
Teclast T60 Plus review: 12-inch tablet for $130 with some excessive promises
Price cutter with GPS and 90 Hz.
The Teclast T60 Plus has slimmer display bezels than an Apple iPad Air, and the equipment of the Android tablet also sounds very interesting. The large display is combined with stereo sound, mobile communication support, an optional storage expansion, and even an audio port.Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Mark Riege) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict on the Teclast T60 Plus
Those who are looking for a large tablet beyond 11 inches won't find a lot of selections in the low budget segment yet. The Teclast T60 Plus not only offers an ample display diagonal for the money with its 11.97 inches, but the quality of the panel is also right in terms of brightness and contrast.
However, Teclast advertises for its entry-level tablet with numerous promises that it is unable to always keep in everyday operation. The bezels around the panel are significantly wider than those displayed in the advertising images, the 16 GB of RAM turn out to be deceptive, and other specifications are also unclear with misleading announcements about the weight or Bluetooth version, for example.
Particularly considering its very affordable price, there is still a good reason for the T60 Plus to exist. In addition to offering a good PMW-free panel, the entry-level tablet also impresses with its extensive equipment. On the other hand, those who value smooth operation should better take a look at the affordable mid-range competitors such as the Honor Pad 9 or Redmi Pad Pro 5G.
Pros
Cons
Price and Availability
At the time of this test, the Teclast T60 Plus is available for ~$124 from Aliexpress or $179 from Amazon, for example.
Possible Alternatives in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $19.98 AKNICI Case for TECLAST T60 ... 2. $12.99 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... 3. $17.99 Misenya Case for Teclast T60... List Price: 180€ | 621 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 11.97" 2000x1200 195 PPI IPS LCD | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $294.64 Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre... 2. $9.99 XunyLyee 2 Pack, Screen Prot... 3. $49.53 Tab Pen Plus for Lenovo Tab ... | 520 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.45" 2000x1200 204 PPI IPS | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A ⎘ ARM Mali-G51 MP4 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.0 | Amazon: 1. $31.99 GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ... 2. $10.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 3. $36.99 GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ... List Price: 219€ | 475 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 11.00" 1900x1200 204 PPI LCD | |
Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $294.64 List Price: 299 Euro | 660 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.50" 2000x1200 204 PPI IPS | |
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Natbok Case for Honor Pad 9 ... 2. $12.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector C... 3. $11.89 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... List Price: 350€ | 555 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS LCD | |
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $218.49 TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro... 2. $179.99 TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro... 3. $5.29 Anoowkoa [2 Pack TECLAST Tab... List Price: 299€ | 570 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 11.97" 2000x1200 195 PPI IPS |
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Teclast T60 Plus
- Specifications of the Teclast T60 Plus
- Case - Entry-level tablet with slim bezels
- Equipment - Teclast T60 Plus with 3.5-mm audio port
- Software - Tablet with Android 14
- Communication and GNSS - An affordable tablet with GPS
- Cameras - Teclast T60 Plus with single camera
- Accessories and Warranty - Entry-level tablet includes a charger
- Input Devices and Operation - Tablet without fingerprint sensor
- Display - Teclast T60 Plus with 90 Hz
- Performance - Low-budget tablet with a MediaTek SoC
- Games - Teclast T60 Plus with a weak GPU
- Emissions - The entry-level tablet stays cool
- Battery Life - An affordable tablet with a large battery
- Notebookcheck Overall Evaluation
The Teclast T60 Plus is an entry-level tablet that stands out with its attractive price-performance ratio. Despite its very affordable price, the T60 Plus aims to score with an attractive quality, particularly with its 12 inch - or to be exact 11.97 inch - display. As was already the case for the Teclast T60, the cost-saving measures become very noticeable in the selection of the chipset. We find out in our test, whether the weak MediaTek processor is still able to get the 12-inch tablet from the Chinese manufacturer through everyday tasks in a satisfactory way.
