Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T50HD tablet review - The affordable 11-inch allrounder with Android 14

Good entertainment. For a very inexpensive 11-inch tablet, the Teclast T50HD comes with a solid selection of features. Aside from Android 14, it also comes with 256 GB storage, a bright IPS display, DRM Widevine L1 and even dual-SIM support with 4G. Our review will reveal whether this introductory tablet is worth recommending.
Teclast T50HD

The Chinese manufacturer Teclast has a large number of affordable tablets on sale. None of which offer high-end performance or crazy features. In turn, you get everything that a tablet might need for everyday use. The same can be said for the Teclast T50HD which can already be found for under US$150 online.

The 11-inch T50HD features an IPS display with a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels. Adding to this is 256 GB UFS storage, an 8000-mAh battery, 4G support as well as Android 14—the latest version of Google's operating system.

The T50HD's Unisoc T606 is fast enough for multimedia, surfing the web and playing simple games. An extra is its DRM Widevine L1 certification which ensures high-resolution streaming on Netflix and co. 

good (82%) Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606ARM Mali-G57 MP1 Tablet - 05/10/2024 - v7
Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Teclast T50 HD (T Series)
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
10.95 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 207 PPI, Touchscreen, IPS, 300 nits typ. brightness, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 243 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: brightness sensor, gravity sensor, hall sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (1/2/5/8) 4G (1/3/5/7/8/20/34/38/39/40/41), GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 257.1 x 169.2 ( = 0.31 x 10.12 x 6.66 in)
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED flash
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Limited, fanless
Weight
500 g ( = 17.64 oz / 1.1 pounds), Power Supply: 43 g ( = 1.52 oz / 0.09 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.7 %
05/2024
Teclast T50 HD
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
500 g7.9 mm10.95"1920x1200
80.4 %
01/2024
Blackview Tab 80
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
484 g7.5 mm10.10"1280x800
84.2 %
02/2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
480 g6.9 mm11.00"1920x1200
79.3 %
04/2024
Teclast M50
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
460 g8 mm10.10"1280x800
81.5 %
09/2023
Telekom T Tablet
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
490 g7.8 mm10.40"2000x1200
83.5 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
481 g7.36 mm11.00"1920x1200

Case - The Teclast T50HD with an aluminum case

The T50HD's aluminium case looks great with its rounded edges and you wouldn't be able to tell how inexpensive the Teclast tablet is. Its bezels are around 1 cm in width which gives the 11-inch device quite a modern look while making sure that you don't accidentally activate the touchscreen when you are holding it.

The T50HD doesn't feature an IP certification and if you really want to, you can quite easily dent and twist the 7.9-mm-thick case. Even so, the tablet is stable enough for everyday use and at 500 grams, it isn't too heavy, meaning you can get away with holding it in one hand for quite a while. 

On the flip side, we don't really like how the manufacturer has preinstalled the screen protector on the tablet. As it is relatively soft, you can barely avoid collecting the odd scratch or two—this happened quite quickly during our test even though we handled the tablet carefully.

The Teclast T50HD only comes in one color with a matte gray back cover. The most eye-catching design element on the back is the camera module with a high-shine finish and its "AI Dual Camera" lettering. This looks neat and suggests advanced technologies—unfortunately this is clearly more appearance than reality, as the camera isn't capable of delivering anything more than snapshot quality.

Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD

Size comparison

257.1 mm / 10.1 in 169.2 mm / 6.66 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 500 g1.102 lbs257.1 mm / 10.1 in 168.7 mm / 6.64 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 480 g1.058 lbs255.53 mm / 10.1 in 167.08 mm / 6.58 in 7.36 mm / 0.2898 in 481 g1.06 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 in 157.1 mm / 6.19 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 490 g1.08 lbs241 mm / 9.49 in 156 mm / 6.14 in 7.5 mm / 0.2953 in 484 g1.067 lbs238 mm / 9.37 in 158 mm / 6.22 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 460 g1.014 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Connectivity - 256 GB storage and dual SIM

The T50HD is equipped with a generous amount of RAM and storage, namely 6 GB and 256 GB respectively. Teclast even speaks of up to 14 GB RAM, however, the additional 8 GB don't bring much, as they are provided via a swap file in the internal storage, which runs significantly slower than the RAM. The RAM expansion is active by default, but can be switched off at any time via the Android settings.

