Notebookcheck Logo
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review

Huawei MatePad SE 11 review - Pen support makes this tablet unique within its price class

Digitizer tablet at a competitive price. The MatePad SE 11 is a very affordable tablet that still offers users the option to use a stylus. As a result, the MatePad SE 2024 sets itself apart from the entry-level competition and could be especially interesting for school and college students. Did the Huawei tablet manage to earn our purchase recommendation? Find out here.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Tablet Android Touchscreen

If you like to take notes on your tablet, then you'll usually have to reach for mid-range Android devices such as the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE or the Xiaomi Pad 6. Huawei's MatePad SE 11 offers an interesting entry-level alternative with its current price of around US$280. The new SE model is an 11-inch tablet with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels. It also advertises DC dimming and an eye-friendly display mode.

In Germany, where this test was carried out, the manufacturer's own Kirin 710A is installed, which is by no means a performance miracle—however, in combination with a 7,700 mAh battery, it should ensure decent runtimes. In other markets, the Huawei tablet comes with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. In this review, we'll be taking a closer look at whether the MatePad SE 11 is the perfect tablet for school and college students thanks to its stylus support.

Huawei MatePad SE 11 (MatePad Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 16:9, 1900 x 1200 pixel 204 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LCD, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: position sensor, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 252.3 x 163.8 ( = 0.24 x 9.93 x 6.45 in)
Battery
7700 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/​2.0, AF)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/​2.2, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad Speakers, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, HarmonyOS 2, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
475 g ( = 16.76 oz / 1.05 pounds), Power Supply: 61 g ( = 2.15 oz / 0.13 pounds)
Price
219 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
76.2 %v8
09 / 2024
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
475 g6 mm11.00"1900x1200
73.8 %v8
06 / 2024
Teclast P50
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
545 g8.6 mm10.95"1280x800
84.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
480 g6.9 mm11.00"1920x1200
83.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Lenovo Tab M11
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
465 g7.2 mm11.00"1920x1200
81.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Huawei MatePad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
440 g7.9 mm10.40"2000x1200

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Case - The MatePad SE 11 is made from aluminum

For a tablet below US$300, the bezels surrounding the MatePad SE 11's display are super slim, giving the Huawei tablet a screen-to-body ratio of almost 85 per cent. This means the front of the device has been kept very efficient. To compare, a much more expensive Apple iPad 10 only manages 80.5 per cent in this aspect.

At 475 grams and 11 inches in size, the MatePad SE 11 has gotten a little larger and heavier compared to its predecessor. However, the metal unibody design of this aluminum case is impressive with a thickness of less than 7 millimeters, and it feels relatively high-quality. The matte finish on the back conceals grease marks well.

The tablet is missing an IP certification to protect it against dust and water, but you can live with this considering its price. The entry-level tablet boasts great stability: Even when applying lots of pressure, the case can barely be twisted.

Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review

Size comparison

258 mm / 10.2 in 170 mm / 6.69 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 545 g1.202 lbs257.1 mm / 10.1 in 168.7 mm / 6.64 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 480 g1.058 lbs255.3 mm / 10.1 in 166.3 mm / 6.55 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 465 g1.025 lbs252.3 mm / 9.93 in 163.8 mm / 6.45 in 6 mm / 0.2362 in 475 g1.047 lbs247 mm / 9.72 in 156.7 mm / 6.17 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 440 g0.97 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Connectivity - The Huawei tablet only has USB 2.0

The amount of RAM is dependent on which model you go for, and in Germany (where this test was carried out), you can choose between 4 and 6 GB. Its internal UFS storage consisting of either 64 or 128 GB is a little on the low side seeing as how you can't expand the tablet's storage through an SD card.

With the operating system deducted, our test device only has around 106 GB free to use. If you occasionally need more space for videos or photos, you can use external peripherals such as a USB stick via USB OTG. However, transferring data to storage media is very slow according to the USB 2.0 standard. Wired image output is also not possible.