Specifications of the Teclast T60 Plus
Case - Entry-level tablet with slim bezels
The back of the T60 Plus is CNC-milled from aluminum and has a sandblasted finish that shows fingerprints only to a very limited extent. Despite the very low price, the case still shows some quality thanks to its slim, 8.2-mm size. On the other hand, the frame is made from plastic, which feels very thin and can be easily pressed in.
The affordable price of the 12-inch tablet also becomes noticeable by the visible distortions in the liquid crystal of the display when pressing on the edges. Teclast doesn't tell its users what kind of glass is used in front. The slightly darker plastic strip on the top edge that is supposed to allow for a better tablet antenna reception also shows the low price level.
The workmanship overall is at a good level. At a weight of 612 grams, the T60 Plus is comfortable to hold despite its large 12-inch display – although the manufacturer strangely advertises a weight of only 550 grams for its tablet in some places. The same kind of discrepancy can also be seen in the product pictures with very slim bezels that turn out significantly larger in reality. But with a display-to-surface ratio of more than 81%, the Teclast tablet still gives a more modern impression than an Apple iPad 11 Air 2024, for example.
Equipment - Teclast T60 Plus with 3.5-mm audio port
The "Plus" label of the entry-level tablet is also a bit misleading compared to the regular T60, since that offers 256 GB of storage and 8 GB of RAM. While the 128 GB eMMC storage and 6 GB working memory are adequate considering the price of the Teclast tablet, we would have expected better equipment from a Plus version. The manufacturer advertises even more RAM (16 GB) for its tablet, but that can only be achieved by using an external file on the data storage, which is also deceptive in our opinion.
Otherwise, the T60 Plus presents its good side with its stereo speaker system, an FM radio, Miracast support, a 3.5-mm audio port, and support of microSD cards including exFAT support up to 1 TB. But the slow USB-2.0 connection only allows slow data transfer, and you cannot transfer the image signals to an external display. At least, the USB Type-C connection supports OTG, allowing you to connect external peripheral devices.
microSD Card Reader
In combination with our Angelbird V60 reference card, the T60 Plus delivers a satisfactory although not fast copy speed at the level of its sibling model.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Teclast T60 Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Teclast T60 (Angelbird V60) |
Software - Tablet with Android 14
The operating system of the T60 Plus is based on Google's Android version 14, even though it comes with aged security patches from July 2024 at the time of this test. The manufacturer overlays its own UI above that, but there are hardly any visual changes. There is no bloatware and there are no advertising apps. Widevine DRM Level L1 is also included, which will allow you to play high-resolution video content from video streaming services.
Teclast doesn't specify any update policy. On its website, the manufacturer mentions Android 15, which indicates that an upgrade to the current version is planned. But the period of security updates remains a complete unknown.
Sustainability
Teclast wraps its tablet together with its accessories in plenty of plastic, and there is no information on the sustainability of the T60 Plus. We are unable to find out anything in terms of an analysis of the CO2 consumption during the production and use of the tablet. Our search for service manuals or replacement parts for repair by the owner remains similarly unsuccessful.
Communication and GNSS - An affordable tablet with GPS
The Teclast tablet communicates wirelessly via Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 5. In combination with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router, the T60 Plus reaches solid transfer rates of 370 Mbit/s as the top value. However, we only measure about 260 Mbit/s when receiving, which can be done better even in this price class.
If you like, you can also use the 12-inch tablet to make phone calls, including an option for dual-SIM. While the T60 Plus includes an LTE modem, the number of supported 4G frequencies is very limited. The tablet can only use six LTE bands, so users outside the German-speaking countries should check if the tablet can be used in their country. But even for complete coverage in Europe, band 28 and 32 are missing.
Whether users of a 12-inch tablet really need it or not, the option of determining the location of the T60 Plus offers some flexibility. This is particularly the case since the GNSS module delivers almost surprisingly good results in our practical test: In addition to all the usual main satellite systems - Beidou (B1), GPS (L1), Galileo (E1), and GLONASS (L1) - our test unit with its communication modem also uses A-GPS for locating.
Even though our position is not always accurately located by the T60 Plus, the deviations from our actual route can be considered small. The Garmin Venu 2 we take for comparison delivers to a large extent similar results as the Teclast tablet.
