Notebookcheck Logo

Huawei MatePad T10s Review: Affordable tablet with large screen and Kids Corner

The perfect kids tablet? Despite the low price, the Huawei MatePad T10s wants to be the go-to tablet for everything. However, the entry-level tablet reveals some weaknesses in our review that are better solved by a Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 and other such competing tablets.
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

The MatePad T series is the entry point into Huawei's tablet world. The T10s model is based on a 10.1-inch IPS display with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels. Due to the low MSRP of 179 Euros (~$179), the Chinese multimedia tablet only has 2 GB of working memory and 32 GB of flash storage in the basic version. However, the latter can be expanded via a micro-SD memory card.

One of the highlights of this multimedia tablet is the integrated stereo speakers, which have been optimized by Harmon Kardon. Beyond that, the Chinese manufacturer advertises a high performance thanks to the in-house HiSilicon Kirin 710A. We will take a closer look at whether the MatePad T10s lives up to these promises in everyday use and how the rather small 5,100 mAh battery performs in this review.

Huawei MatePad T10S (MatePad Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LCD IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSDXC (up to 512GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration , OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.85 x 240.2 x 159 ( = 0.31 x 9.46 x 6.26 in)
Battery
5100 mAh
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2,2)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix (f/2,4)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, EMUI, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
450 g ( = 15.87 oz / 0.99 pounds), Power Supply: 51 g ( = 1.8 oz / 0.11 pounds)
Price
219 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.9 %
04/2022
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
80.5 %
03/2022
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200
81 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
84.1 %
11/2021
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
490 g7.5 mm11.00"2000x1200
74.3 %
09/2021
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
523 g8.4 mm10.10"1920x1080

Case: Huawei tablet with wide edges

Huawei MatePad T10s in Deepsea Blue
Huawei MatePad T10s in Deepsea Blue

The 450 g-Huawei tablet is only available in a bluish color option. Visually, the MatePad T10s makes a high-quality impression in view of the low price, and the build quality is also on a good level for an entry-level tablet. The aluminum back fits ergonomically in the hand and fingerprints are not immediately visible due to the light matte finish.

The front is completely made of scratch-resistant display glass, which blends smoothly into the metal frame. The bezels around the IPS display are quite wide, which is also reflected in the 77% screen-to-body ratio.

Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

Size comparison

258.4 mm / 10.2 inch 163 mm / 6.42 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 490 g1.08 lbs248 mm / 9.76 inch 157 mm / 6.18 inch 9.2 mm / 0.3622 inch 480 g1.058 lbs246.8 mm / 9.72 inch 161.9 mm / 6.37 inch 6.9 mm / 0.2717 inch 508 g1.12 lbs243 mm / 9.57 inch 162 mm / 6.38 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 523 g1.153 lbs240.2 mm / 9.46 inch 159 mm / 6.26 inch 7.85 mm / 0.3091 inch 450 g0.992 lbs

Equipment: MatePad T10s with 3.5 mm jack

The MatePad T10s is available in both Wi-Fi and LTE versions. The entry-level variant with 32 GB of storage and 2 GB of RAM starts at 179 Euros (~$179), the 128 GB version with 4 GB of RAM costs 249 Euros (~$259), and Huawei charges 259 Euros (3 GB / 64 GB) for the tablet with LTE.

Our test device offers 64 GB of internal eMMC 5.1 storage (RRP: 219 Euros). There is still approximately 51 GB available for the user after deducting the space occupied by the OS. Users who need to expand their storage capacity can do so via microSD cards up to 512 GB. 

The USB Type-C port on the tablet's bottom can also be used to read data from a USB stick such as videos, for example. However, a corresponding adapter is required, which is not included in the MatePad T10s. Of course, other peripherals, such as external keyboards, can also be connected via the port.