Apart from this, the MatePad SE 11's features include four speakers and Bluetooth 5.1. It additionally has a DRM certification, meaning you can watch videos from streaming platforms in HD.

Huawei also offers a dedicated space for children via its KidsSpace application, which parents can configure extensively to protect their kids from harmful content. If you own a smartphone or PC from the manufacturer, you can also use the MadPad SE 11 as a second screen using the multi-screen collaboration function.

Right case side (speaker, USB port, speaker)
Right case side (speaker, USB port, speaker)
Top case side (button: on/off, microphone)
Top case side (button: on/off, microphone)
Bottom case side
Bottom case side
Left case side (button: volume, speaker)
Left case side (button: volume, speaker)

Software - The MatePad SE 11 has to make do without Google

The entry-level tablet from Huawei comes with HarmonyOS version 2.0, which is based on the outdated Android 10. However, only the open source part of the operating system is used, which means that most Android apps can be installed on the MatePad SE 11—but no Google Mobile Services (GMS) are available due to commercial restrictions. This also implies access to the PlayStore; installing it is not possible without further ado.

With the App Gallery and the cross-system search "Petal Search", which uses applications from third-party sources such as apkpure or aurora store, users can still enjoy a variety of apps on the entry-level tablet. Still, applications from alternative stores do not always have to contain the latest version and security concerns (malware) are also an issue that needs to be considered.

Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review

Sustainability

Huawei hasn't officially communicated how long it intends to provide its inexpensive tablet with software updates. At the time of testing, the MatePad SE 11's latest security patches were from July 2024 despite it running Android 10.

Sustainability is not the focus of the MatePad SE 11. The manufacturer hasn't provided any information on material extraction or recyclability. However, the tablet's packaging appears to be plastic-free. The device itself is wrapped in a film, while the rest of the packaging is made of cardboard.

Communication and GNSS - The MatePad SE 11 comes without GPS

The MatePad SE 11's integrated Wi-Fi module supports the IEEE 802.11 standard according to a/b/g/n/ac and therefore only operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency range.

Within this price range, outdated WiFi 5 is still the standard, which guarantees slow transfer rates of around 300 MBit/s using a home network and with our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. Its transfer speeds are anything but high, even for this price range. Its data rates in the receiving direction could also be more consistent.

The Huawei tablet lacks a cellular modem as well as a GNSS module. Our test sample is therefore unable to access the mobile internet and it is also not possible to locate the device when you are not connected to WLAN.

Networking
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
323 (min: 218) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
279 (min: 228) MBit/s ∼76%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
318 (min: 280) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
357 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
304 (min: 283) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼98%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
310 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼99%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (218-377)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø279 (228-295)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)

Cameras - The Huawei tablet only features a single-cam

Selfie on the Huawei MatePad SE 11
Selfie on the Huawei MatePad SE 11

A low-resolution 5-MP lens with a fixed focus is installed into the front of the entry-level tablet. Aside from making video calls, you shouldn't set your expectations too high when it comes to the lens on the front. Selfies are softened quite a bit and the lighting doesn't work all too reliably either.

The 8-MP camera on the back gets to make use of an autofocus, which isn't always a given in this price range. However, it works super slowly. During everyday use, the camera's picture sharpness is only really good enough for photographing documents for later annotation—but nothing more. The photos lack a lot of dynamism and their sharpness level is very low.

Videos can be recorded using the rear lens of the MatePad SE 11 at a maximum of 1,080p and 30 fps. The selfie cam only supports an HD option.

1x
1x
2x
2x
6x (max)
6x (max)
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow light

We analyzed the 8-MPix main camera's color depiction under controlled lighting conditions. We used the actual reference colors for comparison. Apart from some visible brightening, the rear lens didn't reveal any serious deviations in the ColorChecker passport for an entry-level tablet. Nevertheless, the Huawei tablet had some outliers in color fidelity (>10).

ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad SE 11: 7.89 ∆E min: 3.54 - max: 15.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad SE 11: 47.1 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.33 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Only the manufacturer includes a stylus

The Huawei MatePad SE 11's power supply
The Huawei MatePad SE 11's power supply

The tablet's scope of delivery includes a USB cable (USB-A to USB-C), a short instruction manual and a modular 22.5-watt power supply.

If you purchase the 128-GB model directly from Huawei (which we also recommend because of the 6 GB RAM), then you'll get a silver M-Pen Lite for free. If you don't, the stylus retails for around US$30 separately. 

In the United States, the Huawei tablet is covered by a standard 12-month warranty.

Input devices & operation - The afforsable tablet with pen support

Huawei M-Pen Lite
Huawei M-Pen Lite

The MatePad SE 11's stylus support is not a common feature in this price range. The M-Pen Lite allows users to make handwritten notes on the entry-level tablet.

Huawei specifies a pressure sensitivity of 4,096 levels and a low delay for its stylus. The exact latency is not known. Unfortunately, we couldn't test the stylus as it wasn't included with our test sample. The M-Pen Lite can be charged wirelessly via the magnetic holder on the tablet's case.

Finger inputs are implemented precisely on the 11-inch LCD panel. However, due to its low refresh rate of just 60 Hz, animations don't appear the smoothest. In addition, the Kirin SoC often seems overwhelmed by the installed panel's comparatively high 1,200p resolution, resulting in drops in performance and delays.

The MatePad SE 11 doesn't have a fingerprint scanner, which is an inconvenience. You can only unlock the tablet biometrically via 2D facial recognition which uses the front-facing camera.

Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
Huawei MatePad SE 11 tablet review
VVSvVC-t4dk

Display - The MatePad SE 11 with an LCD

The LC display uses a classic RGB sub-pixel matrix consisting of a red, a blue and a green light-emitting diode.
The LC display uses a classic RGB sub-pixel matrix consisting of a red, a blue and a green light-emitting diode.

The screen has a size of 11 inches and a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels, giving it a pixel density of around 200 PPI. This means that the IPS display doesn't display content terribly sharply and its brightness could also be better. Depending on the environment, the Huawei tablet can adjust its brightness to the ambient lighting conditions. According to the manufacturer, the panel is certified by TÜV Rheinland as low blue light and flicker-free.

In terms of brightness, the MatePad SE 11 cuts a good figure, even though our brightness measurement when depicting a fully white display only reached a maximum of 481 cd/m². Still, this is completely satisfactory for this price range. At 497 cd/m², the APL18 measurement (which is more representative during everyday use), didn't result in a significant increase in brightness, which is normal for a tablet using LCD technology.

We didn't measure any screen flickering (PWM) using an oscilloscope, but the typical LCD weaknesses (shadows, uneven lighting at the edges) were present—albeit at a low level.

419
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 481 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 451.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 461 cd/m²
Contrast: 1537:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.183
Huawei MatePad SE 11
LCD, 1900x1200, 11"
Teclast P50
IPS, 1280x800, 11"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Lenovo Tab M11
IPS, 1920x1200, 11"
Huawei MatePad SE
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen
-39%
-54%
-64%
-12%
Brightness middle
461
441
-4%
493
7%
431
-7%
398
-14%
Brightness
451
416
-8%
460
2%
405
-10%
368
-18%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
90
3%
88
1%
87
0%
Black Level *
0.3
0.4
-33%
0.35
-17%
0.4
-33%
0.46
-53%
Contrast
1537
1103
-28%
1409
-8%
1078
-30%
865
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.48
5.01
-102%
6
-142%
9.72
-292%
2.17
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.9
8.57
-75%
11.7
-139%
11.59
-137%
4.32
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
5.8
-66%
8.2
-134%
3.6
-3%
3.1
11%
Gamma
2.183 101%
2.3 96%
2.21 100%
2.194 100%
2.214 99%
CCT
7471 87%
8477 77%
9131 71%
7348 88%
7245 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8799 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The IPS display's contrast is very good at over 1:1,500 thanks to its low black value of 0.3 cd/m².

