Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T45HD review - The bargain tablet with dual-SIM support and a slim metal case

Money-saver. The 10.5-inch Teclast T45HD offers lots of features for little money. For well under US$200, you get a surfing and multimedia tablet with a slim metal case, fast storage, a large battery, and even dual-SIM support with 4G. Our review will show who this budget tablet is made for.
Teclast T45HD

The Chinese manufacturer Teclast offers lots of tablets spread out over three different series in total. Aside from an affordable price, they also boast extensive features. The Teclast TD45HD is no exception to this.

For well under US$200, you get a 10.5-inch tablet with Android 13 and a 1,920 x 1,200 pixel IPS display. Moreover, the Teclast T45HD has 8 GB RAM and 128 GB storage with fast UFS-2.0 speeds, which you don't see often in this price range.

The Teclast tablet's communication is just as solid, as aside from WiFi 5, it also features dual-SIM support. This means you can surf the web on the go using 4G speeds and if needed, you can also make calls. In contrast, the SoC's performance is a little on the slower side.

good (80%) Teclast T45 HD UNISOC T606ARM Mali-G57 MP1 Tablet - 01/12/2024 - v7
Test device courtesy of purchased by editorial department
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Teclast T45 HD (T Series)
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
10.51 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 218 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 117 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (shared), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity sensor, hall sensor, DRM Widevine Level 1, Camera2 API Limited
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8), 4G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/34/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 247 x 162 ( = 0.3 x 9.72 x 6.38 in)
Battery
7200 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED Flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED Flash
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB cable, SIM needle, user manual, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
505 g ( = 17.81 oz / 1.11 pounds), Power Supply: 42 g ( = 1.48 oz / 0.09 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.8 %
01/2024
Teclast T45 HD
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
505 g7.5 mm10.51"1920x1200
80 %
03/2023
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
T610, Mali-G52 MP2
460 g8.5 mm10.10"1920x1200
81.2 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
477 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
79.3 %
01/2024
Teclast T40 HD
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
462 g7.7 mm10.36"2000x1200
81.5 %
09/2023
Telekom T Tablet
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
490 g7.8 mm10.40"2000x1200
84.6 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
445 g7.05 mm10.61"2000x1200

Case - The Teclast T45HD with a metal case

The Teclast T45HD is clad in a solid metal case and its colorway Space Gray is clearly inspired by Apple. A dark plastic strip along the full width of the top of the back cover brings a different color into the mix. This strip houses the cellular module's antenna.

Its weight of 505 grams isn't particularly lightweight or heavy—the T45HD feels nice to hold and makes quite a high-quality and stable impression. If you try to, you can elicit some cracking noises from the Teclast when you twist it. The tablet isn't IP-certified. 

The T45HD's display is surrounded by a 9-millimeter-wide frame. These bezels aren't terribly slim but they do allow you to hold the tablet comfortably in your hands without accidentally activating the touchscreen.

Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD

Size comparison

250.38 mm / 9.86 inch 157.98 mm / 6.22 inch 7.05 mm / 0.2776 inch 445 g0.981 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 inch 157.1 mm / 6.19 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 490 g1.08 lbs248 mm / 9.76 inch 157 mm / 6.18 inch 7 mm / 0.2756 inch 477 g1.052 lbs247 mm / 9.72 inch 162 mm / 6.38 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 505 g1.113 lbs246 mm / 9.69 inch 156 mm / 6.14 inch 7.7 mm / 0.3031 inch 462 g1.019 lbs239.84 mm / 9.44 inch 158.62 mm / 6.24 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 460 g1.014 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Connectivity - Dual-SIM and lots of free storage

Compared to other similarly-priced tablets, the Teclast T45HD is well-equipped with its 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM and 128 GB UFS-2.0 storage. Its storage can be further expanded by using a microSD card up to 1 TB in size.

The tablet's USB-C port runs at USB-2.0 speeds and supports USB-OTG, meaning it can be used to connect peripheral devices such as USB sticks. Further physical ports include a 3.5-mm audio jack and a SIM slot which can either accommodate two nano SIM cards or one nano SIM and one microSD card.