Cameras - Teclast T60 Plus with single camera
The 8-MP camera built into the bezel above the display uses an f/2.8 aperture and delivers decent results in daylight conditions. Videos can be recorded in FHD resolution. The quality of the camera solution with a 13-MP resolution in the back isn't much better. Even though the module in the back looks like it houses two lenses, one of them is only for the LED flash.
The cameras of the T60 Plus are fine for taking pictures of documents, but often the lack of sufficient illumination and the pronounced noise levels might become a hindrance even in that basic usage scenario. The same also goes for the very slow autofocus. In lower light conditions, you can hardly take any decent pictures anymore with the entry-level tablet.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingsLow LightWe take a more detailed look at the color accuracy of the 13-MP sensor under controlled light conditions. Our analysis of the color reproduction reveals no major reasons for complaint, with only the bad black color tones being less than optimal when taking pictures of books or writing.


Accessories and Warranty - Entry-level tablet includes a charger
Despite the affordable price, there are hardly any compromises in the accessories. The box includes a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a small tool to open the card slot, a charger, and some info material.
Teclast offers a warranty of 24 months to buyers of its entry-level tablet in Germany. In addition, the warranty is also expanded by a 24-hour customer service.
Input Devices and Operation - Tablet without fingerprint sensor
Touch inputs on the 11.97-inch IPS panel are implemented quickly and accurately. According to the manufacturer, the touchscreen offers a scan rate of 120 Hz, meaning that the panel is scanned for inputs up to 120-times per second. Due to the refresh rate of 90 Hz, animations are displayed fairly smoothly, even though at times, the Mediatek SoC appears overtaxed by the relatively high 1200p resolution of the LCD. This has a negative effect on the performance and leads to some delays.
Unfortunately, the T60 Plus doesn't offer a fingerprint sensor, which represents a clear deficit in the operating comfort. Unlocking via biometric face recognition is only supported using the front camera and that only for a single stored face. However, although fairly insecure, the 2D face recognition performed convincingly during daylight in our test.
Display - Teclast T60 Plus with 90 Hz

The IPS panel of the T60 Plus from BOE is fully laminated and reaches a pixel density of almost 200 ppi thanks to its 1200p resolution. It offers a refresh rate of up to 90 Hz. The sharpness is sufficiently high, although the pixel structures are still visible when looking closely.
In our brightness measurement, the Teclast tablet reaches a maximum of 487 cd/m², which is very attractive for its price-class and slightly higher than the manufacturer specifications of 400 nits. It is not very surprising that at a maximum of 503 cd/m², our APL18 measurement (with bright and dark areas) results in a slightly higher brightness for the LCD than with the display of a completely white area.
PWM-sensitive users should be happy about the IPS display, because we are unable to detect any display flickering in the T60 Plus.
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 487 cd/m²
Contrast: 1432:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
78.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.38
Teclast T60 Plus IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 12" | Lenovo Tab K11 Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5" | Huawei MatePad SE 11 LCD, 1900x1200, 11" | Lenovo Tab Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5" | Honor Pad 9 IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Teclast T60 IPS, 2000x1200, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 33% | 21% | 19% | 23% | 18% | |
Brightness middle | 487 | 473 -3% | 461 -5% | 465 -5% | 613 26% | 352 -28% |
Brightness | 472 | 449 -5% | 451 -4% | 438 -7% | 570 21% | 324 -31% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 87 -5% | 88 -4% | 87 -5% | 88 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.25 26% | 0.3 12% | 0.3 12% | 0.4 -18% | 0.25 26% |
Contrast | 1432 | 1892 32% | 1537 7% | 1550 8% | 1533 7% | 1408 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.16 | 1.56 75% | 2.48 60% | 2.96 52% | 2.7 56% | 2.6 58% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.96 | 3.8 65% | 4.9 55% | 5.32 51% | 5.1 53% | 5.75 48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 1.3 80% | 3.5 45% | 3.6 44% | 3.7 42% | 1.5 77% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.178 101% | 2.183 101% | 2.372 93% | 2.3 96% | 2.319 95% |
CCT | 8212 79% | 6726 97% | 7471 87% | 6016 108% | 6763 96% | 6747 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
The black value of 0.34 cd/m² results in a good contrast ratio of about 1500:1 for the T60 Plus. We evaluate the color calibration of the display with the Calman analysis software. The DeltaE values in the sRGB color space are clearly outside the target value of <3, and the deviations from the reference colors are easily noticeable. Likewise, the grayscale also shows a noticeable slight color tint.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.7 ms rise | |
↘ 14.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.7 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
There isn't much to complain about the viewing angle stability of the LCD panel. Even from steep viewing angles, the brightness only diminishes slightly, and colors look hardly distorted. Outdoors, the entry-level tablet remains sufficiently readable in the wintry light conditions, but you still need to avoid reflections on the glass surface. In the middle of summer, you can probably only use the T60 Plus in the shade.
