Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast P50 review - The affordable 11-inch tablet for couch surfers

HD entertainer. Tablets below US$200 often leave a lot to be desired when it comes to performance and connectivity. You will have to make a few compromises if you go for the Teclast P50 as well but in return, you get a surf and multimedia tablet with decent storage, good runtimes and 4G capabilities. Thanks to its Widevine L1 support, you can additionally stream web content in HD quality.
Teclast P50

The P50, made by Chinese manufacturer Teclast, is an affordable tablet with a focus on multimedia uses. Although the Teclast tablet can only display 1280 x 800 pixels on its 10.95-inch IPS display, it can get nice and bright. In addition, it supports DRM Widevine L1, making it HD-ready when it comes to streaming from Netflix and co.

Despite the Teclast P50 officially costing over US$300, you can already find it only for just over US$100 and it still manages to offer a comparatively extensive range of features. It runs using Android 14, features 128 GB of storage and has a 4G cellular modem including dual-SIM support.

average (74%) Teclast P50 UNISOC T606ARM Mali-G57 MP1 Tablet - 06/19/2024 - v8
Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Teclast P50
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4
Display
10.95 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 138 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Sensors: gravity sensor, hall sensor, Camera2 API Limited
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 258 x 170 ( = 0.34 x 10.16 x 6.69 in)
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash, 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix videos up to 720p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
545 g ( = 19.22 oz / 1.2 pounds), Power Supply: 41 g ( = 1.45 oz / 0.09 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
73.8 %v8 (new)
06/2024
Teclast P50
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
545 g8.6 mm10.95"1280x800
83.4 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Lenovo Tab M11
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
465 g7.2 mm11.00"1920x1200
84.2 %v7 (old)
02/2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
480 g6.9 mm11.00"1920x1200
81.7 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Teclast T50 HD
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
500 g7.9 mm10.95"1920x1200
81.5 %v7 (old)
09/2023
Telekom T Tablet
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
490 g7.8 mm10.40"2000x1200
83.5 %v7 (old)
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
481 g7.36 mm11.00"1920x1200

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here .

Case - A well-built aluminum case

The Teclast P50 sits inside an aluminum case that has a high-quality appearance thanks to its rounded edges and its matte, light-blue turquoise back cover. You wouldn't be able to tell that this is only an entry-level tablet from just looking at it. There is a plastic strip along the back which improves its cellular modules' connection. The AI camera labelling above the camera module suggests advanced technology, but the device unfortunately doesn't offer anything more than snapshot quality.

Its approx. 1-cm wide bezels give the Teclast tablet quite a modern appearance. At 545 grams, the P50 can be held in your hands quite comfortably, but it is quite a bit heavier than the comparison devices. You can dent and twist the P50 without needing to use much force but in doing so, you won't elicit any image artefacts or creaking noises from it. The P50 doesn't have an IP certification.

Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50

Size comparison

258 mm / 10.2 in 170 mm / 6.69 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 545 g1.202 lbs257.1 mm / 10.1 in 169.2 mm / 6.66 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 500 g1.102 lbs257.1 mm / 10.1 in 168.7 mm / 6.64 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 480 g1.058 lbs255.53 mm / 10.1 in 167.08 mm / 6.58 in 7.36 mm / 0.2898 in 481 g1.06 lbs255.3 mm / 10.1 in 166.3 mm / 6.55 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 465 g1.025 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 in 157.1 mm / 6.19 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 490 g1.08 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Connectivity - 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage inside the P50

The Teclast P50 offers 6 GB LPDDR4 RAM and 128 GB UFS 2.2 storage. Its internal storage can be expanded via a microSD card, which can be up to 1 TB in size. If you choose not to expand the storage, two nano SIM cards can also be inserted into the hybrid slot instead.

