Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T65 Max review - A 13-inch tablet at a bargain price

Lots of display for little money. The Teclast T65 Max is swimming against the current. In contrast to many other XXL tablets, the almost 13-inch T65 Max is super affordable, with prices starting from under US$400. Despite this, the Teclast is extremely versatile thanks to its extensive selection of features.
Teclast T65 Max

Tablets larger than 12 inches in size offer lots of screen surface for watching videos and surfing the web, but they are also one thing above all: expensive. The T65 Max, made by the Chinese manufacturer Teclast, is now attempting the complete opposite. The Android 14 tablet has a screen diagonal of 12.95 inches, meaning it is as big as the Apple iPad Pro 12.9—but its price starts as low as under US$400. 

The T65 Max is Teclast's largest tablet so far and despite its comparatively low price, it comes with quite a few features. Aside from an IPS display with a 1920 x 1200 pixel resolution, it also comes with 256 GB storage, a 4G modem, a 10,000-mAh battery, four speakers, and the MediaTek Helio G99—a solid mid-range SoC. Let's take a look at who this tablet is made for.

good (81%) Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99ARM Mali-G57 MP2 Tablet - 05/30/2024 - v7
Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Teclast T65 Max (T Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
12.95 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 175 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 300 nits typ. brightness, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gyroscope, Compass, Gravity sensor, Distance Sensor, Light Sensor, Hall Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 305 x 199 ( = 0.32 x 12.01 x 7.83 in)
Battery
10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 20W charger (12V/1.67A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Full, fanless
Weight
710 g ( = 25.04 oz / 1.57 pounds), Power Supply: 51 g ( = 1.8 oz / 0.11 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.2 %
05/2024
Teclast T65 Max
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
710 g8.2 mm12.95"1920x1200
84.8 %
03/2024
Honor Pad 9
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710
555 g6.96 mm12.10"2560x1600
86.5 %
09/2023
Huawei MatePad 11.5
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
499 g6.85 mm11.50"2200x1440
85.2 %
09/2023
Lenovo Tab P12
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4
615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840
80.7 %
01/2024
Teclast T60
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
570 g7.7 mm11.97"2000x1200

Case - The T65 Max with a matte aluminum unibody case

Thanks to its matte-gray aluminium unibody case, the 12.95-inch T65 Max looks high-quality and is built well. 

On the other hand, if you apply pressure, then you can twist the Teclast tablet quite easily, which is met with some creaking noises. Even so, the T65 Max is definitely stable enough for everyday use. In turn, it doesn't feature an IP certification.

The Teclast tablet, which is nice and slim at only 8.2 mm in thickness, isn't the most lightweight due to its XXL size—we measured 710 grams. Still, its bezels (1 cm wide) allow you to hold the tablet comfortably without accidentally activating the touchscreen. The volume rocker and power button allow a little lateral flex and have a crisp pressure point.

The main camera, with its eye-catching high-shine bezels, draws all attention to the back of the tablet. Embedded in this are two lenses which both protrude from the back cover by about 2 millimetres. Thankfully, the tablet doesn't wobble when placed on a flat surface thanks to its enormous size.

Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max

Size comparison

305 mm / 12 in 199 mm / 7.83 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 710 g1.565 lbs293.37 mm / 11.5 in 190.76 mm / 7.51 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 615 g1.356 lbs279 mm / 11 in 174 mm / 6.85 in 7.7 mm / 0.3031 in 570 g1.257 lbs278.27 mm / 11 in 180.11 mm / 7.09 in 6.96 mm / 0.274 in 555 g1.224 lbs260.88 mm / 10.3 in 176.82 mm / 6.96 in 6.85 mm / 0.2697 in 499 g1.1 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - 256 GB storage on the Teclast tablet

Teclast has equipped the T65 Max with 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM and 256 GB UFS 2.2 storage. Its RAM can be expanded to up to 20 GB, but not physically—instead, via a 6 to 12 GB swap file in the storage. As this works much slower than the RAM, this memory expansion ultimately remains a marketing gimmick with no practical benefit.

