Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi Redmi Pad review - Affordable Android tablet with 90 Hz and 4 speakers

Redmi debut. With the Redmi Pad, Xiaomi introduces its first Redmi series tablet. This suggests that the 10.6-inch device offers good features for an affordable price. While the Redmi Tab shines in our review with features such as the 90-Hz display, a sleek metal construction, and long battery life, we also discovered a few weaknesses.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Different device class, same goal: Like the popular Redmi smartphone series, which consists of budget and mid-range phones that tend to offer a lot for their price, the Redmi Pad, too, tries to give you the most bang for your buck.

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad starts at around 240 USD. The 10.6-inch Android 12 tablet comes with the octa-core MediaTek Helio G99 SoC and up to 128 GB storage. The included charger is able to charge the internal 8000-mAh battery at up to 18 watts. Although the Redmi Pad does well in many areas, we also discovered some drawbacks during our review.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
10.61 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 220 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 400 Nits, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.05 x 250.38 x 157.98 ( = 0.28 x 9.86 x 6.22 in)
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18W fast charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF, video recording up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix FOV 105°, FocusFrame, video recording up to [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, 22.5W charger (10V/2.25A), USB cable, microSD slot eject tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information , MIUI 13, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
445 g ( = 15.7 oz / 0.98 pounds), Power Supply: 65 g ( = 2.29 oz / 0.14 pounds)
Price
330 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.6 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
445 g7.05 mm10.61"2000x1200
88.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
487 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
80.9 %
04/2022
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
81 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
80.5 %
03/2022
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200
87.6 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5
SD 860, Adreno 640
511 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600

Case - Lightweight Aluminum Unibody Chassis

Although the Redmi Series consists of more budget-oriented smartphones and tablets, this does not necessarily mean that users will have to make major compromises when it comes to the materials or the build quality. In the same vein, the Redmi Pad does not fit the stereotypical cheap device archetype.

The flat metal case has a height of 7.05 mm and leaves a premium visual and haptic impression in addition to appearing fairly sturdy. Although the case can be twisted slightly from the shorter edges, the rigidity is more than sufficient for day-to-day use. However, the tablet does not have an IP certification.

With a weight of 445 grams, the Redmi Pad is fairly lightweight and lighter than all competitors with similar dimensions from our comparison including the Apple iPad 2021 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022.

Xiaomi offers three color variants. Users can choose between gray (Graphite Gray), silver (Moonlight Silver), and a light green (Mint Green).

Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Size Comparison

254.69 mm / 10 inch 166.25 mm / 6.55 inch 6.85 mm / 0.2697 inch 511 g1.127 lbs250.6 mm / 9.87 inch 174.1 mm / 6.85 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 487 g1.074 lbs250.38 mm / 9.86 inch 157.98 mm / 6.22 inch 7.05 mm / 0.2776 inch 445 g0.981 lbs248 mm / 9.76 inch 157 mm / 6.18 inch 9.2 mm / 0.3622 inch 480 g1.058 lbs246.8 mm / 9.72 inch 161.9 mm / 6.37 inch 6.9 mm / 0.2717 inch 508 g1.12 lbs240.2 mm / 9.46 inch 159 mm / 6.26 inch 7.85 mm / 0.3091 inch 450 g0.992 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Connectivity - 3 Memory Configurations

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is available in three different configurations. At the time of writing, the tablet costs around 240 USD with 3 GB LPDDR4X RAM and 64 GB UFS-2.2 storage. The 4/128GB and 6/128GB models are available for about 250 USD and 280 USD, respectively. The internal storage can be expanded via a microSD card formatted in exFAT with a capacity of up to 1 TB.

An additional 8/128-GB configuration is currently exclusively available on the Chinese market. Whether it will find its way to other regions is uncertain at this time.

The Redmi Pad uses a USB-C 2.0 interface for charging purposes and data transfers. Due to the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, the USB-OTG-capable port also serves as an audio output. The Redmi Pad produces Dolby Atmos surround sound with its quad speakers, which occupy the shorter edges of the device in pairs.

Left: Power button, 2x speaker
Left: Power button, 2x speaker
Right: Speaker, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Right: Speaker, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Top: microSD card slot, microphones, volume rocker
Top: microSD card slot, microphones, volume rocker
Bottom: No connectivity
Bottom: No connectivity

microSD Card Reader

The microSD card reader of the Redmi Tab only reaches average speeds in conjunction with our reference Angelbird AV Pro V60 memory card.

