Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

The ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (or G52MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Helio G80 with a clock speed of up to 950 MHz.

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the Helio G80) is comparable to the Adreno 612 and ARM Mali-G72 MP3 (thanks to the high clock speed of the G52MP2).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ManufacturerARM
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed950 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
technology12 nm
Date of Announcement06.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://developer.arm.com/ip-products/gr...
CPU in Mali-G52 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P658 x 2000 MHz820 MHz? MHz
UNISOC Tiger T6188 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio G858 x 2000 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 820 MHz820 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22232     avg: 24576     median: 25142 (4%)     max: 27034 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1595     avg: 1808     median: 1841 (14%)     max: 2122 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1464     avg: 1667     median: 1669 (6%)     max: 2032 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1179     avg: 1325     median: 1347 (14%)     max: 1504 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1028     avg: 1164     median: 1179 (9%)     max: 1352 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 39     avg: 40.8     median: 39 (0%)     max: 44 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 35     avg: 43.2     median: 37 (1%)     max: 55 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 19     median: 21 (2%)     max: 26 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 19     avg: 28.4     median: 22 (6%)     max: 43 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 4.5     avg: 8.5     median: 9.6 (6%)     max: 12 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.8     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (1%)     max: 3.7 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 7.1     avg: 12.7     median: 12 (6%)     max: 18 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.5     avg: 8.5     median: 8 (1%)     max: 9.7 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8.1     avg: 9.4     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 13 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 7     avg: 11     median: 8.5 (3%)     max: 17 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 12.07     avg: 16.3     median: 16.9 (1%)     max: 18.05 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 17217     avg: 21691     median: 23007 (23%)     max: 24849 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 14908     avg: 15009     median: 14992 (35%)     max: 15128 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
44 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 38 fps 40 fps 40 fps ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med.
29 fps 30 fps 30 fps 40 fps 40 fps ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high
28 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
ultra
30 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
59 fps 60 fps 60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
28 fps 29 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high
24 fps 27 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
53 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 07. 13:33:02

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 May 2021 12:34:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.067s ... 0.068s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.068s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.068s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10399 +0.014s ... 0.082s

#7 got single benchmarks 10399 +0.022s ... 0.104s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.394s ... 0.498s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.498s

#11 Got 35 rows for game benchmarks. +0.067s ... 0.565s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.565s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.565s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.148s ... 0.713s

#15 return log +0.068s ... 0.781s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G52 MP2 graphics card

Infinix Hot 10S: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  Review » Infinix Hot 10S NFC Smartphone Review: 90 Hz for $120 USD

realme 6i: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 6i Smartphone Review – Successful Germany Launch

realme 7i: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 7i Smartphone Review - Cell phone for little money with real triple cam

realme C3: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme C3 smartphone review – Rock-bottom pricing with charm

Samsung Galaxy A31: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A31 Smartphone in review: Quad-camera for 200 Euros (~$239)

Samsung Galaxy A41: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A41 Smartphone Review: Affordable despite its Super AMOLED display

Xiaomi Redmi 9: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9 Smartphone Review- Upmarket package at a bargain price

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Smartphone Review - The better Redmi 9 with a 64-MP quad cam

ZTE Axon 20: UNISOC Tiger T618, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  Review » ZTE Axon 20 Review - How good is the first under-display camera in a smartphone?

Huawei Y9a: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.63", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y9a

Oppo Realme C3i: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme C3i

realme 6i: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 6i

realme 7i: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 7i

realme C25: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C25

realme C3: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C3

realme C3i: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C3i

realme Narzo 10: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme Narzo 10

realme Narzo 10A: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme Narzo 10A

realme Narzo 20: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 20

realme Narzo 30A: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 30A

Samsung Galaxy A31: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A31

Samsung Galaxy A32: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A32

Samsung Galaxy A41: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A41

Xiaomi Redmi 9: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9

Xiaomi Redmi 9 Prime: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9 Prime

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 9

ZTE Axon 20: UNISOC Tiger T618, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 20

realme 6i: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Realme 6i: Gaming Fun Thanks to Helio G80 and a Low-Resolution Display

Samsung Galaxy A31: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A31: Affordable, with Super AMOLED, and long battery life

Samsung Galaxy A41: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.10", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A41: A lot of equipment at a small price

Xiaomi Redmi 9: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.53", 0.2 kg
   » The Redmi 9 is the price-to-performance champion among the budget smartphone

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.53", 0.2 kg
   » Is the Redmi Note 9 the perfect entry-level smartphone?

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Adreno 642 *
Adreno 640 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
GeForce Tegra 4 *
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ARM Mali-G52 MP2 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-05-27)