The T65 Max's USB-C port runs at USB-2.0 speeds and supports USB-OTG, allowing you to connect USB drives to the tablet, for example. A further option to expand the internal storage is by using the microSD card slot, which can accommodate cards up to 1 TB in size. If you don't reach for a microSD card, then you can also insert two nano SIM cards into the hybrid slot. The device also features a 3.5-mm jack with which you can connect external audio devices.

Left: speaker
Left: speaker
Right: speaker, USB-C 2.0, speaker, hybrid SIM/microSD slot, 3.5-mm jack
Right: speaker, USB-C 2.0, speaker, hybrid SIM/microSD slot, 3.5-mm jack
Top: power button, volume rocker, microphone
Top: power button, volume rocker, microphone
Bottom: no connections
Bottom: no connections

microSD card reader

Using our Angelbird AV Pro V60 as a microSD reference card, we noted the card reader to deliver good speeds slightly above those of its sister model, the Teclast T60. The Lenovo Tab P12 did the worst amongst the comparison devices, lagging behind the Teclast T65 Max in both sequential data throughput and the copying test.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.8 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.28 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (26-49.4)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.1 (16-51.7)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (28-49.4)
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.3 (15.6-78.2)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.6 (39.2-83.8)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (38.3-83.8)

Software - The Teclast T65 Max with stock Android 14

The latest version of Android, namely Android 14, runs on the T65 Max. No third-party apps come preinstalled, meaning the available storage space can be used very effectively. The Teclast tablet supports DRM Widevine L1, so it can play copy-protected streaming content from Netflix and co in HD. 

At the time of testing at the end of May, the tablet ran using the system build 1.06_20240425 whose Android security patches were from February 5th 2024, so not totally up to date. Unfortunately, Teclast hasn't given any information on how long the T65 Max is set to receive OS upgrades and security patches, and how frequently these will be delivered.

Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max

Communication and GNSS - WiFi 5 and an LTE modem

The T65 Max uses WiFi 5 as its fastest Wi-Fi standard. Using our reference router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 as a remote station, the T65 Max achieved good and stable transfer rates that roughly corresponded to the maximum data throughput possible with WiFi 5. It was surpassed by comparable devices such as the Huawei MatePad 11.5 and the Lenovo Tab P12, both of which already make use of WiFi 6.

The T65 Max's communication features also include Bluetooth 5.0 and a 4G mobile module. This supports the LTE bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40 and 41, ensuring good reception in the EU, where this test was carried out.

Networking
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
314 (min: 269) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
371 (min: 344) MBit/s ∼40%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
349 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
366 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼39%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
846 (min: 507) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
792 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼85%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
814 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
309 (min: 244) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼39%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø314 (269-334)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (171-354)
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø371 (344-381)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (184-389)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outside
GPS reception outside

The T65 Max uses the satellite navigation services GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1) and Beidou (B1) to determine its position. Inside buildings, the tablet was able to locate us to within 2 meters, and outdoors to within 1 meter.

During the practical test, the T65 Max showed itself to be suitable for navigation tasks—provided you are willing to use a giant tablet for this. In comparison with the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, the Teclast didn't record our route within an urban environment quite as accurately. In less densely populated areas, however, the T65 Max was almost as accurate as the Garmin smartwatch.

GPS test Teclast T65 Max: overview
GPS test Teclast T65 Max: overview
GPS test Teclast T65 Max: bridge
GPS test Teclast T65 Max: bridge
GPS test Teclast T65 Max: turning point
GPS test Teclast T65 Max: turning point
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: overview
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: overview
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: bridge
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: bridge
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: turning point
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: turning point

Cameras - Okay for snapshots

Photo taken using the selfie camera
Photo taken using the selfie camera

The T65 Max's selfie camera has a resolution of 8 megapixels, uses a fixed focus and delivers acceptable results—provided there is sufficient ambient light. Its image quality is also fine for video calls in Full HD.

The Teclast tablet's main camera features a resolution of 13 MP and, unlike the selfie camera, is supported by autofocus and an LED flash. There are two identical-looking lenses on the back cover. However, the lower of the two cannot be actively used, as it only works as a depth sensor for the 13 MP main camera.