We analyzed the panel in detail using a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software. The DeltaE deviations we measured were close to the target range (<3) for both colors and grayscale. We managed to achieve the best color accuracy using the "warm" white balance.

Unfortunately, HarmonyOS doesn't offer any different color profiles on the MatePad SE 11.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color space (target color space: AdobeRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color space (target color space: AdobeRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color accuracy (target color space: P3; profile: white balance, warm)
Color accuracy (target color space: P3; profile: white balance, warm)
Color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: white balance, warm)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.5 ms rise
↘ 10.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.9 ms rise
↘ 14.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

The MatePad SE 11 didn't leave a great impression outdoors, as reflections on the glass surface already led to a visible reduction in readability on an overcast day, but the Huawei tablet without an LTE module is intended for indoor use anyway. Then, there are no problems with its display brightness—even in the summer.

The IPS panel's viewing angles are impressive and the typical drop in brightness when viewed flat is only moderate.

Performance - The MatePad SE 11 with a Kirin SoC

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A, which the MatePad SE 11 is equipped with, is a chipset manufactured using the 14nm FinFET process. We previously already encountered it during our review of the MatePad T10s. It is hardly surprising that this model's system performance is also at a manageable level due to the SoC's low performance.

During the CPU benchmarks, the Kirin SoC ranked at the bottom of our comparison test. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ performed significantly better than the Huawei tablet. Even the Snapdragon 680 in its predecessor delivered better CPU performance during the Geekbench benchmark.

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=64, last 2 years)
3382 Points +189%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1993 Points +70%
Lenovo Tab M11
1379 Points +18%
Teclast P50
1364 Points +16%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
1172 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
1172 Points 0%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=64, last 2 years)
1054 Points +226%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
919 Points +185%
Lenovo Tab M11
436 Points +35%
Teclast P50
377 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
323 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
323 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=72, last 2 years)
720 Points +137%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
693 Points +128%
Huawei MatePad SE
377 Points +24%
Lenovo Tab M11
364 Points +20%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
304 Points
Teclast P50
301 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (296 - 304, n=4)
299 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=72, last 2 years)
2534 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1768 Points +30%
Huawei MatePad SE
1630 Points +20%
Lenovo Tab M11
1475 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
1359 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1256 - 1359, n=4)
1315 Points -3%
Teclast P50
1247 Points -8%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=33, last 2 years)
730478 Points +211%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
422144 Points +80%
Teclast P50
245797 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
235067 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
235067 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
10550 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab M11
9802 Points +38%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=70, last 2 years)
9523 Points +34%
Teclast P50
7327 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7102 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6622 - 7102, n=2)
6862 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad SE
5432 Points -24%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
578 Points +72%
Teclast P50
348 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
337 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
337 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
335 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 9147, n=56, last 2 years)
3845 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3596 Points +64%
Huawei MatePad SE
2580 Points +18%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
2187 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2013 - 2187, n=3)
2124 Points -3%
Teclast P50
1925 Points -12%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7626 Points +66%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=56, last 2 years)
6828 Points +48%
Huawei MatePad SE
5760 Points +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4598 - 4934, n=3)
4792 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
4598 Points
Teclast P50
4181 Points -9%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=56, last 2 years)
4544 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3872 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad SE
3381 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
3128 Points
Teclast P50
2954 Points -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2772 - 3128, n=3)
2932 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=56, last 2 years)
7247 Points +404%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
4337 Points +202%
Huawei MatePad SE
1994 Points +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1438 - 1572, n=3)
1487 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
1438 Points
Teclast P50
1021 Points -29%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1307 Points +25%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=56, last 2 years)
1232 Points +18%
Huawei MatePad SE
1141 Points +9%
Teclast P50
1090 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
1046 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (956 - 1046, n=3)
1008 Points -4%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=48, last 2 years)
5273 Points +2026%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
429 Points +73%
Teclast P50
279 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad SE
264 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
248 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
248 Points 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=54, last 2 years)
8966 Points +152%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
5687 Points +60%
Huawei MatePad SE
4228 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
3564 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
3564 Points 0%
Teclast P50
3164 Points -11%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB eMMC Flash

