Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Xiaomi Redmi 14C smartphone review - Budget phone with a faster screen than the iPhone

Something for the eye.

The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is available with an eye-catching or understated exterior, depending on your taste. However, it always comes with a very fast screen, NFC and fingerprint sensor, which is not commonplace for inexpensive smartphones. In our test, we find out whether the processor power is sufficient for everyday use.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict

On the one hand, the Xiaomi Redmi 14C is a stylish, very well-built and well-equipped phone for its price range. The long battery life, the fast screen and the good performance of the camera system are also impressive.

There is no need to worry about PWM flickering even at low brightness, there are many Bluetooth audio codecs for wireless sound transmission and there is hardly any noticeable warming even after prolonged use.

On the other hand, there is the SoC, for whose choice Xiaomi has to listen to clear criticism: The new name actually hides an older SoC, which can now also drive 120 Hz screens. Otherwise, however, it even offers slightly less performance than the SoC of its predecessor Redmi 13C and this is definitely noticeable in everyday use in this low price range.

It's great that you have the choice between an understated and unusual casing, as this allows the Redmi phone to blend in unobtrusively in any environment or become a real eye-catcher. The Redmi 14C is also attractive thanks to the already significantly reduced price on the Internet. And 4 years of guaranteed software updates is no bad thing in this price range.

Pros

+ affordable smartphone
+ with NFC and fingerprint sensor
+ 120 Hz display
+ sturdy and stylish casing
+ many Bluetooth audio codecs
+ good image quality of the cameras
+ Update guarantee until 2028

Cons

- quite heavy
- moderate speaker quality
- slow SoC
- slow memory

Price and availability

The three officially available color variants of the Redmi 14C are widely available in Europe, including both memory versions. Even the purple variant can be found at some retailers.

Compared to the manufacturer's official price, the phone is already available at a significantly lower price, for example at amazon.de, where the 128 GB model cost less than 120 Euros (~$126) at the time of testing.

Amazon Logo
$114.99
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 4G LTE (for Tello Mint & Global) (128GB + 4GB) Factory Unlocked Global Gsm 6.88" 50MP Triple Camera (Sage Green)
Bestpreis 98.49€ tradeno-shop
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 128GB/4GB Midnight Black
2. 99.9 € PreiswertePC.de
3. 104.32 € tease Shop
4. 106.96 € Boomstore.de

Possible competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
70.7%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $114.99
List Price: 150€
211 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.88"
1640x720
260 PPI
IPS
2.
77.7% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $122.00
List Price: 149€
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.74"
1600x720
260 PPI
IPS
3.
78.8% v7 (old)
Motorola Moto G24
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $149.99
List Price: 150€
181 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.56"
1612x720
269 PPI
IPS
4.
77.2% v7 (old)
Nokia G11 Plus
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $99.99
List Price: 150€
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.52"
1600x720
269 PPI
IPS

Xiaomi gathers its price breakers under the "Redmi" brand, which usually offer a lot of features for little money.

The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is another particularly affordable smartphone: it is available for less than 150 Euros (~$158). Nevertheless, the manufacturer has provided plenty of memory, a large battery and a fast display, which can even compete with significantly more expensive devices.

In this test, we take a closer look at the affordable Redmi phone.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Processor
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.88 inch 20:9, 1640 x 720 pixel 260 PPI, capactive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 171.9 x 77.8 ( = 0.32 x 6.77 x 3.06 in)
Battery
5160 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18W charging (USB-PD)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1), 2MP, f/2.4 (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.987W/​kg Head, 0.902W/​kg Body
Weight
211 g ( = 7.44 oz / 0.47 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
150 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Housing & features - Sturdy plastic housing

The chassis of the Xiaomi Redmi 14C is made of plastic and is available in different colors: In Europe, there are three variants, namely the classic Midnight Black with a matte surface and the olive green Sage Green with a light texture.

More interesting is Starry Blue, which has a color gradient from gray to blue and changes its appearance slightly depending on the incidence of light thanks to the circular lines that have been ground into it. A lavender-colored back is also available internationally.