Left side of housing
Left side of housing
Right side of housing (keys, microphones)
Right side of housing (keys, microphones)
Upper housing side (loudspeaker)
Upper housing side (loudspeaker)
Bottom case (card slot, 3.5 mm jack, USB port, speaker)
Bottom case (card slot, 3.5 mm jack, USB port, speaker)

microSD card reader

The integrated microSD card slot supports the current SDHC and SDXC standards. The performance in the cross-platform disk test is convincing in combination with our reference Angelbird AV PRO V60 card. However, the MatePad T10s is quite slow with a copy speed of only 18 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s ∼100% +175%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.4 MB/s ∼41% +14%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s ∼37% +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s ∼36%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

Software: Huawei tablet without GMS

Huawei relies on Android 10 as the operating system for its entry-level tablet, which is supplemented by a highly customized EMUI 10 user interface. Although the Android base is outdated, Huawei still provides the MatePad T10s with up-to-date security patches that were based on January 2022 at the time of testing.

As already known, the Chinese company's products do not support Google services, so most Google apps and many third-party apps that rely on Google Play Services do not work. It is not possible to install the Google Play Store without resorting to workarounds, but Huawei's AppGallery in conjunction with Petal Search and alternative app sources now offers a solid selection of apps.

Despite the Google waiver, the MatePad T10s does support Widevine Level L1 DRM. Huawei also integrates useful features like App Multiplier into the Android interface. Two windows of the same app are displayed simultaneously in landscape mode and the size of the windows can be configured individually, which is quite practical.

With Kids Corner, Huawei also aims at the Fire HD 10 tablet market, particularly the Kids Pro Edition. The application offers age-appropriate content and includes an eye comfort mode with optimized display effects to prevent eyestrain in children.

Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

Communication and GNSS: MatePad T10s with GPS

Bluetooth 5.0 is available for wireless communication, but an NFC chip is not installed. The integrated Wi-Fi module supports the IEEE 802.11 standard a/b/g/n/ac, and thus operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency ranges

The transmission speed between the inexpensive Huawei tablet and our reference Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router is on a somewhat poor level. However, the average data transfer rates of over 200 Mbps should only be limiting for very few users due to bandwidth constraints of local internet contracts in general. That being said, the MatePad T10s is certainly not very future-proof.

A probable field of application for a large tablet is video telephony. We looked at the voice quality of the built-in microphone with the Skype app. The voice reproduction with the MatePad T10s is sufficiently loud and our conversation partners can be understood well. However, audio reproduction via built-in speakers is mixed with reverberation and sometimes difficult to understand.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (327min - 349max) MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AX12
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
352 (334min - 359max) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s ∼100% +46%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s ∼99% +45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s ∼100% +60%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s ∼99% +59%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s ∼62%
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø203 (158-227)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø239 (202-259)
Locating in the building
Locating in the building
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors

The MatePad T10s uses GPS, BeiDou and Glonass satellite networks for positioning. Outdoor positioning shows good accuracy, but the positioning itself takes quite a long time and is below average with an SNR value of less than 30. A satellite fix indoors is not possible with the entry-level tablet.

We also check the positioning accuracy on a 4 km bike ride and compare the results with the Garmin Venu 2s smartwatch. When analyzing the tablet's route, we always see that there are always bigger deviations from our route. Navigation with a car is definitely possible with the MatePad T10s, but the positioning quality is not beyond doubt. It is possible that the LTE version with A-GPS support could score better than our Wi-Fi version in terms of positioning.

Garmin Venu 2s
Garmin Venu 2s
Huawei MatePad T10s
Huawei MatePad T10s

Cameras: Huawei tablet with a single rear cam

Selfie with the Huawei MatePad T10s
Selfie with the Huawei MatePad T10s

A 2 MP front-facing camera with an f/2.4 aperture is located in the display's upper frame. Photo quality is on a low level. Details are hardly present and the colors look very pale.

A 5 MP single camera with an f/2.2 aperture is installed on the back. Sharpness and picture detail are slightly better in bright light than with the front-facing camera, but these photos also lack sharpness overall. Colors are reproduced much more appealingly, though.

In order to evaluate the color reproduction as objectively as possible, we take additional photos with the MatePad T10s in artificial light with the help of the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport. Colors are recorded quite faithfully here as well.

Huawei's tablet records videos with a resolution of up to 1080p. Only HD recordings are possible with the front-facing camera.

