Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 review

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 tablet review – As compact as an iPad mini but significantly cheaper

Fits everywhere.

You can already get the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 on the internet for around $100. Does a handy tablet priced this low provide both smooth operation and video streaming? Our review reveals whether we are getting a bargain or the low performance will become an issue.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android ARM Tablet

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 verdict

With the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7, the manufacturer has brought a handy tablet to the marketplace that is easy to transport and yet offers significantly more screen real estate than a smartphone. The screen itself can get quite bright and doesn't suffer from PWM flickering, but the low resolution does not provide particularly sharp images.

On the one hand, the processor offers a little more power than is normally the case in this very affordable price range, but on the other hand, it cannot completely prevent stuttering performance and longer loading times. You will also have to settle for compromises when it comes to the fairly straightforward camera system.

We like the promise of 3 years of updates, however, further efforts to make the tablet suitable for long-term use and to use sustainable materials are hardly noticeable.

For under $100, you get a lot with the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7: a 90 Hz display or an infrared blaster so that you can use the tablet as a TV remote control. There is also very long battery life and even a 4G module if that's in your sights.

Of course, with high-class devices like the iPad Mini, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 is unable to keep up in terms of performance or case quality. But if you don't wish to part with so much money, Xiaomi has a lot to offer.

Pros

+ very long runtimes
+ very low price
+ decent performance for its price category
+ reasonably bright 90 Hz display
+ no PWM
+ infrared blaster
+ promise of 3-year updates
+ also available with a 4G module

Cons

- low screen resolution
- treble-heavy speakers
- average camera image quality
- comparably long charging times
- no fingerprint sensor
- little effort toward sustainability

Price and availability

At the time of our review, some retailers are offering the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 for around £119 - even the manufacturer itself (current UK price), for example. 

Amazon Logo
Amazon
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se 8.7 Only WiFi 8.7" Octa Core 2.0GHZ HyperOS 6650mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8MP (Auora Green (WiFi), 128GB + 4GB)

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
List Price: 150€
373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
2.
80.4% v7 (old)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
2 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $94.99
List Price: 115€
337 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"
1280x800
189 PPI
LCD
3.
84.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $109.70
List Price: 179€
332 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
LCD TFT
4.
82.2% v7 (old)
Lenovo Tab M9
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $119.99
List Price: 160€
344 g32 GB eMMC Flash9.00"
1340x800
173 PPI
IPS
5.
82.2% v7 (old)
Nokia T10
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $149.99
List Price: 169€
375 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"
1280x800
189 PPI
IPS

We have already reviewed the larger Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and now it's the turn of the more portable 8.7-inch variant. At that time, we were able to confirm that the bigger brother had a great price-performance ratio but Pad SE 8.7 is significantly cheaper.

Xiaomi has never offered such a handy tablet up to now, but the success of the Apple iPad Mini has already inspired several manufacturers to bring smaller models back onto the market. On request, the compact Xiaomi tablet is also available with 4G, making it an exciting device, especially for those on a tight budget.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Redmi Pad Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
8.70 inch 15:9, 1340 x 800 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Hall Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensor, Virtual Light Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 211.6 x 125.5 ( = 0.35 x 8.33 x 4.94 in)
Battery
6650 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
373 g ( = 13.16 oz / 0.82 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
150 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – A lot of plastic and weight

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7's chassis is made largely of plastic and is available from the manufacturer in Europe in two colors, namely gray and light blue. Internationally, it is also available in light green.

The tablet is cleanly manufactured, and material transitions are barely noticeable. However, the case is not completely pressure-resistant with even moderate touches leading to distortions in the screen's liquid crystals.

At 373 grams, the tablet is averagely heavy for its size. If an even lighter device is your thing, you'll get your money's worth with the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9. The screen bezels on the front are not too thick and give the tablet a modern look. However, you can still hold it comfortably in your hand without accidentally operating the touchscreen.

Size comparison

215.4 mm / 8.48 in 136.8 mm / 5.39 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 344 g0.758 lbs211.6 mm / 8.33 in 125.5 mm / 4.94 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 373 g0.822 lbs211 mm / 8.31 in 124.7 mm / 4.91 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 332 g0.732 lbs208 mm / 8.19 in 123.2 mm / 4.85 in 9 mm / 0.3543 in 375 g0.827 lbs202 mm / 7.95 in 137 mm / 5.39 in 9.7 mm / 0.3819 in 337 g0.743 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features – Two storage variants and, if required, LTE

Customers can get the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 in two storage variants:

4 GB RAM / 64 GB of mass storage: $150

4 GB RAM / 128 GB of mass storage: $170

However, the price has already dropped significantly both on the internet and from the manufacturer itself, and you can sometimes even get the device for around $100. Because of the small additional cost, we would definitely recommend the larger storage variant: the 64 GB version can get filled very quickly after installing a few apps and recording some videos.

