Notebookcheck Logo
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)

Teclast T60 Plus review: 12-inch tablet for $130 with some excessive promises

Price cutter with GPS and 90 Hz.

The Teclast T60 Plus has slimmer display bezels than an Apple iPad Air, and the equipment of the Android tablet also sounds very interesting. The large display is combined with stereo sound, mobile communication support, an optional storage expansion, and even an audio port.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Mark Riege) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Touchscreen Tablet Android

Verdict on the Teclast T60 Plus

Those who are looking for a large tablet beyond 11 inches won't find a lot of selections in the low budget segment yet. The Teclast T60 Plus not only offers an ample display diagonal for the money with its 11.97 inches, but the quality of the panel is also right in terms of brightness and contrast.

However, Teclast advertises for its entry-level tablet with numerous promises that it is unable to always keep in everyday operation. The bezels around the panel are significantly wider than those displayed in the advertising images, the 16 GB of RAM turn out to be deceptive, and other specifications are also unclear with misleading announcements about the weight or Bluetooth version, for example.   

Particularly considering its very affordable price, there is still a good reason for the T60 Plus to exist. In addition to offering a good PMW-free panel, the entry-level tablet also impresses with its extensive equipment. On the other hand, those who value smooth operation should better take a look at the affordable mid-range competitors such as the Honor Pad 9 or Redmi Pad Pro 5G. 

Pros

+ large and bright panel (for the price class)
+ good equipment (audio port, storage expansion, ...)
+ locating supported
+ high-quality metal case
+ mobile communication support
+ hardly any heat development

Cons

- slow chipset
- slow storage
- bad cameras
- no fingerprint sensor
- lack of transparency (sustainability, updates)

Price and Availability

At the time of this test, the Teclast T60 Plus is available for ~$124 from Aliexpress or $179 from Amazon, for example. 

Amazon Logo
$19.98
AKNICI Case for TECLAST T60 Plus Tablet 12 Inch, Premium PU Leather Folio Folding Stand Protective Tablet Cover with Hand Strap Magnet for TECLAST T60 Plus Tablet 12 Inch
  • $12.99
    Natbok 2 Pack Compatible with Teclast T60 Plus Screen Protector,Full Coverage 9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Teclast T60 Plus Screen Protector
  • $17.99
    Misenya Case for Teclast T60 12-inch Tablet, Multi-Angle Viewing of Videos or Games Multi-Color Silicone Multi-Purpose Case (Colorful Dark Blue)

Possible Alternatives in Comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
73.8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $19.98
AKNICI Case for TECLAST T60 ...
2. $12.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $17.99
Misenya Case for Teclast T60...
List Price: 180€
621 g128 GB eMMC Flash11.97"
2000x1200
195 PPI
IPS LCD
2.
78.1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $294.64
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
2. $9.99
XunyLyee 2 Pack, Screen Prot...
3. $49.53
Tab Pen Plus for Lenovo Tab ...
520 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.45"
2000x1200
204 PPI
IPS
3.
76.2%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A ⎘
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.0
Amazon:
1. $31.99
GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ...
2. $10.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
3. $36.99
GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ...
List Price: 219€
475 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash11.00"
1900x1200
204 PPI
LCD
4.
77.8%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $294.64
List Price: 299 Euro
660 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.50"
2000x1200
204 PPI
IPS
5.
84.8% v7 (old)
Honor Pad 9
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.99
Natbok Case for Honor Pad 9 ...
2. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $11.89
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
List Price: 350€
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS LCD
6.
80.7% v7 (old)
Teclast T60
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $218.49
TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro...
2. $179.99
TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro...
3. $5.29
Anoowkoa [2 Pack TECLAST Tab...
List Price: 299€
570 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash11.97"
2000x1200
195 PPI
IPS

The Teclast T60 Plus is an entry-level tablet that stands out with its attractive price-performance ratio. Despite its very affordable price, the T60 Plus aims to score with an attractive quality, particularly with its 12 inch - or to be exact 11.97 inch - display. As was already the case for the Teclast T60, the cost-saving measures become very noticeable in the selection of the chipset. We find out in our test, whether the weak MediaTek processor is still able to get the 12-inch tablet from the Chinese manufacturer through everyday tasks in a satisfactory way. 