8x zoom (max)
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Motiv 1 - TagMotiv 2 - TagLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T10S: 11.25 ∆E min: 4.16 - max: 15.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T10S: 47.15 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 94.33 ∆E

Accessories and warranty: Huawei tablet with power adapter

10W power supply of Huawei MatePad T10s
10W power supply of Huawei MatePad T10s

The MatePad T10s comes with a modular charger, a USB-C cable, an ejector tool, as well as a quick-start guide and a warranty card. The in-house online store also offers optional accessories, such as a protective case, for the tablet.

The warranty is for 24 months and its status can be easily viewed in the service app.

Input devices and operation: MatePad T10s with FaceUnlock

Huawei's MatePad T10s has a capacitive touchscreen with convincing gliding with nothing to complain about in terms of precision. Our inputs with the fingers are accurately recognized by Huawei's tablet.

A 2D face recognition is available for biometric security. The recognition is quite fast; a fingerprint sensor is not available.

Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

Display: Huawei tablet with LCD

Sub-pixel representation
Sub-pixel representation

The display of the Huawei MatePad T10s measures 10.1 inches diagonally in a 16:10 format. The IPS display has a Full HD resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 pixels. The achieved pixel density of just under 224 PPI is not very high. Furthermore, the "smart resolution" is preset ex-factory, which often leads to a reduction of content to 720p. To avoid a blurry display, users should adjust this during the initial setup because a fixed 1080p resolution is noticeably better.

The screen's maximum brightness is just 285 cd/m². The more realistic APL50 measurement, which simulates an even distribution of bright and dark areas on the panel, shows near-identical 306 cd/m². Although the inexpensive tablet competition does not offer bright displays either, the luminance of the MatePad T10s is low even in this price range and borderline in bright indoor environments.

For brightness control, the tablet's display uses PWM-like flickering with a 100 Hz frequency below 15% of the maximum brightness. However, this is not a classic PWM flickering like in OLEDs.

278
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 281.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 285 cd/m²
Contrast: 950:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.044
Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.00
Blackview Tab 10
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.10
Screen
6%
-38%
9%
-54%
Brightness middle
285
433
52%
368
29%
410
44%
467
64%
Brightness
282
412
46%
346
23%
400
42%
445
58%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
91
0%
83
-9%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.3
0.48
-60%
0.61
-103%
0.29
3%
0.66
-120%
Contrast
950
902
-5%
603
-37%
1414
49%
708
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.53
3
15%
6.9
-95%
4.47
-27%
9.9
-180%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.84
7.2
-23%
11.4
-95%
8.84
-51%
15.66
-168%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
4.4
29%
7.7
-24%
5.1
18%
9.9
-60%
Gamma
2.044 108%
2.12 104%
2.16 102%
2.248 98%
1.72 128%
CCT
8130 80%
7003 93%
8547 76%
7966 82%
9142 71%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The rather mixed impressions of the display continue with the low contrast of less than 1000:1. The black value of 0.3 cd/m² is on a good level for an IPS panel, but the low brightness spoils a more contrasting display.

In combination with the ClariVu display technology, content should be brought to life in brilliant colors but our measured DeltaE deviations are not in the ideal range (<3). However, the color accuracy as well as the accuracy of the displayed grayscale levels are okay for the price range in the "Warm" profile. In return, the sRGB color space coverage and color temperature are less than ideal. The latter leads to a slightly turquoise-bluish color cast in the display content.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Color space (target color space: AdobeRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Color space (target color space: AdobeRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Color space (target color space: P3; profile: standard, warm)
Color space (target color space: P3; profile: standard, warm)
Color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Grayscale(Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Standard, Default)
Grayscale(Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Standard, Default)
Grayscale(Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Standard, Warm)
Grayscale(Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Standard, Warm)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: standard, warm)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: standard, warm)
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).


Only at very low brightness do we notice PWM flickering at 100 Hz.
Only at very low brightness do we notice PWM flickering at 100 Hz.
0% Brightness
0% Brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

The low contrast ratio coupled with low luminance makes for poor readability outdoors. Content is not legible in direct sunlight — the panel reaches its limits even without reflections. However, the luminance is sufficient for indoor use in most situations.

Thanks to the liquid crystal display with in-plane switching technology (IPS), content is displayed relatively true to color even at flat viewing angles. However, a brightness-drop is clearly perceptible when viewed from the side.

Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

Performance: MatePad T10s with Kirin SoC

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A is an octa-core SoC that is based on the Kirin 710 but is manufactured in the 14nm FinFET process. Like the Kirin 960 and 970 the processor integrates four Cortex-A73 clocked at 2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores that clock with up to 1.7 GHz in the big.LITTLE configuration. The GPU is a low-performance Mali-G51 MP4.

System performance is at a low level due to the modest SoC. The MatePad T10s often shows lags, and scrolling in the browser sometimes feels choppy. Closing and opening applications also feels a bit sluggish. Even a Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 with the not-often-seen UNISOC T618 offers significantly better system performance.

The Kirin SoC is clearly behind Samsung's competition in CPU benchmarks. A Lenovo Tab P11 Plus with the Mediatek Helio G90T almost plays in a league of its own — especially in the single-core area. A similar situation is seen in GFXBench graphics tests. Only the performance deficits of a PowerVR GE8320 in the Blackview Tab 10 are even more glaring.

The performance bottleneck of the MatePad T10s is not only the weak chipset — even the eMMC storage is slow, which leads to long loading times.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=46, last 2 years)
695 Points ∼34% +135%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
503 Points ∼25% +70%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points ∼19% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points ∼18% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (296 - 299, n=3)
297 Points ∼15% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points ∼14%
Blackview Tab 10
152 Points ∼7% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=46, last 2 years)
2364 Points ∼8% +88%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1557 Points ∼5% +24%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points ∼5% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1256 - 1332, n=3)
1300 Points ∼5% +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points ∼4% -2%
Blackview Tab 10
780 Points ∼3% -38%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=24, last 2 years)
8932 Points ∼48% +35%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points ∼45% +26%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
8346 Points ∼45% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points ∼40% +12%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points ∼36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6622 Points ∼36% 0%
Blackview Tab 10
4564 Points ∼25% -31%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3374 Points ∼30% +133%
Average of class Tablet (504 - 9238, n=29, last 2 years)
2706 Points ∼24% +87%
Teclast T40 Pro
2140 Points ∼19% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2084 Points ∼19% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1445 - 1525, n=3)
1475 Points ∼13% +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1445 Points ∼13%
Blackview Tab 10
699 Points ∼6% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3472 Points ∼21% +160%
Average of class Tablet (453 - 14283, n=29, last 2 years)
3223 Points ∼19% +142%
Teclast T40 Pro
1998 Points ∼12% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1958 Points ∼12% +47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1326 - 1493, n=3)
1384 Points ∼8% +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1333 Points ∼8%
Blackview Tab 10
630 Points ∼4% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3283 Points ∼61% +46%
Teclast T40 Pro
2850 Points ∼53% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2692 Points ∼50% +19%
Average of class Tablet (674 - 4482, n=29, last 2 years)
2457 Points ∼45% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2191 - 2332, n=3)
2260 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2256 Points ∼42%
Blackview Tab 10
1136 Points ∼21% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (527 - 13682, n=39, last 2 years)
4541 Points ∼27% +203%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3128 Points ∼19% +108%
Teclast T40 Pro
2158 Points ∼13% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2105 Points ∼13% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1501 - 1573, n=3)
1527 Points ∼9% +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1501 Points ∼9%
Blackview Tab 10
835 Points ∼5% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (475 - 42751, n=39, last 2 years)
7865 Points ∼18% +480%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3057 Points ∼7% +125%
Teclast T40 Pro
2002 Points ∼5% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1957 Points ∼5% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1356 - 1452, n=3)
1389 Points ∼3% +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1356 Points ∼3%
Blackview Tab 10
774 Points ∼2% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3438 Points ∼50% +41%
Teclast T40 Pro
2969 Points ∼43% +22%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 5623, n=39, last 2 years)
2949 Points ∼43% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2862 Points ∼42% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2441 - 2511, n=3)
2464 Points ∼36% +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2441 Points ∼35%
Blackview Tab 10
1152 Points ∼17% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2483 Points ∼12% +129%
Average of class Tablet (281 - 7098, n=29, last 2 years)
1972 Points ∼10% +82%
Teclast T40 Pro