The Teclast P50's USB-C port supports USB OTG and can therefore be used to connect USB peripherals such as keyboards, mice or USB sticks. External audio devices can be connected to the tablet via the 3.5 mm jack. Stereo speakers are also on board.

left: power button, volume rocker
left: power button, volume rocker
right: 3.5-mm headphone jack, speakers, USB-C 2.0, hybrid SIM/microSD slot
right: 3.5-mm headphone jack, speakers, USB-C 2.0, hybrid SIM/microSD slot
top: microphones, volume rocker
top: microphones, volume rocker
bottom: no connections
bottom: no connections

microSD card reader

Using our microSD reference card—the Angelbird AV Pro V60—the microSD card reader inside the test device achieved good transfer rates in the copying test with an average of 39.8 MByte/s. Among the comparison devices, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ did the best with values around 47 MByte/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +19%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
41.2 MB/s +4%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.92 MB/s -27%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.02 MB/s -57%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.2 (31.3-47.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.5 (39.3-80.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

Software - Android 14 without bloatware

Stock Android 14 runs on the Teclast P50, as no third-party apps come preinstalled on the tablet. This also means that the preinstalled system doesn't take up much space on the device. After first booting it up, users have 115 GB free to use from its initial 128 GB storage space.

At the time of testing (mid June 2024), the Teclast P50 received an update to the OS version 1.05_20240525, with its latest Android security patches being from April 5. Teclast hasn't indicated how long the P50 will receive updates and how frequently these are set to be rolled out.

Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50
Teclast P50

Communication and GNSS - WiFi 5 and Dual SIM with 4G

WiFi 5, Bluetooth 5.0 and 4G cellular data are the three ways in which the Teclast P50 can connect to the outside world. With its supported 4G bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40 and 41, it offers solid frequency coverage, so it should at least have no issues with signal quality within the EU space, which is where this test was carried out.

In our WLAN test using the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 as a reference router, the P50 achieved good and stable WiFi 5 data throughput that reached a peak of 357 MBit/s. The similarly priced comparison devices all delivered comparable transfer rates.

Networking
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
318 (min: 280) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
357 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼96%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
304 (min: 283) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼99%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
320 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼96%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
371 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
307 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼99%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (280-333)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (337-370)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outside
GPS reception outside

The P50 can access the satellite navigation services GPS, Glonass and Beidou (all in single-band mode) to determine users' location. 

Within buildings, the tablet takes quite a while to determine its location and even when it does, it doesn't manage to locate very accurately. Outside, its accuracy rises from 13 to 5 meters but in this case, you'll also have to wait quite a long time before a semi-accurate location is shown.

In our navigation test, the P50 left quite a mixed impression. It only managed to record our 5-kilometer city trip very inaccurately. On the flip side, the tablet did a much better job during parts of the route that were more rural. Then it almost worked as precisely as our navigation reference device, the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch.

GPS test Teclast P50: overview
GPS test Teclast P50: overview
GPS test Teclast P50: bridge
GPS test Teclast P50: bridge
GPS test Teclast P50: turning point
GPS test Teclast P50: turning point
Garmin Venu 2: overview
Garmin Venu 2: overview
Garmin Venu 2: bridge
Garmin Venu 2: bridge
Garmin Venu 2: turning point
Garmin Venu 2: turning point

Cameras - Fine for snapshots

Photo using selfie camera
Photo using selfie camera

On most cheap tablets, cameras are usually an emergency solution and the Teclast P50 is no exception to this. Its 5-MP selfie camera only delivers blurry and noisy images. It delivers a similar picture quality when recording video, which can be done at a maximum of 720p. This is just good enough for video calls.

Its main camera has a resolution of 13 MP and, in contrast to the selfie cam, is supported by an LED flash and an autofocus. At first glance, it even takes pretty decent photos, but they are quite pale and don't show a lot of detail. Zoomed-in photos are dominated by image noise and in low-light conditions, subjects are lost to the darkness. The main camera can record video at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps.

Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Low-light photo

In controlled lighting conditions, the main camera shows that even in optimum lighting, its color depiction and image sharpness suffer. 1 lux of residual light is too little to expose the test chart and the ColorChecker card enough for them to be recognisable.

