Teclast T60 in review – 12 inch tablet with a huge battery

Name: Teclast T60
Brand: Teclast

Plenty of storage.

The Teclast T60's main features include an impressive display and a large battery. It is priced around ~$300, however it is frequently available at significantly lower prices. While it lacks in power, it does support mobile phones and has plenty of storage.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Carmen Pol), Published 01/15/2024 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

The Teclast T60 stands out as one of the largest tablets in the Chinese producer's lineup, featuring a nearly 12-inch screen that provides ample space for activities such as watching movies or editing documents.

Priced at less than ~$300, purchasers of the T60 can still enjoy a metal case, a cellular modem, and a substantial battery.

However, cost-cutting measures become apparent when examining the charging speed and the SoC specifications in the data sheet. Let's delve deeper to determine whether the Teclast T60 remains a worthwhile choice and for whom it might be most suitable.

Test device courtesy of Teclast

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast T60 (T Series)

Processor

Unisoc T7255 (T616) 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

8 GB

Display

11.97 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 195 PPI, capactive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, proximity

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 279 x 174 ( = 0.3 x 10.98 x 6.85 in)

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10 watt charging

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

570 g ( = 20.11 oz / 1.26 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

299 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible competitors compared

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Teclast T60 T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1	570 g	7.7 mm	11.97"	2000x1200
80 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Teclast T40 Air T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1	464 g	7.7 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Amazon Fire Max 11 MT8188J, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Huawei MatePad 11.5 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	499 g	6.85 mm	11.50"	2200x1440
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200

Case - Sturdy metal housing

Teclast refers to the T60's colour as Space Grey, unmistakably drawing inspiration from Apple. The metal case boasts a polished finish, free of sharp edges, providing a comfortable feel in the hand. The casing shows sturdiness, requiring deliberate effort to leave pressure marks on the liquid crystal screen.

A noteworthy detail is the shiny metallic red standby button, adding a touch of flair to an otherwise understated design. At the top edge, a slightly darker plastic strip is incorporated to enhance reception for the tablet's various antennas.

While there are more compact and lightweight tablets available in this price range, the Teclast T60's weight of 570 grams is deemed reasonable, particularly when considering its expansive screen size.

Size comparison

Connectivity – Plenty of storage in the Teclast tablet

Without a doubt, the Teclast T60 outperforms many devices in its pricing range in terms of memory. With 8 GB of RAM and an amazing 256 GB eMMC memory for data storage, it surpasses most other devices at comparable prices.

Even though the producer claims to have even more RAM, this is actually accomplished by using a swap file on the data storage. Nevertheless, this is a very slow approach and is unlikely to provide considerable advantages for most programmes given the existing large RAM capacity.

Unlike most Teclast tablets that feature a 3.5 mm audio port, the Teclast T60 opts for exclusivity: audio devices can only be connected via cable through the USB-C port, utilizing an adapter if necessary. It's important to note that this port supports a maximum USB 2.0 speed.

The SIM card holder provides the flexibility to insert either 2 nano-SIMs or a combination of a SIM and a microSD for memory expansion.

Right: speaker, USB-C port, speaker, SIM slot

Top: microphone, volume rocker, microphone, standby button

microSD card reader

During our testing, we assessed the microSD reader using the Angelbird V60, our designated reference microSD card. The Teclast T60 demonstrated a respectable data transfer rate of just under 30 MB/s, with the reader showcasing performance at a class level in the CPDT benchmark.

It's worth noting, that the tablet falls short of fully harnessing the memory card's potential read rates of 260 MB/s during reading and 140 MB/s during writing. Despite achieving decent data transfer speeds, the Teclast T60 does not maximize the capabilities of the microSD card in terms of read and write rates.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.8 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -3%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.4 MB/s -5%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	11.83 MB/s -60%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (28-49.4)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (28.2-50.2)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.5 (16.8-35.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (38.3-83.8)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.3 (33.2-86.5)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø60 (27.7-71.7)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

Software – Pure Android, but the wrong version

Teclast advertises Android 14 on its website, but our test device comes pre-installed with Android 13. However, this suggests a forthcoming update is in the pipeline, even though the manufacturer remains non-committal and is still finalizing an update plan for all devices.