The T50HD's USB-C port runs with USB-2.0 speeds and supports USB-OTG, which lets you connect USB drives to the tablet, for example. You can also expand its internal storage via the microSD slot which supports cards up to 1 TB in size. You can also insert a SIM card directly next to it. If you decide to go without a microSD card, then you can actually even insert two SIM cards at once. The device also has a 3.5-mm jack for audio devices.

Left: speaker
Left: speaker
Right: SIM/microSD slot, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Right: SIM/microSD slot, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Top: microphone, volume rocker, power button
Top: microphone, volume rocker, power button
Bottom: microphone
Bottom: microphone

microSD card reader

In combination with our Angelbird AV Pro V60 reference card, the card reader achieved very good data throughput values for its price class. During the sequential read and write tests, it was as quick as the card reader inside the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+. During the copying test, it came ahead of most of the comparison devices, achieving 41.2 MByte/s. Only the Samsung tablet was faster in this aspect.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +15%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
41.2 MB/s
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
30.5 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.92 MB/s -30%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.6 MB/s -35%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.02 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.8 (28.1-47.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.8 (41.8-84.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

Software - Android 14 and DRM Widevine L1

Not only does the latest version of Android (Android 14) run on the Teclast tablet, it also doesn't come preinstalled with third-party sponsored apps, meaning you can make use of the available storage very effectively. The T50HD supports DRM Widevine L1, so you can stream high-resolution content from streaming platforms such as Netflix. 

At the time of testing at the beginning of May, the latest Android security patch was from 5th February, so not entirely up-to-date anymore. Even when asking Teclast directly, the manufacturer couldn't reveal to us for how long or how frequently the T50HD will be supplied with updates.

Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD

Communication and GNSS - Stable WiFi 5, poor GPS

The Teclast T50HD supports WiFi 5 as its fastest WLAN standard and over short distances, it can also communicate via Bluetooth 5.0. It doesn't support NFC.

When connected to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the T50HD delivered good and stable WLAN transfer rates. With a peak value of 358 MBit/s, it almost makes use of the standard's maximum possible data throughput. Amongst the comparison devices, only the Telekom T Tablet is a little faster.

You can use 4G to access the web on the go on the T50HD. It supports the 4G bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40 and 41, assuring good reception within the EU, where this test was carried out.

Networking
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
320 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼96%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
44.1 (min: 27) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
47.8 (min: 32) MBit/s ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼99%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
302 (min: 240) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
353 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼95%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
371 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
307 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼99%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (196-336)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (340-367)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outside
GPS reception outside

The T50HD determines its location via the satellite navigation services GPS, Glonass, Galileo and Beidou, all in single-band mode. However, it doesn't locate quickly and indoors, we couldn't get a result. Outside, the tablet managed to locate us with an accuracy of 7 meters. 

As our practical test showed, the tablet is only partly suitable for navigation purposes. In contrast to the Garmin Venu 2, the fitness smartwatch that we took with us to compare, the T50HD recorded our 4-kilometer long route very imprecisely. It took shortcuts through buildings, sometimes jumped an entire street further or it assumed that we were in the river instead of on the bridge going over it.

GPS test Teclast T50HD: overview
GPS test Teclast T50HD: overview
GPS test Teclast T50HD: bridge
GPS test Teclast T50HD: bridge
GPS test Teclast T50HD: turning point
GPS test Teclast T50HD: turning point
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: overview
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: overview
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: bridge
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: bridge
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: turning point
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: turning point

Cameras - Only snapshot quality

Photo taken using selfie camera
Photo taken using selfie camera

The T50HD's selfie camera has an 8-MP resolution and doesn't take particularly bright or sharp photos. Even so, its picture quality is still good enough for video calls. It allows a maximum resolution of 720p at 30 frames per second.

The tablet's main camera features a resolution of 13 MP and, the same as with the selfie camera, is supported by an LED flash. Viewers will see two lenses but the bottom one is just used as a depth sensor and has a resolution of 0.3 MP.