The main camera's picture quality is fine for occasional snapshots. It can capture image details quite well, but mixes this with rather low-contrast depiction. You should avoid zooming in on images, as they will quickly become blurred. Shooting in low light conditions also demands too much from the camera.

The main camera can record videos at up to 2560 x 1440 pixels and at 30 frames per second, resulting in an image quality comparable to that of its photos. Alternatively, you can also switch to Full HD or 720p.

Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Low-light photo

Under controlled lighting conditions, the main camera showed that it is able to capture colors quite accurately. However, even with optimal studio lighting, it had difficulties capturing the test chart in focus. At 1 lux of residual light, the camera no longer achieved any meaningful results—the ColorChecker color chart and the test chart were no longer visible.

ColorChecker
3.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T65 Max: 4.97 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T65 Max: 47.62 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.33 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - A 20-watt power supply and an optional folio case

The included 20-watt power supply
The included 20-watt power supply

The Teclast T65 Max's scope of delivery includes a 20-watt power supply (12V/1,67A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, short instruction manual and a warranty card. The manufacturer also offers an optional folio case which you can purchase via its website.

The Teclast T65 Max is covered by a 12-month warranty.

Inout devices & operation - Facial recognition, but no fingerprint sensor

The T65 Max's touchscreen works well and inputs are recognized precisely along the edges and right into the corners. The eight-core Mediatek Helio G99 SoC gives the tablet a high system speed that doesn't sink even with multiple apps open at once. Due to its 60-Hz refresh rate, however, depiction on its screen isn't quite as smooth as it could be.

The T65 Max doesn't have a fingerprint sensor. This means you can only sign in biometrically using 2D facial recognition—this works well in adequate lighting conditions. Further sign-in options include patterns, PINs and passwords.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display - Dim IPS panel without PWM

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The T65 Max's 12.95-inch IPS panel has a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels. It therefore features a 16:10 aspect ratio and achieves a pixel density of 175 PPI. The display does not support HDR.

With a white background, the IPS panel showed an average brightness of 289.6 cd/m². When the measurement was repeated with evenly distributed light and dark image areas (APL18), the screen's brightness increased to up to 328 cd/m².

The IPS panel's luminance is easily sufficient for indoor use, but it may not be quite enough if you want to use the tablet outdoors. In addition, all competing tablets in this comparison offer better brightness—in particular the Honor Pad 9, which manages up to 613 cd/m².

The Teclast T65 Max is well suited for users who are sensitive to PWM flickering, as it doesn't use pulse width modulation for brightness control.

269
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 289.6 cd/m² Minimum: 12.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 630:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
90.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.204
Teclast T65 Max
IPS, 1920x1200, 13"
Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Huawei MatePad 11.5
IPS, 2200x1440, 11.5"
Lenovo Tab P12
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Teclast T60
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Screen
69%
43%
40%
42%
Brightness middle
296
613
107%
472
59%
435
47%
352
19%
Brightness
290
570
97%
432
49%
407
40%
324
12%
Brightness Distribution
87
87
0%
86
-1%
89
2%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.47
0.4
15%
0.44
6%
0.58
-23%
Contrast
630
1533
143%
1073
70%
750
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
2.7
62%
3.4
52%
1.5
79%
2.6
63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
22.2
5.1
77%
6.6
70%
3.2
86%
5.75
74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8
3.7
54%
4.8
40%
2.4
70%
1.5
81%
Gamma
2.204 100%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.319 95%
CCT
7992 81%
6763 96%
7035 92%
6546 99%
6747 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17585 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

Using the factory-set color mode standard (warm and cool can also be selected), the IPS panel's color reproduction is slightly off the ideal line. It shows a clear blue cast and only manages a poor contrast ratio of 630:1 due to its high black value of 0.47 cd/m². Its low color accuracy isn't that noticeable to the naked eye, but its somewhat pale display is.