Performance - Low-budget tablet with a MediaTek SoC
As is customary in this price class, there are some particular cost savings in the choice of the SoC. The Teclast tablet is unfortunately no exception here. In everyday operation, the Helio G88 doesn't give the impression of having much power, and the users have to accept some stutters and delays. The T60 Plus turns out fairly weak in our benchmark package, and particularly in the multi-core tests, even the Unisoc T7255 in the sibling model is significantly more powerful.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (3367 - 5025, n=4) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 |
AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
Average of class Tablet (99.7 - 7341, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 () |
In the area of graphics, the Mali-G52 MP2 integrated in the Helio G88 is unable to deliver a very convincing performance. The Teclast tablet is not suitable for HFR gaming, as the test of GFXBench with onscreen results of only 40 fps reveals. In the comparison with affordable tablet competitors, the T60 Plus still fares slightly better in terms of the GPU power than with the CPU benchmarks.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Teclast T60 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus |
The browser performance of the T60 Plus is acceptable in both the benchmarks as well as everyday operation, although the Teclast tablet doesn't really present itself as powerful in this regard either. Particularly while surfing, the users benefit from the 90-Hz panel.
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260) | |
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120) | |
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131) | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (28.1 - 48, n=4) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122) | |
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260) | |
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 () | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260) | |
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120) | |
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (31 - 54, n=3) | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260) | |
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120) | |
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 15102, n=7) | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (2743 - 5573, n=4) | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131) | |
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120) | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260) | |
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122) | |
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122) |
* ... smaller is better
The eMMC storage that is fairly aged at this point only reaches very low values in our AndroBench benchmark measurements. Compared to a Lenovo Tab Plus, which is equipped with modern UFS storage, the Teclast tablet offers significantly lower read and write speeds.
Teclast T60 Plus | Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | Huawei MatePad SE 11 | Lenovo Tab Plus | Honor Pad 9 | Teclast T60 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 660% | 267% | 632% | 853% | 116% | 100% | 583% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 296.42 | 1003.25 238% | 528.79 78% | 991.99 235% | 1921.34 548% | 240.4 -19% | 295 ? 0% | 1164 ? 293% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 193.23 | 876.29 353% | 103.41 -46% | 837.52 333% | 1222.83 533% | 230 19% | 195.4 ? 1% | 805 ? 317% |
Random Read 4KB | 49.58 | 244.03 392% | 166.24 235% | 240.56 385% | 256.06 416% | 76.4 54% | 84.1 ? 70% | 198.4 ? 300% |
Random Write 4KB | 13.21 | 232.16 1657% | 119.02 801% | 221.09 1574% | 266.17 1915% | 67.5 411% | 56.4 ? 327% | 201 ? 1422% |
Games - Teclast T60 Plus with a weak GPU
If you buy a tablet for less than 130 Euros (~$134), you shouldn't expect a fast gaming experience, but the Mali GPU used here is still suitable for older games in low graphics. We take a look at how many frames per second the T60 Plus is able to manage with the app from GameBench.
At up to 40 fps, PUBG Mobile can be played fairly smoothly at minimum details, but with an HD setting, you only get 30 fps and the drops in the framerate are clearly noticeable. Our second test game, Genshin Impact, clearly requires more graphics power than the T60 Plus is able to provide. Even at the minimum graphics setting, we only reach 18 fps on average.