Although sequential read and write rates of 66.1 MB/s and 35.8 MB/s, respectively, are a decent, there are recurring dips in performance particularly during read operations. Furthermore, the Xiaomi tablet is very slow in our copy test at 9.48 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s ∼100% +419%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s ∼37% +91%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s ∼36% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.48 MB/s ∼19%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.1 (16.3-45.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.1 (47.9-85.6)

Software - Android 12 and MIUI 13 for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad

The Redmi Pad runs Android 12 with Xiaomi's own MIUI user interface version 13.1. The manufacturer does not include a lot in terms of extra software. Aside from the Google applications and a small collection of Xiaomi tools, only the two third-party apps WPS Office and Netflix - both of which can be removed - come preinstalled. Thanks to DRM Widevine L1 support, the tablet can be used to stream HD-quality content.

MIUI 13 not only allows for apps to be run in fullscreen mode, but also in a windowed view that allows multiple apps to be open simultaneously. Additionally, two app windows can be automatically aligned to take up half the screen, each. Using this feature requires the 4-GB version of the tablet (or higher), however, since the 3-GB model does not support split view.

At the time of testing (early December), the Android security patches of the Redmi Tab date back to 01.09.22, making them fairly outdated. According to Xiaomi, there is no official support window for OS updates and security patches.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Communication and GNSS - Bluetooth 5.3 and WiFi 5

With Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 5, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad only supports two communication channels, since neither NFC nor WWAN options are on board. There is also no GPS module.

In conjunction with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the Xiaomi reaches very consistent Wi-Fi transfer speeds, which come close to the limits of Wi-Fi 5 with up to 369 Mb/s. The low initial transmission speed is caused by the router "waking up".

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
635 (320min - 652max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
587 (290min - 624max) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
538 (317min - 618max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
485 (191min - 554max) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
367 (358min - 370max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s ∼55% -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (358-370)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)

Cameras - Special Features for Group Video Chats

Picture taken with the selfie camera
Picture taken with the selfie camera

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad has an 8-MP selfie camera on the longest edge of the tablet. It covers a 105° field of view, captures videos at up to 1080p with 30 frames per second, and comes with the FocusFrame feature, which is supposed to enhance group video calls.

FocusFrame works similarly to Apple's Center Stage. During video calls, the selfie camera of the Redmi Tab automatically detects all current participants and keeps them in focus, even when they move. However, only a few apps are currently supported. According to Xiaomi, FocusFrame is available for Facebook Messenger, WeChat, and WhatsApp.

The main camera has a resolution of 8 MP and also supports video recording at up to 1080p with 30 FPS. Like the selfie camera, it shines with a good video quality under good lighting conditions, which takes a big hit in low-light situations due to significant image noise. The same holds true for pictures.

The main camera takes decent pictures with natural colors and good contrast under good ambient lighting. Since the images are lacking in terms of details, zooming in is inadvisable. Like the selfie camera, the main camera also is out of its depth in low-light situations.

Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 25-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images

The main camera shows itself to be very accurate under ideal conditions in our test lab (maximum deltaE of 8.64). Under poor lighting conditions, which we emulate with a 1-Lux scene, this no longer holds true. The color accuracy then deviates widely from its ideal range and the test chart, which was previously clearly visible, almost entirely disappears in the darkness.

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 5.41 ∆E min: 3.07 - max: 8.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 47.37 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.7 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - 22.5-Watt Charger Included

Xiaomi includes a 22.5-watt charger, a USB cable (type-A-to-type-C), a tool to eject microSD cards from the slot, a quick-start guide, and a warranty card with the Redmi Tab. The manufacturer offers no accessories specifically made for the tablet.

Since there is no official warranty information for the Xiaomi Redmi Tab in the US, buyers should be aware of the individual retailer conditions and our Warranty FAQ.

Input Devices & Handling - 90-Hz und 2D Facial Recognition

Thanks to the 90-Hz display and the 8-core MediaTek Helio G99 SoC, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad feels very responsive and smooth during use. Even more demanding apps usually run without any issues and the performance is sufficient for opening multiple apps simultaneously. It should be noted that this applies to our test model with 4 GB of RAM. By contrast, there may be occasional stuttering with the 3-GB version.