The MatePad SE 11's integrated graphics card is a low-performance Mali-G51 MP4. During the GFXBench graphics tests, the performance differences between the Adreno 619 inside the Galaxy Tab and the Huawei tablet were again significant. However, the GPU unit performed slightly better here than the Adreno 610 in the 2022 model.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +124%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
158 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
120 Points -24%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +133%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points +15%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
155 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
121 Points -22%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +108%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
700 Points +21%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
579 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
440 Points -24%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
423 Points -27%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +111%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
702 Points +22%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
576 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
441 Points -23%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
429 Points -26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +174%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1330 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1121 Points
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
980 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +204%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1203 Points +22%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1156 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
985 Points
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
830 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2935 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2809 Points +12%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2652 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2499 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +110%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
39 fps
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36 fps -8%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +133%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
40 fps
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +125%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +35%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +124%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +136%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +36%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +127%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +135%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +36%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.1 fps
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.3 fps -10%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +124%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.5 fps
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps -7%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +177%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps +55%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps +6%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4.7 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +183%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps +14%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps +10%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2.9 fps
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps -31%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +184%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +49%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +12%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +201%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps +27%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps +22%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7.3 fps
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -26%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +200%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +17%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1.2 fps
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.88 fps -27%

In the browser benchmarks, the Huawei tablet again came in at the bottom of the comparison field. Its surfing speed is solid, but some system lags creep in again and again during everyday use. Furthermore, it sometimes takes quite a while for complex page content to be loaded.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
109.5 Points +205%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +169%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
52.153 Points +45%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
35.847 Points
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
35.746 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (30.1 - 35.8, n=3)
32.1 Points -10%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +174%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.1 Points +167%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
54 Points +38%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
41 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
39 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
39 Points 0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=20, last 2 years)
12.9 runs/min +932%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
3.01 runs/min +141%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
1.25 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
1.25 runs/min 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +192%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28666 Points +186%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
13455 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M11 (Chrome 124)
13413 Points +34%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
10370 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
10018 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8911 - 10018, n=3)
9642 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (3675 - 4411, n=3)
4069 ms * -11%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3800 ms * -3%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
3675.3 ms *
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
3460.5 ms * +6%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
2903.5 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

For the price range in which the MatePad SE 11 operates, its internal storage with its read rates of over 500 MBit/s can almost be described as fast. Huawei hasn't provided the exact specification, but based on the values in the AndroBench benchmark, it is likely to be the UFS 2.0 standard.

On the other hand, its data throughput when writing is very slow for UFS storage and is more on par with tablets such as the Lenovo Tab M11 with eMMC flash.

Huawei MatePad SE 11Teclast P50Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+Lenovo Tab M11Huawei MatePad SEAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
39%
92%
12%
-42%
17%
162%
Sequential Read 256KB
528.79
879.52
66%
485.96
-8%
294.5
-44%
293.6
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
103.41
191.5
85%
476.37
361%
256.9
148%
99.5
-4%
Random Read 4KB
166.24
122.95
-26%
130.67
-21%
95.6
-42%
61.8
-63%
130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
119.02
153.65
29%
162.9
37%
101.2
-15%
54
-55%
101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37)
-15%

Games - The Huawei tablet can't manage 60 fps

Before buying the MatePad SE 11, gaming enthusiasts should bear in mind that its lack of Google mobile services means that games may not run on the Huawei tablet—Dead Trigger 2 or Asphalt 8, among others, didn't work during our test. Nevertheless, we took a closer look at two Android games using the GameBench app.