On a positive note, the Teclast T60 actively addresses security concerns, featuring up-to-date security patches as of December 2023 on our test device.

The device offers a refreshing experience by providing a clean Android interface without any bloatware or intrusive advertising apps. This approach ensures ample storage space without the need to uninstall unwanted programs.

Additionally, Teclast has obtained Widevine L1 certification, allowing users to enjoy high-definition streaming of copy-protected content—an appreciated feature for those who prioritize video streaming quality.

Communication and GNSS - Mobile radio is also possible

The tablet connects to a Wi-Fi network using the Wi-Fi 5 standard. In our test with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router, it achieved suitable transfer rates ranging from approximately 300 to 370 MBit/s. These transfer rates remained relatively stable over the entire test period.

Close to the router, where the signal strength is at its maximum, websites load quickly. However, at a distance of 10 meters, the signal indicator drops to 50%, and a noticeable delay occurs when loading websites.

While there are tablets like the Huawei MatePad 11.5, equipped with WiFi 6, enabling better utilization of a gigabit Internet connection, the Teclast T60's Wi-Fi module still performs well overall.

Notably, the tablet is not limited to Wi-Fi connectivity but also supports mobile Internet via a WWAN modem with a maximum 4G standard, allowing for phone calls as well.

Although the frequency diversity is somewhat limited, it proves sufficient for US use. Throughout our approximately three-week test, periodic signal strength comparisons with high-end smartphones revealed that the Teclast T60 consistently delivers commendable reception quality.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5	846 (507^min - 927^max) MBit/s +174%
Amazon Fire Max 11	391 (385^min - 400^max) MBit/s +27%
Teclast T60	309 (244^min - 321^max) MBit/s
Teclast T40 Air	308 (238^min - 322^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	307 (284^min - 322^max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5	792 (376^min - 968^max) MBit/s +120%
Amazon Fire Max 11	499 (483^min - 516^max) MBit/s +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s +3%
Teclast T60	360 (341^min - 370^max) MBit/s
Teclast T40 Air	358 (337^min - 370^max) MBit/s -1%

Teclast T60; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (244-321)

Teclast T60; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (341-370)

The Teclast T60 is equipped with a tracking module compatible with all major satellite networks. When stepping outside and waiting a few seconds, the system detects enough satellites to locate you within a 3-meter range. Compared to other devices in the same location, the T60 connects to significantly fewer satellites simultaneously.

This discrepancy becomes evident in our practical test, where we conducted a bike ride with the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch as a comparison device. Periodically, the T60 places us on incorrect paths parallel to the route, and at times, it records a route that navigates through front gardens and houses. Especially in narrow streets of the old town and when crossing a bridge, the system often loses track entirely.

Consequently, the Teclast tablet is best suited for providing an approximate location. For navigation tasks requiring absolute precision, alternative devices may be more suitable.

Cameras - More of a makeshift

High-quality camera performance is generally not a strong suit of tablets, and unfortunately, the Teclast T60 is no exception. It features a relatively simple 13-megapixel rear camera that tends to capture blurry images with limited dynamic range and partially distorted colors.

Even in low-light conditions, the camera struggles to produce sharp images, with minimal detail visible in both very bright and very dark areas.

Video recording capabilities are limited to a maximum of 1,080p at 30 fps. The autofocus often requires a slightly longer adjustment phase before achieving a truly sharp image.

The front-facing camera, with a resolution of 5 megapixels, also tends to produce somewhat blurred images with a noticeable color cast.