Emissions - The entry-level tablet stays cool
Temperatures
Heat development remains a foreign concept to the Teclast tablet. Both during idle operation as well as under load, the surface temperatures of the case are hardly worth mentioning. In addition, we evaluate the constancy of the Helio G88 using the stress test of 3DMark.
In both test scenarios of the Wild Life stress test, the Mediatek SoC only throttles its performance minimally. Correspondingly, we also don't see a reduction in the frame rates under high loads.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Teclast T60 | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Honor Pad 9 | |
Teclast T60 Plus | |
Lenovo Tab Plus | |
Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus | |
Teclast T60 |
Speakers
The T60 Plus uses a dual-speaker system that is located on the bottom of the case and provides a stereo experience. Our measurements of the Teclast tablet reveal a pronounced wave-shaped frequency curve for the mids, and the sound spectrum doesn't contain any bass. But the sound quality is still okay for this price class.
To listen via wired headphones, the T60 Plus offers a 3.5-mm audio port that allows for a more bass-rich sound reproduction. For wireless connections, Bluetooth is supported, although the selection of codecs is very limited with only SBC, AAC, and LDAC. While the manufacturer specifies 5.2 as the Bluetooth standard, the Mediatek chipset officially only supports the older BT 5.0.
Teclast T60 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Teclast T60 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery Life - An affordable tablet with a large battery
Power Consumption
The T60 Plus has an 8,000 mAh battery that can be completely recharged in about 3 hours using the included 10-Watt charger. The Teclast tablet behaves a little erratic with powerful power banks: a Xiaomi Powerbank 25000 as well as another power bank with Power Delivery 3.0 (130 watts) didn't work in our test. Similarly, our own chargers beyond 30 watts are unable to provide power to the T60 Plus.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Teclast T60 Plus 8000 mAh | Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 8600 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 11 7700 mAh | Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh | Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh | Teclast T60 8000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G88 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 35% | 14% | 39% | -106% | 33% | 26% | -37% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 1.1 39% | 1.7 6% | 1.2 33% | 1.5 17% | 1.2 33% | 1.11 ? 38% | 1.835 ? -2% |
Idle Average * | 2.2 | 1.3 41% | 1.9 14% | 1.6 27% | 8.39 -281% | 1.4 36% | 1.803 ? 18% | 3.78 ? -72% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 1.6 45% | 2.2 24% | 1.8 38% | 8.46 -192% | 1.7 41% | 2.14 ? 26% | 4.34 ? -50% |
Load Average * | 6.7 | 4.4 34% | 5.9 12% | 3.7 45% | 11.65 -74% | 4.2 37% | 5 ? 25% | 9.64 ? -44% |
Load Maximum * | 11.4 | 9.8 14% | 9.7 15% | 5.7 50% | 11.67 -2% | 9.5 17% | 8.69 ? 24% | 13.5 ? -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Battery Life
With more than 11 hours in the WLAN and 11.5 hours playing videos in our realistic battery tests at a brightness of 150 cd/m², the Teclast tablet shows a good battery life for a 12-inch tablet. However, due to the weak SoC, we would have expected a slightly longer battery life under load.
Teclast T60 Plus 8000 mAh | Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 8600 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 11 7700 mAh | Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh | Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh | Teclast T60 8000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 23% | 49% | 104% | -1% | 92% | |
Reader / Idle | 1074 | 1517 41% | 1992 85% | 2657 147% | 3313 208% | |
H.264 | 685 | 727 6% | 953 39% | 1113 62% | 1145 67% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 667 | 734 10% | 931 40% | 1450 117% | 661 -1% | 1096 64% |
Load | 192 | 260 35% | 254 32% | 367 91% | 249 30% |
Notebookcheck Overall Evaluation
Overall, the Teclast T60 Plus is a good choice for its price, even though it remains behind the high expectations created by the spec sheet. Those looking for a lot of display for the money surely won't be disappointed.
Teclast T60 Plus
- 01/18/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.