Left: SIM/microSD hybrid slot, speaker, USB-C 2.0, 3.5-mm jack
Left: SIM/microSD hybrid slot, speaker, USB-C 2.0, 3.5-mm jack
Right: speaker
Right: speaker
Top: power button, volume rocker, microphone
Top: power button, volume rocker, microphone
Bottom: no connections
Bottom: no connections

microSD card reader

In our copying test using the Angelbird AV Pro V60 as a reference router, the Teclast T45HD's microSD card slot achieved an average transfer rate of 20.1 MB/s. This isn't fast but most of the similarly configured comparison devices didn't manage anything better. We noted good maximum sequential read rates of 80.9 MB/s and sequential write rates of 45.5 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
21.3 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.9 MB/s +4%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.1 MB/s
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.02 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.48 MB/s -53%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Teclast T45 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.7 (14.9-45.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.5 (12.9-44.1)
Teclast T45 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.4 (37.6-80.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.6 (44.2-82)

Software - Android 13 without bloatware

Stock Android runs on the Teclast T45HD. It doesn't come with any sponsored apps or bloatware preinstalled, meaning we still had 117 GB of storage free to use from its initial 128 GB. Thanks to its DRM Widevine L1 support, the tablet can also stream content in HD quality.

At the time of testing (beginning January 2024), the latest Android security patch was from 5th September 2023—not very up to date. Upon asking how long the device will be supplied with updates, Teclast didn't give us a concrete answer. You can safely expect Android security updates for about 2 to 3 years. On the other hand, it remains unclear whether the T45HD will receive an upgrade to Android 14 in the future.

Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD

Communication and GNSS - Good WiFi 5, weak GPS

The Teclast T45HD masters WLAN with WiFi-5 speeds. Connected to our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000, we noted class-typical performance with peak values of up to 363 MBit/s. Its data transfers were quite stable when it came to sending as well as receiving.

On the go, the Teclast tablet can connect to the 4G network to access the Internet. Compatible with 11 4G bands, its frequency cover could do with being a little better, but its frequency repertoire does also include the LTE bands 7, 8 and 20—allowing you to travel throughout the EU with no issues. The Teclast T45HD also supports Bluetooth 5.0. However, it doesn't feature an NFC module.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet
371 (365min - 371max) MBit/s +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
367 (358min - 370max) MBit/s +20%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
319 (310min - 325max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
317 (251min - 326max) MBit/s +3%
Teclast T45 HD
307 (251min - 318max) MBit/s
Teclast T40 HD
306 (249min - 318max) MBit/s 0%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet
372 (358min - 381max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s +2%
Teclast T45 HD
363 (349min - 372max) MBit/s
Teclast T40 HD
358 (343min - 369max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
351 (333min - 366max) MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
218 (172min - 258max) MBit/s -40%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Teclast T45 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (251-318)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (251-326)
Teclast T45 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (349-372)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø218 (172-258)
GPS recepiton indoors
GPS recepiton indoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

The Teclast T45HD determines your current location via the satellite navigation systems GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1) and Beidou (B1C)—all in single-band mode. Inside, the tablet takes its time and can only locate with an accuracy of 15 meters. Outdoors, its satellite location services work quite a bit quicker with an improved accuracy of 3 meters. 

Even so, our practical test didn't cast a positive light onto the tablet. On our small bike trip, on which we took the fitness smartwatch Garmin Venu 2 with us to compare, the tablet quite frequently got our location wrong and it struggled to record our route in more populated areas in particular. As a result, the T45HD only seems fit for navigation purposes when you aren't relying on accurate locating.

GPS test Teclast T45HD: overview
GPS test Teclast T45HD: overview
GPS test Teclast T45HD: bridge
GPS test Teclast T45HD: bridge
GPS test Teclast T45HD: turning point
GPS test Teclast T45HD: turning point
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: overview
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: overview
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: bridge
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: bridge
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: turning point
GPS test Garmin Venu 2: turning point

Cameras - Only snapshot quality

Photo taken using the selfie camera
Photo taken using the selfie camera

A 13-MP camera with an LED flash is situated on the back cover of the Teclast T45HD. Although it seems to have two lenses at first glance, the lens further on the inside is actually used as a depth sensor and it only has a resolution of 0.3 MP. It collects additional data for blurred camera effects.

Photos taken on the 13-MP camera have quite a hefty blue tint—as a result, our test photo in the snow appears a few degrees colder. Furthermore, photos are missing some dynamics as well as detail, and their color depiction is a little unnatural at times. The camera captures dark surroundings with a lot of noise and as a result, can be barely used in low-light conditions. The 13-MP camera's performance is definitely good enough for snapshots, as its sharpness isn't even all too bad.

Videos have a similar quality compared to photos—they can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps. Further supported resolutions include 720p at 30fps and 480p at 30fps.