Specifications of the Teclast T60 Plus

Teclast T60 Plus (T Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G88 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
11.97 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 195 PPI, Capacitve touchscreen, IPS LCD, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Hall, proximity , OTG, Miracast, UKW radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G: B2/3/5/8; 3G: B1/2/5/19; 4G: B1/2/3/5/7/8/20/38/39/40/41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 282 x 178 ( = 0.31 x 11.1 x 7.01 in)
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.8, AF, LED) camera2 API: limited
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.8, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Charger, USB cable, info material, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
621 g ( = 21.91 oz / 1.37 pounds), Power Supply: 45 g ( = 1.59 oz / 0.1 pounds)
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Entry-level tablet with slim bezels

The Teclast T60 Plus is only available in Aqua Blue color (photo: Teclast)
The Teclast T60 Plus is only available in Aqua Blue color (photo: Teclast)

The back of the T60 Plus is CNC-milled from aluminum and has a sandblasted finish that shows fingerprints only to a very limited extent. Despite the very low price, the case still shows some quality thanks to its slim, 8.2-mm size. On the other hand, the frame is made from plastic, which feels very thin and can be easily pressed in.

The affordable price of the 12-inch tablet also becomes noticeable by the visible distortions in the liquid crystal of the display when pressing on the edges. Teclast doesn't tell its users what kind of glass is used in front. The slightly darker plastic strip on the top edge that is supposed to allow for a better tablet antenna reception also shows the low price level.

The workmanship overall is at a good level. At a weight of 612 grams, the T60 Plus is comfortable to hold despite its large 12-inch display – although the manufacturer strangely advertises a weight of only 550 grams for its tablet in some places. The same kind of discrepancy can also be seen in the product pictures with very slim bezels that turn out significantly larger in reality. But with a display-to-surface ratio of more than 81%, the Teclast tablet still gives a more modern impression than an Apple iPad 11 Air 2024, for example. 

2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)

Size Comparison

282 mm / 11.1 in 178 mm / 7.01 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 621 g1.369 lbs279 mm / 11 in 174 mm / 6.85 in 7.7 mm / 0.3031 in 570 g1.257 lbs278.27 mm / 11 in 180.11 mm / 7.09 in 6.96 mm / 0.274 in 555 g1.224 lbs268.3 mm / 10.6 in 174.25 mm / 6.86 in 13.58 mm / 0.535 in 660 g1.455 lbs268.7 mm / 10.6 in 168.96 mm / 6.65 in 7.15 mm / 0.2815 in 520 g1.146 lbs252.3 mm / 9.93 in 163.8 mm / 6.45 in 6 mm / 0.2362 in 475 g1.047 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Equipment - Teclast T60 Plus with 3.5-mm audio port

The "Plus" label of the entry-level tablet is also a bit misleading compared to the regular T60, since that offers 256 GB of storage and 8 GB of RAM. While the 128 GB eMMC storage and 6 GB working memory are adequate considering the price of the Teclast tablet, we would have expected better equipment from a Plus version. The manufacturer advertises even more RAM (16 GB) for its tablet, but that can only be achieved by using an external file on the data storage, which is also deceptive in our opinion. 

Otherwise, the T60 Plus presents its good side with its stereo speaker system, an FM radio, Miracast support, a 3.5-mm audio port, and support of microSD cards including exFAT support up to 1 TB. But the slow USB-2.0 connection only allows slow data transfer, and you cannot transfer the image signals to an external display. At least, the USB Type-C connection supports OTG, allowing you to connect external peripheral devices. 

2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
Right case side
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
Top (keys)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
Bottom (speakers)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
Left side (USB port, card slot, 3.5 mm audio port)

microSD Card Reader

In combination with our Angelbird V60 reference card, the T60 Plus delivers a satisfactory although not fast copy speed at the level of its sibling model

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
39.7 MB/s +21%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
35.5 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (Angelbird V60)
34.1 MB/s +4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 (Angelbird V60)
32.9 MB/s
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616) (Angelbird V60)
29.8 MB/s -9%

Software - Tablet with Android 14

The operating system of the T60 Plus is based on Google's Android version 14, even though it comes with aged security patches from July 2024 at the time of this test. The manufacturer overlays its own UI above that, but there are hardly any visual changes. There is no bloatware and there are no advertising apps. Widevine DRM Level L1 is also included, which will allow you to play high-resolution video content from video streaming services. 

Teclast doesn't specify any update policy. On its website, the manufacturer mentions Android 15, which indicates that an upgrade to the current version is planned. But the period of security updates remains a complete unknown. 