ColorChecker
16.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast P50: 13.18 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 18.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
24.7 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
30 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
57.9 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
59.8 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
73 ∆E
40 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
82.3 ∆E
67.3 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast P50: 42.26 ∆E min: 7.34 - max: 82.34 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Teclast P50 with a 10-watt power supply

The Teclast P50's scope of delivery includes a 10-watt power supply (5V/2A), a USB cable (Type A to C), a SIM tool, a short instruction manual as well as a warranty card. You can also buy a folio case for the device via Teclast's website.

The manufacturer gives its tablet a standard 12-month warranty.

Input devices & operation - The Teclast P50 without a fingerprint sensor

The Teclast P50's touchscreen reacts quickly to inputs right into the edges. However, its depiction doesn't look the smoothest as a result of its low panel refresh rate of 60 Hz.

The Teclast tablet doesn't feature a fingerprint sensor. You can only unlock it biometrically via 2D facial recognition that works reliably as long as there is enough ambient light. You can additionally unlock the device using patterns, PINs and passwords.

Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright

Display - IPS panel without PWM

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The Teclast P50's 10.95-inch IPS panel has a resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of only 138 PPI.

When playing back video, you likely won't notice much of this but when depicting static content such as menus or websites, the 16:10 picture doesn't look all too sharp and when looking closely at angled edges, you can see the pixels. The similarly priced comparison devices show a sharper picture, as they have a resolution of at least 1920 x 1200 pixels.

When it comes to brightness, the IPS screen does well. When showing a white background, it reaches an average of 415.8 cd/m² and its brightness levels rise to 466 cd/m² when depicting evenly distributed light and dark image excerpts (APL18 measurement). The test device is in good company with these results, as the comparison devices all deliver similar brightness levels. The P50 doesn't feature a brightness sensor.

The IPS panel regulates its brightness without the use of pulse width modulation. This means it is perfect for users who react sensitively to PWM flickering.

409
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 441 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 415.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 441 cd/m²
Contrast: 1103:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.97
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
78.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
Teclast P50
IPS, 1280x800, 11"
Lenovo Tab M11
IPS, 1920x1200, 11"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Teclast T50 HD
IPS, 1920x1200, 11"
Telekom T Tablet
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen
-13%
-4%
13%
-33%
27%
Brightness middle
441
431
-2%
493
12%
500
13%
529
20%
473
7%
Brightness
416
405
-3%
460
11%
457
10%
486
17%
449
8%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
90
0%
86
-4%
87
-3%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.4
0.4
-0%
0.35
12%
0.33
17%
0.56
-40%
0.28
30%
Contrast
1103
1078
-2%
1409
28%
1515
37%
945
-14%
1689
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.01
9.72
-94%
6
-20%
4.64
7%
9.6
-92%
3
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.57
11.59
-35%
11.7
-37%
9.02
-5%
14.4
-68%
6
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
3.6
38%
8.2
-41%
4.1
29%
10.5
-81%
2.7
53%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.194 100%
2.21 100%
2.016 109%
2.17 101%
2.27 97%
CCT
8477 77%
7348 88%
9131 71%
7316 89%
10482 62%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17560 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The IPS panel's color calibration isn't the best. It shows a noticeable blue cast and only covers the small sRGB color space by about 79 per cent. In terms of colors and grayscale depiction, its deviations from the ideal values are held within limits and the IPS panel also manages to show content in quite a lively fashion thanks to its contrast ratio of 1103:1.

Color accuracy
Color accuracy
Grayscale
Grayscale
Color saturation
Color saturation
sRGB color space
sRGB color space
DCI-P3 color space
DCI-P3 color space
AdobeRGB color space
AdobeRGB color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.9 ms rise
↘ 13.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.4 ms).

The Teclast P50's viewing-angle-stable IPS panel is bright enough for outdoor use. However, its limited brightness reserves are quickly used up and if the sun is shining directly onto the display, then they quickly struggle to compete with the resulting reflections.

Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Teclast P50 with a Unisoc T606

The Teclast P50's Unisoc T606 is mostly used inside more inexpensive tablets and smartphones. The SoC's performance is comparable to that of the MediaTek Helio G99 inside the Lenovo Tab M11 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G inside the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE. It is enough for videos, surfing the web and playing simple games. However, small stutters or delays will likely occur relatively frequently in everyday use.