There is also an option with a 4G modem and dual SIM, but the SoC remains the same. The price increase from the manufacturer is $30. Our review model is the Wi-Fi variant.

NFC for mobile payment transactions is not on board, but there is an infrared transmitter so that you can operate a television with the device.

The USB-C port is only connected internally at USB 2.0 speed, which means data transfers take a while and image output via the USB-C port is not possible. However, you can transfer images wirelessly to a Wi-Fi-enabled screen.

microSD card reader

The microSD reader is a separate item, so the 4G version of the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 also allows for dual SIM operation with a memory card inserted at the same time.

In terms of speed, the reader does a decent job compared to other cheap and compact tablets. However, if you look at our reference micro SD card's (the Angelbird V60) maximum possible transfer speeds, it becomes clear that the card reader does not even come close to making use of them.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
48.7 MB/s +42%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=57, last 2 years)
35.5 MB/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -40%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 (Angelbird V60)
19.8 MB/s -42%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)

Software – That even comes with update promises

Xiaomi's inexpensive and handy little tablet has Android 14 providing the basis for HyperOS 1.0.4, Xiaomi's in-house operating system. This comes at the cost of bloatware, i.e. pre-installed third-party apps, but these can be easily deleted.

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 bears the "Android Enterprise Recommended" seal, which means that Xiaomi is committed to installing a security update every 90 days at the latest. This should happen through to August 2027, in other words, for 3 years from the launch of the device. New Android versions should be available up to Android 16.

This means Xiaomi is offering a decent update supply for such an inexpensive tablet with other providers sometimes making no promises at all in this price range. Samsung, on the other hand, shows that even longer updates are possible.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 software
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 software
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 software

Sustainability

A basic update supply for the next few years is therefore guaranteed.

There is no information regarding the materials used for the product, and Xiaomi does not seem to pay much attention to sustainability when it comes to packaging: it is neither plastic-free nor has petroleum-free printing ink been used. There is no analysis of CO2 consumption over the life cycle of the product, and the information concerning sustainability in Xiaomi's latest ESG report is of a more general nature.

The power consumption is comparatively low. However, Xiaomi's efforts to protect the environment, at least with this product, are not very credible overall.

Communication and GNSS – WiFi 5 on board

The fastest Wi-Fi standard is WiFi 5. We tested the data transfer speeds with our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture AXE 11000.

We were able to determine speeds of around 369 Mbit/s in the receiving direction, and this is roughly on par with comparable tablets. The transmission is also quite stable in terms of data speeds. In the send direction, however, there are occasional drops to under 200 Mbit/s.

As already mentioned, a 4G module is only available in a slightly more expensive version of the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7. A GNSS module for satellite positioning has also been installed. With our review device, it is only possible to rely on approximate positioning via known Wi-Fi networks, so navigation while on the go is not possible.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1463, n=81, last 2 years)
528 MBit/s +115%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
374 (360min - 392max) MBit/s +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
372 (189min - 388max) MBit/s +51%
Lenovo Tab M9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (346min - 374max) MBit/s +50%
Nokia T10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (333min - 367max) MBit/s +45%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=196)
349 MBit/s +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
246 (171min - 290max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=81, last 2 years)
520 MBit/s +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (338min - 385max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (359min - 369max) MBit/s 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (337min - 355max) MBit/s -5%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=195)
328 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Tab M9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
326 (271min - 340max) MBit/s -12%
Nokia T10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (279min - 315max) MBit/s -18%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø245 (171-290)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (338-385)

Cameras – Best suited for snapshots

Front camera image
Front camera image

The portable Xiaomi pad is definitely not a photo expert and you will have to make do with a fairly simple 8-megapixel camera on the rear. In good light, it takes usable snapshots, which are, for example, sufficient for documenting a situation. However, for really high-quality shots, it falls short in terms of detail reproduction and general image sharpness.

In low light and high contrast, we miss good dynamic range in very bright and dark areas this is an area in which detail reproduction is also rather mediocre.

The test chart in the photo studio under full lighting is quite blurry when using the review device camera. At 1 lux illumination, nothing can be seen in the images.

Videos can be recorded with the main camera at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps. However, the autofocus is very slow and the dynamic range in areas that are not quite perfectly lit also leaves something to be desired.