In summary, the cameras on the Teclast T60 are more suitable for tasks like document scanning or reading QR codes rather than meeting the expectations of demanding photographers.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Even with studio lighting, the main camera shows to be rather imprecise in the lab, creating blotchy patches and a picture enveloped in a hazy haze. The colour reproduction is also off.

The camera only records a few details with only 1 lux lighting, but you can still make out the subject overall.

ColorChecker Teclast T60: 7.78 ∆E min: 3.03 - max: 15.44 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - 12 month warranty

Teclast provides a charger, a USB cable, and a SIM tool with the tablet. However, a case needs to be purchased separately.

Regarding warranty, Teclast offers a 12-month limited warranty. The producer also pledges to address and resolve issues within a 24-hour timeframe.

Input devices & operation - Face recognition is possible

The touchscreen on the Teclast T60 proves to be reliable, even in the corners and at the edges. The edges of the casing strike a good balance between a modern aesthetic and effective protection against unintentional touchscreen operations while holding the device.

The physical buttons on the tablet work flawlessly, providing a tactile feel and clear pressure points for user convenience.

It's worth noting that the Teclast T60 does not feature a fingerprint sensor. Biometric unlocking is exclusively available through facial recognition. While the system initially faced challenges registering the user's face, a second attempt was successful and proved to be a swift process thereafter. Subsequently, the facial recognition system reliably unlocks the tablet after a brief waiting period.

▶ load Youtube video

Display – Large screen, but not that bright

With its 11.97-inch display, the Teclast T60 provides ample screen space in a 5:3 aspect ratio. This aspect ratio proves to be a good choice as it accommodates 16:9 videos with only narrow stripes at the top and bottom, ensuring comfortable viewing. Additionally, documents can be read and edited conveniently on the spacious screen.

The resolution of 2,000 x 1,200 pixels is sufficient to deliver a good display despite the large screen size.

However, the maximum brightness of 352 cd/m² is relatively moderate, potentially posing challenges for use in brightly lit environments. In comparison, the Amazon Fire Max 11 offers significantly higher brightness in this regard.


314 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	313 cd/m²
319 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	331 cd/m²
308 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	308 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 352 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 323.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 352 cd/m²
Contrast: 1408:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.319

	Teclast T60 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Teclast T40 Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Amazon Fire Max 11 TFT LCD, 2000x1200, 11"	Huawei MatePad 11.5 IPS, 2200x1440, 11.5"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		-170%	-32%	-38%	-3%
Brightness middle	352	319 -9%	564 60%	472 34%	473 34%
Brightness	324	296 -9%	509 57%	432 33%	449 39%
Brightness Distribution	88	85 -3%	86 -2%	86 -2%	85 -3%
Black Level *	0.25	0.44 -76%	0.4 -60%	0.44 -76%	0.28 -12%
Contrast	1408	725 -49%	1410 0%	1073 -24%	1689 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	10.9 -319%	4 -54%	3.4 -31%	3 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.75	19.02 -231%	7.1 -23%	6.6 -15%	6 -4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	11.5 -667%	5 -233%	4.8 -220%	2.7 -80%
Gamma	2.319 ^95%	2.035 ^108%	2.07 ^106%	2.41 ^91%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6747 ^96%	11482 ^57%	1168 ^557%	7035 ^92%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8564 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

In the test using a spectrophotometer and CalMAN software, it was observed that a fairly accurate color representation can be achieved on the screen when in "Automatic contrast" mode and with a warm white balance. The color accuracy is notable, with only slight distortion in yellow tones, and there is no apparent color cast in the grayscale when viewed with the naked eye.

The screen also does not use PWM to reduce the screen brightness so that even sensitive people can use the tablet.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.6 ms rise
17.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.9 ms rise
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Outdoor use of the Teclast T60 may be challenging due to the highly reflective screen and the relatively low maximum brightness.

The Teclast T60's screen has excellent viewing angle stability, allowing for visual clarity of the content even at extremely flat viewing angles.