Since there is no fingerprint sensor, 2D facial recognition is the only available biometric authentification option. While Face Unlock works without any hickups and unlocks the Redmi Tab without any noticeable delay, it is less secure than PIN or pattern unlock due to its software-based nature. The tablet can also be unlocked with a Bluetooth device, but this only works with certain Xiaomi smartwatches and smartbands.

Keyboard landscape mode
Keyboard landscape mode
Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard portrait mode

Display - IPS Screen with 400 Nits

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The Redmi Pad's 10.6-inch screen has a native resolution of 2000 x 1200 pixels with a 15:9 aspect ratio for a pixel density of 220 PPI. The IPS panel has a nominal brightness of 400 nits and does not use pulse-width modulation, making the tablet potentially a good choice for sensitive users. As our slow-motion observations with a microscope show, Temporal Dithering is absent as well.

When displaying a purely white image (APL50), the display reaches an average brightness of 401.6 nits. This value increases to 414 nits when repeating this test with a smaller image (APL18). The highest luminance of 418 nits can be reached with the ambient light sensor disabled. We measure 1.54 nits on the lowest brightness setting.

390
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 419 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 401.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1493:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61
Apple iPad 2021
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Xiaomi Pad 5
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen
3%
-29%
-78%
-24%
-22%
Brightness middle
418
507
21%
285
-32%
368
-12%
433
4%
491
17%
Brightness
402
491
22%
282
-30%
346
-14%
412
2%
473
18%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
91
1%
91
1%
86
-4%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.28
0.5
-79%
0.3
-7%
0.61
-118%
0.48
-71%
0.87
-211%
Contrast
1493
1014
-32%
950
-36%
603
-60%
902
-40%
564
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
3.53
-53%
6.9
-200%
3
-30%
1.9
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.4
3.9
28%
5.84
-8%
11.4
-111%
7.2
-33%
4.1
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
2.4
35%
6.2
-68%
7.7
-108%
4.4
-19%
3
19%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.044 108%
2.16 102%
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
CCT
6595 99%
6923 94%
8130 80%
8547 76%
7003 93%
7182 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19454 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The colors of the IPS display can be adjusted by choosing between the three color presets Vivid, Saturated, and Standard. Additionally, the color temperature can be altered with a color wheel or one of three presets (Standard, Warm, or Cool).

The Standard color and color temperature settings provide the most accurate results. With these settings, the screen achieves a good contrast ratio, black value, and color temperature. For daily use, the color accuracy is more than sufficient as well.

Color accuracy (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color profile Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.42 ms rise
↘ 12.47 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.15 ms rise
↘ 20.98 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

With its good viewing angles, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad's IPS panel performs well during outdoor use, provided the ambient light conditions are not too bright. Due to the somewhat low maximum brightness, the readability of the display quickly deteriorates under direct sunlight, making a move to the shade almost a necessity.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Redmi Pad with MediaTek Helio G99

With the MediaTek Helio G99 introduced in August 2022, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad is based on an upper mid-range ARM SoC. The 6-nm octa-core processor relies on two ARM Cortex-A76 cores with a clock speed of up to 2.2 GHz for demanding tasks and a cluster consisting of six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2-GHz clock speeds. The GPU is an ARM Mali-G57 MP2.