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=57, last 2 years)
3173 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1993 Points +46%
Telekom T Tablet
1919 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1439 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M11
1379 Points +1%
Teclast P50
1364 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (1285 - 1482, n=11)
1364 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
1319 Points -3%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=57, last 2 years)
1011 Points +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
919 Points +144%
Telekom T Tablet
711 Points +89%
Lenovo Tab M11
436 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
413 Points +10%
Teclast P50
377 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (368 - 380, n=11)
375 Points -1%
Teclast T50 HD
368 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
693 Points +130%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=75, last 2 years)
683 Points +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
384 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab M11
364 Points +21%
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points +2%
Teclast P50
301 Points
Teclast T50 HD
300 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=75, last 2 years)
2429 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1768 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1684 Points +35%
Lenovo Tab M11
1475 Points +18%
Teclast P50
1247 Points
Teclast T50 HD
1217 Points -2%
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points -3%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=29, last 2 years)
706378 Points +187%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
422144 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
287727 Points +17%
Teclast P50
245797 Points
Teclast T50 HD
245367 Points 0%
Average UNISOC T606 (221540 - 245797, n=6)
237693 Points -3%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=55, last 2 years)
464563 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
354299 Points +64%
Teclast T50 HD
236491 Points +9%
Average UNISOC T606 (202973 - 238808, n=6)
221439 Points +2%
Teclast P50
216040 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
201810 Points -7%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
10550 Points +44%
Lenovo Tab M11
9802 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=72, last 2 years)
9005 Points +23%
Telekom T Tablet
8329 Points +14%
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points 0%
Teclast P50
7327 Points
Teclast T50 HD
7321 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
7068 Points -4%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
744 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
578 Points +66%
Telekom T Tablet
534 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
402 Points +16%
Teclast T50 HD
362 Points +4%
Average UNISOC T606 (339 - 362, n=5)
349 Points 0%
Teclast P50
348 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=56, last 2 years)
3682 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3596 Points +87%
Telekom T Tablet
2839 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2551 Points +33%
Teclast P50
1925 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (1879 - 1954, n=7)
1913 Points -1%
Teclast T50 HD
1879 Points -2%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7626 Points +82%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=56, last 2 years)
6643 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5580 Points +33%
Telekom T Tablet
4934 Points +18%
Average UNISOC T606 (4009 - 4362, n=7)
4273 Points +2%
Teclast P50
4181 Points
Teclast T50 HD
4009 Points -4%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=56, last 2 years)
4374 Points +48%
Telekom T Tablet
3923 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3872 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
3120 Points +6%
Teclast P50
2954 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (2675 - 3095, n=7)
2808 Points -5%
Teclast T50 HD
2679 Points -9%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=56, last 2 years)
6709 Points +557%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
4337 Points +325%
Telekom T Tablet
2667 Points +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2179 Points +113%
Teclast T50 HD
1027 Points +1%
Average UNISOC T606 (989 - 1076, n=7)
1023 Points 0%
Teclast P50
1021 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1307 Points +20%
Telekom T Tablet
1258 Points +15%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=56, last 2 years)
1217 Points +12%
Teclast T50 HD
1129 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1116 Points +2%
Average UNISOC T606 (1034 - 1129, n=7)
1098 Points +1%
Teclast P50
1090 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=45, last 2 years)
4702 Points +1585%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
429 Points +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
348 Points +25%
Teclast P50
279 Points
Teclast T50 HD
275 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T606 (256 - 280, n=6)
275 Points -1%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Telekom T Tablet
9056 Points +186%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)
8756 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
5687 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4150 Points +31%
Teclast T50 HD
3441 Points +9%
Teclast P50
3164 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (2678 - 3748, n=7)
3026 Points -4%