Performance - Sufficient power

The Unisoc Tiger T616 is not a high-performance SoC, but it proves to be sufficient for relatively smooth everyday use. While it may not handle very complex applications seamlessly, the Teclast T60 is well-suited for tasks like watching videos, staying updated on news, and browsing the internet.

It's worth noting that there are more powerful tablets available in the Teclast T60's price range, such as the MatePad 11.5 or the Amazon Fire Max 11.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	781 Points +116%
Average of class Tablet (103 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)	712 Points +97%
Amazon Fire Max 11	702 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points +6%
Teclast T60	361 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (298 - 380, n=7)	351 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Air	350 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	2854 Points +90%
Average of class Tablet (303 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)	2534 Points +69%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2070 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points +12%
Teclast T60	1502 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1184 - 1502, n=7)	1410 Points -6%
Teclast T40 Air	1387 Points -8%

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)	1085 Points +147%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	1059 Points +141%
Amazon Fire Max 11	949 Points +116%
Teclast T60	440 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (427 - 441, n=5)	435 Points -1%
Teclast T40 Air	427 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)	3466 Points +117%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	2970 Points +86%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2363 Points +48%
Teclast T60	1596 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1474 - 1606, n=5)	1553 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Air	1474 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points -10%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5	556242 Points +137%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=38, last 2 years)	483696 Points +106%
Amazon Fire Max 11	311846 Points +33%
Teclast T60	235075 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (228124 - 235075, n=4)	230591 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Air	228517 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points -14%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Huawei MatePad 11.5	10389 Points +30%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)	10152 Points +27%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (7936 - 8066, n=7)	8004 Points 0%
Teclast T60	7992 Points
Teclast T40 Air	7936 Points -1%
Amazon Fire Max 11	7249 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points -12%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)	786 Points +104%
Amazon Fire Max 11	587 Points +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points +4%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (382 - 394, n=4)	388 Points +1%
Teclast T60	386 Points
Teclast T40 Air	382 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5	4784 Points +119%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 11721, n=57, last 2 years)	4360 Points +100%
Amazon Fire Max 11	3263 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points +17%
Teclast T60	2182 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2026 - 2182, n=4)	2095 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air	2026 Points -7%
System
Huawei MatePad 11.5	9716 Points +89%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 16435, n=57, last 2 years)	7371 Points +43%
Amazon Fire Max 11	6786 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points +8%
Teclast T60	5151 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (4795 - 5151, n=4)	4969 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air	4959 Points -4%
Memory
Amazon Fire Max 11	6055 Points +86%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 12938, n=57, last 2 years)	5080 Points +56%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	4970 Points +53%
Teclast T60	3255 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points -4%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2632 - 3255, n=4)	2941 Points -10%
Teclast T40 Air	2632 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=57, last 2 years)	9799 Points +755%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	7739 Points +575%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2501 Points +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points +90%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1137 - 1173, n=4)	1151 Points 0%
Teclast T60	1146 Points
Teclast T40 Air	1137 Points -1%
Web
Huawei MatePad 11.5	1402 Points +19%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2056, n=57, last 2 years)	1292 Points +10%
Teclast T60	1179 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1096 - 1181, n=4)	1148 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Air	1135 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points -5%
Amazon Fire Max 11	1103 Points -6%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)	6855 Points +2036%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	668 Points +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points +8%
Teclast T60	321 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (292 - 321, n=4)	302 Points -6%
Teclast T40 Air	292 Points -9%
Amazon Fire Max 11	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Amazon Fire Max 11	17202 Points +493%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years)	11205 Points +286%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	9027 Points +211%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points +43%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2817 - 4209, n=5)	3157 Points +9%
Teclast T60	2902 Points
Teclast T40 Air	2817 Points -3%

Legend

Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Teclast T40 Air Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Unisoc T7255 (T616)