When running the graphically demanding open-world game Genshin Impact, the Mali-G51 MP4 didn't manage smooth playback with the high detail level selected. But even using the minimum graphics settings, the Matepad SE 11 was far from achieving the 60-Hz panel's native refresh rate on average.

The Kirin 710A doesn't make gaming a fun experience. Less demanding games, such as PUBG Mobile, can only be played at around 30 fps (HD setting), albeit constantly. We didn't manage to use the current best display quality of the shooter (UltraHD). 

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE 11; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø29 (13-58)
Huawei MatePad SE 11; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø14.7 (5-21)
Huawei MatePad SE 11; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Huawei MatePad SE 11; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Emissions - The MatePad SE 11 stays cool

Temperature

The MatePad SE 11's case hardly heats up during everyday use and even in our load scenario, the temperature increase wasn't that large. We used the 3DMark benchmark to check the internal heat dissipation behavior for possible throttling.

The Wild Life stress tests completed their work on the Huawei tablet with a high consistency of over 98 %. A reduction in performance is therefore pretty unlikely during everyday use.

Max. Load
 38.6 °C
101 F
36.9 °C
98 F
30.9 °C
88 F
 
 36 °C
97 F
32.9 °C
91 F
30.4 °C
87 F
 
 34.4 °C
94 F
31.5 °C
89 F
30.1 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 38.6 °C = 101 F
Average: 33.5 °C = 92 F
31.6 °C
89 F
35.7 °C
96 F
37.2 °C
99 F
31.6 °C
89 F
33.7 °C
93 F
35.1 °C
95 F
30.7 °C
87 F
32 °C
90 F
32.9 °C
91 F
Maximum: 37.2 °C = 99 F
Average: 33.4 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.35 (3.34-3.37)
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.57 (2.55-2.58)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.22 (4.19-4.23)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.64 (2.64-2.64)
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.92 (0.91-0.928)
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.699 (0.686-0.71)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.088 (1.072-1.097)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.725 (0.703-0.747)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99 (2.14min - 2.16max) % +1%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
98.1 (0.91min - 0.928max) %
Lenovo Tab M11
97.8 (1.072min - 1.097max) % 0%
Teclast P50
96.5 (0.686min - 0.71max) % -2%
Huawei MatePad SE
94.2 (0.703min - 0.747max) % -4%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad SE
99.7 (2.64min - 2.64max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99.5 (7.23min - 7.27max) % 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
99.1 (3.34min - 3.37max) %
Lenovo Tab M11
98.9 (4.19min - 4.23max) % 0%
Teclast P50
98.7 (2.55min - 2.58max) % 0%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Speakers

The MatePad SE 11 comes with a quad speaker system that has been optimized with Histen 9.0 technology. However, this audio system is not a highlight, as the sound is rather weak for a tablet, especially when it comes to low frequencies. Even so, our measurement showed a fairly linear frequency curve for the mids and highs, with super tweeters suffering a slight dip.

You can connect wired headphones via the USB-C port, while only Bluetooth version 5.1 is supported wirelessly. The MatePad SE 11 is also very limited when it comes to its selection of codecs. In addition to the obligatory SBC and AAC, not even HWA—a high-resolution Huawei audio codec with low latency—is on board.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.72534.740.83124.634.44026.526.1502934.5633130.38017.527.810016.933.21251838.516021.242.620021.645.62502252.431523.557.940016.457.150017.560.963017.562.580016.368.7100015.371.5125012.872.1160011.274.9200011.268.1250011.868315012.266.3400012.766.8500013.162.7630013.666.3800014.569.91000015.266.71250015.959.21600016.753.9SPL26.881.2N0.948.9median 15.9median 62.7Delta37.128.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad SE 11Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad SE 11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - The Huawei tablet charges slowly

