Huawei MatePad 10.4
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus, flash
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 29 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MatePad 10.4
The Huawei MatePad 10.4 is affordable but still has quite something to offer. An octa-core SoC, up to 64 GB of storage, 4 speakers and optional extras such as LTE support and a digital input pen make the 10.4-inch tablet a real all-rounder for multimedia, games and surfing the web. Google services are the only thing that is missing to make this package complete.
Source: Tech Nave
Archive.org versionEven if you compare it with other gaming laptops from ASUS ROG, Predator, or MSI in the price range, I'd still choose the Lenovo Legion 5 Pro because of features like the 16:10 aspect ratio. Also, the ports for most gaming laptops are either on the left or right side, so having them behind is a bonus for me. That said, if you prefer desktop PCs, you're better off in the long run with building your own PC using that amount of money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Source: Yugatech
Archive.org versionThis is our Huawei MatePad 10.4 Long-term Experience. As most of us are staying at home, having an Android tablet can be really helpful for work and fun for the whole family to use! This tablet is loaded with features, including a wide 10.4-inch display, Sound by Harman Kardon, LTE connectivity plus expandable storage, and of course, the Huawei M-Pen support.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2020
Source: Tech Nave
Archive.org versionOverall, the MatePad is a fairly worthwhile tablet to purchase. It's best used as an extra tool for multitasking work or if you like reading e-books online, as well as to watch or stream videos. For RM1399, the MatePad is easily an affordable tablet that anyone can set their eyes on. Another worthwhile mid-range tablet is the Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite, though that costs RM1699 with the same screen size of 10.4-inches and an additional 3.5mm audio jack. You can learn more about that table by reading our review here. The choice is yours.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2020
Source: Gadgetspeak
Archive.org versionA substantial Tablet in that the screen is over ten inches, it runs Android 10, however as you probably know Trump had a falling out with Huawei and because of that certain features cannot be included, probably the biggest miss is the Google Store for Apps.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Team Android
Archive.org versionConcluding, the MatePad 10.4 delivers some great performance for the price. Amazing battery as well as sound along with a good display make it a great tablet for media consumption, online classes heck even as a first device for young children. The only downside would be the missing Google Services.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/29/2020
Source: Hitech Century
Archive.org versionThe Huawei MatePad WiFi is an affordable tablet that offers excellent value on account of its large display, a good quad-speaker setup, long battery life and decent performance for enjoying content and web browsing though the lack of Google services is still a bit of a downer.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Yugatech
Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2020
Source: Yugatech
Archive.org versionWhen people ask me for tablet recommendations it’s usually difficult to make recommendations, especially if it’s an Android. Things are easier now that we have better tablet options like the MatePad. Priced at PHP 20,990, here’s a tablet that is portable, has a good display, great speakers, long battery life, M Pencil support, and good performance. Yes, it’s a bit pricey, but it’s one of the best mid-range Android tablets you can buy right now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/30/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tablet Blog
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: WinFuture
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2020
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life; decent speakers; smart stylus pen. Negative: Missing Google services; relatively high price; slow charging; no headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/13/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life; nice speakers; smart stylus pen. Negative: Missing Google services; relatively high price; slow charging; no headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/29/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; decent processor; large battery capacity; good speakers; smart stylus pen. Negative: Missing Google services; relatively high price; slow charging; no headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/14/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; decent processor; high autonomy; good speakers; smart stylus pen. Negative: Missing Google services; relatively high price; slow charging; no headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/21/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Powerful processor; high performance; large battery capacity; good price; great speakers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/21/2020
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; big screen; nice connectivity; decent processor; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2020
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komorkomania
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice display; decent hardware; smart M-Pencil.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2020
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Log.com.tr
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: DGL.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Powerful processor; support LTE; nice speakers; good price. Negative: Plastic case; no headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2020
Source: Genk
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; elegant design; metal case; solid workmanship.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2021
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive display; great speakers; decent hardware; good price.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/21/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; great speakers; nice performance.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: Genk
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Powerful processor; large battery capacity; smart stylus pen; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2020
Source: Jagat Review
ID→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; smart stylus pen; nice design; great built quality; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2020
Comment
ARM Mali-G52 MP6: Integrated mid range graphics card with 6 clusters. ARM states that the G52 series is 30% faster and 15% more efficient compared to the G51 series on the same process node.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 810: ARM based octa-core SoC containing two Cortex-A76 cores for performance tasks (up to 2.2 GHz) and six Cortex-A55 cores (up to 1.88 GHz) to save power. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an LTE radio (1400 MBps down) and a ARM Mali-G52MP6 GPU. The SoC is manufactured at TSMC in 7nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