2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus

Sustainability

Teclast wraps its tablet together with its accessories in plenty of plastic, and there is no information on the sustainability of the T60 Plus. We are unable to find out anything in terms of an analysis of the CO2 consumption during the production and use of the tablet. Our search for service manuals or replacement parts for repair by the owner remains similarly unsuccessful. 

Communication and GNSS - An affordable tablet with GPS

The Teclast tablet communicates wirelessly via Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 5. In combination with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router, the T60 Plus reaches solid transfer rates of 370 Mbit/s as the top value. However, we only measure about 260 Mbit/s when receiving, which can be done better even in this price class. 

If you like, you can also use the 12-inch tablet to make phone calls, including an option for dual-SIM. While the T60 Plus includes an LTE modem, the number of supported 4G frequencies is very limited. The tablet can only use six LTE bands, so users outside the German-speaking countries should check if the tablet can be used in their country. But even for complete coverage in Europe, band 28 and 32 are missing.   

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=83, last 2 years)
539 MBit/s +105%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (184min - 389max) MBit/s +39%
Teclast T60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
360 (341min - 370max) MBit/s +37%
Lenovo Tab Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
354 (289min - 365max) MBit/s +35%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=194)
350 MBit/s +33%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
315 (223min - 362max) MBit/s +20%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
279 (228min - 295max) MBit/s +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
263 (212min - 276max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=83, last 2 years)
525 MBit/s +43%
Lenovo Tab Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
372 (362min - 397max) MBit/s +1%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (363min - 373max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
352 (125min - 381max) MBit/s -4%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (171min - 354max) MBit/s -5%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=193)
329 MBit/s -11%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
323 (218min - 377max) MBit/s -12%
Teclast T60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 (244min - 321max) MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (212-276)
Teclast T60 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (341-370)
Teclast T60 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (363-373)
Teclast T60 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (244-321)
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors
Locating indoors
Locating indoors

Whether users of a 12-inch tablet really need it or not, the option of determining the location of the T60 Plus offers some flexibility. This is particularly the case since the GNSS module delivers almost surprisingly good results in our practical test: In addition to all the usual main satellite systems - Beidou (B1), GPS (L1), Galileo (E1), and GLONASS (L1) - our test unit with its communication modem also uses A-GPS for locating.

Even though our position is not always accurately located by the T60 Plus, the deviations from our actual route can be considered small. The Garmin Venu 2 we take for comparison delivers to a large extent similar results as the Teclast tablet.

Garmin Venu 2 locating
Garmin Venu 2 locating
Teclast T60 Plus locating
Teclast T60 Plus locating

Cameras - Teclast T60 Plus with single camera

Selfie taken with the Teclast T60 Plus
Selfie taken with the Teclast T60 Plus

The 8-MP camera built into the bezel above the display uses an f/2.8 aperture and delivers decent results in daylight conditions. Videos can be recorded in FHD resolution. The quality of the camera solution with a 13-MP resolution in the back isn't much better. Even though the module in the back looks like it houses two lenses, one of them is only for the LED flash. 

The cameras of the T60 Plus are fine for taking pictures of documents, but often the lack of sufficient illumination and the pronounced noise levels might become a hindrance even in that basic usage scenario. The same also goes for the very slow autofocus. In lower light conditions, you can hardly take any decent pictures anymore with the entry-level tablet.

1x
1x
2x
2x
4x (max)
4x (max)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantSurroundingsLow Light

We take a more detailed look at the color accuracy of the 13-MP sensor under controlled light conditions. Our analysis of the color reproduction reveals no major reasons for complaint, with only the bad black color tones being less than optimal when taking pictures of books or writing.

ColorChecker
7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 Plus: 6.51 ∆E min: 0.71 - max: 12.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 Plus: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.34 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Entry-level tablet includes a charger

The 10W charger of the Teclast T60 Plus
The 10W charger of the Teclast T60 Plus

Despite the affordable price, there are hardly any compromises in the accessories. The box includes a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a small tool to open the card slot, a charger, and some info material. 

Teclast offers a warranty of 24 months to buyers of its entry-level tablet in Germany. In addition, the warranty is also expanded by a 24-hour customer service.

Input Devices and Operation - Tablet without fingerprint sensor

Touch inputs on the 11.97-inch IPS panel are implemented quickly and accurately. According to the manufacturer, the touchscreen offers a scan rate of 120 Hz, meaning that the panel is scanned for inputs up to 120-times per second. Due to the refresh rate of 90 Hz, animations are displayed fairly smoothly, even though at times, the Mediatek SoC appears overtaxed by the relatively high 1200p resolution of the LCD. This has a negative effect on the performance and leads to some delays.