In good lighting conditions, the main camera takes usable photos, but they don't offer much more than snapshot quality. The photos look less dynamic and have a slightly anemic look to them, almost as if they were taken during a solar eclipse. There is little image detail, homogeneous areas are washed out and image noise creeps into darker areas of the image. Poor lighting conditions then completely overwhelm the camera. 

The main camera can record video at up to 1080p and 30 frames per second. Its picture quality when recording video is comparable with its photography quality. In turn, the camera adjusts to changing lighting conditions relatively speedily. The autofocus also does its job pretty reliably. 

Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Low-light photo

Subsequently, we took a closer look at the main camera's picture quality in controlled lighting conditions. In optimum lighting conditions, the main camera captured colors accurately but the test chart appeared blurry. In 1 lux of residual lighting, the ColorChecker color card and the test chart almost entirely disappeared into the darkness. 

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50 HD: 5.72 ∆E min: 1.63 - max: 11.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50 HD: 46.24 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 92.92 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Teclast T50HD with a 10-watt power supply

The Teclast T50HD comes with a 10-watt power supply (5V/2A), a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a SIM tool, a short instruction manual as well as a warranty card. The manufacturer also offers a folio case for the tablet via its website.

The Teclast T50HD is protected by a 12-month warranty.

Input devices & operation - No fingerprint sensor, but 2D facial recognition

The Teclast tablet's touchscreen reacts quickly and precisely to inputs. As is typical for the class, it features a refresh rate of 60 Hz.

The T50HD isn't fitted with a fingerprint sensor. However, you can unlock the tablet biometrically via 2D facial recognition which also works well in low-light surroundings. Further ways to lock the device include patterns, PINs and passwords. 

Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright

Display - Bright IPS panel without PWM

Subpixels
Subpixels

The T50HD's 11-inch display has a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels, resulting in an aspect ratio of 16:10 and a pixel density of 207 PPI. During our APL18 test (even distribution of light and dark image areas), the screen reached a maximum luminance of 528 cd/m², meaning it was the brightest device within the comparison field.

We didn't measure any PWM on the IPS display. As a result, people who react sensitively to screen flickering can purchase this tablet without any hesitations.

431
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 500 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 457 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 1515:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.016
Teclast T50 HD
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.95
Blackview Tab 80
LCD, 1280x800, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11.00
Teclast M50
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Telekom T Tablet
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.40
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11.00
Screen
-8%
-21%
-44%
-52%
15%
Brightness middle
500
425
-15%
493
-1%
371
-26%
529
6%
473
-5%
Brightness
457
423
-7%
460
1%
369
-19%
486
6%
449
-2%
Brightness Distribution
86
83
-3%
90
5%
87
1%
87
1%
85
-1%
Black Level *
0.33
0.4
-21%
0.35
-6%
0.45
-36%
0.56
-70%
0.28
15%
Contrast
1515
1063
-30%
1409
-7%
824
-46%
945
-38%
1689
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.64
5.11
-10%
6
-29%
7.46
-61%
9.6
-107%
3
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.02
9.8
-9%
11.7
-30%
16.5
-83%
14.4
-60%
6
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
2.8
32%
8.2
-100%
7.4
-80%
10.5
-156%
2.7
34%
Gamma
2.016 109%
2.183 101%
2.21 100%
2.055 107%
2.17 101%
2.27 97%
CCT
7316 89%
7136 91%
9131 71%
8423 77%
10482 62%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17673 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The IPS display boasts contrast-rich depiction (1515:1) and it also performed well during the tests with the other image parameters. Its results weren't totally ideal but still, they are fine for this price range. This is also due to the fact its overall color deviations are low and shouldn't be noticeable in everyday use.