Average of class Tablet

When it comes to graphics performance, it's obvious that the SoC cannot compete with other similarly priced tablets. This means that only basic benchmarks can run smoothly in the native resolution of the screen.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	825 Points +550%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	310 Points +144%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	126 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points +543%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 Points +148%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3164 Points +565%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1078 Points +126%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points +21%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	474 Points 0%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3157 Points +559%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1101 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points +23%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	479 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	474 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6367 Points +476%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2525 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points +29%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1089 Points -2%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7147 Points +663%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2310 Points +147%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points +40%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	927 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4608 Points +54%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3747 Points +25%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2990 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2798 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -30%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	63 fps +163%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +54%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	150 fps +500%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54 fps +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +64%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	25 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps -4%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +263%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +31%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	15 fps -6%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	91 fps +469%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +38%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps +363%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +47%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.5 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.3 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	65 fps +563%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +53%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.8 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps -1%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +339%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps +32%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.7 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.6 fps -2%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps +523%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +33%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps -3%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +386%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps +43%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +639%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps +139%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.3 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps -4%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +417%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps +55%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +658%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps +58%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.2 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps -2%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.6 fps +676%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.3 fps +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.95 fps -3%

When it comes to internet browser speed testing, the tablet merely performs in the midfield. Webpages load quite rapidly, and browsing across images requires little waiting time.

So, speed-wise, daily browsing on the Teclast T60's big screen is quite enjoyable.

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)	117.8 Points +109%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	86.231 Points +53%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	74.31 Points +32%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	56.281 Points
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	53.27 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points -6%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (45.4 - 57.2, n=5)	52 Points -8%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)	112.2 Points +87%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	91 Points +52%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	75 Points +25%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	60 Points
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	58 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points -5%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (45 - 60, n=4)	55 Points -8%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=59, last 2 years)	133.5 runs/min +201%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	65.6 runs/min +48%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	61.5 runs/min +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min +20%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	44.4 runs/min
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	40.5 runs/min -9%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (34.4 - 46.6, n=5)	40.4 runs/min -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	30093 Points +97%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	30021 Points +96%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	24222 Points +58%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	15304 Points
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	14522 Points -5%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (12141 - 15522, n=6)	14331 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points -7%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)	3702 ms * -43%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2531 - 3014, n=4)	2711 ms * -5%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	2708.7 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * -2%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	2592 ms *
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	1831.1 ms * +29%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	1365.8 ms * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Despite having ample mass storage, the Teclast T60 is comparatively slow in terms of access rates. Even when compared to other tablets with eMMC flash, the tablet registers very low access rates and falls behind devices like the Huawei MatePad 11.5, which uses UFS 2.2 memory.

Users may experience longer loading times and slower data transfers.

	Teclast T60	Teclast T40 Air	Amazon Fire Max 11	Huawei MatePad 11.5	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		5%	-31%	359%	44%	1%	240%
Sequential Read 256KB	240.4	270.7 13%	299.4 25%	1037.71 332%	297.47 24%	272 ?(240 - 297, n=5) 13%	1144 ?(126.9 - 3912, n=73, last 2 years) 376%
Sequential Write 256KB	230	246.2 7%	78.21 -66%	903.32 293%	228.97 0%	221 ?(149.5 - 253, n=5) -4%	783 ?(78.2 - 3299, n=73, last 2 years) 240%
Random Read 4KB	76.4	76.3 0%	81.85 7%	297.25 289%	102.41 34%	81.3 ?(61.7 - 100, n=5) 6%	194.6 ?(18.4 - 474, n=73, last 2 years) 155%
Random Write 4KB	67.5	67.8 0%	8.23 -88%	418.84 521%	146.92 118%	61 ?(9.4 - 92.2, n=5) -10%	195.2 ?(8.23 - 668, n=73, last 2 years) 189%

Games - Gaming for the unpretentious

In the gaming tests conducted on the tablet, it's noted that Teclast's devices do not work with the benchmark software from GameBench, preventing specific frame rates.