Unfortunately, the T60 Plus doesn't offer a fingerprint sensor, which represents a clear deficit in the operating comfort. Unlocking via biometric face recognition is only supported using the front camera and that only for a single stored face. However, although fairly insecure, the 2D face recognition performed convincingly during daylight in our test. 

2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus

Display - Teclast T60 Plus with 90 Hz

The LC display uses a classic RGB subpixel grid consisting of a red, a blue, and a green light diode.
The LC display uses a classic RGB subpixel grid consisting of a red, a blue, and a green light diode.

The IPS panel of the T60 Plus from BOE is fully laminated and reaches a pixel density of almost 200 ppi thanks to its 1200p resolution. It offers a refresh rate of up to 90 Hz. The sharpness is sufficiently high, although the pixel structures are still visible when looking closely.  

In our brightness measurement, the Teclast tablet reaches a maximum of 487 cd/m², which is very attractive for its price-class and slightly higher than the manufacturer specifications of 400 nits. It is not very surprising that at a maximum of 503 cd/m², our APL18 measurement (with bright and dark areas) results in a slightly higher brightness for the LCD than with the display of a completely white area.

PWM-sensitive users should be happy about the IPS display, because we are unable to detect any display flickering in the T60 Plus.

480
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 487 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 472.1 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 487 cd/m²
Contrast: 1432:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
78.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.38
Teclast T60 Plus
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 12"
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"
Huawei MatePad SE 11
LCD, 1900x1200, 11"
Lenovo Tab Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"
Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Teclast T60
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Screen
33%
21%
19%
23%
18%
Brightness middle
487
473
-3%
461
-5%
465
-5%
613
26%
352
-28%
Brightness
472
449
-5%
451
-4%
438
-7%
570
21%
324
-31%
Brightness Distribution
92
87
-5%
87
-5%
88
-4%
87
-5%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.34
0.25
26%
0.3
12%
0.3
12%
0.4
-18%
0.25
26%
Contrast
1432
1892
32%
1537
7%
1550
8%
1533
7%
1408
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.16
1.56
75%
2.48
60%
2.96
52%
2.7
56%
2.6
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.96
3.8
65%
4.9
55%
5.32
51%
5.1
53%
5.75
48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.4
1.3
80%
3.5
45%
3.6
44%
3.7
42%
1.5
77%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.178 101%
2.183 101%
2.372 93%
2.3 96%
2.319 95%
CCT
8212 79%
6726 97%
7471 87%
6016 108%
6763 96%
6747 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The black value of 0.34 cd/m² results in a good contrast ratio of about 1500:1 for the T60 Plus. We evaluate the color calibration of the display with the Calman analysis software. The DeltaE values in the sRGB color space are clearly outside the target value of <3, and the deviations from the reference colors are easily noticeable. Likewise, the grayscale also shows a noticeable slight color tint. 

Color Accuracy (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Color Accuracy (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Color Space (Target Color Space: Adobe RGB, Profile: Standard)
Color Space (Target Color Space: Adobe RGB, Profile: Standard)
Color Space (Target Color Space: P3, Profile: Standard)
Color Space (Target Color Space: P3, Profile: Standard)
Color Space (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Color Space (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Grayscale (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Grayscale (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Saturation (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)
Saturation (Target Color Space: sRGB, Profile: Standard)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.7 ms rise
↘ 14.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.7 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

There isn't much to complain about the viewing angle stability of the LCD panel. Even from steep viewing angles, the brightness only diminishes slightly, and colors look hardly distorted. Outdoors, the entry-level tablet remains sufficiently readable in the wintry light conditions, but you still need to avoid reflections on the glass surface. In the middle of summer, you can probably only use the T60 Plus in the shade. 

2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)

Performance - Low-budget tablet with a MediaTek SoC

As is customary in this price class, there are some particular cost savings in the choice of the SoC. The Teclast tablet is unfortunately no exception here. In everyday operation, the Helio G88 doesn't give the impression of having much power, and the users have to accept some stutters and delays. The T60 Plus turns out fairly weak in our benchmark package, and particularly in the multi-core tests, even the Unisoc T7255 in the sibling model is significantly more powerful. 