Color accuracy (color mode standard)
Color accuracy (color mode standard)
Grayscale (color mode standard)
Grayscale (color mode standard)
Color saturation (color mode standard)
Color saturation (color mode standard)
Color space sRGB (color mode standard)
Color space sRGB (color mode standard)
Color space DCI-P3 (color mode standard)
Color space DCI-P3 (color mode standard)
Color space AdobeRGB (color mode standard)
Color space AdobeRGB (color mode standard)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 9.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.5 ms rise
↘ 24.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

The T65 Max is only suitable for outdoor use to a limited extent. In direct sunlight, content remains recognizable on the IPS panel, but the strong reflections make it quite difficult to read. On the other hand, the tablet can be used well in the shade.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use

The IPS panel's viewing angle stability is fine, but could definitely be a little better. The screen darkens noticeably when viewed from the side, but without distorting the colors.

Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Teclast T65 Max with a MediaTek Helio G99

The MediaTek Helio G99 from 2022 in no way turns the T65 Max into a performance high-flyer, but the SoC's performance is easily sufficient for multimedia uses and web surfing. The tablet only reaches its limits running very complex apps. There are a number of tablets in this price range that are significantly faster. The Huawei MatePad 11.5 and the Lenovo Tab P12, for example, offer more power.

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=56, last 2 years)
3194 Points +71%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2970 Points +59%
Honor Pad 9
2773 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab P12
2422 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1864 - 2065, n=10)
1984 Points +6%
Teclast T65 Max
1867 Points
Teclast T60
1596 Points -15%
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1059 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=56, last 2 years)
1016 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P12
958 Points +35%
Honor Pad 9
944 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (710 - 738, n=10)
727 Points +2%
Teclast T65 Max
711 Points
Teclast T60
440 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
781 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab P12
738 Points +39%
Honor Pad 9
725 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=75, last 2 years)
683 Points +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=16)
546 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
531 Points
Teclast T60
361 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2854 Points +69%
Honor Pad 9
2763 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=75, last 2 years)
2430 Points +44%
Lenovo Tab P12
1973 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=16)
1830 Points +8%
Teclast T65 Max
1693 Points
Teclast T60
1502 Points -11%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=28, last 2 years)
717146 Points +79%
Honor Pad 9
490448 Points +22%
Teclast T65 Max
401641 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (383511 - 421861, n=4)
399546 Points -1%
Teclast T60
257601 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
556242 Points +73%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=56, last 2 years)
461399 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P12
442871 Points +37%
Teclast T65 Max
322195 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 337968, n=7)
308787 Points -4%
Teclast T60
235075 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Tab P12
12131 Points +37%
Honor Pad 9
11693 Points +32%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
10389 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11027, n=16)
9801 Points +10%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=71, last 2 years)
8972 Points +1%
Teclast T65 Max
8885 Points
Teclast T60
7992 Points -10%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
744 Points +36%
Honor Pad 9
689 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab P12
682 Points +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=9)
565 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
549 Points
Teclast T60
386 Points -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4784 Points +67%
Honor Pad 9
4233 Points +48%
Lenovo Tab P12
4158 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=57, last 2 years)
3680 Points +28%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=9)
3006 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max
2869 Points
Teclast T60
2182 Points -24%
System
Honor Pad 9
10083 Points +70%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9716 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)
6632 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab P12
6610 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=9)
6268 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max
5944 Points
Teclast T60
5151 Points -13%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P12
5807 Points +60%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4970 Points +37%
Honor Pad 9
4837 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=57, last 2 years)
4366 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=9)
3726 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
3619 Points
Teclast T60
3255 Points -10%
Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7739 Points +183%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)
6695 Points +145%
Honor Pad 9
5783 Points +111%
Lenovo Tab P12
4975 Points +82%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=9)
2810 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
2738 Points
Teclast T60
1146 Points -58%
Web
Lenovo Tab P12
1566 Points +36%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1402 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=9)
1252 Points +9%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)
1217 Points +6%
Honor Pad 9
1192 Points +4%
Teclast T60
1179 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
1150 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=44, last 2 years)
4789 Points +441%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=7)
908 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
885 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5
668 Points -25%
Honor Pad 9
644 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12
456 Points -48%
Teclast T60
321 Points -64%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9027 Points +5%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)
8665 Points 0%
Teclast T65 Max
8626 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=8)
8523 Points -1%
Honor Pad 9
7236 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P12
5315 Points -38%
Teclast T60
2902 Points -66%

Legend

 
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T60 UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