There are clearly visible edges around the screen on the front, but these are relatively narrow for an inexpensive smartphone. Xiaomi does not provide any information about the protective glass for the screen.

With its 6.88-inch screen, the Redmi 14C is quite a large smartphone and this is also reflected in its weight, which comes in at 211 grams (~7.4 oz). Overall, it feels good in the hand and the edges are pleasantly rounded. The workmanship is also impressive, material transitions are barely noticeable. The phone is also very stable and can hardly be twisted or dented.

The Redmi 14C is available with 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage. There is also a larger version with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB mass storage; the difference in price from the manufacturer is 30 Euros (~$32). Other RAM sizes are stated on the packaging, but these are due to virtual RAM, i.e. a swap file in the much slower data memory.

NFC for contactless payments is on board.

Size comparison

171.9 mm / 6.77 in 77.8 mm / 3.06 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 211 g0.4652 lbs168 mm / 6.61 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 192 g0.4233 lbs164.8 mm / 6.49 in 75.9 mm / 2.99 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 192 g0.4233 lbs163.5 mm / 6.44 in 74.5 mm / 2.93 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 181 g0.399 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
36.9 MB/s +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (Angelbird V60)
32.6 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
30.2 MB/s -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=83, last 2 years)
29.6 MB/s -9%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)
24.4 MB/s -25%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.4 (26.1-43.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (19.3-45.4)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (22.9-43.6)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.5 (21.2-48)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.6 (34.6-79.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø69.8 (31.7-79.9)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.5 (33-81.7)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.4 (38.1-82.1)

Communication and operation - without 5G network

The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is a 4G phone, so you have to do without the fast 5G network. We randomly test the signal strength during our test period and see that the Xiaomi Redmi 14C sometimes has problems ensuring good reception, especially in difficult locations such as between tall buildings.

WiFi 5 is used as the fastest Wi-Fi standard. Our test device achieved transfer rates of around 300 to 350 MBit/s, which is in line with the expected values. When transmitting, there are sometimes dips as low as 221 MBit/s, which also occurred repeatedly during the test. Data reception, on the other hand, is more consistent.

Thanks to the ability to reach 120 Hz the display is quite smooth to use, but the device does occasionally stutter, probably due to the slow SoC. A fingerprint sensor is built into the standby button on the right, which unlocks the smartphone quite quickly after one-time learning.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=192, last 2 years)
723 MBit/s +166%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
365 (346min - 378max) MBit/s +34%
Nokia G11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (242min - 376max) MBit/s +33%
Motorola Moto G24
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
352 (295min - 377max) MBit/s +29%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=188)
350 MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
272 (221min - 319max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=190, last 2 years)
709 MBit/s +92%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (342min - 380max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=187)
327 MBit/s -11%
Motorola Moto G24
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
319 (294min - 338max) MBit/s -14%
Nokia G11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
313 (243min - 321max) MBit/s -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 (276min - 335max) MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 14C; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (221-319)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (342-380)

Software and sustainability - 4 years of updates

Xiaomi delivers the Redmi 14C with HyperOS 1, which is still based on Android 14. The operating system is heavily customized, so you have to get used to it in many areas if you previously used a cleaner Android.

Security updates are guaranteed until 26.09.2028. However, it is not stated how frequent these will be. There is also no information on how many new OS versions the device will receive.

There are no specific statements on the sustainability of the device, nor are there any repair manuals. Nevertheless, you can find out the approximate cost of spare parts for a repair on the website of Xiaomi and the packaging is largely plastic-free.

Cameras - Surprisingly good

Recording front camera
Recording front camera

Two camera lenses are visible on the back of the Xiaomi Redmi 14C: the main camera with 50 megapixels, which is identical to the Redmi 13C. The second camera lens no longer seems to be of any use, even though it was still used for extreme close-ups on the predecessor, but this option is no longer available.

In the test of the Redmi 13C we were able to attest to the good image quality of the main camera for such an inexpensive phone. So what does the current Redmi 14C look like? Here, too, we can confirm the decent image quality of the main camera: Photos even appear reasonably detailed and are quite sharp. Colors are also displayed well and even in low light and high contrasts, some details are still visible. The test chart in the photo studio, on the other hand, is not very contrasty.