The selfie camera has an 8-MP resolution and even in good lighting conditions, photos taken using this lens look a bit pale. Their sharpness and details are fine as long as you don't set your expectations all too high. You can record video on the selfie camera at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Low-light photo
click to load images

In our test lab, we checked how well the 13-MP camera can depict the ColorChecker card's reference colors as well as our test chart. This showed that even under optimum lighting conditions, the camera suffers from color deviations. Even in full studio lighting, the test chart was depicted as blurry and patchy. In 1-lux lighting, you can practically see none of the test chart anymore.

ColorChecker
25.9 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
19 ∆E
22 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
0 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T45 HD: 17.07 ∆E min: 0 - max: 27.54 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
49 ∆E
38 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T45 HD: 47.71 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.36 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Charging using the 10-watt power supply

The Teclast T45HD's scope of delivery includes a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a 10-watt power supply (5V/2A), a SIM tool and a short instruction booklet. The manufacturer offers an optional folio case on its website which acts as a protective case as well as a stand for the tablet.

The T45HD comes with a 12-month warranty.

Input devices & operation - No fingerprint sensor on the Teclast T45HD

The Teclast T45HD's touchscreen reacts quickly and precisely to inputs. The IPS display operates at a touch-sampling rate of 120 Hz and has a class-typical refresh rate of 60 Hz.

The tablet doesn't feature a fingerprint sensor, however, you can unlock the device via a biometric 2D facial scan. It sometimes takes a second to activate, but then it recognizes users reliably. Moreover, you can select a pattern, PIN or password to unlock the tablet.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display - IPS panel without PWM

Subpixels
Subpixels

The Teclast T45HD's 10.5-inch IPS panel has a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels and it is in good company, as the comparison devices all feature similar resolutions. If you relate the screen's diagonal length to its resolution, you get a pixel density of 218 PPI, which is nice and sharp.

With an average brightness of 298 cd/m², the Teclast tablet is, again, class-average. When taking measurements with evenly distributed light and dark surfaces (APL18), we even managed to elicit 362 cd/m² from the T45HD. This brightness is easily enough for indoor use. Outside, things look a little different. 

We didn't note any PWM flickering on the IPS panel. This makes the Teclast T45HD suitable for users who react sensitively to pulse width modulation.

287
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 340 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 298 cd/m² Minimum: 20.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 340 cd/m²
Contrast: 850:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.427
Teclast T45 HD
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.51
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40
Teclast T40 HD
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Telekom T Tablet
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.40
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61
Screen
13%
0%
2%
1%
44%
Brightness middle
340
343
1%
322
-5%
367
8%
529
56%
418
23%
Brightness
298
332
11%
303
2%
346
16%
486
63%
402
35%
Brightness Distribution
77
94
22%
89
16%
90
17%
87
13%
90
17%
Black Level *
0.4
0.31
22%
0.45
-13%
0.4
-0%
0.56
-40%
0.28
30%
Contrast
850
1106
30%
716
-16%
918
8%
945
11%
1493
76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
5.9
17%
7.02
1%
6.54
8%
9.6
-35%
2.3
68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.8
11.2
-4%
10.38
4%
14.53
-35%
14.4
-33%
5.4
50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.2
7.9
4%
7.1
13%
8.7
-6%
10.5
-28%
3.7
55%
Gamma
2.427 91%
2.184 101%
2.179 101%
2.169 101%
2.17 101%
2.21 100%
CCT
9580 68%
9198 71%
8730 74%
7952 82%
10482 62%
6595 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

Users hardly have any control over the tablet's color depiction. You can only activate a blue-light filter and set color and contrast at three different levels each. In total, its color depiction is a tad too cool and as a result of its contrast ratio of only 850:1, it doesn't appear terribly lively, either. At the same time, the IPS panel doesn't match colors very accurately as well, but this shouldn't be too noticeable in everyday use.

CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color saturation
CalMAN color saturation
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.5 ms rise
↘ 19.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.7 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

The Teclast tablet is only partially suited for outdoor use—its combination of few brightness reserves and a reflective display make it difficult to use outside. In shaded areas, content remains more legible.

Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Teclast T45HD with a Unisoc T606

The Teclast T45HD uses the Unisoc T606 alongside its GPU, the ARM Mali-G57 MP1. The eight-core SoC—presented in late 2019—doesn't give the 10.5-inch device much power. During the synthetic benchmarks, the T45HD had to admit defeat to most of the comparison devices. On the other hand, there were sometimes not that many points between them. 