The MediaTek Helio G99's ARM Mali-G57 MC2 provides the T65 Max with solid graphics performance. As the GFXBench tests showed, you can even run games smoothly in higher detail settings.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points +148%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
611 Points +84%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points +84%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
127 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points +144%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points +83%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points +82%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
340 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
129 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3164 Points +213%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points +138%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2237 Points +121%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1011 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
476 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3157 Points +159%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2156 Points +77%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1221 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
479 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6367 Points +149%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points +69%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2554 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1106 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7147 Points +201%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4301 Points +81%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
937 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4608 Points +33%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points +24%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3468 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2990 Points -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +20%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
24 fps -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
150 fps +163%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps +84%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps +75%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
25 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +61%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -22%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +68%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +63%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
44 fps +83%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -33%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.5 fps -60%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps +171%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +92%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +79%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.8 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +79%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps -21%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -29%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.7 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +153%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +73%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +53%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.1 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +86%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps -27%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
3.7 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +188%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps +90%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +86%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.3 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +100%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -27%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.8 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +194%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +94%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +81%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.2 fps -61%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps +204%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps +92%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps +88%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
0.98 fps -61%

The T65 Max achieved average results in our browser benchmark and had to admit defeat to faster tablets such as the Honor Pad 9 and the Huawei MatePad 11.5. When surfing the web, you shouldn't notice any performance restrictions, as websites are fully loaded in no time and can then be scrolled through smoothly. 

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
101.7 Points +27%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
86.231 Points +8%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
79.796 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
75.924 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 79.8, n=8)
64.7 Points -19%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
56.281 Points -29%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)
98 Points +13%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
91 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
87 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 87, n=8)
67.1 Points -23%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
60 Points -31%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years)
144.1 Points +39%
Honor Pad 9
132 Points +27%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
104 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
99 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=7)
93.6 Points -10%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=65, last 2 years)
107.3 runs/min +50%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
86.6 runs/min +21%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 runs/min +9%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
71.3 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
61.5 runs/min -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 71.3, n=8)
49 runs/min -31%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
44.4 runs/min -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
31245 Points +28%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
30021 Points +23%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
26810 Points +9%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
24489 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=16)
20758 Points -15%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
15304 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=72, last 2 years)
3571 ms * -95%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
2592 ms * -41%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1835 - 2444, n=8)
2106 ms * -15%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
1834.7 ms *
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
1460.1 ms * +20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
1365.8 ms * +26%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

The Teclast tablet boasts short loading times thanks to its UFS 2.2 storage and achieves a data throughput that is characteristic of this type of storage. The Honor Pad 9, which uses UFS 3.1 storage, is even faster.

Teclast T65 MaxHonor Pad 9Huawei MatePad 11.5Lenovo Tab P12Teclast T60Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
50%
36%
5%
-70%
-2%
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB
967.58
1921.34
99%
1037.71
7%
956.07
-1%
240.4
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
707.27
1222.83
73%
903.32
28%
776.24
10%
230
-67%
Random Read 4KB
201.81
256.06
27%
297.25
47%
241.23
20%
76.4
-62%
Random Write 4KB
262.04
266.17
2%
418.84
60%
234.58
-10%
67.5
-74%

Games - Gaming with limitations

We used Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile to take a look at how well current games run on the T65 Max. We recorded the frame rates achieved by the tablet using our Gamebench test tool.

The T65 Max had an easy time with PUBG Mobile, as it ran the tactical shooter at a very stable 30 frames per second using the HD setting. In the lowest setting, Liquid, it even achieved an almost continuous 40fps.

When playing the graphically more demanding game Genshin Impact, over 50 frames per second are possible if you set all graphic details to minimum. However, the game is hardly any fun to play at the highest detail level. When doing so, we noted severe and repeated frame rate drops and on average, Genshin Impact jerked along at just over 20fps.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø39.7 (28-53)
Teclast T65 Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø20.7 (4-31)
Teclast T65 Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)
Teclast T65 Max; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø29.6 (27-31)

Emissions - 4 speakers inside the T65 Max

Temperature

Under load, the Teclast T65 Max barely heats up. Even after an hour of the stress test using the Burnout benchmark, we only noted a maximum surface temperature of 31.7 °C. Further stress tests with 3DMark Wild Life and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme showed very even progression, meaning the Teclast tablet doesn't throttle its performance even under load.