1456 Points ∼7% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1425 Points ∼7% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1082 - 1099, n=3)
1089 Points ∼5% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1085 Points ∼5%
Blackview Tab 10
411 Points ∼2% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2374 Points ∼21% +149%
Average of class Tablet (236 - 9612, n=30, last 2 years)
2043 Points ∼18% +114%
Teclast T40 Pro
1281 Points ∼11% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1252 Points ∼11% +31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
955 Points ∼8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (945 - 955, n=3)
950 Points ∼8% -1%
Blackview Tab 10
348 Points ∼3% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3183 Points ∼54% +42%
Teclast T40 Pro
2783 Points ∼47% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2768 Points ∼47% +24%
Average of class Tablet (369 - 4201, n=30, last 2 years)
2455 Points ∼42% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2203 - 2338, n=3)
2259 Points ∼38% +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2236 Points ∼38%
Blackview Tab 10
1130 Points ∼19% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (305 - 9630, n=41, last 2 years)
3661 Points ∼32% +226%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2694 Points ∼23% +140%
Teclast T40 Pro
1526 Points ∼13% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1463 Points ∼13% +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1123 - 1136, n=3)
1128 Points ∼10% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1124 Points ∼10%
Blackview Tab 10
495 Points ∼4% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (258 - 25707, n=41, last 2 years)
5138 Points ∼20% +424%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2473 Points ∼10% +152%
Teclast T40 Pro
1338 Points ∼5% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1284 Points ∼5% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (981 - 988, n=3)
985 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
981 Points ∼4%
Blackview Tab 10
425 Points ∼2% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3375 Points ∼42% +43%
Teclast T40 Pro
3007 Points ∼38% +27%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=41, last 2 years)
2925 Points ∼37% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2865 Points ∼36% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2365 - 2501, n=3)
2426 Points ∼30% +3%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2365 Points ∼30%
Blackview Tab 10
1171 Points ∼15% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2684 Points ∼20% +153%
Average of class Tablet (488 - 6292, n=28, last 2 years)
2023 Points ∼15% +91%
Teclast T40 Pro
1518 Points ∼11% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1488 Points ∼11% +41%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1059 Points ∼8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1052 - 1066, n=3)
1059 Points ∼8% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=28, last 2 years)
2849 Points ∼11% +199%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2603 Points ∼10% +173%
Teclast T40 Pro
1361 Points ∼5% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1340 Points ∼5% +40%
Huawei MatePad T10S
954 Points ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (911 - 954, n=3)
926 Points ∼4% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2774 Points ∼53% +1106%
Teclast T40 Pro
2541 Points ∼48% +1005%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2422 Points ∼46% +953%
Average of class Tablet (230 - 3285, n=28, last 2 years)
2287 Points ∼43% +894%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (230 - 2298, n=3)
1584 Points ∼30% +589%
Huawei MatePad T10S
230 Points ∼4%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=29, last 2 years)
4610 Points ∼4% +728%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1344 Points ∼1% +141%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
712 Points ∼1% +28%
Teclast T40 Pro
709 Points ∼1% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (557 - 564, n=2)
561 Points ∼1% +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
557 Points ∼1%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=27, last 2 years)
5400 Points ∼5% +857%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1387 Points ∼1% +146%
Teclast T40 Pro
709 Points ∼1% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
708 Points ∼1% +26%
Huawei MatePad T10S
564 Points ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (552 - 564, n=2)
558 Points ∼0% -1%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (135 - 5035, n=25, last 2 years)
1569 Points ∼3% +925%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
380 Points ∼1% +148%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
184 Points ∼0% +20%
Teclast T40 Pro
182 Points ∼0% +19%
Huawei MatePad T10S
153 Points ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
153 Points ∼0% 0%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (132 - 4975, n=25, last 2 years)
1500 Points ∼3% +887%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
381 Points ∼1% +151%
Teclast T40 Pro
180 Points ∼0% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
179 Points ∼0% +18%
Huawei MatePad T10S
152 Points ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
152 Points ∼0% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (19 - 120, n=40, last 2 years)
62.5 fps ∼2% +64%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
58 fps ∼2% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
39 fps ∼1% +3%
Teclast T40 Pro
39 fps ∼1% +3%
Huawei MatePad T10S