Benchmarks are one thing, but practical use is the deciding factor: If you are primarily looking to use the tablet to surf the web, watch videos or partake in any other lesser demanding tasks, then you probably won't notice that the T45HD doesn't house the most powerful SoC. You may have to tolerate some short loading times but all-in-all, they shouldn't be too annoying.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
558 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
373 Points +21%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
346 Points +12%
Teclast T40 HD
309 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
308 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=15)
306 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1889 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
1345 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD
1324 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
1323 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1267 Points -4%
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=15)
1196 Points -10%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)
812 Points +115%
Telekom T Tablet
711 Points +88%
Teclast T40 HD
378 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
378 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (371 - 380, n=7)
375 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)
2287 Points +61%
Telekom T Tablet
1919 Points +35%
Teclast T45 HD
1419 Points
Teclast T40 HD
1403 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T606 (1298 - 1482, n=7)
1387 Points -2%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)
453858 Points +110%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
316212 Points +46%
Average UNISOC T606 (202973 - 238808, n=4)
219025 Points +1%
Teclast T40 HD
218100 Points +1%
Teclast T45 HD
216219 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
213115 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
199786 Points -8%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9475 Points +33%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points +22%
Telekom T Tablet
8329 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
7404 Points +4%
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 7912, n=15)
7227 Points +1%
Teclast T40 HD
7155 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
7142 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)
3631 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2988 Points +57%
Telekom T Tablet
2839 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
2550 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
2283 Points +20%
Teclast T40 HD
1921 Points +1%
Average UNISOC T606 (1887 - 1954, n=5)
1917 Points +1%
Teclast T45 HD
1899 Points
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)
6543 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
6509 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
5507 Points +26%
Telekom T Tablet
4934 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
4777 Points +10%
Teclast T45 HD
4362 Points
Teclast T40 HD
4358 Points 0%
Average UNISOC T606 (4332 - 4362, n=5)
4344 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)
4284 Points +59%
Telekom T Tablet
3923 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
3550 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
3412 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
3178 Points +18%
Average UNISOC T606 (2675 - 3095, n=5)
2805 Points +4%
Teclast T40 HD
2757 Points +2%
Teclast T45 HD
2691 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)
6639 Points +553%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2875 Points +183%
Telekom T Tablet
2667 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
2124 Points +109%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1497 Points +47%
Average UNISOC T606 (989 - 1076, n=5)
1023 Points +1%
Teclast T40 HD
1021 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
1016 Points
Web
Telekom T Tablet
1258 Points +15%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)
1205 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1201 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
1138 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1114 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD
1110 Points +2%
Average UNISOC T606 (1034 - 1123, n=5)
1094 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
1090 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=39, last 2 years)
5325 Points +1815%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
892 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
304 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
302 Points +9%
Teclast T40 HD
280 Points +1%
Teclast T45 HD
278 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (256 - 280, n=4)
273 Points -2%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9213 Points +238%
Telekom T Tablet
9056 Points +232%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)
8899 Points +226%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
4094 Points +50%
Average UNISOC T606 (2678 - 3748, n=5)
2916 Points +7%
Teclast T40 HD
2735 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
2729 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1662 Points -39%

Legend

 
Teclast T45 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

During the graphically demanding tests, we noted the same results as in the synthetic benchmarks. The Teclast T45HD's rather weak ARM Mali-G57 MP1 already struggled to depict smooth content during simple graphics tests such as the T-Rex benchmark from GFXBench. As a result, our test device came far behind all the other comparison devices.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
329 Points +223%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
318 Points +212%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 Points +81%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points +29%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
102 Points
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
101 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 Points +246%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points +229%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points +91%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
135 Points +36%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99 Points
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
85 Points -14%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1215 Points +188%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1171 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
722 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
522 Points +24%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
422 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
422 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points +192%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1173 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
721 Points +70%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
524 Points +24%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
424 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
424 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2644 Points +170%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2511 Points +156%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1527 Points +56%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1146 Points +17%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
979 Points
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
978 Points 0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2442 Points +194%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2321 Points +180%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1332 Points +60%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points +18%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
830 Points
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
829 Points 0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points +40%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3124 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2848 Points +8%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2651 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2647 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps +162%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps +143%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +81%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps +48%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +186%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
61 fps +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +86%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps +45%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
22 fps 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
22 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps +150%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +143%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps +36%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +186%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +171%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps +86%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps +43%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +167%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +63%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +28%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.6 fps
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.4 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +191%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +179%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +74%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +40%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.7 fps +1%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.6 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +155%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps +73%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.4 fps +25%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.1 fps
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5 fps -2%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +183%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +183%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps +83%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.6 fps +25%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.3 fps 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps +147%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.9 fps +74%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.5 fps +32%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3.4 fps
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3.3 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps +170%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.7 fps +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.7 fps +35%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2 fps 0%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +126%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps +77%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.4 fps +40%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.3 fps
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.2 fps -2%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +159%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps +141%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps +44%
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.5 fps +2%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.4 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps +176%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps +153%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.6 fps +84%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.2 fps +38%
Teclast T45 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
0.87 fps
Teclast T40 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
0.83 fps -5%

