSilicon Kirin T92, 13.20", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)

Huawei Mate X6: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 7.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate X6

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » The new best camera in a smartphone? Verdict on the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Huawei Pura 80 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Huawei Pura 80 Pro: A hefty price tag for one of the best cameras in a smartphone

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei Pura 80 Ultra dominates DxOMark camera rankings, far ahead of Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025: HiSilicon Kirin T92, 12.20", 0.5 kg
   » Verdict on the Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025): Solid tablet with minor flaws

   » Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2: Much cheaper than the iPad Air but not necessarily better

Huawei Pura 80 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Global Huawei Pura 80 Ultra now launching much earlier than expected

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Global Huawei Pura 80 Ultra now launching much earlier than expected

Huawei Pura 80 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Pura 80 Ultra with zoom camera innovation: Huawei teaser videos reminiscent of old classics such as the P30 Pro

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Pura 80 Ultra with zoom camera innovation: Huawei teaser videos reminiscent of old classics such as the P30 Pro

Huawei Pura 80 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei Pura 80 Pro+ showcased with massive camera in first official promo image

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei Pura 80 Pro+ showcased with massive camera in first official promo image

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025): HiSilicon Kirin T92, 13.20", 0.6 kg
   » Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) review verdict: Much cheaper and partly better than the iPad Pro

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei Pura 80 Ultra: First camera photos and comparisons with iPhone 16 Pro, Vivo X200 Ultra and Oppo Find X8 Ultra

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-28)