Color accuracy
Color accuracy
Grayscale
Grayscale
Color saturation
Color saturation
sRGB color space coverage
sRGB color space coverage
DCI-P3 color space coverage
DCI-P3 color space coverage
AdobeRGB color space coverage
AdobeRGB color space coverage

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.1 ms rise
↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.1 ms rise
↘ 17.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

Even on bright days, content remains legible on the viewing-angle-stable IPS panel. In contrast, direct sunlight poses some issues for the device, as strong reflections oftentimes hinder your view. In shaded locations, on the other hand, the display can be read from pretty comfortably.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Teclast T50HD with a Unisoc T606

The Unisoc T606 inside the Teclast T50HD is a familiar friend also used in many other tablets produced by the manufacturer. The eight-core SoC, which was presented toward the end of 2019, is no performance miracle, as stutters or small delays occur from time to time during everyday use. On the other hand, the Teclast tablet is fast enough to surf the web and watch videos. Games can run smoothly, too, if the graphics calculations aren't too demanding. 

As its synthetic benchmark results show, the Teclast T50HD can hold its own against its similarly priced competitors. Its performance is similar to that of the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, which is equipped with the Snapdragon 680 4G. The Telekom T Tablet (MediaTek Dimensity 700) and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Snapdragon 695 5G), on the other hand, keep the T50HD at a clearer distance.

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=55, last 2 years)
2989 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1993 Points +51%
Telekom T Tablet
1919 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1439 Points +9%
Teclast M50
1386 Points +5%
Average UNISOC T606 (1285 - 1482, n=11)
1364 Points +3%
Teclast T50 HD
1319 Points
Blackview Tab 80
1298 Points -2%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=55, last 2 years)
982 Points +167%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
919 Points +150%
Telekom T Tablet
711 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
413 Points +12%
Teclast M50
380 Points +3%
Blackview Tab 80
377 Points +2%
Average UNISOC T606 (368 - 380, n=11)
375 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD
368 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
693 Points +131%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=74, last 2 years)
682 Points +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
384 Points +28%
Blackview Tab 80
309 Points +3%
Teclast M50
309 Points +3%
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD
300 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=74, last 2 years)
2435 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1768 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1684 Points +38%
Teclast M50
1305 Points +7%
Blackview Tab 80
1245 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD
1217 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=27, last 2 years)
725042 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
422144 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
287727 Points +17%
Teclast T50 HD
245367 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (221540 - 245797, n=6)
237693 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 80
221540 Points -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=55, last 2 years)
462027 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
354299 Points +50%
Teclast T50 HD
236491 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (202973 - 238808, n=6)
221439 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
201810 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
10550 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=70, last 2 years)
8917 Points +22%
Telekom T Tablet
8329 Points +14%
Teclast M50
7383 Points +1%
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
7321 Points
Blackview Tab 80
7178 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
7068 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=60, last 2 years)
734 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
578 Points +60%
Telekom T Tablet
534 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
402 Points +11%
Teclast T50 HD
362 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (339 - 362, n=5)
349 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 80
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=56, last 2 years)
3675 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3596 Points +91%
Telekom T Tablet
2839 Points +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2551 Points +36%
Average UNISOC T606 (1879 - 1954, n=7)
1913 Points +2%
Blackview Tab 80
1887 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
1879 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7626 Points +90%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=56, last 2 years)
6630 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5580 Points +39%
Telekom T Tablet
4934 Points +23%
Blackview Tab 80
4335 Points +8%
Average UNISOC T606 (4009 - 4362, n=7)
4273 Points +7%
Teclast T50 HD
4009 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=56, last 2 years)
4349 Points +62%
Telekom T Tablet
3923 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3872 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
3120 Points +16%
Average UNISOC T606 (2675 - 3095, n=7)
2808 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD
2679 Points
Blackview Tab 80
2675 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=56, last 2 years)
6722 Points +555%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
4337 Points +322%
Telekom T Tablet
2667 Points +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2179 Points +112%
Blackview Tab 80
1076 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD
1027 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (989 - 1076, n=7)
1023 Points 0%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1307 Points +16%
Telekom T Tablet
1258 Points +11%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=56, last 2 years)
1215 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD
1129 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1116 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T606 (1034 - 1129, n=7)
1098 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 80
1034 Points -8%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=43, last 2 years)
4889 Points +1678%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
429 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
348 Points +27%
Teclast T50 HD
275 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (256 - 280, n=6)
275 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80
256 Points -7%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Telekom T Tablet
9056 Points +163%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=54, last 2 years)
8728 Points +154%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
5687 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4150 Points +21%
Teclast T50 HD
3441 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (2678 - 3748, n=7)
3026 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 80
2678 Points -22%