Surfing the web is fun on the Teclast tablet; pages load quickly and are available in no time. Sometimes, you might have to wait a moment or two for some images to load but in total, surfing on the T45HD feels nice and smooth.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)
84.9 Points +70%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
58.17 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
55.842 Points +12%
Teclast T45 HD (Chrome 120.0.6099.144)
49.853 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
49.8 Points 0%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)
49.095 Points -2%
Average UNISOC T606 (38.1 - 50.2, n=6)
47.3 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
46.85 Points -6%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)
85.7 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
58 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
56 Points +8%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
56 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
53 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)
52 Points 0%
Teclast T45 HD (Chrome 120.0.6099.144)
52 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (51 - 52, n=5)
51.6 Points -1%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)
120.7 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
93 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
84 Points +9%
Average UNISOC T606 (77 - 78, n=2)
77.5 Points +1%
Teclast T45 HD (Chrome 120.0.6099.144)
77 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)
77.2 runs/min +98%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)
39.1 runs/min +1%
Teclast T45 HD (Chrome 120.0.6099.144)
38.9 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112)
38.16 runs/min -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
38.1 runs/min -2%
Average UNISOC T606 (31.2 - 39.3, n=5)
37.1 runs/min -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)
34.43 runs/min -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +85%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
21843 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
17557 Points +41%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)
12696 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
12681 Points +2%
Teclast T45 HD (Chrome 120.0.6099.144)
12452 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
11952 Points -4%
Average UNISOC T606 (9871 - 12696, n=10)
11755 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)
3209 ms * -6%
Average UNISOC T606 (3013 - 3187, n=5)
3089 ms * -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
3075.1 ms * -2%
Teclast T45 HD (Chrome 120.0.6099.144)
3017.2 ms *
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)
3012.8 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
2895.3 ms * +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
2443.7 ms * +19%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
2194.9 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to its UFS-2.0 storage, the T45HD benefits from short loading times and a high data throughput when compared to similarly-priced tablets' performance levels. Competitors such as the Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 or the Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022, which both cost almost the same as our test sample, are quite a bit slower at times.

Teclast T45 HDLenovo Tab M10 Gen 3Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022Teclast T40 HDTelekom T TabletXiaomi Redmi PadAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-61%
-10%
-49%
121%
-19%
44%
Sequential Read 256KB
806.38
277.2
-66%
249
-69%
688.9
-15%
287.1
-64%
976.9
21%
530 ?(286 - 948, n=36)
-34%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.89
210.4
2%
83
-60%
188
-9%
188.3
-9%
883.6
329%
Random Read 4KB
136.81
105.1
-23%
67.3
-51%
137
0%
52.8
-61%
250.82
83%
129.6 ?(65 - 233, n=36)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
168.92
78.5
-54%
58.8
-65%
143.8
-15%
66.55
-61%
257.02
52%
100.7 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=36)
-40%

Games - Only run with severe limitations

The T45HD is by no means a gaming machine. In order for games to run smoothly, you will definitely have to reduce their details by quite a lot. In more demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Genshin Impact, you will barely see frame rates above 30fps.

At this point, we would have liked to deliver concrete frame rates. However, the Teclast tablet refused to cooperate with our test tool Gamebench which determines fps rates.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact

Emissions - Always cool in use

Temperature

During use, the Teclast T45HD doesn't even get warm to the touch. Even after running our one-hour stress test with the Burnout benchmark, we measured a maximum surface temperature of only 29.5 °C. At no point did the tablet break out in a sweat during any of the other stress tests.

Even after 20 runs of the Wild Life benchmark from 3DMark, the SoC's performance remained consistently high. Its low value of 82.7 per cent during 3DMark Wild Life masks its actual stability. As higher point numbers were achieved during quite a few runs compared to the beginning of the test, this results in a negative deviation from the target value. In turn, this negatively impacts the total score.