38 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (36 - 38, n=2)
37 fps ∼1% -3%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 588, n=40, last 2 years)
168.1 fps ∼1% +310%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
78 fps ∼1% +90%
Huawei MatePad T10S
41 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
41 fps ∼0% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
41 fps ∼0% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (40 - 41, n=2)
40.5 fps ∼0% -1%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=39, last 2 years)
47.6 fps ∼13% +138%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
43 fps ∼12% +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
25 fps ∼7% +25%
Teclast T40 Pro
25 fps ∼7% +25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
20 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (15 - 20, n=2)
17.5 fps ∼5% -12%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (6.9 - 345, n=40, last 2 years)
95.6 fps ∼7% +241%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
48 fps ∼4% +71%
Huawei MatePad T10S
28 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
26 fps ∼2% -7%
Teclast T40 Pro
26 fps ∼2% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (19 - 28, n=2)
23.5 fps ∼2% -16%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=40, last 2 years)
34.2 fps ∼1% +144%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
26 fps ∼1% +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
15 fps ∼0% +7%
Teclast T40 Pro
15 fps ∼0% +7%
Huawei MatePad T10S
14 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7.9 - 14, n=2)
11 fps ∼0% -21%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.7 - 229, n=40, last 2 years)
65.3 fps ∼1% +308%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
29 fps ∼1% +81%
Huawei MatePad T10S
16 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
15 fps ∼0% -6%
Teclast T40 Pro
15 fps ∼0% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (13 - 16, n=2)
14.5 fps ∼0% -9%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=40, last 2 years)
23.4 fps ∼1% +175%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
16 fps ∼0% +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.2 fps ∼0% +8%
Huawei MatePad T10S
8.5 fps ∼0%
Teclast T40 Pro
8.1 fps ∼0% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7.1 - 8.5, n=2)
7.8 fps ∼0% -8%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.1 - 153.5, n=40, last 2 years)
40.7 fps ∼0% +347%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
18 fps ∼0% +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.7 fps ∼0% +7%
Huawei MatePad T10S
9.1 fps ∼0%
Teclast T40 Pro
8.7 fps ∼0% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8.1 - 9.1, n=2)
8.6 fps ∼0% -5%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=44, last 2 years)
16.6 fps ∼11% +246%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
10 fps ∼6% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
6 fps ∼4% +25%
Teclast T40 Pro
6 fps ∼4% +25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4.8 fps ∼3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4.4 - 4.8, n=3)
4.57 fps ∼3% -5%
Blackview Tab 10
2.2 fps ∼1% -54%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.87 - 70, n=44, last 2 years)
15.8 fps ∼5% +445%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
6.7 fps ∼2% +131%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
3.6 fps ∼1% +24%
Teclast T40 Pro
3.6 fps ∼1% +24%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2.9 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2.8 - 2.9, n=3)
2.87 fps ∼1% -1%
Blackview Tab 10
1.4 fps ∼0% -52%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=44, last 2 years)
23.8 fps ∼12% +213%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
17 fps ∼8% +124%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.9 fps ∼5% +30%
Teclast T40 Pro
9.9 fps ∼5% +30%
Huawei MatePad T10S
7.6 fps ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6.7 - 7.6, n=3)
7.03 fps ∼3% -7%
Blackview Tab 10
3.6 fps ∼2% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.4 - 191, n=44, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼6% +879%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
19 fps ∼3% +342%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
10 fps ∼1% +133%
Teclast T40 Pro
10 fps ∼1% +133%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4.3 - 7.6, n=3)
6.5 fps ∼1% +51%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4.3 fps ∼1%
Blackview Tab 10
3.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=25, last 2 years)
540119 Points ∼46% +196%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
322048 Points ∼27% +76%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points ∼20% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points ∼17% +10%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points ∼15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
182567 Points ∼15% 0%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=23, last 2 years)
30230 Points ∼11% +579%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
13053 Points ∼5% +193%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points ∼2% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points ∼2% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4455 - 4489, n=2)
4472 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points ∼2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (806 - 6908, n=27, last 2 years)
3534 Points ∼42% +76%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2948 Points ∼35% +46%
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points ∼25% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2013 - 2173, n=2)