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=77, last 2 years)
1094 Points +153%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
944 Points +119%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
733 Points +70%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
440 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (432 - 442, n=6)
436 Points +1%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
432 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
412 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
323 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=77, last 2 years)
3480 Points +215%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2773 Points +151%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2018 Points +83%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1596 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1425 Points +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1104 - 1436, n=6)
1277 Points +16%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1172 Points +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1104 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=72, last 2 years)
726 Points +107%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
725 Points +107%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
574 Points +64%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
361 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (284 - 378, n=7)
356 Points +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
350 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
304 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2763 Points +115%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=72, last 2 years)
2571 Points +100%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1792 Points +39%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1502 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1359 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1132 - 1475, n=7)
1312 Points +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1288 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=43, last 2 years)
772514 Points +208%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
490448 Points +96%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
404871 Points +62%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
329731 Points +32%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
257601 Points +3%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
250503 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
250503 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
235067 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
11693 Points +58%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
11379 Points +54%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=74, last 2 years)
10275 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
8752 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (6789 - 9802, n=7)
8567 Points +16%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7992 Points +8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
7383 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7102 Points -4%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=64, last 2 years)
794 Points +149%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
689 Points +116%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
561 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
419 Points +31%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
386 Points +21%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
337 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (319 - 326, n=3)
322 Points +1%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
319 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4462 Points +105%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4233 Points +95%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3004 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2383 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2172 - 2396, n=4)
2287 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2187 Points +1%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2182 Points 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2172 Points
System
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
10083 Points +158%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7460 Points +91%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5890 Points +51%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5259 Points +35%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5151 Points +32%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4598 Points +18%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3901 - 4695, n=4)
4282 Points +10%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3901 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=59, last 2 years)
5158 Points +114%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4837 Points +101%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
4104 Points +70%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
3255 Points +35%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3128 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2412 - 3358, n=4)
2958 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2554 Points +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2412 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
10174 Points +428%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
5783 Points +200%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2697 Points +40%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2243 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1878 - 1960, n=4)
1930 Points 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1928 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1438 Points -25%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1146 Points -41%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=59, last 2 years)
1313 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1249 Points +8%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
1192 Points +3%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1179 Points +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1161 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1042 - 1161, n=4)
1113 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1071 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1046 Points -10%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11869 Points +149%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9075 Points +91%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
7236 Points +52%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4759 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3367 - 5025, n=4)
4206 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3820 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3564 Points -25%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2902 Points -39%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7265 Points +1359%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (498 - 3367, n=3)
1555 Points +212%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
913 Points +83%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
644 Points +29%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
498 Points
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
321 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
258 Points -48%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
248 Points -50%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=6, last 2 years)
2096 Points +2002%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
113 Points +13%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
99.7 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
99.7 Points 0%

In the area of graphics, the Mali-G52 MP2 integrated in the Helio G88 is unable to deliver a very convincing performance. The Teclast tablet is not suitable for HFR gaming, as the test of GFXBench with onscreen results of only 40 fps reveals. In the comparison with affordable tablet competitors, the T60 Plus still fares slightly better in terms of the GPU power than with the CPU benchmarks.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points +234%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
337 Points +84%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
183 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
158 Points -14%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
127 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points +227%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 Points +84%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
155 Points -18%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
129 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points -35%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points +219%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1232 Points +64%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
753 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
583 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
579 Points -23%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
476 Points -37%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points +221%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1246 Points +69%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
598 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
576 Points -22%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
479 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3642 Points +81%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2990 Points +49%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2499 Points +24%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2499 Points +24%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2012 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2449 Points +95%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1325 Points +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1254 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
985 Points -21%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
937 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2641 Points +93%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1479 Points +8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1367 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1121 Points -18%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1106 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +48%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
39 fps -2%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
24 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
40 fps -9%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
25 fps -43%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps +54%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +46%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20 fps -17%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -33%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +148%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +60%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps -16%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +60%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps -7%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.5 fps -37%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +188%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +63%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps -6%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.8 fps -39%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +79%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps +41%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.1 fps +4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.7 fps -27%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +140%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +56%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.5 fps -11%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.1 fps -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +88%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.4 fps +88%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4.7 fps -6%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
3.7 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps +261%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps +94%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2.9 fps -6%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.3 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +100%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +100%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7.4 fps -1%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.8 fps -23%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +292%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +103%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7.3 fps -8%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.2 fps -22%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps +243%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps +79%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1.2 fps -14%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
0.98 fps -30%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%

The browser performance of the T60 Plus is acceptable in both the benchmarks as well as everyday operation, although the Teclast tablet doesn't really present itself as powerful in this regard either. Particularly while surfing, the users benefit from the 90-Hz panel. 