In our synthetic benchmarks, the Redmi Pad positions itself ahead of many similarly priced tablets. In terms of performance, our test device falls between the eclast T40 Pro (UNISOC T618) and its in-house competitor Xiaomi Pad 5, which offers significantly faster performance thanks to its Snapdragon 860 SoC. The Apple iPad 2021 comes with even better performance, beating all its Android alternatives.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad 2021
1328 Points ∼57% +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5
784 Points ∼34% +41%
Average of class Tablet (152 - 1892, n=46, last 2 years)
745 Points ∼32% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
558 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (540 - 576, n=4)
556 Points ∼24% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points ∼16% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points ∼16% -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points ∼13% -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 2021
3235 Points ∼11% +71%
Xiaomi Pad 5
2768 Points ∼10% +47%
Average of class Tablet (780 - 8524, n=46, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼9% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1889 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1767 - 1924, n=4)
1848 Points ∼6% -2%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points ∼5% -31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points ∼4% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points ∼4% -35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021
622382 Points ∼44% +97%
Xiaomi Pad 5
575553 Points ∼41% +82%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1416727, n=36, last 2 years)
526113 Points ∼37% +66%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (316212 - 337968, n=3)
329413 Points ∼23% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
316212 Points ∼22%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points ∼17% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points ∼14% -36%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points ∼13% -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5
11318 Points ∼59% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (9475 - 10589, n=4)
9995 Points ∼52% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9475 Points ∼49%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points ∼44% -12%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=37, last 2 years)
8360 Points ∼44% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points ∼39% -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points ∼34% -30%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 2021
842 Points ∼33% +46%
Average of class Tablet (335 - 1585, n=24, last 2 years)
784 Points ∼30% +36%
Xiaomi Pad 5
635 Points ∼25% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (575 - 602, n=3)
593 Points ∼23% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
575 Points ∼22%
Teclast T40 Pro
384 Points ∼15% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
361 Points ∼14% -37%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5
5154 Points ∼54% +72%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 6908, n=31, last 2 years)
3511 Points ∼37% +18%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2988 - 3054, n=3)
3031 Points ∼32% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2988 Points ∼31%
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points ∼22% -28%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points ∼21% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points ∼19% -38%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5
8805 Points ∼45% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6484 - 6637, n=3)
6543 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Tablet (2793 - 10926, n=31, last 2 years)
6536 Points ∼33% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
6509 Points ∼33%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points ∼25% -25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points ∼25% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points ∼24% -27%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5
5788 Points ∼50% +63%
Average of class Tablet (970 - 8167, n=31, last 2 years)
4007 Points ∼34% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3550 - 3982, n=3)
3778 Points ∼33% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
3550 Points ∼31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points ∼25% -18%
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points ∼14% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points ∼8% -73%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
10293 Points ∼36% +258%
Average of class Tablet (928 - 22308, n=31, last 2 years)
6354 Points ∼22% +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2875 Points ∼10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2730 - 2875, n=3)
2783 Points ∼10% -3%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points ∼7% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points ∼7% -30%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points ∼5% -49%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5
1346 Points ∼56% +12%
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points ∼55% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points ∼52% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1201 - 1250, n=3)
1228 Points ∼51% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1201 Points ∼50%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1598, n=31, last 2 years)
1189 Points ∼50% -1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points ∼40% -20%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5
46413 Points ∼16% +939%
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 119686, n=23, last 2 years)
29074 Points ∼10% +551%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points ∼2% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points ∼2% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
4468 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
4468 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points ∼2% 0%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Average of class Tablet (1535 - 73266, n=19, last 2 years)
9924 Points ∼12% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (9213 - 9695, n=3)
9467 Points ∼11% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9213 Points ∼11%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (676 - 8816, n=6, last 2 years)
3327 Score ∼34% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2909 Score ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
2909 Score ∼30% 0%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Similarly, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad delivers an average performance compared to its competitors in the graphics benchmarks. Both the Xiaomi Pad 5 and Apple iPad 2021 still manage to outperform it by significant margins.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal: offscreen Overall Score
Basemark GPU 1.2: Vulkan Medium Native | 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | OpenGL Medium Native | 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1872 Points ∼100% +469%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
970 Points ∼52% +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
329 Points ∼18%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points ∼10% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points ∼10% -46%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 Points ∼8% -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1992 Points ∼100% +481%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
985 Points ∼49% +187%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points ∼9% -46%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points ∼9% -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 Points ∼8% -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7858 Points ∼100% +547%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3436 Points ∼44% +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1215 Points ∼15%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼9% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points ∼9% -42%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
564 Points ∼7% -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7457 Points ∼100% +503%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3428 Points ∼46% +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points ∼10% -42%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼10% -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
557 Points ∼7% -55%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8661 Points ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3780 Points ∼44%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2158 Points ∼25% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points ∼24% -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1501 Points ∼17% -60%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12007 Points ∼100% +215%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3809 Points ∼32%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2002 Points ∼17% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1957 Points ∼16% -49%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1356 Points ∼11% -64%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4385 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points ∼84%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2969 Points ∼68% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2862 Points ∼65% -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2441 Points ∼56% -34%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6981 Points ∼100% +164%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
5362 Points ∼77% +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2644 Points ∼38%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1526 Points ∼22% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points ∼21% -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1124 Points ∼16% -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
9773 Points ∼100% +300%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8202 Points ∼84% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2442 Points ∼25%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1338 Points ∼14% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points ∼13% -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points ∼10% -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4590 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points ∼81%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3007 Points ∼66% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points ∼62% -23%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2365 Points ∼52% -36%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2078 Points ∼45% -44%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5000 Points ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2452 Points ∼49%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1518 Points ∼30% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1488 Points ∼30% -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1059 Points ∼21% -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6876 Points ∼100% +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2360 Points ∼34%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1361 Points ∼20% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1340 Points ∼19% -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points ∼14% -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2841 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2558 Points ∼90% -10%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2541 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2422 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 Points ∼8% -92%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2583 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1456 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1425 Points ∼55% -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1085 Points ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2412 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1281 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1252 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
955 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3439 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2783 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2768 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2236 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3473 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2140 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2084 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1445 Points ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3482 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1998 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1958 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1333 Points ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3441 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2850 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2692 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2256 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼100% +104%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼54% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼35% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼35% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps ∼34% -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
307 fps ∼100% +387%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps ∼60% +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps ∼21%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼13% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼13% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼13% -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼100% +86%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼92% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼38% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼38% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼31% -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
167 fps ∼100% +318%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps ∼65% +173%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼24%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼17% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼16% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼16% -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
57 fps ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼70% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼26% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼26% -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼25% -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
110 fps ∼100% +340%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps ∼71% +212%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps ∼23%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼15% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼14% -40%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼14% -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
43 fps ∼100% +231%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps ∼58% +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼21% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps ∼20% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps ∼19% -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
69 fps ∼100% +360%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼68% +213%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps ∼14% -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps ∼13% -39%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼13% -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
35 fps ∼100% +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps ∼49% +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼17% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼17% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps ∼14% -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
31 fps ∼100% +474%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps ∼58% +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼12% -33%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼12% -33%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps ∼9% -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
50 fps ∼100% +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼52% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼20% -17%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼20% -17%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps ∼15% -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
82 fps ∼100% +486%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼57% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼12% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼12% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.3 fps ∼5% -69%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2965 Points ∼100% +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
917 Points ∼31%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24.45 fps ∼100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26.11 fps ∼100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23.79 fps ∼100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26.81 fps ∼100%