Legend

 
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 80 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast M50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

The Unisoc T606 contains the ARM Mali-G57 MP1 graphics unit, which gives the T50HD solid graphics performance when running applications. However, games present the GPU with major challenges. The T-Rex benchmark from GFXBench shows that 30 frames per second and thus a reasonably smooth display are by no means guaranteed in even graphically simple games.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +209%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
123 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
101 Points -14%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
89 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +186%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1171 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
574 Points +36%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
424 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
422 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
421 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +188%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1173 Points +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
589 Points +40%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
432 Points +2%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points +1%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
422 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +214%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2511 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1429 Points +46%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
989 Points +1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
979 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +260%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2321 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1309 Points +58%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
830 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
829 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
822 Points -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +29%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2659 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2647 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2593 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +273%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps +132%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps +68%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +55%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +323%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
61 fps +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +86%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +221%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +143%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
27 fps +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +50%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +213%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +153%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps +47%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +275%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +161%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +282%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +170%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +69%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -2%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +258%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +126%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps +42%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +252%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +50%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps +6%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +282%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +144%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.2 fps +112%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps +56%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +310%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps +65%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.1 fps +5%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +289%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +122%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +104%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps +67%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +300%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps +78%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -4%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +309%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.88 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -9%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -9%

The browser benchmarks showed a slightly different picture, as there was hardly any difference in performance compared to tablets such as the Telekom T Tablet or the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE. In everyday use, you can surf quickly on the Teclast tablet and websites are loaded quickly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)
98.8 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +83%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
58.17 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
52.9 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
52.862 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (38.1 - 52.9, n=8)
48.6 Points -8%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
47.753 Points -10%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +91%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=65, last 2 years)
94.8 Points +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
57 Points +2%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
56 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
56 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (51 - 56, n=7)
52.6 Points -6%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
51 Points -9%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
144 Points +67%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 430, n=49, last 2 years)
138.8 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
93 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
86 Points
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
78 Points -9%
Average UNISOC T606 (70 - 86, n=4)
77.8 Points -10%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (48 - 572, n=61, last 2 years)
106.6 runs/min +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
53.5 runs/min +3%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
52.1 runs/min
Average UNISOC T606 (31.2 - 52.1, n=7)
40.8 runs/min -22%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
36.9 runs/min -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +122%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 105178, n=82, last 2 years)
26541 Points +101%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
21843 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)
14279 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
13211 Points
Teclast M50 (Chrome 122)
12461 Points -6%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
11786 Points -11%
Average UNISOC T606 (2228 - 13455, n=14)
11332 Points -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
3176.1 ms * -7%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=68, last 2 years)
3120 ms * -5%
Average UNISOC T606 (2904 - 3187, n=7)
3045 ms * -3%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
2965.7 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
2650.1 ms * +11%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
2194.9 ms * +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS storage helps the Teclast T50HD achieve very good transfer rates. This makes itself noticeable in everyday use, as even large apps load quite quickly.

Teclast T50 HDBlackview Tab 80Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+Teclast M50Telekom T TabletXiaomi Redmi Pad SEAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-72%
-43%
-73%
-74%
-59%
-8%
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB
970.01
266.71
-73%
485.96
-50%
269.9
-72%
287.1
-70%
297.47
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
831.36
235.98
-72%
476.37
-43%
196
-76%
188.3
-77%
228.97
-72%
696 ?(369 - 913, n=27)
-16%
Random Read 4KB
218.22
65.11
-70%
130.67
-40%
69.6
-68%
52.8
-76%
102.41
-53%
Random Write 4KB
257.68
70.74
-73%
162.9
-37%
62.3
-76%
66.55
-74%
146.92
-43%

Games - Rarely smooth-running

We use Gamebench to test how well tablets can run games. Unfortunately, the Teclast T50HD refused to provide data to our test app, so we can't provide any frame rates.