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
118.4 Points +147%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points +84%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
80.918 Points +69%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
66.048 Points +38%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
56.281 Points +17%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
47.986 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
35.847 Points -25%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (28.1 - 48, n=4)
35.1 Points -27%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=33, last 2 years)
12 runs/min +283%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
5.01 runs/min +60%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
4.74 runs/min +51%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
3.7 runs/min +18%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
3.13 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G88 ()
3.13 runs/min 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
1.25 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
112.7 Points +109%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
89 Points +65%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
68 Points +26%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
60 Points +11%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
54 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (31 - 54, n=3)
41 Points -24%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
39 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points +115%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=88, last 2 years)
30521 Points +102%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
24857 Points +65%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
16498 Points +9%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
15304 Points +1%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
15102 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 15102, n=7)
10721 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
10018 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (2743 - 5573, n=4)
4111 ms * -50%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
3675.3 ms * -34%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3629 ms * -32%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
2743.4 ms *
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
2592 ms * +6%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
2459.4 ms * +10%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
1670.9 ms * +39%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

The eMMC storage that is fairly aged at this point only reaches very low values in our AndroBench benchmark measurements. Compared to a Lenovo Tab Plus, which is equipped with modern UFS storage, the Teclast tablet offers significantly lower read and write speeds.

Teclast T60 PlusLenovo Tab K11 PlusHuawei MatePad SE 11Lenovo Tab PlusHonor Pad 9Teclast T60Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
660%
267%
632%
853%
116%
100%
583%
Sequential Read 256KB
296.42
1003.25
238%
528.79
78%
991.99
235%
1921.34
548%
240.4
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.23
876.29
353%
103.41
-46%
837.52
333%
1222.83
533%
230
19%
Random Read 4KB
49.58
244.03
392%
166.24
235%
240.56
385%
256.06
416%
76.4
54%
Random Write 4KB
13.21
232.16
1657%
119.02
801%
221.09
1574%
266.17
1915%
67.5
411%

Games - Teclast T60 Plus with a weak GPU

If you buy a tablet for less than 130 Euros (~$134), you shouldn't expect a fast gaming experience, but the Mali GPU used here is still suitable for older games in low graphics. We take a look at how many frames per second the T60 Plus is able to manage with the app from GameBench.

At up to 40 fps, PUBG Mobile can be played fairly smoothly at minimum details, but with an HD setting, you only get 30 fps and the drops in the framerate are clearly noticeable. Our second test game, Genshin Impact, clearly requires more graphics power than the T60 Plus is able to provide. Even at the minimum graphics setting, we only reach 18 fps on average.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus; Genshin Impact: Ø17.6 (7-23)
Teclast T60 Plus; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø37.4 (14-41)
Teclast T60 Plus; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.3 (19-32)

Emissions - The entry-level tablet stays cool

Temperatures

Heat development remains a foreign concept to the Teclast tablet. Both during idle operation as well as under load, the surface temperatures of the case are hardly worth mentioning. In addition, we evaluate the constancy of the Helio G88 using the stress test of 3DMark. 

In both test scenarios of the Wild Life stress test, the Mediatek SoC only throttles its performance minimally. Correspondingly, we also don't see a reduction in the frame rates under high loads. 

Max. Load
 31.9 °C
89 F
27.4 °C
81 F
27.5 °C
82 F
 
 36.1 °C
97 F
27.5 °C
82 F
27.5 °C
82 F
 
 31.6 °C
89 F
27.5 °C
82 F
27.5 °C
82 F
 
Maximum: 36.1 °C = 97 F
Average: 29.4 °C = 85 F
27.3 °C
81 F
28.1 °C
83 F
29.8 °C
86 F
27.8 °C
82 F
27.9 °C
82 F
32 °C
90 F
27 °C
81 F
28.2 °C
83 F
29.6 °C
85 F
Maximum: 32 °C = 90 F
Average: 28.6 °C = 83 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.5 %
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 %
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
98.1 % -1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % -2%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
89.1 % -10%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.61.822.22.42.72.93.13.33.63.844.2Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.146 (1.141-1.149)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.758 (0.748-0.766)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.44 (4.43-4.45)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.56 (3.55-3.56)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus

Speakers

Codec selection of the Teclast T60 Plus
Codec selection of the Teclast T60 Plus

The T60 Plus uses a dual-speaker system that is located on the bottom of the case and provides a stereo experience. Our measurements of the Teclast tablet reveal a pronounced wave-shaped frequency curve for the mids, and the sound spectrum doesn't contain any bass. But the sound quality is still okay for this price class.  