Legend

 
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

The Unisoc T606's ARM Mali-G57 MP1 delivers entry-level GPU performance. Only graphically undemanding games run smoothly on the tablet, or games which have had their graphics settings reduced to the minimum. On the other hand, it can also manage frame rates above 30fps, as the T-Rex benchmark from GFXBench showed.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +209%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points +179%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
123 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 Points 0%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +185%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1171 Points +177%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
700 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
574 Points +36%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
423 Points
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
422 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +183%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1173 Points +173%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
702 Points +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
589 Points +37%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
429 Points
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
422 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +214%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2511 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1429 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points +41%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
980 Points
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
979 Points 0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +260%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2321 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1309 Points +58%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1203 Points +45%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
830 Points 0%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
830 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2935 Points +11%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2652 Points
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2647 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points -21%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +134%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps +6%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +323%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
61 fps +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +86%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps 0%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +67%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +26%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -22%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +236%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +171%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps +57%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +7%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +74%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +21%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -26%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +295%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +74%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps +3%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +73%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +9%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -32%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps -52%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +258%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +53%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps +2%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +78%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +14%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -27%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps -32%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +310%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps +65%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps +65%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps 0%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +91%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +9%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps -18%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps -25%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +307%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps +81%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps +65%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps +2%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +309%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +59%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.88 fps 0%
Teclast P50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.88 fps

The Teclast P50 can generally navigate the internet smoothly. The browser benchmarks confirmed this, with the tablet achieving good performance values equal to most of the comparison devices. Even so, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ was a lot faster.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
102 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +85%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
58.17 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
52.9 Points +1%
Teclast T50 HD
52.862 Points +1%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
52.153 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (38.1 - 52.9, n=8)
48.6 Points -7%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +98%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)
98.4 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
57 Points +6%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
56 Points +4%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
56 Points +4%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
54 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (51 - 56, n=7)
52.6 Points -3%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years)
144.5 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
144 Points +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
93 Points +33%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
86 Points +23%
Average UNISOC T606 (70 - 86, n=4)
77.8 Points +11%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
70 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=65, last 2 years)
108 runs/min +125%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
53.5 runs/min +11%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
52.1 runs/min +9%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
48 runs/min
Average UNISOC T606 (31.2 - 52.1, n=7)
40.8 runs/min -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +118%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
26881 Points +100%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
21843 Points +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)
14279 Points +6%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
13455 Points
Lenovo Tab M11 (Chrome 124)
13413 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
13211 Points -2%
Average UNISOC T606 (2228 - 13455, n=14)
11332 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=72, last 2 years)
3564 ms * -23%
Average UNISOC T606 (2904 - 3187, n=7)
3045 ms * -5%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
2965.7 ms * -2%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)
2903.5 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
2650.1 ms * +9%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
2194.9 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +53%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast has given its tablet UFS 2.2 storage, which isn't always a given inside tablets within this price range. You'll notice that the device offers more than the standard during every use, as apps are loaded comparatively speedily.

Teclast P50Lenovo Tab M11Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+Teclast T50 HDTelekom T TabletXiaomi Redmi Pad SEAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
29%
122%
-46%
-17%
56%
61%
Sequential Read 256KB
879.52
294.5
-67%
485.96
-45%
970.01
10%
287.1
-67%
297.47
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
191.5
256.9
34%
476.37
149%
831.36
334%
188.3
-2%
228.97
20%
Random Read 4KB
122.95
95.6
-22%
130.67
6%
218.22
77%
52.8
-57%
102.41
-17%
188.8 ?(89.3 - 297, n=65)
54%
Random Write 4KB
153.65
101.2
-34%
162.9
6%
257.68
68%
66.55
-57%
146.92
-4%
181.7 ?(62.6 - 419, n=65)
18%

Games - Only simple games run smoothly

We used Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile to test how well current games run on the Teclast P50. We unfortunately can't give you any frame rates, as the Teclast tablet didn't want to provide our test tool Gamebench with the corresponding values. We can still assess the P50's gaming qualities without exact figures.