Nevertheless, from the observed game settings, it's evident that high performance should not be expected. In games like PUBG Mobile, selecting frame rates of more than 40 fps is not possible even at very low settings. Genshin Impact allows for a maximum of 60 fps, but achieving smooth performance at this level seems challenging based on occasional jerky behavior.

Consequently, the Teclast T60 is better suited for gamers with lower power demands and those who primarily engage in casual gaming.

No graph data

Emissions - The Teclast T60 has no throttling

Temperature

Even under prolonged load, the case of the Teclast T60 only heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C (92.84 °F). While this temperature is slightly noticeable, it is by no means unpleasant.

Additionally, the 3DMark stress tests reveal very even curves, indicating that throttling should not be a concern even during extended periods of heavy usage.

Max. Load

Idle


31.6 °C 89 F	33.8 °C 93 F	28.8 °C 84 F
31.1 °C 88 F	30 °C 86 F	29.1 °C 84 F
30.2 °C 86 F	28.9 °C 84 F	28.4 °C 83 F

Maximum: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Average: 30.2 °C = 86 F


29.1 °C 84 F	33.8 °C 93 F	33.6 °C 92 F
29.3 °C 85 F	30.6 °C 87 F	30 °C 86 F
28.3 °C 83 F	28.8 °C 84 F	29.3 °C 85 F

Maximum: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Average: 30.3 °C = 87 F

Power Supply (max.) 40.6 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.85 (2.84-2.86)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.6 (6.58-6.62)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.775 (0.732-0.818)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.924 (1.907-1.936)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5	99.5 (4.94^min - 4.96^max) % +12%
Amazon Fire Max 11	98.5 (1.907^min - 1.936^max) % +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) % +9%
Teclast T40 Air	89.6 (0.732^min - 0.818^max) % +1%
Teclast T60	89.1 (0.742^min - 0.833^max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad 11.5	99.7 (18.8^min - 18.9^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % 0%
Amazon Fire Max 11	99.5 (6.58^min - 6.62^max) % 0%
Teclast T60	99.4 (2.85^min - 2.87^max) %
Teclast T40 Air	99.1 (2.84^min - 2.86^max) % 0%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %

Legend

Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Teclast T40 Air Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Loudspeaker

The tablet includes four speakers, according to the supplier. The maximum volume is sufficient, although it may be a little too quiet in large settings.
When the volume is turned all the way up, it's noted that the treble can sometimes sound unpleasantly overemphasized, but overall, both videos and music can be played on the tablet in good quality.

For those seeking the finest sound quality, the Teclast T60 allows the option to connect headphones or external speakers via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.0. The tablet supports major wireless audio codecs, and users can enjoy Hi-Res music in appealing quality with support for LDAC and aptX HD.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast T60 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power management - 20 watt charging for the large battery

Power consumption

When compared to other tablets of a similar kind, the Teclast T60 uses less power when it in idle mode. Despite having a bigger screen, it nevertheless manages to use less energy even under medium and high loads.

The tablet can be recharged with up to 20 watts, and a complete cycle from 0 to 100% takes 2:30 hours. All of the chargers we tested, even those made by other producers, worked flawlessly with the tablet.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Load	4.2 / 9.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast T60 8000 mAh	Teclast T40 Air 7200 mAh	Amazon Fire Max 11 7500 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 7700 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		-0%	-85%	-114%	-93%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.2 -0%	1.04 13%	1.23 -3%	0.63 47%
Idle Average *	1.4	1.3 7%	4.25 -204%	4.44 -217%	4.25 -204%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.5 12%	4.3 -153%	4.49 -164%	4.34 -155%
Load Average *	4.2	5.6 -33%	7.62 -81%	11.2 -167%	10.24 -144%
Load Maximum *	9.5	8.4 12%	9.69 -2%	11.32 -19%	10.47 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T60: Ø6.8 (4.25-10.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T60; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.59 (5.39-6.38)

Teclast T60; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

Runtimes

The Teclast T60 comes with a large 8,000 mAh battery. It outperforms numerous related devices in terms of runtimes:

For example, users can surf the internet continuously for 18 hours and 16 minutes before the device has to be plugged in. Furthermore, with a runtime of 19 hours and 5 minutes, one can also watch numerous movies stored on the tablet before the power runs out.