2093 Points ∼25% +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points ∼22% -9%
System
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10926, n=27, last 2 years)
6283 Points ∼32% +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4845 - 4934, n=2)
4890 Points ∼25% +1%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points ∼25% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points ∼24% -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
4273 Points ∼22% -12%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=27, last 2 years)
3918 Points ∼43% +35%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3632 Points ∼40% +25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points ∼32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2772 - 2896, n=2)
2834 Points ∼31% -2%
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points ∼18% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points ∼11% -67%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (542 - 22308, n=27, last 2 years)
6666 Points ∼23% +359%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3647 Points ∼13% +151%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points ∼7% +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points ∼7% +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1452 - 1572, n=2)
1512 Points ∼5% +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points ∼5%
Web
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points ∼55% +37%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1273 Points ∼53% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points ∼52% +30%
Average of class Tablet (731 - 1581, n=27, last 2 years)
1216 Points ∼51% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (956 - 1023, n=2)
990 Points ∼41% +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points ∼40%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 10 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, n=34, last 2 years)
79.1 Points ∼100% +161%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points ∼56% +45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
35.48 Points ∼45% +17%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points ∼38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (30.1 - 30.3, n=2)
30.2 Points ∼38% 0%
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
17.03 Points ∼22% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=40, last 2 years)
144 Points ∼100% +199%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points ∼52% +56%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
70.6 Points ∼49% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points ∼46% +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (48.1 - 48.5, n=2)
48.3 Points ∼34% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
48.12 Points ∼33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=41, last 2 years)
103 Points ∼100% +87%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
76 Points ∼74% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points ∼73% +36%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points ∼53%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
55 Points ∼53% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (55 - 55, n=2)
55 Points ∼53% 0%
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
33 Points ∼32% -40%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 255, n=32, last 2 years)
84.4 runs/min ∼100% +229%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min ∼40% +30%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
31.4 runs/min ∼37% +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (25.6 - 27.1, n=2)
26.4 runs/min ∼31% +3%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min ∼30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=39, last 2 years)
25360 Points ∼100% +154%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
16947 Points ∼67% +70%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points ∼58% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points ∼43% +8%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points ∼39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8911 - 9996, n=2)
9454 Points ∼37% -5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
10760 ms * ∼100% -161%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4122 - 4411, n=2)
4267 ms * ∼40% -4%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms * ∼38%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=42, last 2 years)
3617 ms * ∼34% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * ∼28% +26%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
2793 ms * ∼26% +32%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * ∼26% +33%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad T10STeclast T40 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Lenovo Tab P11 PlusBlackview Tab 10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
54%
5%
103%
-25%
9%
159%
Sequential Read 256KB
302.9
260.9
-14%
255.1
-16%
503
66%
263.6
-13%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=188)
-10%
703 ?(123.3 - 2031, n=38, last 2 years)
132%
Sequential Write 256KB
99
199.2
101%
101.1
2%
205.5
108%
135.3
37%
176.7 ?(40 - 274, n=188)
78%
374 ?(87.2 - 1559, n=38, last 2 years)
278%
Random Read 4KB
51.1
94.2
84%
68.3
34%
112.6
120%
31.37
-39%
58.9 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=188)
15%
121.8 ?(10.1 - 310, n=38, last 2 years)
138%
Random Write 4KB
57.8
83.6
45%
57.5
-1%
126.1
118%
9.4
-84%
30.8 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=188)
-47%
108 ?(4.27 - 370, n=38, last 2 years)
87%