Max. Load
 27.2 °C
81 F
26.7 °C
80 F
26.2 °C
79 F
 
 26.3 °C
79 F
26.3 °C
79 F
25.6 °C
78 F
 
 25.4 °C
78 F
25.8 °C
78 F
25.8 °C
78 F
 
Maximum: 27.2 °C = 81 F
Average: 26.1 °C = 79 F
28 °C
82 F
29.5 °C
85 F
28.1 °C
83 F
27 °C
81 F
29.1 °C
84 F
28 °C
82 F
26.3 °C
79 F
27.6 °C
82 F
27.4 °C
81 F
Maximum: 29.5 °C = 85 F
Average: 27.9 °C = 82 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Teclast T45 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.56)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.34-4.36)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.56)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)
Teclast T45 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.645 (0.584-0.706)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.117 (1.11-1.127)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.623 (0.575-0.677)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
98.5 (1.11min - 1.127max) % +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
97.9 (2.03min - 2.07max) % +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
97.5 (0.789min - 0.809max) % +18%
Teclast T40 HD
84.8 (0.575min - 0.677max) % +3%
Teclast T45 HD
82.7 (0.584min - 0.706max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Telekom T Tablet
99.6 (7.07min - 7.1max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
99.4 (4.34min - 4.36max) % +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
99.3 (3.13min - 3.16max) % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
99 (7.39min - 7.47max) % 0%
Teclast T45 HD
98.8 (2.53min - 2.56max) %
Teclast T40 HD
98.7 (2.53min - 2.56max) % 0%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Telekom T Tablet
99.5 (6.99min - 7.03max) %

Legend

 
Teclast T45 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD
Teclast T45HD

Speakers

The Teclast T45HD is fitted with stereo speakers. At up to 75.2 dB(A), they can't get particularly loud and at maximum volume, they start to sound a bit booming.

Voices are transmitted very well by the speakers, however, since they are missing any bass whatsoever, their sound lacks volume and music sounds quite flat.

You can connect external audio devices via the device's 3.5-mm jack or Bluetooth 5.0. Bluetooth codecs supported by the T45HD include AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC and SBC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203840.52529.434.43126.3254032.832.65037.840.36329.724.18022.715.810018.917.612520.616.416012.928.72009.232.625010.341.23157.344.94006.849.25008.654.563012.359.380010.759.210001163.912508.760.916008.765.220009.264.5250010.259.3315011.458.1400013.266500014.567.4630014.464.8800015.362.41000016.362.71250016.352.61600017.243.2SPL24.775.2N0.534.1median 11.4median 59.2Delta3.310.836.437.128.23126.626.226.627.732.436.622.528.81733.125.532.921.234.919.141.5154914.755.113.761.711.367.414.767.716.271.316.573.314.377.412.174.211.674.211.171.713.669.621.470.924.872.72875.523.464.723.156.920.867.223.461.82253.233.584.41.561.4median 16.5median 67.44.48.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T45 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T45 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - The Teclast T45HD with a 7200-mAh battery

Power consumption

The Teclast T45HD's 7200-mAh battery can be charged at a maximum of 10 watts. The corresponding power supply (5V/2A) comes delivered with the tablet and in our test, it took 4:14 hours to charge its battery from 0 to 100 per cent.

The Teclast tablet proved to have inconspicuous power consumption values and at times, it uses considerably less energy than comparison devices such as the Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 or the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. In turn, its sister model, the Teclast T40HD, is very frugal under load in particular.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 2.8 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Teclast T45 HD
7200 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
7040 mAh
Teclast T40 HD
7200 mAh
Telekom T Tablet
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
-70%
-23%
8%
-145%
-79%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1.9
-58%
1.4
-17%
1.2
-0%
1.28
-7%
0.93
22%
Idle Average *
1.4
2.1
-50%
1.6
-14%
1.3
7%
4.52
-223%
4.02
-187%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
2.5
-47%
2
-18%
1.5
12%
4.58
-169%
4.07
-139%
Load Average *
2.8
7.6
-171%
4.2
-50%
2.9
-4%
10.5
-275%
5.52
-97%
Load Maximum *
7.4
9
-22%
8.7
-18%
5.4
27%
11.2
-51%
6.89
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Teclast T45 HD UNISOC T606: Ø4.84 (2.81-7.37)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618: Ø6.22 (3.31-8.74)
Teclast T40 HD UNISOC T606: Ø3.12 (1.152-5.35)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456