Max. Load
 28.7 °C
84 F
31.4 °C
89 F
31.7 °C
89 F
 
 28 °C
82 F
28.2 °C
83 F
27.1 °C
81 F
 
 28.4 °C
83 F
27.2 °C
81 F
26.6 °C
80 F
 
Maximum: 31.7 °C = 89 F
Average: 28.6 °C = 83 F
27.6 °C
82 F
33.7 °C
93 F
29 °C
84 F
27.6 °C
82 F
29.6 °C
85 F
29.6 °C
85 F
27 °C
81 F
28.6 °C
83 F
28.4 °C
83 F
Maximum: 33.7 °C = 93 F
Average: 29 °C = 84 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.19 (6.84-7.35)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.22 (7.21-7.22)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.5 (4.94min - 4.96max) %
Honor Pad 9
99.5 (3.65min - 3.66max) %
Lenovo Tab P12
99.4 (3.7min - 3.72max) %
Teclast T60
89.1 (0.742min - 0.833max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12
99.7 (12.9min - 12.9max) % +7%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.7 (18.8min - 18.9max) % +7%
Honor Pad 9
99.7 (14.1min - 14.1max) % +7%
Teclast T60
99.4 (2.85min - 2.87max) % +7%
Teclast T65 Max
93 (6.84min - 7.35max) %
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Teclast T65 Max
99.9 (7.21min - 7.22max) %
Honor Pad 9
99.3 (14.2min - 14.3max) % -1%

Legend

 
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T60 UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max

Speakers

Teclast has equipped the T65 Max with four speakers. They are located on the two short sides of the tablet and produce a treble-emphasized sound without significant bass volume. Overall, however, their sound is quite decent for this price range.

External audio devices can be connected via the USB-C port or Bluetooth. The tablet supports the most important Bluetooth codecs such as SBC, AAC and LDAC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.128.82528.729.13123.1284026.531.35037.6366319.627.68016.724.310024.220.512520.424.616020.534.120011.64725010.751.731510.354.94007.853.45008.156.76309.265.78009.570.610009.672.612508.17516009.367.220009.772.5250010.271.5315010.965.6400011.467.7500012.368630012.870.2800013.965.91000014.669.21250015.468.21600016.251.6SPL23.682N0.551.6median 10.9median 65.9Delta2.68.436.243.130.736.825.629.426.733.536.737.824.63617.634.318.742.618.254.715.963.617.362.415.266.514.171.213.469.613.874.114.377.513.779.712.48112.782.112.178.312.977.612.574.712.270.612.872.313.172.613.576.513.175.913.774.31464.513.358.725.289.10.782.9median 13.5median 74.11.25.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T65 MaxHonor Pad 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T65 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Pad 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - The T65 Max with a 10,000-mAh battery

Power consumption

The T65 Max's 10,000 mAh battery can be charged at a maximum of 20 watts using the included power supply. During our test, it took 2:30 hours to charge the tablet from 0 to 100 %. 80 % of its capacity was available after 1:43 hours.

In terms of power consumption, the large Teclast tablet behaves in an exemplary manner, as it consumes only a little power in idle mode—namely 2.6 watts. It also remains fairly frugal under load with an average of 6 watts. Only the Teclast T60 is more energy-efficient among the comparison devices.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.9 / 2.6 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 6 / 10.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Teclast T65 Max
10000 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh
Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh
Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
-102%
-39%
-100%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.9
1.5
21%
1.23
35%
1.91
-1%
1.2
37%
Idle Average *
2.6
8.39
-223%
4.44
-71%
7.94
-205%
1.4
46%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
8.46
-202%
4.49
-60%
8.12
-190%
1.7
39%
Load Average *
6
11.65
-94%
11.2
-87%
10.68
-78%
4.2
30%
Load Maximum *
10.2
11.67
-14%
11.32
-11%
12.69
-24%
9.5
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99: Ø8.1 (6.4-10.2)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1: Ø6.14 (3.02-10.1)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050: Ø6.66 (3.76-11.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678