The P50 is only fun to play on when running graphically simple games. Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile are not among them, as both have quite high system requirements. The Teclast P50 didn't manage to render them smoothly even in the lowest graphics setting.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
No graph data

Emissions - Stereo speakers on the Teclast tablet

Temperature

The Teclast P50 is very stable under load. As 3DMark's Wild Life stress tests showed, it could call up its full performance at practically any time. We only measured a maximum of 36.6 °C on the tablet's surface after the burnout benchmark had used its full performance for an hour straight. 

Max. Load
 31.6 °C
89 F
36.6 °C
98 F
29.9 °C
86 F
 
 32.3 °C
90 F
31.3 °C
88 F
29.6 °C
85 F
 
 31 °C
88 F
29.9 °C
86 F
29.9 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 36.6 °C = 98 F
Average: 31.3 °C = 88 F
31.5 °C
89 F
36 °C
97 F
32.2 °C
90 F
30.4 °C
87 F
32 °C
90 F
32.3 °C
90 F
30.1 °C
86 F
30.7 °C
87 F
31.1 °C
88 F
Maximum: 36 °C = 97 F
Average: 31.8 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.5 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.1 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.57 (2.55-2.58)
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.22 (4.19-4.23)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.699 (0.686-0.71)
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.088 (1.072-1.097)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99 (2.14min - 2.16max) % +3%
Lenovo Tab M11
97.8 (1.072min - 1.097max) % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
97.3 (0.72min - 0.741max) % +1%
Teclast P50
96.5 (0.686min - 0.71max) %
Teclast T50 HD
% -100%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.6 (3.49min - 3.5max) % +1%
Telekom T Tablet
99.6 (7.07min - 7.1max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99.5 (7.23min - 7.27max) % +1%
Teclast T50 HD
99.1 (2.53min - 2.55max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M11
98.9 (4.19min - 4.23max) % 0%
Teclast P50
98.7 (2.55min - 2.58max) %
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.9 (3.52min - 3.53max) %
Telekom T Tablet
99.5 (6.99min - 7.03max) %

Legend

 
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Teclast P50
Teclast P50

Speakers

The Teclast tablet has stereo speakers that sound very treble-heavy at maximum volume. If you turn the volume down, you get a more balanced, but still rather flat sound due to its lack of bass. For this price range, however, this is fine.

External audio devices can be connected to the tablet via the 3.5 mm jack or Bluetooth 5.0. The Teclast P50 supports the Bluetooth codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3 and Opus.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.136.42528.733.33123.129.54026.529.25037.637.36319.620.98016.717.310024.22212520.416.416020.529.120011.642.225010.748.731510.3554007.851.25008.152.36309.2628009.561.610009.666.212508.170.216009.365.420009.758.7250010.264.6315010.963.9400011.462.4500012.365.2630012.860.9800013.964.11000014.663.61250015.455.71600016.243.4SPL23.676.4N0.537.1median 10.9median 60.9Delta2.610.128.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast P50Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast P50 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - Good battery life but slow charging

Power consumption

The Teclast P50 can be charged at a maximum of 10 watts. A fitting power supply comes delivered with the tablet. You just have to have a little patience when charging it. During our test, it took 4:29 hours for the empty battery to reach 100 per cent. If 90 per cent is enough, then its charging time shortens to 3:48 hours.

The Teclast tablet behaves in an exemplary way when it comes to its power consumption, as it consumes significantly less power than the comparison devices under load and in idle mode. The P50 only faces in-house competition, as the Teclast T50 HD is even more energy-efficient.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 1.8 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 4.3 / 9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Teclast P50
8000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Teclast T50 HD
8000 mAh
Telekom T Tablet
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
-67%
17%
-74%
-57%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1
33%
1.6
-7%
1.28
15%
0.63
58%
Idle Average *
1.8
4.76
-164%
1.8
-0%
4.52
-151%
4.25
-136%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
4.79
-71%
2
29%
4.58
-64%
4.34
-55%
Load Average *
4.3
9.52
-121%
2.8
35%
10.5
-144%
10.24
-138%
Load Maximum *
9
9.92
-10%
6.4
29%
11.2
-24%
10.47
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Teclast P50 UNISOC T606: Ø6.55 (4.28-9.02)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606: Ø3.86 (1.833-6.32)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345