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is an excellent choice for web browsing and able to load even complex sites quickly. Regardless, it places lower than the Xiaomi Pad 5 in our browser benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
142.2 Points ∼100% +155%
Average of class Tablet (17 - 225, n=41, last 2 years)
81.9 Points ∼58% +47%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
73 Points ∼51% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
55.842 Points ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 59.8, n=3)
54.2 Points ∼38% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points ∼31% -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points ∼21% -46%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
291.1 Points ∼100% +222%
Average of class Tablet (28.1 - 436, n=30, last 2 years)
156.9 Points ∼54% +74%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
128.1 Points ∼44% +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
90.4 Points ∼31% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
90.377 Points ∼31%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points ∼26% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points ∼23% -26%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
48.12 Points ∼17% -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score
Average of class Tablet (25 - 227, n=14, last 2 years)
83.8 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
56 Points ∼67%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 58, n=3)
51 Points ∼61% -9%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
202 Points ∼100% +140%
Average of class Tablet (33 - 342, n=41, last 2 years)
116.9 Points ∼58% +39%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
96 Points ∼48% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (84 - 92, n=3)
88 Points ∼44% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
84 Points ∼42%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
76 Points ∼38% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points ∼37% -11%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points ∼27% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
171 runs/min ∼100% +349%
Average of class Tablet (13.9 - 376, n=39, last 2 years)
91.2 runs/min ∼53% +139%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
61.3 runs/min ∼36% +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
38.1 runs/min ∼22%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 40.7, n=3)
34.3 runs/min ∼20% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min ∼20% -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min ∼15% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
47288 Points ∼100% +169%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
28456 Points ∼60% +62%
Average of class Tablet (5004 - 74614, n=44, last 2 years)
27345 Points ∼58% +56%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 21308, n=4)
18583 Points ∼39% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
17557 Points ∼37%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points ∼31% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points ∼23% -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points ∼21% -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms * ∼100% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * ∼74% -25%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 12972, n=42, last 2 years)
2844 ms * ∼69% -16%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * ∼67% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
2443.7 ms * ∼59%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2213 - 2444, n=3)
2295 ms * ∼56% +6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
1603 ms * ∼39% +34%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
545 ms * ∼13% +78%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS-2.2 storage within the Redmi Tab allows for short loading times and above-average speeds for its price category. Not even the Xiaomi Pad 5 is able to keep up with it overall, although it achieves significantly faster sequential read speeds.