There is also a 5-megapixel camera on the front for selfies. Photos turn out quite well, a bright background is still recognizable and does not overexpose greatly. However, when magnified, hardly any details are visible, so it is better to view the images in a smaller format.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera low light


ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches: 6.74 ∆E min: 2.49 - max: 12.54 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.4 ∆E
44 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches: 47.12 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 94.34 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – The Redmi Pad SE 8.7 comes without a charger

The Redmi Pad SE 8.7 does not come with a charger, just a USB cable and a SIM tool. A special cover with a wrist strap is also available to buy on Xiaomi's website, for which the manufacturer charges $10 at the time of review.

The manufacturer offers a 24-month warranty on its tablets purchased in Europe.

Input devices & operation – No fingerprint sensor

The tablet provides an 8.7-inch touchscreen with a refresh rate of up to 90 Hz. Menus can often be scrolled smoothly, but there are also waiting times and stuttering in some places, mainly due to the slow SoC and the sluggish mass storage.

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 does not have a fingerprint sensor. However, you can use the front camera for facial recognition. This unlocks the tablet quite reliably and quickly. Even in darker areas, the screen light is usually sufficient for recognition. However, this method is much more easily manipulated than fingerprint recognition.

The physical buttons on the right side of the case are easy to find and operate. However, they do not react to changes in the position of the tablet, so the upper part of the volume rocker always increases the volume, even if the tablet is held the other way around.

Keyboard portrait
Keyboard portrait
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display – It gets quite bright

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 possesses an IPS display with a frame rate of up to 90 Hz. At 1,340 x 800 pixels, the resolution is rather low meaning slight jagged edges and blurring are visible, especially in text.

Xiaomi specifies a maximum display brightness of around 500 cd/m², and we achieved this value quite accurately in our tests using the spectrophotometer. In outdoor mode - which can be activated via the settings - up to 600 cd/m² is possible, but it leads to the device heating up noticeably and using up a lot of battery. For this reason, we wouldn't recommend using it for long periods.

We achieved the best color representation in "Standard" mode, where only a very slight blue tint was visible in the grayscale. Colors tend to appear a little too dark, especially strong brown and blue tones.

502
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 502 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 479.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 499 cd/m²
Contrast: 1349:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
82.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.184
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
LCD, 1280x800, 8"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Lenovo Tab M9
IPS, 1340x800, 9"
Nokia T10
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Screen
-24%
-40%
-13%
-52%
Brightness middle
499
388
-22%
486
-3%
405
-19%
446
-11%
Brightness
479
364
-24%
462
-4%
368
-23%
429
-10%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
92
2%
83
-8%
94
4%
Black Level *
0.37
0.36
3%
0.35
5%
0.17
54%
0.65
-76%
Contrast
1349
1078
-20%
1389
3%
2382
77%
686
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.68
4.38
-19%
6.2
-68%
5.15
-40%
4.87
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.82
10.7
-57%
10.4
-52%
10.12
-48%
9.85
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
2.9
-53%
5.7
-200%
3.7
-95%
5.7
-200%
Gamma
2.184 101%
2.232 99%
2.12 104%
2.287 96%
2.189 101%
CCT
6787 96%
6221 104%
7911 82%
7379 88%
7781 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8556 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

We did not observe any PWM flickering, even at very low screen brightness. However, the response times are probably too slow for demanding users.

CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 22.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 23.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Outdoors, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7's screen performs quite well on days that are not too sunny. However, direct light shining on the screen creates pronounced reflections. This means that the device is probably best used in shaded areas in summer.

Even when viewed from very wide angles, the screen content can still be seen clearly. However, slight shadows are visible on the sides.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Performance – A good choice of processor

For its SoC, the Xiaomi tablet uses the MediaTek Helio G85. It is a solid choice for a cheap tablet, but doesn't always manage to navigate through menus entirely smoothly. Especially after restarting the system, it takes a few minutes before commands are processed reasonably quickly. 

Playback of 1,440p YouTube videos is anything but smooth. All resolutions below this, including 1080p at 60fps, run smoothly.

In the system and processor benchmarks, the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 is quite powerful for its price bracket and is only beaten by the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9. However, you should not expect high-level performance when it comes to AI calculations. 

