Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

The ARM Mali-G52 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2019 in the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 810) is comparable to the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 and G76MP4 in the Helio G90T.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrost
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines6 - unified
Shared Memoryno
Man. Technology12 nm
Date of Announcement06.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G52 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8108 x 1880 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 45182     avg: 46563     median: 46944 (5%)     max: 47563 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3314     avg: 3463     median: 3483 (15%)     max: 3591 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3274     avg: 3389     median: 3406 (7%)     max: 3488 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2515     avg: 2810     median: 2954 (12%)     max: 2961 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2328     avg: 2626     median: 2752 (7%)     max: 2798 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3252     avg: 3342     median: 3338 (30%)     max: 3437 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3243     avg: 3318     median: 3327 (20%)     max: 3384 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2502     avg: 2748     median: 2837 (14%)     max: 2904 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2347     avg: 2599     median: 2710 (9%)     max: 2740 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7.7     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 20 (2%)     max: 21 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (2%)     max: 53 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85     avg: 87     median: 87 (1%)     max: 89 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
21.1 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
8.6 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
11576 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3831 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile404030
World of Tanks Blitz60
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

1


2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 24. 04:36:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Mar 2026 13:16:09 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10362 +0.016s ... 0.047s

#8 got single benchmarks 10362 +0.011s ... 0.058s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.428s ... 0.486s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.486s

#12 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.489s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.489s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.49s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.523s

#16 return log +0.124s ... 0.647s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G52 MP6 graphics card

Huawei MatePad 10.4 Tablet Review: An all-rounder without Google

Huawei MatePad 10.4 Tablet Review: An all-rounder without Google

The Huawei MatePad 10.4 is affordable but still has quite something to offer. An octa-core SoC, up to 64 GB of storage, 4 speakers and optional extras such as LTE support and a digital input pen make the 10.4-inch tablet a real all-rounder for multimedia, games and surfing the web. Google services are the only thing that is missing to make this package complete.
HiSilicon Kirin 810, ARM Mali-G52 MP6, 10.4", 460 g
Honor 9X Pro

Honor 9X Pro Smartphone Review: With a popup cam against the notch

As a subsidiary of the Huawei corporation, Honor must also limit itself to an operating system without Google Services. While this initially works well with EMUI 9.1.1 based on Android 9, some limitations will show up in the details. Our review shows what you can expect.
HiSilicon Kirin 810, ARM Mali-G52 MP6, 6.59", 206 g
Camera comparison of the P40 series: Huawei P40 Lite vs. Huawei P40 vs. Huawei P40 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro vs. P40 vs. P40 Lite camera review: Huawei smartphones compared

In one area, the dominance is great! We let the current Huawei P40 series compete in a camera comparison. How big are the differences between the two top dogs, the Huawei P40 and P40 Pro? Can the cheapest Huawei P40 Lite surprise positively as it did last year? Our review of the Huawei P40 smartphones will reveal this.
HiSilicon Kirin 810, ARM Mali-G52 MP6, 6.4", 183 g
Huawei P40 Lite Smartphone Review: Good even without Google Services

Huawei P40 Lite Smartphone Review: Good even without Google Services

The Huawei P40 Lite is the most affordable smartphone in the new P40 lineup. With its 6.4-inch display, the octa-core Kirin 810 SoC, 128 GB of storage, and a 48-MP four-camera system, it competes in the fiercely contested mid-range segment. Only one thing is lacking: There is no Google Play and no other Google Services. Our test shows how well the P40 Lite fares despite this lack.
HiSilicon Kirin 810, ARM Mali-G52 MP6, 6.4", 183 g

Honor Play 4T Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor Play 4T Pro

Huawei MatePad 10.4: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 10.4

Huawei P40 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei P40 Lite

Huawei Nova 5i Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 5i Pro

Honor 9X Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 9X Pro

Huawei MatePad 10.4: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 10.40", 0.5 kg
   » Huawei MatePad 10.4: An overview of our review highlights

Honor 9X Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 6.59", 0.2 kg
   » Honor 9X Pro: No Google, no problem?

Huawei P40 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 810, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei P40 Lite: Provision of apps ensured despite the lack of Google Play Store

   » Oppo presents the Find X2 Lite with 5G and a 32 MP selfie camera

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 935 *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)