To listen via wired headphones, the T60 Plus offers a 3.5-mm audio port that allows for a more bass-rich sound reproduction. For wireless connections, Bluetooth is supported, although the selection of codecs is very limited with only SBC, AAC, and LDAC. While the manufacturer specifies 5.2 as the Bluetooth standard, the Mediatek chipset officially only supports the older BT 5.0. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.838.62538.235.33132.931.24033.536.65037.537.86327.126.68021.121.31002421.712521.729.716019.540.220016.847.32501353.631515.557.740014.160.250015.765.963020.371.480022.677.7100019.280.4125016.176.1160014.372.5200012.369.825001566.3315019.973.9400021.770.3500024.171.8630023.272.7800026.974.41000025.771.41250019.161.9160002449.7SPL33.585.8N1.765median 19.5median 69.8Delta49.535.837.14032.930.328.833.632.436.630.52726.520.619.916.817.616.130.114.94510.347.87.245.77.351.37.857.49.259.6866.49.470.215.270.19.366.98.9689.768.710.765.211.264.91260.812.865.313.659.714.458.515.362.51653.116.938.824.2780.541median 11.2median 59.73.110.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T60 PlusTeclast T60
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T60 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Teclast T60 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - An affordable tablet with a large battery

Power Consumption

The T60 Plus has an 8,000 mAh battery that can be completely recharged in about 3 hours using the included 10-Watt charger. The Teclast tablet behaves a little erratic with powerful power banks: a Xiaomi Powerbank 25000 as well as another power bank with Power Delivery 3.0 (130 watts) didn't work in our test. Similarly, our own chargers beyond 30 watts are unable to provide power to the T60 Plus.    

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 11.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7700 mAh
Lenovo Tab Plus
8600 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G88
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
35%
14%
39%
-106%
33%
26%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
1.1
39%
1.7
6%
1.2
33%
1.5
17%
1.2
33%
1.11 ?(0.53 - 1.8, n=3)
38%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.3
41%
1.9
14%
1.6
27%
8.39
-281%
1.4
36%
1.803 ?(1.2 - 2.2, n=3)
18%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
1.6
45%
2.2
24%
1.8
38%
8.46
-192%
1.7
41%
2.14 ?(1.5 - 2.9, n=3)
26%
Load Average *
6.7
4.4
34%
5.9
12%
3.7
45%
11.65
-74%
4.2
37%
Load Maximum *
11.4
9.8
14%
9.7
15%
5.7
50%
11.67
-2%
9.5
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.6 (4.76-11.4)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.8 (4.25-10.2)
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.95 (2.91-3.01)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.42 (6.77-8.17)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.59 (5.39-6.38)
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.95 (2.91-3.01)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

Battery Life

With more than 11 hours in the WLAN and 11.5 hours playing videos in our realistic battery tests at a brightness of 150 cd/m², the Teclast tablet shows a good battery life for a 12-inch tablet. However, due to the weak SoC, we would have expected a slightly longer battery life under load.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 54min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
11h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 12min
Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7700 mAh
Lenovo Tab Plus
8600 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Battery Runtime
23%
49%
104%
-1%
92%
Reader / Idle
1074
1517
41%
1992
85%
2657
147%
3313
208%
H.264
685
727
6%
953
39%
1113
62%
1145
67%
WiFi v1.3
667
734
10%
931
40%
1450
117%
661
-1%
1096
64%
Load
192
260
35%
254
32%
367
91%
249
30%

Notebookcheck Overall Evaluation

Overall, the Teclast T60 Plus is a good choice for its price, even though it remains behind the high expectations created by the spec sheet. Those looking for a lot of display for the money surely won't be disappointed.

Teclast T60 Plus - 01/18/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
37 / 69 → 54%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
89%
Display
77%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 4%
Application Performance
38 / 92 → 42%
AI Performance
15%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Average
54%
74%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
93.5%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
33.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 34.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Teclast T60 Plus review: 12-inch tablet for $130 with some excessive promises
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-01-20 (Update: 2025-01-20)