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)
1085 Points +169%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
738 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=5)
400 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)
3466 Points +139%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2065 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1449, n=5)
1367 Points -6%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=69, last 2 years)
717 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
565 Points +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (335 - 437, n=16)
357 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
349 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
338 Points -3%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
310 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
Points -100%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=69, last 2 years)
2550 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1981 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1456 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1456, n=16)
1321 Points -9%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
1256 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1241 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=71, last 2 years)
10183 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9083 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=14)
8086 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
6916 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6709 Points -16%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
5028 Points -37%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
786 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
573 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
386 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (280 - 394, n=5)
351 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
348 Points -10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=57, last 2 years)
4360 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3120 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2087 - 2422, n=7)
2258 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2072 Points -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
444 Points -80%
System
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=57, last 2 years)
7371 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6776 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4213 - 5010, n=7)
4608 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
4045 Points -18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
2793 Points -43%
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=57, last 2 years)
5080 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4152 Points +56%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2253 - 3437, n=7)
2785 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2343 Points -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
1236 Points -54%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=57, last 2 years)
9799 Points +441%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2683 Points +48%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1780 - 1960, n=7)
1842 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1818 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
1182 Points -35%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=57, last 2 years)
1292 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1273 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=7)
1129 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1069 Points -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
10 Points -99%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years)
11205 Points +187%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6453 Points +66%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3849 - 5112, n=4)
4333 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3992 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
3028 Points -22%

The graphics benchmarks highlight that smooth playback using the integrated graphics chip is a struggle when it comes to rendered content - also at 1,080p. Even in the screen's native resolution, the content should not contain too many modern graphic effects to ensure a smooth frame rate.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points -38%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
177 Points -2%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
114 Points -37%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points +77%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
705 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
411 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1256 Points +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
692 Points 0%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
412 Points -41%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +49%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps +79%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +79%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps -30%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +93%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.8 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +122%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.1 fps -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.6 fps -19%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.6 fps +75%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4.1 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps -3%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +136%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +9%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +9%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.7 fps -9%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -35%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.84 fps -40%

On large websites, you often have to wait a while until all the content has been loaded. Even after a loading time of 10 seconds, you can still come across images that are loading when scrolling. For such an inexpensive tablet, the browser performance is quite good and it is a bit faster than most comparable devices.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)
117.8 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
71.728 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
51.638 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 61.3, n=8)
39.8 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
38.697 Points -25%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
23.534 Points -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=59, last 2 years)
133.5 runs/min +175%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
61.2 runs/min +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
48.6 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 48.6, n=7)
35.2 runs/min -28%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110)
30 runs/min -38%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
15.76 runs/min -68%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=33, last 2 years)
12 runs/min +286%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.01 - 3.11, n=2)
3.06 runs/min -2%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)
112.2 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
81 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (51 - 59, n=3)
56 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
45 Points -24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
25 Points -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years)
30287 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
22187 Points +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 15443, n=14)
12959 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
12163 Points -11%
Nokia T10 (Chrome 109)
9871 Points -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
5843 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
9435.4 ms * -244%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3702 ms * -35%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
3467.2 ms * -26%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2712 - 3939, n=8)
3334 ms * -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
1922.1 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

Unfortunately, slow eMMC flash is usually part of the equipment found in cheap tablets, and this is true of the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7. This means that data cannot be transferred as quickly, and loading times are noticeably longer. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 showed us this doesn't have to be the case.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesAmazon Fire HD 8 2022Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Lenovo Tab M9Nokia T10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-46%
120%
2%
-12%
-29%
201%
Sequential Read 256KB
289
270.37
-6%
916.45
217%
274.3
-5%
273.5
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB
263.6
113.44
-57%
398.32
51%
184.4
-30%
191.5
-27%
177.3 ?(40 - 274, n=206)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
71.1
39.46
-45%
182.74
157%
95.2
34%
71.4
0%
Random Write 4KB
82.7
19.81
-76%
128.92
56%
91
10%
71.5
-14%

Games – Not a true gamer

When it comes to gaming on the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7, you should lower your expectations a little: You will struggle to hit more than 40fps in more demanding games, as our tests with PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact show. It is also better to deactivate complex effects. Otherwise, you will experience stuttering. We analyzed the frame rates using the GameBench software.

Operation via the 90 Hz screen and, if required, the position sensor works smoothly.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø27.8 (7-37)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø23.6 (6-30)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.5.0: Ø37.1 (21-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.5.0: Ø29 (15-31)

Emissions – Heat isn't a problem

Temperature

Regarding the case, the Redmi tablet has no problems with excessive temperatures: even after a long period of use, we measured a maximum of 38.9 °C, which is only slightly noticeable. In summery, ambient temperatures, however, this temperature reading could be a little higher.

The SoC is also unaffected by temperature problems: even after numerous runs of the 3DMark Wild Life or Wild Life Extreme, we still got almost the same results.