Videos can be recorded at up to 1080p and 30 fps. The autofocus often takes a while to find the right focus and the exposure is not always immediately suitable. Overall, however, the picture is decent considering the price of the device.

The megapixels of the front camera have been increased slightly compared to the previous model: a 13-megapixel camera is now installed here. Selfies with it work quite well and even a very bright background does not cause the image to be too bright.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
ColorChecker
8.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 14C: 7.37 ∆E min: 2.54 - max: 13.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.4 ∆E
44 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 14C: 47.12 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 94.34 ∆E

Display - 120 Hz are possible

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

At 6.88 inches, the IPS screen of the Redmi 14C is very large, but still only has a resolution of 1,640 x 720 pixels. This leads to a somewhat blurred display in some cases.

One highlight is the maximum frame rate, which is up to 120 Hz. This results in very smooth scrolling and fast operation, which is only occasionally slowed down by the slow SoC.

The screen's maximum brightness of 422 cd/m² for all-white areas and up to 566 cd/m² for smaller areas is at class level. However, the phone is hardly suitable for use on bright days outdoors or in other very bright environments.

We do not notice PWM flickering even at low brightness, but the color reproduction is not as accurate as one could wish for, especially with strong colors.

411
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 422 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.57 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 422 cd/m²
Contrast: 1407:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.382
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
IPS, 1640x720, 6.9"
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
IPS, 1600x720, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G24
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
Nokia G11 Plus
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen
-13%
-17%
-45%
Brightness middle
422
430
2%
521
23%
395
-6%
Brightness
401
424
6%
510
27%
385
-4%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
93
4%
94
6%
Black Level *
0.3
0.28
7%
0.39
-30%
0.3
-0%
Contrast
1407
1536
9%
1336
-5%
1317
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.21
4.06
-26%
4.83
-50%
6.21
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.29
8.11
-29%
7.71
-23%
10.61
-69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
5
-72%
5.3
-83%
8.3
-186%
Gamma
2.382 92%
2.35 94%
2.111 104%
2.639 83%
CCT
6338 103%
7813 83%
7021 93%
7999 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.


CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.7 ms rise
↘ 22.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.1 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Performance, emissions and battery life - lasts a long time

The MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, which is used as SoC in our test device, largely corresponds to the Helio G80, apart from its ability to drive 120 Hz displays. However, this also suggests that the Redmi 14C has slightly less performance than the Redmi 13C, which is equipped with a slightly more powerful Helio G85.

And our benchmarks actually confirm this: The Redmi 14C lags slightly behind its predecessor in terms of both CPU and GPU performance. Given the already low performance level, this definitely makes a difference in everyday use: The Redmi 14C stutters a little more often in everyday use and does not always run as smoothly as its predecessor despite the nominally faster 120 Hz display.

The slow eMMC flash has not changed either: Data is thus only copied relatively slowly and app loading times are long.

The maximum temperature rise after prolonged load is moderate at 42.6 °C (~109 °F) on the casing. The 3DMark stress tests also show hardly any drop in performance after several benchmark runs.

The sound from the mono speaker is generally thin, but at least offers a little more low mid-range than the predecessor. External audio devices can be connected via the 3.5mm audio port. Almost all current Bluetooth audio codecs are available for wireless connections with headphones or speakers.