Still, the T50HD's gaming performance can also be assessed well without exact FPS figures. Demanding games such as Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile can be played in the lowest graphics setting, but they don't really run smoothly. The low-performance ARM Mali-G57 MP1 graphics chip only manages this in graphically simple games, such as Dead Trigger 2 or Subway Surfers.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
No graph data

Emissions - Cool tablet with stereo sound

Temperature

During operation, the T50HD remains cool. After our 1-hour stress test using the Burnout benchmark, we measured a maximum surface temperature of 89.6° F (32° C). The Wild Life stress tests from 3DMark showed that the tablet can practically always access its full performance—even under continuous load.

Max. Load
 26.3 °C
79 F
32 °C
90 F
26.9 °C
80 F
 
 26.5 °C
80 F
28 °C
82 F
26.3 °C
79 F
 
 26.2 °C
79 F
26 °C
79 F
25.8 °C
78 F
 
Maximum: 32 °C = 90 F
Average: 27.1 °C = 81 F
27.7 °C
82 F
31.5 °C
89 F
26.4 °C
80 F
27.4 °C
81 F
29 °C
84 F
27.7 °C
82 F
27 °C
81 F
27.1 °C
81 F
27.1 °C
81 F
Maximum: 31.5 °C = 89 F
Average: 27.9 °C = 82 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.52-2.56)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.619 (0.55-0.676)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.621 (0.58-0.68)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99 (2.14min - 2.16max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
97.3 (0.72min - 0.741max) %
Teclast M50
85.3 (0.58min - 0.68max) %
Blackview Tab 80
81.3 (0.55min - 0.676max) %
Teclast T50 HD
%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.6 (3.49min - 3.5max) % +1%
Telekom T Tablet
99.6 (7.07min - 7.1max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99.5 (7.23min - 7.27max) % 0%
Teclast T50 HD
99.1 (2.53min - 2.55max) %
Teclast M50
98.9 (2.54min - 2.57max) % 0%
Blackview Tab 80
98.2 (2.52min - 2.56max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.9 (3.52min - 3.53max) %
Telekom T Tablet
99.5 (6.99min - 7.03max) %

Legend

 
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 80 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast M50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD

Speakers

Stereo speakers sit inside the Teclast tablet and they can reach up to 80.4 dB(A) without sounding distorted at all. Their sound is fine, however, it is missing bass. In turn, the mids and highs are relatively balanced.

External audio devices can be connected to the tablet via its 3.5 mm jack or Bluetooth 5.0. The Bluetooth codecs available are SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3 and Opus.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.740.92533.234.13129.3284032.331.15040.7366332.628.38019.72110016.923.812515.524.316013.330.22009.631.625011.831.83159.239.94008.749.85001154.163013.258.680013.769.2100014.870.7125013.768.9160010.667.5200010.963.4250012.362.9315013.760.4400013.666.8500013.973.3630014.472.4800015.671.11000015.963.11250016641600016.749.3SPL25.880.4N0.744.5median 13.7median 62.9Delta2.112.928.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T50 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T50 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - Good battery life, but slow charging

Power consumption

The Teclast T50HD is quite energy-efficient compared to the competition. It only requires 1.8 watts in idle mode and its power consumption increases to a moderate 2.8 watts under load.

The 8000 mAh battery can be charged at a maximum of 10 watts via the supplied power adapter. With other power supply units, such as a 65-watt power supply unit from Ugreen that we used, we were unable to elicit a higher charging power from the tablet.

You have to be patient when charging the tablet. In our test, it took 5 hours and 5 minutes for the empty battery to reach 100 per cent again. In practice, it is therefore probably best to charge the tablet overnight.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.8 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 2.8 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Teclast T50 HD
8000 mAh
Blackview Tab 80
7680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Telekom T Tablet
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
26%
-112%
-122%
-104%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.8
50%
1
37%
1.28
20%
0.63
61%
Idle Average *
1.8
1
44%
4.76
-164%
4.52
-151%
4.25
-136%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.5
25%
4.79
-140%
4.58
-129%
4.34
-117%
Load Average *
2.8
3.2
-14%
9.52
-240%
10.5
-275%
10.24
-266%
Load Maximum *
6.4
4.9
23%
9.92
-55%
11.2
-75%
10.47
-64%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606: Ø3.86 (1.833-6.32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.24.5