Max. Load
 29.9 °C
86 F
28.8 °C
84 F
33 °C
91 F
 
 30.9 °C
88 F
30.5 °C
87 F
33.8 °C
93 F
 
 29.6 °C
85 F
29.8 °C
86 F
33.4 °C
92 F
 
Maximum: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Average: 31.1 °C = 88 F
38.3 °C
101 F
35.4 °C
96 F
28.4 °C
83 F
38.9 °C
102 F
32 °C
90 F
28 °C
82 F
33.7 °C
93 F
31.9 °C
89 F
29.4 °C
85 F
Maximum: 38.9 °C = 102 F
Average: 32.9 °C = 91 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 %
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 % -1%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
96.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.1 % -1%
Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map rear
Heat map rear

Speakers

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 has built-in stereo speakers, which can produce a very loud soundscape. Music playback is quite treble-heavy, and the sound would have benefitted from more emphasis on the low mids. However, the speakers are sufficient for listening to music or, if necessary, playing movie sound.

You can get significantly better sound with good headphones or external speakers via Bluetooth or wired via the 3.5mm audio port. Almost all of the current wireless audio codecs are available, so you should have little trouble connecting your Bluetooth headphones with good audio quality.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.948.52540.639.83134.834.14034.434.95037.839.16327.730.38018.422.910021.22512524.429.916023.637.720022.444.825019.550.531519.856.640014.458.850012.863.863014.265.880013.169.4100012.474.6125010.777.9160010.877.1200010.572.1250011.271.9315011.770.4400012.266.5500011.967630012.174.6800012.277.11000012.176.81250011.863.51600011.453.6SPL2585.6N0.762.3median 12.2median 66.5Delta2.69.439.244.134.442.430.832.733.431.33438.629.830.228.919.519.22321.332.218.240.913.845.21452.313.354.3115510.95910.363.515.865.816.166.317.36811.469.911.268.411.571.41269.912.966.713.56614.166.71568.815.864.216.554.117.346.126.179.80.745.6median 14median 64.22.59hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesLenovo Tab M9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab M9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life – The Redmi Pad SE 8.7 has endless stamina

Power consumption

We determined how much power the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 needs in various scenarios and observed good, low measured values: The consumption is quite low both in idle mode and under load.

Other cheap tablets such as the Amazon Fire HD 8 offer slightly lower consumption in some situations, but you also get significantly lower performance.

The tablet can be charged at a maximum of 18 watts. A charger is not included, but the tablet works well with the chargers we tested. Due to the high battery capacity, it can still take over 2 hours and 30 minutes for the battery to complete a full charging cycle and return to 100%.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 3.5 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
3%
-66%
-25%
-18%
-148%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.2
-33%
0.7
22%
1.6
-78%
1.043 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=8)
-16%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.4
-17%
2.94
-145%
1.7
-42%
1.609 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=8)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.7
-0%
3.03
-78%
1.8
-6%
1.988 ?(1.3 - 3, n=8)
-17%
Load Average *
3.5
2.5
29%
7.49
-114%
2.8
20%
4.27 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=8)
-22%
Load Maximum *
6.9
4.3
38%
8.02
-16%
8.1
-17%
6.98 ?(6.11 - 8.5, n=8)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.2 (0.924-6.92)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (0.896-1.612)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.50.70.91.11.21.41.61.81.92.12.32.52.62.833.23.3Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.74 (2.15-3.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (0.896-1.612)

Battery runtimes

Xiaomi has fitted a battery with a fairly high capacity of 6,650 mAh. This means that the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 can run for a very long time: we measured 20 hours and 22 minutes in our Wi-Fi test with fixed screen brightness.

This is significantly longer than the comparison devices; if you watch a downloaded movie with the Wi-Fi module deactivated, you can even run the device for over 21 hours.

Under load, the tablet holds out for around five hours before it needs to be plugged in again.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
20h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 02min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-16%
-20%
-19%
Reader / Idle
2236
1931
-14%
2132
-5%
H.264
1268
1158
-9%
987
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1222
935
-23%
857
-30%
955
-22%
984
-19%
Load
302
274
-9%
206
-32%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 is portable, durable and, above all, very affordable.

You shouldn't expect miracles when it comes to the image quality of the camera or the screen resolution. But you get solid performance, a large selection of Bluetooth codecs and even a 3-year update promise, which is not common in this price range.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches - 12/09/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
33 / 69 → 48%
Weight
85 / 40-88 → 94%
Battery
92%
Display
80%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 4%
Application Performance
43 / 92 → 46%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
43 / 90 → 47%
Average
53%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
95.9%
Repairability
25%
Software Updates
46.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 tablet review – As compact as an iPad mini but significantly cheaper
Florian Schmitt, 2024-12-11 (Update: 2024-12-11)