At 5,160 mAh, the battery in the Redmi 14C offers slightly more capacity than its predecessor and also manages slightly longer runtimes in our Wi-Fi test: our test device lasted 16:16 hours. This is a good value, so you should be able to use the device for two days without charging. The device can be charged with a maximum of 18 watts, but does not come with a charger. The cell phone works well with our existing chargers and needs around 2:15 hours for a full charging cycle.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=179, last 2 years)
1486 Points +262%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
411 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
410 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
410 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
366 Points -11%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=179, last 2 years)
4170 Points +312%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1316 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1251 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1011 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
1011 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=199, last 2 years)
13257 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9403 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9393 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
9393 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9338 Points -1%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
7562 Points -19%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 13896, n=115, last 2 years)
2789 Points +372%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
742 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
730 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
591 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
591 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
404 Points -32%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 25785, n=191, last 2 years)
7940 Points +1212%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
750 Points +24%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
726 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
605 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
605 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
403 Points -33%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=197, last 2 years)
2181 Points +1280%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
190 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
187 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
158 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
158 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
110 Points -30%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=196, last 2 years)
2166 Points +1297%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
188 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
182 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
155 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
155 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
115 Points -26%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=211, last 2 years)
16.1 fps +1242%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps +25%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.2 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
1.2 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
0.8 fps -33%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=212, last 2 years)
39.1 fps +414%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
7.6 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
7.4 fps -3%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
6.5 fps -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=211, last 2 years)
34.3 fps +1125%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.4 fps +21%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
3.3 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
2.8 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2 fps -29%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=211, last 2 years)
50.8 fps +323%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps +33%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
12 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
10 fps -17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=211, last 2 years)
85.8 fps +1029%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps +17%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8.8 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
7.6 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
5.5 fps -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=213, last 2 years)
38822 Points +167%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14717 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
14565 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
14565 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13977 Points -4%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
10596 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 14CXiaomi Redmi 13CMotorola Moto G24Nokia G11 PlusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
14%
10%
-5%
-11%
425%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.9
300.2
0%
291.9
-3%
270.6
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.1
179.4
-7%
252
31%
196
2%
Random Read 4KB
88.6
101.5
15%
86.3
-3%
81.5
-8%
Random Write 4KB
78.9
114.8
46%
90.9
15%
77.1
-2%
Max. Load
 42.6 °C
109 F
37.1 °C
99 F
31.9 °C
89 F
 
 41.2 °C
106 F
35.5 °C
96 F
33.4 °C
92 F
 
 39.5 °C
103 F
33.9 °C
93 F
32.3 °C
90 F
 
Maximum: 42.6 °C = 109 F
Average: 36.4 °C = 98 F
29.9 °C
86 F
36.3 °C
97 F
38.9 °C
102 F
30.7 °C
87 F
34.8 °C
95 F
37.3 °C
99 F
30.3 °C
87 F
35.6 °C
96 F
36.6 °C
98 F
Maximum: 38.9 °C = 102 F
Average: 34.5 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G24
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 %
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.1 % -1%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
95.4 % -3%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G24
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.3 %
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.953.12540.643.73134.833.34034.436.35037.844.26327.728.58018.419.410021.222.312524.429.416023.637.420022.443.325019.547.631519.852.740014.453.250012.859.463014.266.780013.170.3100012.475.9125010.775.1160010.876200010.576.4250011.275.8315011.773.8400012.272.8500011.973.3630012.175.3800012.273.31000012.168.81250011.866.61600011.457.4SPL2586N0.763.5median 12.2median 68.8Delta2.610.837.24330.335.924.126.631.431.637.334.925.924.819.517.616.515.813.715.513.721.49.2288.337.36.744.7753.18.857.58.3638.967.710.772.88.770.39.169.19.766.910.663.911.361.71269.512.971.913.771.614.46815.365.91669.4175823.980.80.546.6median 10.7median 63.92.713.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 14CXiaomi Redmi 13C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 13C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 16min
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
5160 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G24
5000 mAh
Nokia G11 Plus
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-1%
6%
WiFi v1.3
976
948
-3%
969
-1%
1038
6%
Reader / Idle
2143
H.264
1347
Load
336

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Xiaomi Redmi 14C impresses with its 120 Hz display and good camera considering the price. The sturdy, attractive and well-made casing is also a plus point. Compared to its predecessor, however, the performance has been reduced somewhat, which is quite noticeable in an entry-level phone and does not leave a good impression.

Overall, you get a very high-quality phone with lots of features for little money, but without 5G.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C - 12/04/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
40 / 69 → 58%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
2 / 55 → 4%
Application Performance
46 / 85 → 54%
AI Performance
20%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
55%
Average
54%
71%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
45%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
43.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 29.7%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi 14C smartphone review - Budget phone with a faster screen than the iPhone
Florian Schmitt, 2024-12- 5 (Update: 2024-12- 5)