Power consumption

The 11-inch tablet's power consumption is inconspicuously good both when idle and under load. However, with a maximum of 22.5 watts, the 7,700 mAh battery cannot be charged very quickly. In our test, it took just under 2 hours for the battery to recharge after a full discharge. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.7 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 5.9 / 9.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7700 mAh
Teclast P50
8000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Huawei MatePad SE
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
5%
-58%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
1.5
12%
1
41%
1.5
12%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.8
5%
4.76
-151%
2.3
-21%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.8
-27%
4.79
-118%
2.8
-27%
Load Average *
5.9
4.3
27%
9.52
-61%
6.5
-10%
Load Maximum *
9.7
9
7%
9.92
-2%
10.7
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A: Ø4.65 (1.891-9.71)
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606: Ø6.55 (4.28-9.02)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.33 (5.98-6.97)
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.15-5.71)
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.846 (1.793-2.11)
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.12 (3.05-3.5)

Runtimes

In our realistic battery tests, which offer very good comparability due to the standardized display brightness of 150 cd/m², the Huawei tablet showed good endurance.

During the WiFi web surfing test, the MatePad SE 11 only quit after 15.5 hours of continuous use. When playing videos in a continuous loop without Wi-Fi, only an additional half-hour was possible, which speaks for an efficiently working Wi-Fi module.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 127)
15h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 14min
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7700 mAh
Teclast P50
8000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Lenovo Tab M11
7040 mAh
Huawei MatePad SE
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
-2%
-4%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1992
2745
38%
2275
14%
2009
1%
H.264
953
810
-15%
800
-16%
958
1%
WiFi v1.3
931
728
-22%
920
-1%
896
-4%
638
-31%
Load
254
310
22%
243
-4%
249
-2%

Pros

+ barely heats up
+ good battery life
+ stylus support
+ modern design
+ good build quality
+ good IPS panel without PWM

Cons

- only 60-Hz refresh rate
- few BT codecs
- no option to use GNSS or 4G/5G
- slow SoC
- unclear update delivery
- no GMS

Verdict on the Huawei MatePad SE 11

Huawei MatePad SE 11 review. Test device provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Huawei MatePad SE 11 review. Test device provided by notebooksbilliger.de

The MatePad SE 11 delivers a successful mix of a modern-looking design without wide bezels and a nice feel, good runtimes, and a PWM-free display.

Its digitizer in particular, which supports an active stylus, is a rarity for a tablet under US$300. However, if you consider the MatePad SE 11's 60-Hz refresh rate to be a dealbreaker and don't want to do without a stylus, the Lenovo Tab M11 is also a suitable 90-Hz alternative.

For this price class, slow SoCs are still the standard when it comes to tablets. The Huawei tablet we tested unfortunately wasn't an exception to this with its Kirin 710A. This makes itself known during everyday use in the shape of frequent lags. In addition, its lack of a fingerprint sensor makes the MatePad SE 11 less convenient during everyday use, too.

Thanks to its M-Pen Lite, the MatePad SE 11 is an interesting tablet for students without high expectations, costing under US$300. 

As a result of it using HarmonyOS, the MatePad SE 11 can't access Google services or the number of apps that are usually available via the PlayStore. However, this is less of an issue for a tablet than for a smartphone—unless Android games or security concerns with app sideloads are the user's focus.

Unfortunately, the manufacturer has not made any statements about how long it intends to provide the entry-level tablet with updates when it comes to the SE model. Samsung's Galaxy Tab A9+ shows that its update policy is more transparent and, at four years, also more sustainable—even in this price range.

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Huawei MatePad SE 11 can be purchased via online retailers such as AliExpress, where it currently costs US$281.71.

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Huawei MatePad SE 11 - 09/07/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
31 / 69 → 44%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
90%
Display
81%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 4%
Application Performance
39 / 92 → 42%
AI Performance
11%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
53 / 90 → 59%
Average
55%
76%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
95.2%
Repairability
35%
Software Updates
22.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 37.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Huawei MatePad SE 11 review - Pen support makes this tablet unique within its price class
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-09- 9 (Update: 2024-09- 9)