Games: Huawei tablet manages 60 fps

With the GameBench app, we take a closer look at a few games. Here the Mali-G51 MP4 manages a maximum frame rate close to the panel's native 60 Hz mark. However, due to the underpowered GPU, these are barely reached even in less graphics demanding games like Armajet.

Graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile can be played smoothly on the MatePad T10s, but it stops at 30 fps. It is not possible to play the shooter in the best UltraHD quality.

Gaming enthusiasts should also keep in mind that some games might not be playable on Huawei's tablet due to the lack of Google Play Services.

Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Test Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø57.4 (43-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø29.3 (24-31)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.7 (24-31)

Emissions: The MatePad T10s stays cool

Temperature

GFXBench benchmark battery test
GFXBench benchmark battery test

The casing of the MatePad T10s hardly heats up in everyday use, and we only measured a temperature increase to a maximum of 34 °C even under load.

We use the battery test of GFXBench to check the heat dissipation inside the casing. The Manhattan 3.1 test clearly shows that the frame rate hardly drops even after 30 runs, so performance drops under load are unlikely.

The 3DMark tests also reveal a similar picture. The Wild Life stress tests also run smoothly with a consistency of over 99%.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

012345678Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.08-8.11)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.28-2.31)
Max. Load
 32.1 °C
90 F
33.8 °C
93 F
32.5 °C
91 F
 
 31.5 °C
89 F
30.5 °C
87 F
30.6 °C
87 F
 
 31.1 °C
88 F
30 °C
86 F
29.8 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Average: 31.3 °C = 88 F
32.1 °C
90 F
34.4 °C
94 F
30.3 °C
87 F
31 °C
88 F
31.7 °C
89 F
29.9 °C
86 F
29.4 °C
85 F
30.6 °C
87 F
29.6 °C
85 F
Maximum: 34.4 °C = 94 F
Average: 31 °C = 88 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.4 °C = 103 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet
Huawei MatePad T10s Tablet

Loudspeaker

The MatePad T10s features a dual-speaker system that has been optimized and tuned by Harman Kardon. The quality of the two sound sources is satisfactory for this price range but is not free from criticism.

The midrange as well as the high tones are not reproduced very linearly, and the bass is not really present in the tablet's sound. In return, the maximum volume of over 91 dB(A) that we measured is quite high. If you do not push the volume of the MatePad T10s to the limit, you will get a decent sound overall.

Audio output via the 3.5 mm jack is also possible and provides a better sound transmission with your favorite headphones. At the same time, wireless headphones can be connected via Bluetooth.

However, it should be kept in mind that only a few codecs are supported here, viz. SBC and AAC as well as HWA — a high-resolution audio codec with low latency developed by Huawei. Support for the proprietary High-Res codec (L2HC), which is used by Huawei's FreeBuds Studio, is missing as are the common aptX algorithm pairs from Qualcomm or Sony's LDAC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.3522543.941.13137.134.54037.935.25043.842.76331.832.3802833.810027.942.312523.549.816023.856.320019.657.72501961.631517.566.740015.267.750016.870.56302172.480022.374.6100018.778.8125017.381160015.879.2200015.882.8250017.485.9315018.477.3400020.272.1500020.369.6630020.173.6800021.472.61000021.870.61250021.362.51600021.866.5SPL31.691.2N1.681.8median 20.1median 70.6Delta1.86.535.228.921.72018.622.421.720.43233.625.724.527.419.624.318.316.326.518.944.817.547.812.352.715.758.911.660.311.869.712.472.111.671.412.577.213.176.712.576.213.172.212.870.312.868.512.976.313.379.413.480.313.774.613.768.814.463.613.751.725.287.40.771.6median 13.1median 69.71.511.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad T10SSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad T10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power management: Huawei tablet with a 5,100 mAh-battery

Energy consumption

Power consumption is not very efficient for a 10.1-inch tablet, either in idle or under load conditions. Overall, the MatePad T10s consumes significantly too much energy at almost 12 W at its peak.

The energy reserves are somewhat undersized with a nominal battery capacity of 5,100 mAh, which is also noticeable in the runtimes of Huawei's tablet. The completely discharged battery recharges fully in about 2 hours and 45 minutes with the included charger.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.8 / 3.5 Watt
Load midlight 7.9 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
7700 mAh
Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh
Power Consumption
-1%
-9%
32%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
1.44
10%
1.19
26%
1.4
12%
2
-25%
Idle Average *
2.8
3.87
-38%
4.63
-65%
1.6
43%
6
-114%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
3.91
-12%
4.68
-34%
1.9
46%
6.1
-74%
Load Average *
7.9
7.1
10%
7.27
8%
5.3
33%
6.8
14%
Load Maximum *
11.5
8.88
23%
9.17
20%
8.7
24%
8.1
30%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)