Additionally, for gaming enthusiasts, the tablet provides just over 4 hours of gaming fun before requiring a charge.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		55h 13min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 9min

	Teclast T60 8000 mAh	Teclast T40 Air 7200 mAh	Amazon Fire Max 11 7500 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 7700 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-9%	-11%	-25%	0%
Reader / Idle	3313	2805 -15%	2383 -28%	1702 -49%	4236 28%
H.264	1145	1020 -11%	1188 4%	874 -24%	997 -13%
WiFi v1.3	1096	918 -16%	988 -10%	866 -21%	1017 -7%
Load	249	262 5%	228 -8%	237 -5%	231 -7%

Pros

+ Widevine L1

+ pure Android

+ high-quality metal case

+ long runtimes

+ plenty of storage space

+ little heating

+ LTE modem

+ large screen in good format

+ no PWM flickering

Cons

- advertised with (still) non-existent Android 14

- dim screen

- mediocre cameras

- inaccurate localization

- no fingerprint reader

Verdict - Good for indoors, average for outdoor use.

Teclast T60 under review. Test device provided by Teclast.

Indeed, our comprehensive test reveals that the Teclast T60 excels in various aspects:

The nearly 12-inch screen is generously sized, providing enough space for viewing. The tablet boasts more storage capacity compared to similar devices, and its battery offers substantial energy capacity, leading to above-average runtimes.

Several small details contribute to the tablet's positive performance in these areas. The modern screen design with narrow edges results in a compact device housing a large display. The absence of bloatware and advertising software ensures users have ample space for their own files. Additionally, the tablet's low power consumption contributes to its impressive endurance.

However, there are also drawbacks. The screen falls short in brightness compared to other tablets, the cameras are best suited for snapshots or QR codes, and the overall system performance is at best mediocre. The tracking accuracy is also less than optimal.

The Teclast T60 is a notable addition to any home office or living space. Despite featuring a cellular modem, it is less suitable for outdoor use due to its dark screen and inaccuracies in location tracking.

Alternatives to consider are the notably faster Huawei MatePad 11.5, although it comes with software limitations due to the absence of Google services. Another option is the Amazon Fire Max 11, which provides a bright display but comes with the trade-off of limited Amazon software.

Price and availability

The Teclast T60 is officially priced at $269.99.

Teclast T60 - 01/15/2024 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

44 / 70 → 63%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 88%

Battery

92%

Display

86%

Games Performance

11 / 78 → 14%

Application Performance

63 / 92 → 68%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 74%

Camera

50 / 85 → 58%

Average

71%

81%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Schmitt - Managing Editor Mobile - 1225 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I initially wrote about gaming laptops when I joined Notebookcheck in 2009. I was then involved with the setup of the comparison portal Notebookinfo and worked with social media concepts for large companies like BMW and Adidas, while also returning to work for Notebookcheck in 2012. Nowadays, I focus on smartphones, tablets, and future technologies. Since 2018 I have been Managing Editor for mobile device reviews, working alongside my colleague Daniel Schmidt.

contact me via: @FloSchmi26, LinkedIn, Xing

Translator: Carmen Pol - Translator - 532 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Having spent the greater part of my early years in Germany facilitated my upbringing as a bilingual kid. In 2007, I found myself having to reinstall my Windows weekly ... So, one day I bought a MacBook Black. It was during this period that I developed a profound appreciation for technology, which significantly improved my life.

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Teclast T60 in review – 12 inch tablet with a huge battery

Florian Schmitt, 2024-01-15 (Update: 2024-08-15)