Xiaomi Redmi PadHuawei MatePad T10SSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Teclast T40 ProXiaomi Pad 5Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-79%
-79%
-70%
-12%
-33%
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
976.9
302.9
-69%
255.1
-74%
260.9
-73%
1459
49%
716 ?(303 - 999, n=38)
-27%
770 ?(151.1 - 2031, n=41, last 2 years)
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB
883.6
99
-89%
101.1
-89%
199.2
-77%
534
-40%
499 ?(105.3 - 884, n=38)
-44%
437 ?(66.7 - 1559, n=41, last 2 years)
-51%
Random Read 4KB
250.82
51.1
-80%
68.3
-73%
94.2
-62%
208.7
-17%
175.8 ?(89.3 - 253, n=38)
-30%
136.3 ?(10.1 - 310, n=41, last 2 years)
-46%
Random Write 4KB
257.02
57.8
-78%
57.5
-78%
83.6
-67%
158.9
-38%
175.4 ?(113.8 - 258, n=38)
-32%
131.1 ?(5.3 - 370, n=41, last 2 years)
-49%

Gaming - 30 FPS Even in Demanding Games

The integrated ARM Mali-G57 MP2 graphics solution of the MediaTek Helio G99 is sufficient for playing all current titles smoothly. That being said, the 90-FPS maximum is unlikely to be reached in very many games due to the limited performance reserves of the integrated GPU. In our testing, Armajet and Subway Surfers both consistently run at close to 60 FPS. At its maximum available HD/High setting, PUBG Mobile is limited to 30 FPS.

We use Gamebench to determine the frame rates.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
Subway Surfers
Subway Surfers
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.4 (52-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; PUBG Mobile; 2.3.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Subway Surfers; 3.4.0: Ø60.1 (50-61)

Emissions - Four Speakers with Dolby Atmos

Temperatures

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad always remains cool during use. Even after a one-hour stress test, we only measure 30.2 °C on the surface of the tablet, making it less than lukewarm. As our 3DMark Wild Life stress tests show, the core temperatures of the MediaTek Helio G99 remain fairly low with no major throttling.

The best and worst 3DMark Wild Life Extreme runs only differ by 2 % (345 vs. 338 points). Even in a worst case benchmark scenario, the performance level does not drop below 98 %. Thus a noticeably performance decrease should be essentially impossible during day-to-day use.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)
Max. Load
 29 °C
84 F
28.7 °C
84 F
27.4 °C
81 F
 
 30.2 °C
86 F
27.9 °C
82 F
27.8 °C
82 F
 
 30 °C
86 F
27.9 °C
82 F
27.4 °C
81 F
 
Maximum: 30.2 °C = 86 F
Average: 28.5 °C = 83 F
27.4 °C
81 F
28.1 °C
83 F
28.5 °C
83 F
26.6 °C
80 F
26.9 °C
80 F
28.3 °C
83 F
26.3 °C
79 F
27.3 °C
81 F
27.7 °C
82 F
Maximum: 28.5 °C = 83 F
Average: 27.5 °C = 82 F
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 21.1 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.3 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Speakers

Although the Redmi Pad produces decent surround sound with its quad speakers, an overemphasis on the mids and treble prevents the audio experience from being rich and balanced. Dolby Atmos, which is enabled by default, can be adjusted via the Android settings and the four sound presets Dynamic, Video, Music, and Speech.

External audio devices can be connected to the tablet via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.3. Popular Bluetooth codecs such as AAC, LDAC, aptX, and aptX HD are supported.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.538.52526.323.53123.725.14035.925.5503637.16324.9248020.424.110018.53212516.941.116017.955.12001654.525014.159.231512.259.940013.360.150010.967.463012.371.780012.176.9100012.578.9125011.877.4160011.976.6200012.475.9250012.875.8315013.168.840001365.1500013.2666300